Energy Minister Commits to ‘Clean Slate' in Ottawa-Alberta Relations
Newly minted Liberal Energy Minister Tim Hodgson says he supports Alberta's energy sector, adding that he aims to reset strained ties with Ottawa and fast-track infrastructure projects to help make Canada 'a conventional and clean energy superpower.'
Hodgson made the comments during an
'One of my first calls as minister was to [Alberta Energy] Minister Brian Jean. This relationship matters, and I am committed to a clean slate,' Hodgson
'I may live in Toronto right now, but I was born on the Prairies. I want you to understand that I will be a voice for Alberta and Western Canada at the Cabinet table.'
Born in Winnipeg, Hodgson served in the Canadian Armed Forces before joining investment bank Goldman Sachs, where he held several roles, including CEO of its Canadian operations.
'At Goldman, one of my first major deals is also one of the deals I am still the proudest of today: The Alliance Pipeline,' he said during his address, referring to the pipeline that transports natural gas from western Canada to the United States.
Related Stories
3/25/2025
3/13/2025
Hodgson also served on the board of MEG Energy, a Canadian oil sands producer based in Calgary. He was recently the board chair of Hydro One, Ontario's public electricity provider. He also worked as a special adviser to now-Prime Minister Mark Carney when Carney was governor of the Bank of Canada.
In his speech, Hodgson said collaboration between provinces, territories, and the federal government is important for advancing nation-building projects.
'This government isn't just about people in suits in Toronto or Ottawa. It's about people in hard hats, on the drilling pads, in the forests, and at the mills,' Hodgson said.
'From Peace River to Lethbridge, from engineers to rig workers—that work powers our country, and it earns our respect.'
Alberta's energy minister said he was 'encouraged' by Hodgson's comments, adding that, given Hodgson's previous experience in the oil sands sector, 'he should understand the challenges we face and the importance of getting our oil and gas products to tidewater.'
'It is critical the federal government follows through on these promises and prioritizes the construction of pipelines and energy infrastructure while repealing job and investment-killing legislation and policies like the 'Build-No-Pipelines Act' and the emissions cap,' Jean said in a May 23 statement to The Epoch Times.
Alberta has long
Hodgson's comments also come at a time when the issues of
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has
Fast-Tracking Infrastructure Projects
During his address, Hodgson said the new federal government would be defined not by 'talk' but by action.
'I want to be very clear: in the new economy we are building, Canada will no longer be defined by delay,' he said. 'We will be defined by delivery.'
He said the new government will reduce review times for projects of national interest by more than half by establishing a 'Major Federal Projects Office' to serve as a single window for permits and cut red tape, in line with Carney's commitment to a 'One Project, One Review' policy.
Hodgson said Canada's energy is a 'tool for global stability and transformation,' adding that Canada needs to diversify its economy in the face of U.S. tariffs. He added that Canadian exports can help 'our allies break dependence on authoritarian regimes,' referring to oil-producing nations with authoritarian governments like Venezuela and Iran.
'We need infrastructure that gets our energy to tidewater and to trusted allies,' he said. 'We will invest in carbon capture, methane reduction, and other technologies to ensure Canadian oil and gas is not only produced responsibly, but is the most competitive in the world.'
He also said that turning Canada into an energy superpower would require reframing the national conversation, which he says will involve building consensus for projects while 'meeting our duty to consult so indigenous peoples are true partners, and protecting our environment so we don't have to clean up mistakes later.'
'I'm a pragmatist, a businessman,' Hodgson said. 'When I see something that needs changing, I work hard to change it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax reform bill could cost Canadians billions
A small, obscure section buried in U.S. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act could cost Canadians and Canadian companies billions of dollars, CBC News has learned. Moreover, it could hand Prime Minister Mark Carney's government yet another political hot potato from south of the border — forcing it to choose between scrapping Canada's digital services tax (DST) or risk the U.S. imposing a new withholding tax on the income Canadians, Canadian companies and pension plans receive from investments in U.S. securities. While it still has steps to go before becoming law, the provision has Canadian experts worried. "This is building a nuclear option into a tax treaty that has lasted for 80 years between Canada and the U.S," said David Macdonald, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. "Just like the U.S. is totally willing to blow up the international trade order, they're totally willing to blow up international tax rules." The concern centres on Section 899 of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill — more than 1,000 pages of proposed legislation that Trump says will make good on his domestic campaign promises, including tax cuts for Americans. The bill passed the House of Representatives on May 22 by one vote and now has to be approved by the Senate. Section 899, entitled Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes, would increase withholding taxes for non-resident individuals and companies from countries that the U.S. believes have imposed discriminatory or unfair taxes. Experts believe Canada is likely to be one of the countries targeted by the measure because of U.S. government criticism of the DST. The tax applies to all large businesses, foreign and domestic, that earn revenues from certain online business models in Canada. Global minimum tax measures adopted by Canada could also put it in the Trump administration's crosshairs. The timeline for the legislation is in flux and Section 899 could still get dropped from the bill or be amended. If, however, Section 899 becomes law, it could hit Canadians in different ways. For example, the U.S. currently imposes a 15 per cent withholding tax on dividends Canadians receive from U.S. companies. Under tax treaties, however, an equivalent tax credit from the Canadian government generally offsets the withholding tax. If the measure becomes law and the Trump administration designates Canada as a country with discriminatory taxes, a new five per cent withholding tax would go into effect. That tax would increase by five percentage points per year to a maximum of 20 per cent. It is not known if Canada would adjust its tax credits to offset such a tax. Max Reed, a cross-border tax lawyer with Polaris Tax Counsel, said the potential impact could be wide ranging. "It's definitely going to be in the billions, maybe tens of billions," he said. Kim Moody, founder of Moodys Private Client and Moodys Tax, agrees. "Billions, absolutely billions, for sure, would be the impact," he said. "If Canada and the United States allows this to take hold, the result will be chaos. Absolute chaos." Experts say it is not clear exactly how the tax would be applied. For example, would the new withholding tax be imposed on top of existing withholding taxes? Would it also apply to securities held within registered accounts such as RRSPs or only to dividends from shares held directly by Canadians?Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne's office declined an interview request from CBC News. "Analysis of the implications of the U.S. tax reform bill is ongoing and we await the final version of the bill," wrote spokeswoman Audrey Milette. The U.S. embassy also declined to comment on Section 899 or how it would work. "We are unable to comment at this time as the legislation is still pending final approval," responded an embassy official. U.S. Internal Revenue Service figures show that in 2022, the U.S. withheld $2.9 billion US in tax on $108.5 billion US worth of income from a variety of U.S. sources for Canadian residents and companies. The IRS said $261.4 million US was withheld from individual Canadian residents while $1.22 billion was withheld from companies and $1.24 billion US under the category of Canadian "withholding rate pools (general)." Of the sources of U.S. income received by Canadians, the IRS said $31 billion US was from dividends — half of which went to Canadian corporations. David Pierce, vice-president of government relations for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said the chamber began getting worried messages from Canadian businesses once Trump's tax reform bill passed the House of Representatives. "I think the attention and the awareness of it really grew from what was a small subset of companies, now right across the economy — from financial to pensions to, you name it," Pierce said. "They're all very concerned at what this means for average Canadians in your retirement savings and how this would be applied should, of course, it become law." Pierce said the potential cost of Section 899 far outweighs revenue the Canadian government collects from the DST, a tax his group has opposed from the outset. He said the Canadian government should pause the next DST payment scheduled for June 30 and consider getting rid of the tax in negotiations with the U.S. "The concern is that when the U.S. administration makes allegations of Canada's trade practices, they can cite the DST and that's a talking point that rings true not just for Republicans, but also Democrats, in the United States," said Pierce. "That strengthens their hand. It's not strengthening our hand at the bargaining table." Macdonald says the proposed withholding tax would hit hard. "It would have major impacts on Canadian companies, Canadian investors in the U.S — they'd be downright punitive," said Macdonald. "That would probably end up shutting down Canadian businesses in the U.S. and kicking Canadian investors out of the U.S." And the DST isn't the only Canadian tax the U.S. could consider unfair now, or in the future, said Macdonald. "I think this is the tip of the iceberg in terms of threats against Canadian corporate taxation that attempts to level the playing field between American transnationals and Canadian domestic companies that are paying corporate income taxes," he said. Macdonald said the proposed tax could also hit Canadians who don't have direct investments in U.S. securities. "This isn't only for folks with an RRSP," Macdonald said. "I mean, this could extend to the Canada Pension Plan, which is the major means by which people retire in Canada. They could potentially pay dramatically more." The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board declined to comment.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This
Here in the US, we're experiencing the effects of President Trump's tariff wars every single day as prices continue going up. If you're wondering how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries, Emily ( a Canadian living in China, recently shared a video explaining exactly how things have changed for her in the grocery store over there. Emily's video starts out, "Hello from China. So, I'm in a grocery store right now, and I wanted to show you how the American tariffs are affecting Chinese customers." @ / Via "So, I was gonna get some beef for dinner tonight, and I saw this," she says, holding up a package of beef. "What used to be here is American beef. But now, as you can see, it says Australian beef." @ / Via "And I did look around," she added. "I couldn't find one single pack of beef from America. So I guess China just stopped buying beef from America, and it went straight to Australia." @ / Via "The whole idea that China is hurting because of the American tariffs? Well, they're not, because they are not as dependent on the US. In fact, only 18% of Chinese imports come from America. And for stuff like beef and soy, they can just go somewhere else easily." @ / Via Trading Economics says that the number is even lower than Emily suggested, putting the percentage of China's imports that come from the US at around 7% in 2023. According to the USDA, the US exported $1.58 billion worth of beef to China in 2024. Reuters also notes that in 2022, "soybeans were the No. 1 U.S. product imported by China," but that "the U.S. has lost competitive advantage to Brazil." "So I guess I'm having Australian beef for dinner tonight instead of American beef," Emily continued. "And honestly, because of the food quality, I probably trust Australian beef better." "And this box of beef right here is 50 RMB, which is about $7 USD." "So to answer the question, China ain't hurting. And if anything, I think we're probably doing even better because now [we have] better beef that tastes better and at a better price." @ / Via "So, thank you, Trump, for that," she concluded. Unsurprisingly, commenters had a lot to say on the topic. "USA put sanctions on themselves," one said. "No country is hurting apart from the US," said another. "I don't see China going back to the USA for those products in the next 4 years. Sadly a lot of American farmers are big fans of Trump." The video even made its way over to Twitter (now known as X), where even more people shared their opinions. "So Trump trying to beef up American exports, actually lead to losing customers to export to," said one. "Our tariff tiff countries have other options. America isn't the only trade partner in the world. We're even less desirable now because we aren't trusted." "There's nothing the United States can offer that the rest of the world doesn't already have. Except for serial killers and deep-fried hot dogs." You can watch Emily's full video below, and follow her over on TikTok. What do you think? Were you surprised to learn how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries? Let us know in the comments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW): 'I'm a Holder, Not a Buyer'
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (NYSE:BBW) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed recently. A caller asked if they should hold, trim, or add to their position in Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (NYSE:BBW). Cramer replied: 'Alright, I remember many, many years ago when Danny Meyer came here… and he said, listen, this is a company to watch. It is a company that is also a great hospitality company. And I'm going to tell you I have followed it ever since. I cannot believe it had that earnings breakout. And if anything… I'm a holder, not a buyer, because it just had that spike. But if it came down, I would certainly be a buyer.' A smiling woman walking out of a franchised store, her new purchase in her arm. Build-A-Bear Workshop (NYSE:BBW) is a retailer that provides customizable plush toys, pre-stuffed animals, scents, sounds, and a variety of accessories, clothing, and novelty items, with stores operating under the Build-A-Bear Workshop name. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
