India witnessed rapid transformations across diverse sectors in 11 years: PM Modi
A clear focus on good governance and transformation, Mr. Modi said of the last 11 years as his government finished the first year of its third term on Monday (June 9, 2025).
A link shared by him noted that 60% of the current Union Ministers are from the SC, ST and OBC categories, a message aimed at burnishing social justice credentials of his government amid attempts by opposition parties like the Congress to paint it as working against their interests.
This is the highest ever representation of these marginalised groups in the Union Council of Ministers, it added.
A clear focus on good governance and transformation!
Powered by the blessings and collective participation of 140 crore Indians, India has witnessed rapid transformations across diverse sectors.
Guided by the principle of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka… pic.twitter.com/bCC4MJP3Ii — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 9, 2025
India's Vikas Yatra, showcased through interesting videos, infographics, articles and more on the NaMo App... Do explore. https://t.co/VdFMHo1pNH#11YearsOfSeva — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 9, 2025
In his post on X, Mr. Modi said powered by the blessings and collective participation of 140 crore Indians, India has witnessed rapid transformations across diverse sectors.
Guided by the principle of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka Prayas', the NDA government has delivered path-breaking changes with speed, scale and sensitivity, he said.
The last eleven years have brought many positive changes and boosted 'Ease of Living.'
The NaMo App takes you through this transformative journey in an innovative manner, through interactive games, quizzes, surveys and other such formats that inform, engage and inspire.
Do… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 9, 2025
From economic growth to social upliftment, the focus has been on people-centric, inclusive and all round progress, he added.
The Prime Minister said, "We are proud of our collective success but at the same time, we look ahead with hope, confidence and a renewed resolve to build a Viksit Bharat." He used the hashtag of "11 year of seva" (11 years of service) with the post, while sharing links to the details of changes effected in different sectors.
It said Mr. Modi has brought the politics of development, 'Vikasvaad' into the mainstream, making it the focal point around which political discourse and policy action now revolves.
Since assuming office in 2014, 'India First' has guided his every policy and action, it added.
It noted that over 81 crore people are getting free food grains, over 15 crore households have got tap water connections, over four crore houses built for the poor, 12 crore toilets were built, 68 lakh street vendors got loans, 52.5 crores loans given to small entrepreneurs, and 20 crores women were given cash assistance during Covid under different schemes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why PMs deliver Independence Day address from Red Fort
Early morning on Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will hoist the tricolour and address the nation from the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi. In doing so, he will be continuing a tradition that was started by Jawaharlal Nehru in 1947. But why was the Red Fort chosen as the venue for India's official Independence Day celebrations? As to why Delhi became a seat of power has been debated ad nauseum by historians. What is perhaps more interesting is that in the course of it assuming political significance, Delhi became more than just a physical location — it became an idea, a name associated with political power. In the 16th century, Babur, the first Mughal emperor, had referred to Delhi as the 'capital of all Hindustan'. More than a century later, Shah Jahan in 1648 would inaugurate Shahjahanabad, comprising a fortified citadel (the Red Fort) and a walled city surrounding it (Old Delhi), on the banks of the Yamuna. Shahjahanabad remained the Mughal capital till 1857 amid a rapid decline in the dynasty's authority over the 18th and 19th centuries. 'Yet, such was his (the Mughal emperor's) symbolic significance as the source of legitimate sovereign authority that many new states, including the East India Company, continued to rule in his name, and to issue coins in his name until well into the 19th century,' historian Swapna Liddle had written for The Indian Express in 2021. This would change after the rebellion of 1857. 1857 & stamping of British authority In 1857, the East India Company was ruling India from Calcutta. As such, there were only a few Europeans in Delhi, which was pretty unimportant for the grand scheme of the Company's economic and political interests designs in the subcontinent. For the natives, however, Delhi and the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar remained the foremost symbols of indigenous authorities. After mutinying against their British superiors, the sepoys triumphantly marched to Delhi and declared the ailing emperor as their leader. The fall of Delhi to Company forces effectively sealed the fate of the rebellion of 1857. It also sealed the fate of the Mughal emperor, who was exiled to Rangoon, and the city itself. 'Delhi suffered severe devastation, 'both physically and psychologically'. Military destruction was followed by punitive damage, vindictive demolition, radical reconstruction, railway and industrial development in disregard of historic dwellings, and the mixed blessing of modem municipal government,' Frykenberg wrote. Initially, the British planned to raze all of Shahjahanabad to the ground and thus wipe out the memory of the Mughal Empire from the city. While they stopped short of doing that, Shahjahanabad, and specifically the Red Fort, was very deliberately stamped with British authority. 'About 80 per cent of the interior of the fort was destroyed (an area of about 120 acres). This had been densely covered with elaborate royal pavilions, gardens, store-rooms, barracks, and quarters of artisans and other court functionaries. Displacing a substantial residential population, the British converted the fort into a military garrison,' Samuel V Noe wrote in 'What happened to Mughal Delhi: A morphological study', a chapter in the aforementioned Frykenberg-edited book. In the decades after the rebellion, the British systematically harnessed Delhi's symbolic associations with power, most notably with the Delhi Durbars of 1877, 1903, and 1911, before deciding to shift the capital to Delhi from Calcutta in 1911. 'Besides its centrality and connectivity within the Great Indian Empire, Delhi carried in the minds of the colonial rulers a symbolic value — as the age old saying goes: 'he who rules Delhi rules India'…,' Suoro D Joardar, professor at the School of Planning and Architecture in New Delhi, wrote in his article 'New Delhi: Imperial Capital to Capital of World's Largest Democracy' (2006). It is this history of Delhi, and by extension the Red Fort, as a seat of empire that made it the venue of choice to celebrate India's independence. This is more so given that in 1946, the fort was the venue of the highly public trials of senior officers of Subhas Chandra Bose's Indian National Army. These trials, which led to an outpouring of nationalist sentiments, had firmly established the Red Fort as a symbol of power and resistance in the minds of the Indian public. As Swapna Liddle wrote in 2021: 'With the coming of Independence, it was necessary that the site of the Red Fort, over which the British colonial government had sought to inscribe its power and might, be symbolically reclaimed for the Indian people.' This is an edited version of an article which first appeared in 2023
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why many Chinese foreign affairs analysts reacted critically to PM Modi's likely China visit
On June 30, US President Donald Trump first threatened to impose a 25% tariff on Indian imports, over India's oil purchases from Russia amid the Ukraine war. Soon, there were speculations in the Indian media that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was likely to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) leaders' meet in Tianjin, China. The grouping includes nine member nations, including India, China, Pakistan and Russia. A possible reason for the visit, according to some Chinese analysts, was India seemingly hedging its options in global affairs. They called the move, if true, liang tou chi – or, 'to have the cake and eat it too.' Significantly, as soon as Washington escalated the trade offensive with an extra 25% tariff on certain imports, pushing the total levy to 50%, Beijing officially welcomed PM Modi's visit to attend the SCO summit. However, the news has drawn sharp reactions in China over the visit, which could happen after a seven-year gap. The official response in China PM Modi last visited China in 2018 on two occasions. First, in April for the India-China Informal Summit at Wuhan, and later in June for the SCO Heads of State meeting in Qingdao. This time, China's state-run Xinhua news agency and the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson have welcomed the visit, even before an official announcement from New Delhi. The Chinese Communist Party's English tabloid, Global Times, in a recent editorial, even criticised Western media reports interpreting the visit as a 'hedge against' the US, saying the countries had multiple common areas of cooperation. The other view, led by skeptics Those more suspicious of India's 'playing both sides' diplomacy in China have warned their government to remain vigilant. In a rare public defiance of a government decision, a reader wrote on a Chinese news website: 'India's 'allying with the US to resist China' and 'allying with China to deal with the US' — one is for 'resistance' and the other is for 'coping'. Can this be called 'maintaining a balance between China and the United States'?' Scholars in China have offered several explanations for such critical views: First, with economic and trade relations between India and the United States at a low point, India's readjustment of its relationship with China is seen as a key counterbalancing measure. For years, the US has also sought to develop closer ties with India, in part to counter China in Asia. But Chinese analysts are questioning how far India can truly go in improving relations with China in this context. Second, they are questioning that if the visit is not just a result of the US factor, will India a) agree to hold a summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the SCO meeting sidelines; and b) display a genuine commitment to go an extra mile in readjusting its 'leaning on one side' foreign policy towards the US. Third, on the same day as Trump's tariffs and news of the SCO visit came out, Trump announced a 'major breakthrough' in US-Russia negotiations. He is also now scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin. China's strategic affairs community, doubtful of India's commitment, is asking if Trump and Putin strike a 'deal' on Ukraine, India buying Russian oil may no longer be a problem. Will PM Modi still travel to China for the SCO summit? Simply, there remains a significant sense of distrust in China towards India, which is not exactly a new development. From the days of the Cold War, the Chinese establishment has found India's non-alignment policy to be suspicious, often believing that it is acting on behalf of the US under the guise of an autonomous foreign policy. With the collapse of the USSR and India's economic liberalisation, its deepening engagement with the US has added to this view in China. View of limited gains from PM Modi's visit Scholars in China have also questioned India's commitments in both the SCO and BRICS (including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), stating that PM Modi attended just three of the last ten SCO leaders' meetings. They have also pointed to the June meeting in Qingdao for the SCO Defence Ministers, where Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh accused Pakistan of supporting cross-border terrorism, and refused to sign the SCO joint statement. Wang Yiwei, an influential International Relations scholar and professor at Beijing's People's University, has gone as far as to say that New Delhi actually did violate Western sanctions on Russia. 'The nature of China and India is different. China-Russia economic and trade relations have lasted for many years, but India has significantly increased its production of Russian oil after the outbreak of the Russo-Ukrainian war, which is regarded as a violation of Western sanctions. Moreover, India also resells Russian oil to Europe,' he wrote. Shift under Trump An overwhelming sense in China is that India has always pursued a policy of playing both sides. For example, on India being a member of the SCO and the US-led QUAD security dialogue (with Australia and Japan), a Chinese scholar cited PM Modi's previous remarks: 'India has never considered itself bound to a single security alliance.' Some scholars now believe that under Trump 2.0, this will change. Today, the relationship between New Delhi and Washington is undergoing major adjustments, with significant differences on many issues, including trade, diplomacy, and energy. Likewise, there are many pressing issues between China and India which not only limit the depth of China-India economic and trade cooperation but also damage mutual understanding and trust. Some of these include tensions at the border, 'reviewing' and suppressing Chinese capital, restricting visas for Chinese technical personnel, no direct flights between the two countries, India imposing numerous barriers on Chinese investments, etc. Reflecting the Chinese government's view, the GT editorial puts a condition for Modi's visit translating into improved bilateral relations, saying 'We welcome Prime Minister Modi to visit China with genuine intentions to improve bilateral ties…' At the same time, a WeChat social media commentary declared India a 'joke,' saying Trump's 'tariff terrorism' has left the country 'powerless' and without bargaining chips, reflecting the divergent views. Hemant Adlakha teaches Chinese at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. He is also Vice Chairperson and an Honorary Fellow, Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS), Delhi.
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
India's advice to Pakistan on nuclear threat: 'There will be painful consequences as demonstrated recently'
India's advice to Pakistan on nuclear threat: 'There will be painful consequences as was demonstrated recently' Taking a strong note of Pakistan's recent threatening on use of nuclear power, India on Thursday warned the Pakistani leadership that any 'misadventure' will have 'painful consequences'. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal referenced reports regarding 'war-mongering' by Pakistan against India. He further added, 'Pakistan would be well-advised to temper its rhetoric as any misadventure will have painful consequences, as was demonstrated recently.' Jaiswal was referring to Operation Sindoor What Munir had threatened? His comments came at the backdrop of many reports where Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir was quoted issuing a nuclear threat to India. During his visit to the US, Munir apparently threatened that it would 'take half the world down' if faced with an 'existential threat' from India. The remarks were the first nuclear threats known to have ever been delivered from US soil against a third country. Munir had also threatened to destroy India's infrastructure on the Indus water channels, which could impede water flow to Pakistan, and said that the water source is not 'Indians' family property'. 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir das missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles]…The Indus River is not the Indians' family property. Humein missilon ki kami nahin hai, al-hamdulillah [we have no shortage of missiles, Praise be to God],' Munir reportedly said. On the upcoming meeting between Putin and Trump MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal says, 'We welcome the understanding reached between the United States and the Russian Federation for a meeting in Alaska on 15th August…PM Modi has said before on several occasions that this is not an era of war. India endorses the upcoming summit…'
