logo
Rat kings might actually be real—but it's nothing to laugh about

Rat kings might actually be real—but it's nothing to laugh about

A rat king displayed at the University of Tartu Natural History Museum in Estonia. Some have claimed that the phenomenon in which rats become entangled by their tails is just a hoax but experts say there's reason to believe it's real. Photograph by Oleksandr Rupeta, Alamy Stock Photo
This phenomenon is when a pack of rats become entangled by their tails, unable to separate themselves. We asked experts to weigh in on whether it is really possible.
Since at least the 1500s, people have been mesmerized by the legend of a so-called 'rat king.'
Usually depicted as a mass of a rodents with their tails tied in a knot, the specific details can vary by the telling. In some stories, the group is led by one rat that directs the rest, perhaps with psychological powers, while in others, the whole group works together, like some kind of amalgamated monster.
In one version or another, the rat king—which can refer to the whole group of animals, or simply the dominant rat—is an idea that has appeared in all forms of pop culture.
But is there any truth to the rat king legend?
Some experts have argued that historical rat king 'discoveries' could have been hoaxes—although they couldn't rule out the possibility that such a thing is physically possible. Meanwhile others are convinced.
(How rats became part of city life.) Limited Time: Bonus Issue Offer Subscribe now and gift up to 4 bonus issues—starting at $34/year.
'The rat king is not a legend,' argues Andrei Miljutin, curator at the University of Tartu Natural History Museum in Estonia, in an email. 'In contrast to gods and humanoids, everyone can see and study rat kings at museums in different countries. Two of them are housed in the very building where I am writing this message.'
However, Miljutin, who says rats are his favorite animal and that he somewhat fell into studying rat kings, stresses that the discovery of one is nothing to celebrate.
'Indeed, it is a death sentence. The animals suffer from permanent pain. They cannot move around normally to find food and water, and what is worse, they are helpless,' he says. As rats scramble over one another, their tails can become entangled. Above, a miniature sculpture by 19th century netsuke artist Ikkan depicts five rats in a ball. Photograph by Heritage Art/An illustration of a rat king drawn by German physician M. B. Valentini in 1714. Tales of rat kings date back at least to the 1500s. Photograph by Interfoto/Alamy Stock Photo
In a 2007 study published in the journal Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Miljutin found that, before 2005, there were 58 rat king sightings he deemed reliable, though just six of these were preserved in museums. Interestingly, some common themes emerged.
With the exception of one rat king documented on the island of Java in Indonesia, all the rat kings were from the same species—the black rat, or Rattus rattus. Most were identified in Germany, France, Poland, the Netherlands, and Belgium, and findings often seemed to coincide with spates of cold weather.
(Carolina the giant rat retires as a hero after saving many lives.)
Therefore, Miljutin concluded that rat kings are most likely to occur in areas where both cold winters and black rats are found.
As for how the tails of the rats became entangled, it seems true rat kings are not a result of knotting, but rather the product of some other sticky material.
In one case Miljutin investigated in South Estonia in 2021, he says, 'the knot of tails looked like a large ball due to the incorporation of a mixture of clay soil, poultry manure, straw, and feathers.'
Interestingly, those rats were still alive by the time Miljutin got to them. This makes him one of the very few people known to have seen a living rat king phenomenon in person.
The local news channel even captured video of the 13 tangled-up black rats—all young rats of both sexes. How rat kings could happen
As an urban rodentologist of more than 30 years—who has even been described as 'the rat king of New York' himself—Bobby Corrigan has come across this legend more than once.
'I have been asked in the press multiple times about rat kings, and I always reply I have not personally witnessed it in my long career,' says Corrigan, who spent 16 years teaching at Purdue University and is now a consultant for RmC Pest Management Consulting.
But after reviewing Miljutin's evidence, Corrigan says he's convinced.
'For sure, it is real, but it is rare,' he says, 'or at least rare to us humans. Maybe not to the long-tailed rats of the world.'
(Is it time to finally ban glue traps in the U.S.?)
There are also several aspects of rodent behavior and anatomy Corrigan has seen firsthand that align with what would be necessary to create a rat king.
'Rats have a behavior where they all get together in very tiny spaces in walls and ground burrows. It's called hugger-muggering,' says Corrigan. 'They all get really close together to exchange body heat, because they don't hibernate.'
Similarly, Corrigan says rat tails are composed of cartilage, which makes them very flexible, and many rat species use their tails to curl around branches to provide some extra grip.
However, rat tails cannot be tied into a knot, he says.
Finally, while he finds it unlikely any trapped rodents would obey a master and function as one, rats do establish hierarchies, similar to primates or canines.
'Often there will be a dominant male that mates with all the females and keeps a territory,' says Corrigan. 'So, is there a dominant rat in the area where there is a social structure, and could you call that rat 'king'? Yes.'
While rats and rat kings might seem frightening—especially as they're portrayed in pop culture—Corrigan says he takes a different point of view.
'We probably owe 20, maybe 30, additional years to our own [life expectancy] to rats,' he says. 'We've tested every single cancer drug in the world on them, every pharmaceutical, and we continue to do so.'
'These animals are a tremendous benefit to humankind,' says Corrigan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding
Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding

Vaccines using mRNA technology weren't immune to the latest round of federal research cuts. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. The 22 projects are managed by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). 'The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,' Kennedy, a longtime vaccine critic, said in a statement. 'We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.' 4 Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. AP Several studies have demonstrated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were over 90% effective at preventing severe illness and death. Vaccine researchers immediately took issue with the fiscal gutting, calling it a major setback for science. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' said Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations. Here's a closer look at how mRNA vaccines work. What is mRNA? All living cells have ribonucleic acid, an essential biological molecule known as RNA. RNA's primary role in the body is to make proteins, which are needed for virtually every cellular process, from building and repairing tissues to defending the body from bacteria and viruses and transporting nutrients and oxygen. 4 The COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by Pfizer and Biontec is administered during a clinical trial. EPA/Biontech SE/Handout Proteins are synthesized using three main types of RNA — messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). MRNA's job is to carry information for protein making from DNA to the cell's ribosomes, where it's translated into proteins. How do mRNA vaccines work? MRNA can be created in a laboratory and injected into the body to instruct cells to make a protein associated with a specific virus. The body recognizes the protein as foreign and produces antibodies to combat it. When the actual virus or pathogen invades the body, the immune system is ready to neutralize it, preventing or reducing the severity of illness. Though mRNA was discovered in the early 1960s, the first mRNA vaccine wasn't approved for human use until 2020. 4 German firm BioNTech, Pfizer's partner on its Covid vaccine, is developing mRNA-based vaccines for cancers at a rapid pace. Photothek via Getty Images The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in December 2020 and later granted full approval. The vaccine uses mRNA to tell cells to make a harmless piece of the coronavirus's spike protein. Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine was also granted full approval by the FDA. MRNA vaccines are being explored for the treatment of cancer, food allergies and infectious diseases. Researchers say that mRNA vaccines can be developed faster than traditional vaccines because they do not require the time-consuming process of growing live virus cultures in a lab. 'The theoretical advantage of mRNA-based vaccines lies in their rapid adaptability,' Grant Hansman, senior research fellow at the Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics at Griffith University in Australia, wrote this week in The Conversation. 'They will potentially allow annual updates to match circulating strains.' 4 University College London Hospital (UCLH) in London is testing novel cancer immunotherapy that aims to prevent skin cancer from recurring. The mRNA-based technology is for people who have already had high-risk melanomas removed. PA Images via Getty Images The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that mRNA vaccines do not contain any live viruses or pathogens and do not alter a person's DNA. The mRNA molecule eventually breaks down in the body. The Cleveland Clinic reports that the risks of mRNA vaccines include pain or swelling at the injection site, fever, fatigue, headaches, muscle aches and allergic reactions. In his statement, Kennedy said that mRNA vaccines will be phased out in favor of whole killed virus vaccines, a traditional approach that uses entire pathogens that have been inactivated through heat, radiation or chemicals. Though it's a tried-and-true method of immunization, critics have raised concerns that these vaccines produce a weaker immune response than mRNA vaccines and pose manufacturing and logistical challenges. With Post wires

Rat kings might actually be real—but it's nothing to laugh about
Rat kings might actually be real—but it's nothing to laugh about

National Geographic

time2 days ago

  • National Geographic

Rat kings might actually be real—but it's nothing to laugh about

A rat king displayed at the University of Tartu Natural History Museum in Estonia. Some have claimed that the phenomenon in which rats become entangled by their tails is just a hoax but experts say there's reason to believe it's real. Photograph by Oleksandr Rupeta, Alamy Stock Photo This phenomenon is when a pack of rats become entangled by their tails, unable to separate themselves. We asked experts to weigh in on whether it is really possible. Since at least the 1500s, people have been mesmerized by the legend of a so-called 'rat king.' Usually depicted as a mass of a rodents with their tails tied in a knot, the specific details can vary by the telling. In some stories, the group is led by one rat that directs the rest, perhaps with psychological powers, while in others, the whole group works together, like some kind of amalgamated monster. In one version or another, the rat king—which can refer to the whole group of animals, or simply the dominant rat—is an idea that has appeared in all forms of pop culture. But is there any truth to the rat king legend? Some experts have argued that historical rat king 'discoveries' could have been hoaxes—although they couldn't rule out the possibility that such a thing is physically possible. Meanwhile others are convinced. (How rats became part of city life.) Limited Time: Bonus Issue Offer Subscribe now and gift up to 4 bonus issues—starting at $34/year. 'The rat king is not a legend,' argues Andrei Miljutin, curator at the University of Tartu Natural History Museum in Estonia, in an email. 'In contrast to gods and humanoids, everyone can see and study rat kings at museums in different countries. Two of them are housed in the very building where I am writing this message.' However, Miljutin, who says rats are his favorite animal and that he somewhat fell into studying rat kings, stresses that the discovery of one is nothing to celebrate. 'Indeed, it is a death sentence. The animals suffer from permanent pain. They cannot move around normally to find food and water, and what is worse, they are helpless,' he says. As rats scramble over one another, their tails can become entangled. Above, a miniature sculpture by 19th century netsuke artist Ikkan depicts five rats in a ball. Photograph by Heritage Art/An illustration of a rat king drawn by German physician M. B. Valentini in 1714. Tales of rat kings date back at least to the 1500s. Photograph by Interfoto/Alamy Stock Photo In a 2007 study published in the journal Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Miljutin found that, before 2005, there were 58 rat king sightings he deemed reliable, though just six of these were preserved in museums. Interestingly, some common themes emerged. With the exception of one rat king documented on the island of Java in Indonesia, all the rat kings were from the same species—the black rat, or Rattus rattus. Most were identified in Germany, France, Poland, the Netherlands, and Belgium, and findings often seemed to coincide with spates of cold weather. (Carolina the giant rat retires as a hero after saving many lives.) Therefore, Miljutin concluded that rat kings are most likely to occur in areas where both cold winters and black rats are found. As for how the tails of the rats became entangled, it seems true rat kings are not a result of knotting, but rather the product of some other sticky material. In one case Miljutin investigated in South Estonia in 2021, he says, 'the knot of tails looked like a large ball due to the incorporation of a mixture of clay soil, poultry manure, straw, and feathers.' Interestingly, those rats were still alive by the time Miljutin got to them. This makes him one of the very few people known to have seen a living rat king phenomenon in person. The local news channel even captured video of the 13 tangled-up black rats—all young rats of both sexes. How rat kings could happen As an urban rodentologist of more than 30 years—who has even been described as 'the rat king of New York' himself—Bobby Corrigan has come across this legend more than once. 'I have been asked in the press multiple times about rat kings, and I always reply I have not personally witnessed it in my long career,' says Corrigan, who spent 16 years teaching at Purdue University and is now a consultant for RmC Pest Management Consulting. But after reviewing Miljutin's evidence, Corrigan says he's convinced. 'For sure, it is real, but it is rare,' he says, 'or at least rare to us humans. Maybe not to the long-tailed rats of the world.' (Is it time to finally ban glue traps in the U.S.?) There are also several aspects of rodent behavior and anatomy Corrigan has seen firsthand that align with what would be necessary to create a rat king. 'Rats have a behavior where they all get together in very tiny spaces in walls and ground burrows. It's called hugger-muggering,' says Corrigan. 'They all get really close together to exchange body heat, because they don't hibernate.' Similarly, Corrigan says rat tails are composed of cartilage, which makes them very flexible, and many rat species use their tails to curl around branches to provide some extra grip. However, rat tails cannot be tied into a knot, he says. Finally, while he finds it unlikely any trapped rodents would obey a master and function as one, rats do establish hierarchies, similar to primates or canines. 'Often there will be a dominant male that mates with all the females and keeps a territory,' says Corrigan. 'So, is there a dominant rat in the area where there is a social structure, and could you call that rat 'king'? Yes.' While rats and rat kings might seem frightening—especially as they're portrayed in pop culture—Corrigan says he takes a different point of view. 'We probably owe 20, maybe 30, additional years to our own [life expectancy] to rats,' he says. 'We've tested every single cancer drug in the world on them, every pharmaceutical, and we continue to do so.' 'These animals are a tremendous benefit to humankind,' says Corrigan.

Some Mathematicians Don't Believe in Infinity
Some Mathematicians Don't Believe in Infinity

Scientific American

time3 days ago

  • Scientific American

Some Mathematicians Don't Believe in Infinity

One question has preoccupied humankind for thousands of years: Do infinities exist? More than 2,300 years ago Aristotle distinguished between two types of infinity: potential and actual. The former deals with abstract scenarios that would result from repeated processes. For example, if you were asked to imagine counting forever, adding 1 to the previous number, over and over again, this situation, in Aristotle's view, would involve potential infinity. But actual infinities, the scholar argued, could not exist. Most mathematicians gave infinities a wide berth until the end of the 19th century. They were unsure of how to deal with these strange quantities. What results in infinity plus 1—or infinity times infinity? Then the German mathematician Georg Cantor put an end to these doubts. With set theory, he established the first mathematical theory that made it possible to deal with the immeasurable. Since then infinities have been an integral part of mathematics. At school, we learn about the sets of natural or real numbers, each of which is infinitely large, and we encounter irrational numbers, such as pi and the square root of 2, which have an infinite number of decimal places. Yet there are some people, so-called finitists, who reject infinity to this day. Because everything in our universe—including the resources to calculate things—seems to be limited, it makes no sense to them to calculate with infinities. And indeed, some experts have proposed an alternative branch of mathematics that relies only on finitely constructible quantities. Some are now even trying to apply these ideas to physics in the hope of finding better theories to describe our world. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Set Theory and Infinities Modern mathematics is based on set theory, which, as the name suggests, revolves around groupings or sets. You can think of a set as a bag into which you can put all kinds of things: numbers, functions or other entities. By comparing the contents of different bags, their size can be determined. So if I want to know whether one bag is fuller than another, I take out objects one at a time from each bag at the same time and see which empties first. That concept doesn't sound particularly surprising. Even small children can grasp the basic principle. But Cantor realized that infinitely large quantities can be compared in this way. Using set theory, he came to the conclusion that there are infinities of different sizes. Infinity is not always the same as infinity; some infinities are larger than others. Mathematicians Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel used set theory to give mathematics a foundation at the beginning of the 20th century. Before then subfields such as geometry, analysis, algebra and stochastics were largely in isolation from each other. Fraenkel and Zermelo formulated nine basic rules, known as axioms, on which the entire subject of mathematics is now based. One such axiom, for example, is the existence of the empty set: mathematicians assume that there is a set that contains nothing; an empty bag. Nobody questions this idea. But another axiom ensures that infinitely large sets also exist, which is where finitists draw a line. They want to build a mathematics that gets by without this axiom, a finite mathematics. The Dream of Finite Mathematics Finitists reject infinities not only because of the finite resources available to us in the real world. They are also bothered by counterintuitive results that can be derived from set theory. For example, according to the Banach-Tarski paradox, you can disassemble a sphere and then reassemble it into two spheres, each of which is as large as the original. From a mathematical point of view, it is no problem to double a sphere—but in reality, it is not possible. If the nine axioms allow such results, finitists argue, then something is wrong with the axioms. Because most of the axioms are seemingly intuitive and obvious, the finitists only reject the one that, in their view, contradicts common sense: the axiom on infinite sets. Their view can be expressed as follows: 'a mathematical object only exists if it can be constructed from the natural numbers with a finite number of steps.' Irrational numbers, despite being reached with clear formulas, such as the square root of 2, consist of infinite sums and therefore cannot be part of finite mathematics. As a result, some logical principles no longer apply, including Aristotle's theorem of the excluded middle, according to which a mathematical statement is always either true or false. In finitism, a statement can be indeterminate at a certain point in time if the value of a number has not yet been determined. For example, with statements that revolve around numbers such as 0.999..., if you carry out the full period and consider an infinite number of 9's, the answer becomes 1. But if there is no infinity, this statement is simply wrong. A Finitistic World? Without the theorem of the excluded middle, all kinds of difficulties arise. In fact, many mathematical proofs are based on this very principle. It is no surprise, then, that only a few mathematicians have dedicated themselves to finitism. Rejecting infinities makes mathematics more complicated. And yet there are physicists who follow this philosophy, including Nicolas Gisin of the University of Geneva. He hopes that a finite world of numbers could describe our universe better than current modern mathematics. He bases his considerations on the idea that space and time can only contain a limited amount of information. Accordingly, it makes no sense to calculate with infinitely long or infinitely large numbers because there is no room for them in the universe. This effort has not yet progressed far. Nevertheless, I find it exciting. After all, physics seems to be stuck: the most fundamental questions about our universe, such as how it came into being or how the fundamental forces connect, have yet to be answered. Finding a different mathematical starting point could be worth a try. Moreover, it is fascinating to explore how far you can get in mathematics if you change or omit some basic assumptions. Who knows what surprises lurk in the finite realm of mathematics? In the end, it boils down to a question of faith: Do you believe in infinities or not? Everyone has to answer that for themselves.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store