
Pollies told to listen as podcasters muscle mass media
The influence of influencers is being combed over after an election fought as much online as in person, with politicians looking for fresh ways to reach younger voters.
Content creators were able to reach a large audience that wasn't typically engaged with traditional media, Cheek Media CEO and host of the Big Small Talk podcast Hannah Ferguson said.
Labor had utilised podcasters and influencers to reach young people, including women who are the largest growing audience, Ms Ferguson told AAP.
"The Liberal Party's refusal to engage eliminated them, largely, from speaking to women," she said.
Criticisms from Liberals about the campaign included not having a coherent communication strategy and failing to sell their message early enough, with few major policies in the field before the election was called.
Labor spent consistently on advertising throughout the campaign while the coalition saved its large spend for the final weeks, according to video tracking company Adgile.
Labor spent more than $3 million on Facebook election ads while the Liberals spent $1.4 million, according to Meta's ad library.
Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, known for its blanket advertising campaigns, spent about $1.5 million in comparison.
TV ads still made up the bulk of the federal election video spend with more than $54 million spent - $24.1 million by Trumpet of Patriots, $24 million by Labor and $21 million for the coalition, according to Adgile.
The scale of Labor's social media spend was surprising, political communication expert Andrew Hughes said.
Labor was more effective in its digital media strategy while the coalition was severely lacking, Dr Hughes said.
"I was surprised the coalition didn't utilise it more," he said.
There was also a significant surge in spending on YouTube where minor parties focused their ad spend as commercial TV can fail to reach the same volume of viewers or target the right demographics.
The Liberals needed to spread their focus and "engage where voters are", Liberal senator Maria Kovacic said.
"It's unrealistic to expect they'll come to where we are," she told AAP.
Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has been an early adopter of using podcasters and content creators to sell the government's message, especially in her women's portfolio.
Influencers were invited to the federal budget lockup at Parliament House for the first time in 2025.
This helped the government get its message out to people who otherwise wouldn't have paid attention, Senator Gallagher told AAP.
"I think we'll never go back to the way it was before," she said.
"It's really clear that new media are going to feature in politics ... and they have a legitimate place at the table."
The influence of influencers is being combed over after an election fought as much online as in person, with politicians looking for fresh ways to reach younger voters.
Content creators were able to reach a large audience that wasn't typically engaged with traditional media, Cheek Media CEO and host of the Big Small Talk podcast Hannah Ferguson said.
Labor had utilised podcasters and influencers to reach young people, including women who are the largest growing audience, Ms Ferguson told AAP.
"The Liberal Party's refusal to engage eliminated them, largely, from speaking to women," she said.
Criticisms from Liberals about the campaign included not having a coherent communication strategy and failing to sell their message early enough, with few major policies in the field before the election was called.
Labor spent consistently on advertising throughout the campaign while the coalition saved its large spend for the final weeks, according to video tracking company Adgile.
Labor spent more than $3 million on Facebook election ads while the Liberals spent $1.4 million, according to Meta's ad library.
Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, known for its blanket advertising campaigns, spent about $1.5 million in comparison.
TV ads still made up the bulk of the federal election video spend with more than $54 million spent - $24.1 million by Trumpet of Patriots, $24 million by Labor and $21 million for the coalition, according to Adgile.
The scale of Labor's social media spend was surprising, political communication expert Andrew Hughes said.
Labor was more effective in its digital media strategy while the coalition was severely lacking, Dr Hughes said.
"I was surprised the coalition didn't utilise it more," he said.
There was also a significant surge in spending on YouTube where minor parties focused their ad spend as commercial TV can fail to reach the same volume of viewers or target the right demographics.
The Liberals needed to spread their focus and "engage where voters are", Liberal senator Maria Kovacic said.
"It's unrealistic to expect they'll come to where we are," she told AAP.
Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has been an early adopter of using podcasters and content creators to sell the government's message, especially in her women's portfolio.
Influencers were invited to the federal budget lockup at Parliament House for the first time in 2025.
This helped the government get its message out to people who otherwise wouldn't have paid attention, Senator Gallagher told AAP.
"I think we'll never go back to the way it was before," she said.
"It's really clear that new media are going to feature in politics ... and they have a legitimate place at the table."
The influence of influencers is being combed over after an election fought as much online as in person, with politicians looking for fresh ways to reach younger voters.
Content creators were able to reach a large audience that wasn't typically engaged with traditional media, Cheek Media CEO and host of the Big Small Talk podcast Hannah Ferguson said.
Labor had utilised podcasters and influencers to reach young people, including women who are the largest growing audience, Ms Ferguson told AAP.
"The Liberal Party's refusal to engage eliminated them, largely, from speaking to women," she said.
Criticisms from Liberals about the campaign included not having a coherent communication strategy and failing to sell their message early enough, with few major policies in the field before the election was called.
Labor spent consistently on advertising throughout the campaign while the coalition saved its large spend for the final weeks, according to video tracking company Adgile.
Labor spent more than $3 million on Facebook election ads while the Liberals spent $1.4 million, according to Meta's ad library.
Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, known for its blanket advertising campaigns, spent about $1.5 million in comparison.
TV ads still made up the bulk of the federal election video spend with more than $54 million spent - $24.1 million by Trumpet of Patriots, $24 million by Labor and $21 million for the coalition, according to Adgile.
The scale of Labor's social media spend was surprising, political communication expert Andrew Hughes said.
Labor was more effective in its digital media strategy while the coalition was severely lacking, Dr Hughes said.
"I was surprised the coalition didn't utilise it more," he said.
There was also a significant surge in spending on YouTube where minor parties focused their ad spend as commercial TV can fail to reach the same volume of viewers or target the right demographics.
The Liberals needed to spread their focus and "engage where voters are", Liberal senator Maria Kovacic said.
"It's unrealistic to expect they'll come to where we are," she told AAP.
Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has been an early adopter of using podcasters and content creators to sell the government's message, especially in her women's portfolio.
Influencers were invited to the federal budget lockup at Parliament House for the first time in 2025.
This helped the government get its message out to people who otherwise wouldn't have paid attention, Senator Gallagher told AAP.
"I think we'll never go back to the way it was before," she said.
"It's really clear that new media are going to feature in politics ... and they have a legitimate place at the table."
The influence of influencers is being combed over after an election fought as much online as in person, with politicians looking for fresh ways to reach younger voters.
Content creators were able to reach a large audience that wasn't typically engaged with traditional media, Cheek Media CEO and host of the Big Small Talk podcast Hannah Ferguson said.
Labor had utilised podcasters and influencers to reach young people, including women who are the largest growing audience, Ms Ferguson told AAP.
"The Liberal Party's refusal to engage eliminated them, largely, from speaking to women," she said.
Criticisms from Liberals about the campaign included not having a coherent communication strategy and failing to sell their message early enough, with few major policies in the field before the election was called.
Labor spent consistently on advertising throughout the campaign while the coalition saved its large spend for the final weeks, according to video tracking company Adgile.
Labor spent more than $3 million on Facebook election ads while the Liberals spent $1.4 million, according to Meta's ad library.
Clive Palmer's Trumpet of Patriots party, known for its blanket advertising campaigns, spent about $1.5 million in comparison.
TV ads still made up the bulk of the federal election video spend with more than $54 million spent - $24.1 million by Trumpet of Patriots, $24 million by Labor and $21 million for the coalition, according to Adgile.
The scale of Labor's social media spend was surprising, political communication expert Andrew Hughes said.
Labor was more effective in its digital media strategy while the coalition was severely lacking, Dr Hughes said.
"I was surprised the coalition didn't utilise it more," he said.
There was also a significant surge in spending on YouTube where minor parties focused their ad spend as commercial TV can fail to reach the same volume of viewers or target the right demographics.
The Liberals needed to spread their focus and "engage where voters are", Liberal senator Maria Kovacic said.
"It's unrealistic to expect they'll come to where we are," she told AAP.
Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has been an early adopter of using podcasters and content creators to sell the government's message, especially in her women's portfolio.
Influencers were invited to the federal budget lockup at Parliament House for the first time in 2025.
This helped the government get its message out to people who otherwise wouldn't have paid attention, Senator Gallagher told AAP.
"I think we'll never go back to the way it was before," she said.
"It's really clear that new media are going to feature in politics ... and they have a legitimate place at the table."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
26 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Greens strike conciliatory tone on super tax changes
The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well."


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Greens strike conciliatory tone on super tax changes
The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well."

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.