US won't send some weapons pledged to Ukraine following a Pentagon review of military aid
Certain munitions were previously promised to Ukraine under the Biden administration to aid its defenses during the more than three-year-old war. The pause reflects a new set of priorities under President Donald Trump and came after Defense Department officials scrutinized current U.S. stockpiles and raised concerns.
'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran.'
That was a reference to Trump recently ordering U.S. .
Pentagon stocks of some weapons found to be low, official says
The Pentagon review determined that stocks were too low on some weapons previously pledged, so pending shipments of some items won't be sent, according to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity to provide information that has not yet been made public.
The Defense Department did not provide details on what specific weapons were being held back.
'America's military has never been more ready and more capable,' spokesman Sean Parnell said, adding that the major tax cut and spending package moving through Congress 'ensures that our weapons and defense systems are modernized to protect against 21st century threats for generations to come.'
The halt of some weapons from the U.S. is a blow to Ukraine as Russia has recently launched some of its biggest aerial attacks of the war, in an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in peace efforts championed by Trump. Talks between the sides have ground to a halt.
The U.S. stoppage was first reported by Politico.
To date, the U.S. has provided Ukraine more than $66 billion worth of weapons and military assistance since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022.
Over the course of the war, the U.S. has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.
Elbridge Colby, the Defense Department undersecretary for policy, said officials continue 'to provide the president with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end.'
'At the same time, the department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving U.S. forces' readiness for Administration defense priorities,' Colby said in a statement.
Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit last week and had left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more U.S.-made Patriot air defense missile systems, acknowledging they would help the Ukrainian cause.
'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said then. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.'
Trump administration shifts outlook on Ukraine military aid
Those comments hinted at thinking about providing weapons to Ukraine that's begun to change across the administration in recent months.
In testimony before lawmakers in June, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he has moved quickly to quash wasteful programs and redirect funding to Trump's top objectives.
Hegseth said a negotiated peace between Russia and Ukraine, which has been promoted for months by Trump, makes America look strong, even though Moscow is the aggressor in the conflict. He also said the defense budget includes hard choices and 'reflects the reality that Europe needs to step up more for the defense of its own continent. And President Trump deserves the credit for that.'
The defense secretary told lawmakers last month that some U.S. security spending for Ukraine was still in the pipeline, without providing details. But he said such assistance — which has been robust for the past two years — would be reduced.
'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict,' Hegseth said. 'We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests.'
The change comes after Hegseth skipped a meeting last month of an international group to coordinate military aid to Ukraine that the U.S. created three years ago. Hegseth's predecessor, Lloyd Austin, formed the group after Russia attacked Ukraine, and Hegseth's absence was the first time the U.S. defense secretary wasn't in attendance.
Under Austin's leadership, the U.S. served as chair of the group, and he and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff attended monthly meetings, which were both in person and by video.
abandoning the gathering altogether.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meta Adds Startup Founder Gross to New AI Superintelligence Lab
Daniel Gross, the former chief executive officer and co-founder of artificial intelligence startup Safe Superintelligence Inc., is joining Meta Platforms Inc.'s new superintelligence lab focused on AI. Gross will work on AI products for the superintelligence group, according to his spokesperson, Lulu Meservey. Meta just restructured its AI unit and has gone on a major hiring spree to recruit industry experts to develop AI technology that will match or exceed human-level competency, known as superintelligence.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DNC chair says 'bulls---' on air as Dem frustrations over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' mount
The chairman of the Democratic National Committee let an expletive slip on air when describing President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" on Thursday. Ken Martin, who was elected DNC chair earlier this year, called Trump's bill "bulls---" during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Network censors didn't catch the word as he said it, so it came out clearly during the broadcast. "Don't make no mistake about it. The Democratic Party, we're here to fight. We're here to win, and we're here to make sure that we actually give the American people a sense that their better days are ahead of them, and that this bulls--- bill that they see right now in Congress, that's not going to happen if you put Democrats back in power." It didn't appear to be an accident, as Martin had already described the bill that way on social media. Schumer Forces Name Change For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Moments Before It Passes Martin made the statements ahead of the final congressional vote on Trump's $3.3 trillion government spending package. At the time, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., had launched into what would be a multi-hour speech on the House floor to delay the vote. Read On The Fox News App Final passage of the bill came on Thursday afternoon after Jeffries yielded the floor. During his TV appearance, Martin savaged Trump's bill and the Republican lawmakers who supported it, calling their actions a "betrayal." "This is one of the biggest betrayals we've seen in recent history, and we're going to remind voters next year – trust me – this is not going to go well for Republicans. And someone said this earlier, they are handing us a gift on a silver platter," he said, noting the potential political capital the Democratic Party could get with the bill's passage. Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda He continued, arguing that the bill will ultimately "be disastrous for the American people, who are – their lives are going to be shattered and communities are going to be afflicted with a lot of pain over the coming years because of this bill." As he went on, Martin mentioned how his party was galvanized in opposition to the bill and will succeed in the midterm elections against the GOP and Trump administration, which he described as an "authoritarian regime" which has "an unimpeded path to do whatever the hell they want to inflict more pain and damage in this country." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture NBC News correspondent Ali Vitali appeared skeptical of Martin's confidence in the upcoming elections, noting how Democratic figures thought Trump was a "gift" to the party in 2016 until former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's presidential loss. Click To Get The Fox News AppOriginal article source: DNC chair says 'bulls---' on air as Dem frustrations over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' mount


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court enables Trump to resume South Sudan deportation flight
The Supreme Court in an apparent 7-2 decision Thursday ruled the Trump administration can restart plans to deport a group of convicted criminals to the war-torn country of South Sudan who have no ties there. Last month, the high court lifted U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's injunction that limited the administration from deporting migrants to third countries without giving them sufficient opportunity to raise torture claims. Murphy continued to insist that his subsequent ruling, which found the May South Sudan flight violated the injunction, was still in 'full force.' The administration contended it amounted to open defiance of the justices and asked them to again rebuke the judge. 'The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable,' the Supreme Court's unsigned ruling reads, confirming all of Murphy's rulings are void. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented. They rejected the notion that Murphy was at fault, instead pinning the blame on the administration and their colleagues. 'The Court's continued refusal to justify its extraordinary decisions in this case, even as it faults lower courts for failing properly to divine their import, is indefensible,' Sotomayor wrote. She added that the ruling 'clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.' Justice Elena Kagan, the court's third Democratic-appointed justice, said she agreed with the administration this time despite continuing to believe they should've lost before. 'But a majority of this Court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,' Kagan wrote. Federal authorities have kept custody over the group of eight migrants, who have serious criminal records, on a military base in Djibouti ever since Murphy intervened in May. Though the litigation will continue in the lower courts, Thursday's ruling means that no court injunction is currently blocking the administration from again trying to move the migrants to South Sudan.