SC pauses retrial order in Pataudi property dispute
The property once belonged to Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal, who had three daughters — Abida, Sajida, and Rabia. Sajida married Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, becoming the Nawab Begum of Bhopal. When Abida migrated to Pakistan, Sajida inherited the parental property. After Sajida's death, it passed to her son Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, and from him to his children, including Saif.
In 2000, a trial court declared the Pataudi family the rightful owners, relying on a 1962 Government of India certificate naming Sajida Sultan as sole successor to all the Nawab's properties.
In June this year, the Madhya Pradesh high court however overturned that trial court ruling, saying it was based on a 1997 Allahabad high court decision that the Supreme Court later overruled in 2019. The 2019 ruling by the top court had clarified that Muslim personal law governs the succession of private property, meaning the Nawab's property should be divided among all legal heirs.
Although the high court accepted this principle, it did not distribute the property. Instead, it sent the case back to the trial court for a fresh trial, allowing new evidence and directing that a verdict be given within a year.
The high court order judgment was taken in appeal in the top court, not by Saif's family but by two other heirs, Omar Ali and Rashid Ali, who are related to the Nawab through his nephew.
They argued that since the Supreme Court held that Muslim law applies in this case, there was no need for another trial. A retrial after 52 years of litigation (cases began in 1971–72) would only delay justice, lamented their petition while adding that the Civil Procedure Code does not permit a remand when the issue is purely a legal question requiring no fresh evidence. They further stressed that neither side had requested new evidence, so the high court's remand to the trial court for a fresh adjudication was unnecessary.
On Friday, a bench of justices PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar agreed to hear the challenge, issued notices to the Centre, Madhya Pradesh government, Saif Ali Khan's family, and other heirs, and ordered an interim stay on the high court's ruling.
The matter will be heard again on September 9.
Two partition suits over the Nawab's property have been ongoing since the early 1970s. Apart from the Pataudi family, at least 16 other heirs are claiming a share. The 1962 succession certificate remains a key point of contention. Saif's family relies on it, while the others argue it cannot override Muslim inheritance law.
For now, the stay means the 2000 trial court decision in favour of the Pataudis remains in effect.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Udaipur Files Producer Receives Death Threats After Release Of Film Based On Kanhaiya Lal
Producer Amit Jani said that the caller introduced himself as Tabrez, a resident of Bihar. A day after 'Udaipur Files' was released in theatres across India, producer Amit Jani claimed that he has been receiving 'death threats" over the film. In an X post on Saturday, Jani stated that he has been getting repeated calls from an unknown number, with the caller threatening to kill him with a bomb or shoot him. Jani added that the caller introduced himself as Tabrez, a resident of Bihar. In his post, Jani urged the authorities to register a case against Tabrez and arrest him. Take a look at the producer's post here: Last month, the Central government granted 'Y'-category armed security cover to the Udaipur Files producer in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. It came days after the Supreme Court allowed the producer to approach the police and seek protection as he alleged a threat to his life. Y-category security includes a detail of 8 to 11 personnel, including commandos, to protect the individual around the clock. The film was released across India on Friday, August 8, after the Delhi High Court on Thursday gave the go-ahead. It was initially slated for release on July 11, but faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The Supreme Court had directed the Delhi High Court to address challenges against the government's approval of the film's release. The movie is based on the 2022 murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor, who was brutally killed in broad daylight in his shop in Udaipur, Rajasthan, by two men for allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed during a debate show on a private news channel. According to police reports from 2022, the prime accused, Mohammad Riaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad, entered Lal's shop pretending to get clothes stitched before attacking him with a knife and slitting his throat. They recorded the brutal murder and circulated the video on social media, claiming responsibility for the heinous act, which triggered national outrage and raised serious concerns about radicalisation and communal violence. The accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Initially, the case was probed by the Rajasthan police, but later the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over it. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur. The film starring Vijay Raaz in the lead role is directed by Bharat S Shrinate and Jayant Sinha, and produced by Amit Jani. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
‘Udaipur Files' Producer Amit Jani Claims Death Threats After Film's Release, Seeks Action Against Caller
New Delhi: A day after 'Udaipur Files' was released in theatres across India, producer Amit Jani claimed that he has been receiving "death threats" over the film. In a X post on Saturday, Jani stated that he has been getting repeated calls from an unknown number, with the caller threatening to kill him with a bomb or shoot him. Jani added that the caller introduced himself as Tabrez, a resident of Bihar. In his post, Jani urged the authorities to register a case against Tabrez and arrest him. Take a look श्रीमान थाना प्रभारी महोदय सेक्टर 24 नोयडा महोदय, निवेदन है कि +971566707310 से आज मुझे दोपहर 1:03 और 01:06 पर मेरे मोबाइल नंबर 9760000004 पर कॉल आया, कॉल करने वाले ने खुद को बिहार का मोहम्मद तबरेज बताया और धमकी दी कि तुझे कार सहित बम से उड़ा देंगे तूने अपनी फिल्म में हमारे… — Amit Jani (@AmitJaniIND) August 9, 2025 Last month, the Central government granted 'Y'-category armed security cover to the 'Udaipur Files' producer in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. It came days after the Supreme Court allowed the producer to approach the police and seek protection as he alleged a threat to his life. Y-category security includes a detail of 8 to 11 personnel, including commandos, to protect the individual around the clock. The film was released across India on Friday, August 8, after the Delhi High Court on Thursday gave the go-ahead for its release. It was initially slated for release on July 11, but faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The Supreme Court had directed the Delhi High Court to address challenges against the government's approval of the film's release. The movie is based on the 2022 murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor, who was brutally killed in broad daylight in his shop in Udaipur, Rajasthan, by two men for allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed during a debate show on a private news channel. According to police reports from 2022, the prime accused, Mohammad Riaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad, entered Lal's shop pretending to get clothes stitched before attacking him with a knife and slitting his throat. They recorded the brutal murder and circulated the video on social media, claiming responsibility for the heinous act, which triggered national outrage and raised serious concerns about radicalisation and communal violence. The accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Initially, the case was probed by the Rajasthan police, but later the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over it. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur. The film starring Vijay Raaz in the lead role is directed by Bharat S Shrinate and Jayant Sinha, and produced by Amit Jani.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Udaipur Files movie review: Film about Kanhaiya Lal murder case is buried under fluff and questionable intent
Udaipur Files movie review Cast: Vijay Raaz, Rajneesh Duggal, Preeti Jhangiani Director: Bharat S Shrinate Rating: ★.5 Imagine making a two-hour-plus film about a tragic story that can be summed up in one line: a man is killed in the name of religion. Based on the real-life Kanhaiya Lal murder case, Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder stuffs in so much extra that it ends up feeling less about the man and more about the fluff. The film Udaipur Files attempts to explore the Kanhaiya Lal murder but is marred by incoherence and excessive subplots. Directed by Bharat S Shrinate, the story opens by charting the souring of Hindu-Muslim relations over temples and mosques. When authorities discover that a mosque was once a temple, all hell breaks loose, sparking communal unrest. Kanhaiya Lal (Vijay Raaz), a tailor, lives a content life with his wife and two sons until he is targeted by Nazim (Puneet Vashishth), himself a pawn in the hands of those intent on creating chaos. There is also a police investigation angle, with Rajneesh Duggal as cop Ishwar Singh and Preeti Jhangiani as his wife Anjana, a news anchor. If this plot description sounds all over the place, that is because it is. Written by Bharat Singh, Jayant Sinha, and Amit Jani, the film is unfocused, dabbling in religion, politics, and romance, and repeatedly starting subplots only to abandon them. There is even an inexplicable five-minute sequence in the first half that looks straight out of an AI generator. The production values are visibly low. Long embroiled in controversy, the film wears it on its sleeve. Some scenes make no sense, with abrupt jumps between unrelated tracks and nearly 80 percent of the runtime heavily dubbed. Scene-to-scene connectivity is missing. The music is forgettable, and songs appear out of nowhere. In the middle of a murder case narrative, we get two songs about Hindu pilgrimage sites, which feel more like tourism ads than organic storytelling. The pacing is erratic, the turns predictable, and the cartoonish antagonist Nazim drags Udaipur Files into territory better suited for a Crime Patrol episode. Even the usually dependable Vijay Raaz cannot rescue this bland mix of mediocre performances and a headless-chicken script. At points, the film's intentions feel troubling, with the villainisation of one religion as blatant as it gets. Overall, Udaipur Files takes a true story and drowns it in cluttered subplots and one-dimensional characters. With erratic pacing, forgettable music, and an over-the-top antagonist, it ends up feeling more like sensationalised television than a serious cinematic retelling.
