Why all eyes are on the Strait of Hormuz, a 90-mile strip critical to global oil prices
Tensions in the Middle East escalated sharply after the US struck Iran's nuclear facilities on Sunday, prompting fears of retaliation from Tehran. Beyond concerns about defense and security, markets are concerned about the fallout for oil prices and the global economy should Iran block shipping in the Strait of Hormuz — a threat Tehran has repeated for years.
"If Iran chooses to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, it'd be categorically negative," Kyle Rodda, a senior financial markets analyst at Capital.com, told Business Insider.
"In the worst-case scenario, it would be incredibly impactful: higher fuel prices, higher inflation, slower growth, and interest rates higher than where they'd otherwise be," Rodda said.
What is the Strait of Hormuz?
One of the most geopolitically sensitive maritime routes, the Strait of Hormuz is just 21 miles across at its narrowest point. It connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, with Iran to its north and the United Arab Emirates and Oman to its south.
According to the US's Energy Information Administration, the Hormuz is one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, carrying about 20 million barrels of oil a day.
Most energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz have no other means of exiting the Persian Gulf, the starting sea point for major oil producers like Saudi Arabia to export their energy to the rest of the world.
How much shipping goes through the Strait of Hormuz?
About a quarter of seaborne oil and a fifth of global liquified natural gas trade moves through the Hormuz, so any disruption to shipping would hit the energy markets hard.
"The bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the US over the weekend increased supply risks significantly for the oil and LNG market," wrote Warren Patterson, the head of commodities strategy at ING, on Monday.
Can Iran really close the Strait?
Iran doesn't have the legal authority to shut down marine traffic in the Hormuz. But it could disrupt the movement of vessels by other means, for example by damaging oil and shipping infrastructure.
On Sunday, the Iranian parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation against the US's action. The final decision still lies with the country's top security officials, according to Iran's state-owned Press TV.
Analysts said they think an Iranian blockade is probably more about political posturing than real action.
"While the headlines sound dramatic, the reality is that Iran's parliament holds no executive power over military or strategic decisions, particularly not ones with such far-reaching geopolitical and economic consequences," Dilin Wu, a research strategist at Pepperstone, told BI.
"Iran is well aware that any direct disruption to global oil flows through the Strait would likely trigger a significant military and economic response, possibly escalating the conflict beyond its control," she added.
Would the US be affected by a blockade?
The US is an energy giant and has become a net energy exporter since 2019, so it's less prone to physical supply shock from a blockade of the Hormuz.
However, the US could still be hit by the fallout from worsening global economic conditions.
"Any negative impact would be through deteriorating financial conditions or through higher for longer rates as the Fed has another reason to delay cuts," Deutsche Bank analysts said in a Monday note.
What about other countries?
Asian countries would be the most affected by a blockade of the Hormuz, said Priyanka Sachdeva, a senior analyst at brokerage Phillip Nova.
In 2024, over 80% of crude oil, condensates, and LNG that moved through the Hormuz headed to Asia, according to the EIA.
"Asia, which consumes the lion's share of Middle Eastern oil, would be most vulnerable, with India, Japan, South Korea, and China facing logistical uncertainties and costlier re-routing," said Sachdeva.
South European countries dependent on Gulf oil could also face higher import costs, although Saudi Arabia and the UAE can reroute significant volumes of such exports via pipelines and via a pipeline and the UAE port of Fujairah.
What would a closure mean for gas prices and inflation?
Energy is a key input cost, so any gains in oil prices are likely to drive up inflation broadly.
The US's strike on Iran sent oil futures up to a five-month high late on Sunday. Oil prices are now up about 10% since Israel's strikes on Iran in June.
These developments are taking place amid the summer driving season, when US gas demand peaks. Should the gains in oil prices be sustained, pump prices are likely to rise in the weeks ahead.
According to the EIA, the price of gas typically rises by 2.4 cents per gallon when crude oil prices rise by $1. This translates into a gain of about 20 cents per gallon at current levels for oil futures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the latest inflation data gives investors a reason to smile
This post originally appeared in the Business Insider Today newsletter. You can sign up for Business Insider's daily newsletter here. Good morning. Ever considered investing in real estate? You might already have a big piece of what you need. "House hacking" is a new strategy homeowners are using to kick-start their rental portfolios. In today's big story, the latest inflation data gave investors a reason to feel upbeat about what's coming next. What's on deck: Markets: Why day traders' summer dominance could be hit with a September chill. Tech: Microsoft is dangling multimillion-dollar offers to poach Meta's AI talent. Business: Taylor Swift used to separate business from her love life. Not anymore. But first, the rally big story A best-case scenario Not too hot, not too cold — this was just right. The latest inflation report struck a good balance, delivering a best-case scenario for the stock market. The S&P 500 closed at a record high on Tuesday, while the Nasdaq rose over 1% and the Dow spiked nearly 500 points. US stock futures are continuing the climb this morning. The consumer price index rose 2.7% year-over-year in July, below economists' expectations of 2.8%. The figures may seem marginal, but for markets, this was the sweet spot. That's largely because it was likely low enough to allow the Federal Reserve to cut rates at its September meeting, BI's William Edwards writes. At the same time, the inflation reading was high enough to ease recession fears that had flared after the disappointing July jobs report, which included significant downward revisions to previous data. (The report rattled more than just economists — Trump promptly fired Bureau of Labor Statistics director Erika McEntarfer after the data was released.) Meanwhile, the latest inflation report opens up more positive possibilities. The CME FedWatch Tool now shows markets seeing 92% odds the Fed cuts rates by 25 basis points next month, up from about 80% on Monday. Higher odds are also now being priced in for cuts in October and December. For Trump, rate cuts can't come soon enough. "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell must NOW lower the rate. Steve 'Manouychin' really gave me a 'beauty' when he pushed this loser. The damage he has done by always being Too Late is incalculable." Writing in a Truth Social post early Tuesday, Trump said that he is also "considering allowing a major lawsuit against Powell to proceed" over the "grossly incompetent" job he's done renovating the Federal Reserve. This is the latest twist in Trump's feud with the Fed Chair, which seems to remain in an uncomfortable phase. The markets, at least, may be entering a brighter one. 3 things in markets 1. America's biggest bank is about to open its new headquarters. JPMorgan Chase's new 60-story skyscraper at 270 Park Avenue is full of high-end perks and amenities. The building includes a "state-of-the-art" gym — which the bank said employees will have to pay a membership fee to access — an Irish pub, AI tech systems, and more. Take a look. 2. A September showdown may be looming. Day traders outperformed professional money managers this summer, but their dominance might not last long. A historically seasonal pullback in retail trading and other headwinds threaten to upend the summer-long rally. 3. Trump's pick for Bureau of Labor Statistics chief suggested pausing US jobs reports. E.J. Antoni, Trump's nominee and chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, floated the idea on Fox News Digital earlier this month, citing accuracy concerns. Economists and market strategists told BI that such a move would be damaging for investors and economic planners. 3 things in tech 1. Microsoft has Meta AI talent in its sights. The software giant has a list of its most-wanted researchers and engineers from Meta and has already begun offering multimillion-dollar pay packages, documents viewed by BI's Ashley Stewart reveal. It's a step to compete with the eye-popping comp Microsoft's rivals are offering in the AI talent wars. 2. AI coding startups have an inference whale problem. Anthropic and Cursor are facing surging costs from a handful of heavy users, which is eating into their business models. As a result, they're introducing tiers or rate limits to what was formerly a basic fixed-price monthly subscription plan. 3. Baconator with a side of AI? Michael Chorey, the executive responsible for building out the AI automation for Wendy's drive-thru, which he says can take orders faster than a human in a headset, is leaving after five years. Chorey exclusively told BI that he is joining Presto, a tech company developing AI-first drive-thrus, which he believes is the next era of fast-food hospitality. 3 things in business 1. To solve the housing crisis, think outside the bounds. Outside the city bounds, that is. Ned Resnikoff argues that connecting cities, towns, and suburbs into large regional governances would make it easier and cheaper to buy a home in the US. Taxes from exclusive enclaves, like Greenwich, Connecticut, or Sausalito, California, would help support nearby cities. 2. Taylor Swift is in her boyfriend era. The pop star hard-launched the title of her newest album, "The Life of a Showgirl," in a teaser clip of her boyfriend Travis Kelce's podcast. It signals a shift in her marketing strategy, where she's putting her S.O. and her relationship front and center. 3. You've heard of quiet quitting, now get ready for quiet cracking. The latest threat to worker engagement is quiet cracking, in which people show up to work and do their jobs but still feel dissatisfied. Some of the warning signs can look like less extreme symptoms of burnout, EY's chief well-being officer told BI. In other news The DIY cage armor in Ukraine keeps getting weirder, wilder — and more 'Mad Max.' Spirit Airlines warns it may not survive another year after huge losses. A former Miss USA and Miss Teen USA thought the Miss Universe CEO's 'blond hair and blue eyes' comment was 'very destructive.' Elon Musk said Apple made it 'impossible' for non-ChatGPT AI apps to top the App Store. DeepSeek would like a word. Senate Democrats say a new crypto bill raises the risk of 'financial meltdown.' What's happening today Harvey Weinstein is sentenced in Manhattan after a jury convicted him on one count of sexual assault in a retrial. Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Grace Lett, editor, in New York. Meghan Morris, bureau chief, in Singapore. Akin Oyedele, deputy editor, in New York. Amanda Yen, associate editor, in New York. Lisa Ryan, executive editor, in New York. Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York (on parental leave). Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
A new OpenAI researcher shares the one regret he has from his job interviews
Bas van Opeheusden recently started his job at OpenAI as a technical staff member. He shared 8 pages worth of tips on how to nail the AI job interview. He also shared one regret he has from talking with the recruiter. A researcher who just started at OpenAI is opening up about how he landed the job in such a competitive market — and the one big mistake he made in interviews. Bas van Opheusden joined OpenAI as a technical staff member in July. In an X post on Tuesday, he shared eight pages worth of tips for nailing the AI job interview. The document covers everything from general interview advice to coding tips, and what to expect when negotiating comp. "Some recruiters will play dirty," van Opheusden wrote. "I have had companies give extremely short deadlines, retract offers, ghost me entirely, or 'accidentally' fail to make an offer until after another deadline had expired." He also shared a mistake he made during the introductory call with recruiters. The introduction call is customary for many companies early in the hiring process. Van Opheusden said this is often the time for recruiters to explain basic information like who the hiring manager is, what team you'll be on, and, "for startups, what the company's mission and strategy is." He also wrote that recruiters may ask about compensation expectations. Van Opheusden's advice? "During this call, take notes!" he wrote in bold. It might be the only time someone explains the company's organization chart and team structure, he said. "I've had coding interviews 2-3 weeks later where someone would ask what role I was applying to and I didn't know," he wrote. For note-taking, Van Opheusden prefers having dual monitors so that he can take notes while on the call. "I have a dual-screen setup where I can take notes during a call, and I will move the video call window on my screen so that it looks like I'm making eye contact," he wrote. Van Opheusden didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Even CEOs get a do-over now and then. Just ask OpenAI's Sam Altman.
All hail the new ChatGPT, which is much better than the old ChatGPT, which we're getting rid of. That was the messaging from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and his team last week. A day later, Altman changed his mind. He told the world the older version of ChatGPT was going to stick around, after all — in addition to the new version that was meant to replace it. I'm not getting into the weeds here about the change and change back, which is confusing for people who use ChatGPT, and impenetrable to non-users. (If you want to, I suggest you head to Business Insider's coverage, or this post from analyst Ben Thompson, for details.) I'm most interested in Altman's incredibly quick pivot. Because I'm having a hard time thinking of a CEO hyping a new product launch, and almost immediately changing course afterward, supposedly because his customers didn't like it. Can you think of one? The most obvious one I can recall is New Coke, which you have to be pretty old to have tried. It only lasted for a few months in 1985, because lots of Old Coke drinkers hated it, and it's now synonymous with Corporate Mega Flops. But it still lasted for a few months — not a single day. And this is different than product flops like the Samsung Galaxy Note 7, which was pulled off the market after a couple of months because some of them exploded. And to be clear — Altman isn't recalling his newest, very high-profile AI engine. It still exists; he's just reversing his call to get rid of the older one. (Business Insider owner Axel Springer has a commercial agreement with OpenAI. And our CEO thinks we should all use AI in our day-to-day work.) It's possible that there are other, yet-to-surface explanations for Altman's change of heart. But so far, the only one he's offered is that he heard from people on Reddit and presumably other places who were upset to lose the versions of the service they already had. If you are an Altman fan, you can paint the episode as a story that shows you how nimble and responsive a Big Tech CEO can be. If you are less generous, you might argue that this was something Altman and his company should have seen coming, and acted accordingly. Either by not budging, and explaining to users that they were wrong, and would learn to love the new tech. Or by not making the move in the first place. Thompson, in his Stratechery newsletter, worries that Altman's quick flip is a sign of a bigger problem — that he's too willing to tell people what they want to hear: The real question for OpenAI is if they are in fact ... just a bit too obsequious and sycophantic. The paradox of successful consumer companies from Apple to Facebook is that they give customers what they want, but they don't ask them; they make decisions and then seek out revealed preference through data, not stated preference on social media. Hopefully OpenAI did that in this case; my concern is that the more realistic explanation is that this is a company that, in the end, can't say "no" to anyone. Maybe! But I think this is probably a pretty small chapter in the OpenAI story — a visible, but ultimately not-that-consequential misstep. Maybe OpenAI really did misjudge its customers. But it was pretty easy to make those customers happy, simply by … not taking something away from them. It also helps that this was a do-over Altman and crew could do with a couple key strokes. There were no devices (yet) to recall, no refunds to issue. In that sense, this reminds me of something closer to a branding or marketing snafu, like a new Gap logo that lasted for 10 days in 2010, or that Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad from 2017 that disappeared after people called it stupid and tone-deaf. Embarrassing screw-ups, but not the first thing you think about when you think about those companies. I myself had forgotten those stories until ChatGPT reminded me of them, when I asked for comparable flip-flops. (I don't use ChatGPT to write my stories, but I definitely find myself using it as a superior version of Google more and more these days.) And yes, if we see more waffling from Altman in the months and years to come, we'll be able to point back to this botched rollout as the start of a pattern. But for now, this one seems like an odd and interesting footnote, and not much else.