OpenAI dials back conversion plan, nonprofit to retain control
OPENAI has dialled back a significant restructuring plan, with its nonprofit parent retaining control in a move that is likely to limit CEO Sam Altman's power over the pioneering maker of ChatGPT.
The announcement follows a storm of criticism and legal challenges, including a high-profile lawsuit filed by rival and co-founder Elon Musk, who has accused OpenAI of straying from its founding mission to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.
'OpenAI was founded as a non-profit, is today a non-profit that oversees and controls the for-profit, and going forward will remain a non-profit that oversees and controls the for-profit. That will not change,' Altman said in a blog post on Monday.
OpenAI had outlined plans in December to convert its for-profit arm into a public benefit corporation, a structure designed to balance shareholder returns with social goals, unlike nonprofits, which are solely focused on public good.
Under that proposal, the nonprofit parent would have been a big shareholder in the PBC but would cede control over the startup.
On Monday, OpenAI said the nonprofit parent would continue to control the PBC and become a big shareholder in it. The company will push ahead with plans to change the structure of its for-profit arm to allow more capital-raising to keep pace in the AI race.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The move to an outright for-profit was intended to help OpenAI raise more capital and ease restrictions tied to its nonprofit parent. But it sparked concerns over whether the company would fairly allocate assets to the nonprofit and how it would balance profit-making with its mission to develop AI for the public good.
'We made the decision for the nonprofit to stay in control after hearing from civic leaders and having discussions with the offices of the Attorneys General of California and Delaware,' Bret Taylor, chairman of OpenAI's board, said in a blog post, adding that the new announcement meant the startup would continue to have a structure 'extremely close' to the current one.
Altman called the move a compromise 'that (works) well enough for investors that they're happy to continue to fund us to a degree we think we will need.' He said OpenAI would work with major backer Microsoft, regulators and newly appointed nonprofit commissioners to finalize the updated plan.
'We believe this is well over the bar of what we need to be able to fundraise,' Altman said, adding there were 'no changes to any existing investor relationships' and that the company would remove caps on the profit that investors can earn.
He noted that public benefit corporations have become common at AI companies including rivals such as Anthropic, which is backed by Amazon as well as Alphabet's Google, and at Musk's xAI.
But some questions remain over what exactly was changing and whether the move made it harder for OpenAI to raise capital as aggressively as it might have under a more conventional corporate structure.
'We're glad that OpenAI is listening to concerns from civil society leaders ... but crucial questions remain,' said Page Hedley, OpenAI's former policy and ethics adviser, and lead organizer of the group Not For Private Gain.
'Will OpenAI's commercial goals continue to be legally subordinate to its charitable mission? ... Who will own the technology that OpenAI develops? The 2019 restructuring announcement made the primacy of the mission very clear, but so far, these statements have not,' he said.
He added he was concerned that in the current PBC structure, the board would be obligated to maximise shareholder value.
Expensive AI
As the expensive pursuit of artificial general intelligence, or AI that surpasses human intelligence, heats up, OpenAI has been looking to make changes to attract further investment.
It announced in March it would raise up to US$40 billion in a new funding round led by SoftBank Group, at a US$300 billion valuation. The round was contingent on the AI firm transitioning to for-profit status by the end of the year, a structure that drew attention in November 2023 during one of the biggest boardroom dramas in Silicon Valley, where members of the non-profit board ousted Altman over a breakdown in communication and loss of trust.
He was reinstated after five days, following an outpouring of support from employees and investors.
Altman said OpenAI would still be able to receive funding from the Japanese tech investor after Monday's move.
SoftBank did not immediately respond to a request for comment, while Microsoft declined to comment.
The announcement also raised questions over the future of Musk's lawsuit which sought to block OpenAI's transition away from nonprofit control, among other claims. A jury trial had been scheduled for March 2026.
A consortium led by Musk had also made an unsolicited US$97.4 billion bid for OpenAI earlier this year that was swiftly rebuffed by Altman with a 'no thank you.' REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
15 hours ago
- Business Times
AI for sustainability: A practical primer for business leaders
THE advent of generative AI has put businesses at the cusp of a new revolution. This AI can create new content using data that it has been trained on and is creating a big stir everywhere. All aspects of businesses, not least sustainability, will have to squarely face and leverage on the new possibilities brought forth by this AI. For business leaders, using AI goes beyond knowing how to 'prompt' or ask questions on generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT and DeepSeek. These chatbots have changed workplaces as they can tap on large language models (LLMs) or sophisticated AI technology that produces human-like text by being machine-trained on massive datasets. For sustainability, leaders will need a broader appreciation, perhaps a quick road map to rapidly and inevitably leverage on AI for their businesses through and beyond the environmental, social and governance (ESG) aspects. Guiding framework I recommend a '3+3' guide as a starting point to examine how AI can make the sustainability process more efficient and the sustainability impact more effective. The three process domains are: (1) Reporting and data management: Sustainability reporting is information-intensive and AI undoubtedly excels in gathering and consolidating these information for generating the reports. AI is more than pure automation – it can rapidly extract, analyse and structure ESG data for disclosures, even conforming to standards and regulations. Real-time data collection and monitoring are also feasible. Natural language generation tools can indeed cross the final hurdle by crafting narratives for the sustainability reports. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up (2) Carbon management: Carbon emissions have become a specific and probably a most critical aspect of sustainability disclosures. AI is ideal for assisting in the process of measuring, reducing and even offsetting the emissions together with verification. AI-powered carbon accounting capabilities can also work continually to enable businesses to act on identified emission hotspots. Historical data can be assessed to predict future emissions trends that help inform the making of effective decarbonisation plans. (3) Value chain management: Sustainability goes beyond the organisation to include suppliers and customers in the full value chain. Through data access and analysis, AI provides critical tools to enhance transparency and traceability across the parts of the chain. Specific advantages include logistical optimisation such as producing delivery routes with lower carbon footprints. Further, circular economy models like resource reuse, reverse logistics and waste reduction can be incorporated. Actual examples of AI platforms and business use cases are available. An established reporting platform is Project Greenprint launched by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This caters for various user categories such as large corporates, small and medium enterprises and financial institutions. The platform is comprehensive with sustainability reporting and carbon management capabilities, including features pertaining to the organisation's value chain and the broader ecosystem. Similarly, other major providers include IBM Envizi which is an AI-driven data collection and consolidation toolkit for ESG metrics. Another example is HashMicro, an end-to-end cloud-based software that automates business tasks, streamlines operations and enhances decision-making for sustainability. And there are many more platforms available. There are also entities that provide technical platform and other value-added assistance. Next, the three impact areas of the '3+3' guide comprise: (1) Resource optimisation: At a substantive level, AI can enhance resource usage for the business to be more sustainable. This involves all the key inputs for the value creation and delivery process to generate the outputs. A foremost application area is energy utilisation where AI can analyse usage patterns, predict demand and adjust operations as part of smart energy management. Resource impact for carbon emissions is also present in water consumption and waste minimisation. (2) Products and services: This is probably a most basic aspect of sustainable business. Sustainable products and services cut at the core of the business. AI can help to design these offerings such as eco-friendly products in terms of ingredients, production processes and packaging. Many household items such as tableware can have alternatives to plastic such as single-use plant-based materials. Digital services can also be made energy-efficient and environmentally-conscious. (3) Strategic integration: AI can be tapped to embed sustainability in the strategic planning process as well as the crafting of substantive strategies. Strategy will benefit from the inclusion of ESG risks and opportunities that have financial implications. AI can evaluate multimodal data like numerical, textual and image holistically for strategy formulation and implementation. This data collection can be real-time and integrated into operations and decision-making. Examples of AI-driven impact on sustainability are multifarious and industry-specific. From solar panels on rooftops to floating farms, from customised systems to innovative designs, companies should go back to the drawing board to identify the key impact areas and then examine how AI systems can make them even more sustainable. More notably, changing and new regulations will be crucial impetuses for businesses to use technology for rule conformance and, more importantly, business performance. Next AI revolutions The call for using AI in all business domains, including sustainability, is urgent. While generative AI has now emerged, even newer developments like agentic AI are appearing on the scene. Agentic AI makes decisions and takes action autonomously without human intervention. The techniques are related to generative AI and include machine learning and natural language processing. Agentic AI will be useful in task-based sustainability arenas such as energy and supply chain management. And upcoming on the horizon is AGI (or artificial general intelligence) which will have the ability to understand or learn any intellectual task like a human being. The current AI, including generative AI, is narrow AI that is capable of only specific tasks. AGI will be broad and is able to generalise knowledge, transfer skills and solve novel problems without task-specific reprogramming. Agentic AI and the future AGI can do everything that generative AI does and more and better. Moreover, they can do so on their own. Agentic AI is touted to arrive big within months, even as early as this year. Estimates of the advent of AGI have ranged from a few years to a few decades. As the old, evergreen song by Elvis Presley goes: It's Now or Never. Businesses can be old but they can be evergreen. If they are not on the new AI now, it's better late than never. The writer is director of Centre for Governance and Sustainability at NUS Business School where he is also professor in practice of strategy and policy
Business Times
16 hours ago
- Business Times
Meta's US$14.8 billion Scale AI deal latest test of AI partnerships
[NEW YORK] Facebook owner Meta's US$14.8 billion investment in Scale AI and hiring of the data-labeling startup's chief executive offiecer will test how the Trump administration views so-called acquihire deals, which some have criticized as an attempt to evade regulatory scrutiny. The deal, announced on Thursday (Jun 12), was Meta's second-largest investment to date. It gives the owner of Facebook a 49 per cent nonvoting stake in Scale AI, which uses gig workers to manually label data and includes among its customers Meta competitors Microsoft and ChatGPT creator OpenAI. Unlike an acquisition or a transaction that would give Meta a controlling stake, the deal does not require a review by US antitrust regulators. However, they could probe the deal if they believe it was structured to avoid those requirements or harm competition. The deal appeared to be structured to avoid potential pitfalls, such as cutting off competitors' access to Scale's services or giving Meta an inside view into rivals' operations – though Reuters exclusively reported on Friday that Alphabet's Google has decided to sever ties with Scale in light of Meta's stake, and other customers are looking at taking a step back. In a statement, a Scale AI spokesperson said its business, which spans work with major companies and governments, remains strong, as it is committed to protecting customer data. The company declined to comment on specifics with Google. Alexandr Wang, Scale's 28-year-old CEO who is coming to Meta as part of the deal, will remain on Scale's board but will have appropriate restrictions placed around his access to information, two sources familiar with the move confirmed. Large tech companies likely perceive the regulatory environment for AI partnerships as easier to navigate under President Donald Trump than under former President Joe Biden, said William Kovacic, director of the competition law center at George Washington University. Trump's antitrust enforcers have said they do not want to regulate how AI develops, but have also displayed a suspicion of large tech platforms, he added. 'That would lead me to think they will keep looking carefully at what the firms do. It does not necessarily dictate that they will intervene in a way that would discourage the relationships,' Kovacic said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Federal Trade Commission probes into past 'aquihire' deals appear to be at a standstill. Under the Biden administration, the FTC opened inquiries into Amazon's deal to hire top executives and researchers from AI startup Adept, and Microsoft's US$650 million deal with Inflection AI. The latter allowed Microsoft to use Inflection's models and hire most of the startup's staff, including its co-founders. Amazon's deal closed without further action from the regulator, a source familiar with the matter confirmed. And, more than a year after its initial inquiry, the FTC has so far taken no enforcement action against Microsoft over Inflection, though a larger probe over practices at the software giant is ongoing. A spokesperson for the FTC declined to comment on Friday. David Olson, a professor who teaches antitrust law at Boston College Law School, said it was smart of Meta to take a minority nonvoting stake. 'I think that does give them a lot of protection if someone comes after them,' he said, adding that it was still possible that the FTC would want to review the agreement. The Meta deal has its skeptics. US Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts who is probing AI partnerships involving Microsoft and Google, said Meta's investment should be scrutinised. 'Meta can call this deal whatever it wants – but if it violates federal law because it unlawfully squashes competition or makes it easier for Meta to illegally dominate, antitrust enforcers should investigate and block it,' she said in a statement on Friday. While Meta faces its own monopoly lawsuit by the FTC, it remains to be seen whether the agency will have any questions about its Scale investment. The US Department of Justice's antitrust division, led by former JD Vance adviser Gail Slater, recently started looking into whether Google's partnership with chatbot creator was designed to evade antitrust review, Bloomberg News reported. The DOJ is separately seeking to make Google give it advance notice of new AI investments as part of a proposal to curb the company's dominance in online search. REUTERS
CNA
17 hours ago
- CNA
Exclusive-Google, Scale AI's largest customer, plans split after Meta deal, sources say
SAN FRANCISCO :Alphabet's Google, the largest customer of Scale AI, plans to cut ties with Scale after news broke that rival Meta is taking a 49 per cent stake in the AI data-labeling startup, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Google had planned to pay Scale AI about $200 million this year for the human-labeled training data that is crucial for developing technology, including the sophisticated AI models that power Gemini, its ChatGPT competitor, one of the sources said. The search giant already held conversations with several of Scale AI's rivals this week as it seeks to shift away much of that workload, sources added. Scale's loss of significant business comes as Meta takes a big stake in the company, valuing it at $29 billion. Scale was worth $14 billion before the deal. Scale AI intends to keep its business running while its CEO, Alexandr Wang, along with a few employees, move over to Meta. Since its core business is concentrated around a few customers, it could suffer greatly if it loses key customers like Google. In a statement, a Scale AI spokesperson said its business, which spans work with major companies and governments, remains strong, as it is committed to protecting customer data. The company declined to comment on specifics with Google. Scale AI raked in $870 million in revenue in 2024, and Google spent some $150 million on Scale AI's services last year, sources said. Other major tech companies that are customers of Scale's, including Microsoft, are also backing away. Elon Musk's xAI is also looking to exit, one of the sources said. OpenAI decided to pull back from Scale several months ago, according to sources familiar with the matter, though it spends far less money than Google. OpenAI's CFO said on Friday that the company will continue to work with Scale AI, as one of its many data vendors. Companies that compete with Meta in developing cutting-edge AI models are concerned that doing business with Scale could expose their research priorities and road map to a rival, five sources said. By contracting with Scale AI, customers often share proprietary data as well as prototype products for which Scale's workers are providing data-labeling services. With Meta now taking a 49 per cent stake, AI companies are concerned that one of their chief rivals could gain knowledge about their business strategy and technical blueprints. Google, Microsoft and OpenAI declined to comment. xAI did not respond to a request for comment. RIVALS SEE OPENINGS The bulk of Scale AI's revenue comes from charging generative AI model makers for providing access to a network of human trainers with specialized knowledge - from historians to scientists, some with doctorate degrees. The humans annotate complex datasets that are used to "post-train" AI models, and as AI models have become smarter, the demand for the sophisticated human-provided examples has surged, and one annotation could cost as much as $100. Scale also does data-labeling for enterprises like self-driving car companies and the U.S. government, which are likely to stay, according to the sources. But its biggest money-maker is in partnering with generative AI model makers, the sources said. Google had already sought to diversify its data service providers for more than a year, three of the sources said. But Meta's moves this week have led Google to seek to move off Scale AI on all its key contracts, the sources added. Because of the way data-labeling contracts are structured, that process could happen quickly, two sources said. This will provide an opening for Scale AI's rivals to jump in. "The Meta-Scale deal marks a turning point," said Jonathan Siddharth, CEO of Turing, a Scale AI competitor. "Leading AI labs are realizing neutrality is no longer optional, it's essential." Labelbox, another competitor, will "probably generate hundreds of millions of new revenue" by the end of the year from customers fleeing Scale, its CEO, Manu Sharma, told Reuters. Handshake, a competitor focusing on building a network of PhDs and experts, saw a surge of workload from top AI labs that compete with Meta. "Our demand has tripled overnight after the news," said Garrett Lord, CEO at Handshake. Many AI labs now want to hire in-house data-labelers, which allows their data to remain secure, said Brendan Foody, CEO of Mercor, a startup that in addition to competing directly with Scale AI also builds technology around being able to recruit and vet candidates in an automated way, enabling AI labs to scale up their data labeling operations quickly. Founded in 2016, Scale AI provides vast amounts of labeled data or curated training data, which is crucial for developing sophisticated tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT. The Meta deal will be a boon for Scale AI's investors including Accel and Index Ventures, as well as its current and former employees. As part of the deal, Scale AI's CEO, Wang, will take a top position leading Meta's AI efforts. Meta is fighting the perception that it may have fallen behind in the AI race after its initial set of Llama 4 large language models released in April fell short of performance expectations.
