Telangana: BJP's NV Subhash demands probe into Sangareddy Chemical factory blast
The incident, which occurred in the Pasamailaram Phase 1 area between 8:15 am and 9:35 am, triggered a massive rescue operation. Officials stated that approximately 150 workers were on shift at the time, with nearly 90 present in the blast-affected area.
Speaking to ANI, NV Subhash urged the government to verify whether the factory had obtained all the necessary licenses and safety clearances.
'Around eight people have lost their lives in this mishap... The BJP extends condolences to the family members of the persons who have lost their lives. We immediately asked our party workers and leaders to go and extend all possible help so that the damage could be controlled,' Subhash said.
'We also demand a thorough inquiry into whether this company had all the mandatory licenses... If any lapse is found, then we request the authorities to take immediate action against the management of the company,' he added.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed sorrow over the loss of lives in the explosion at the Sigachi Pharma chemical factory. The Prime Minister also announced an ex-gratia of Rs 2 lakhs for the next of kin of each deceased and Rs 50,000 for the injured from the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund (PMNRF).
In a post on X, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) wrote, 'Anguished by the loss of lives due to a fire tragedy at a factory in Sangareddy, Telangana. Condolences to those who have lost their loved ones. May the injured recover soon. An ex-gratia of Rs. 2 lakh from PMNRF would be given to the next of kin of each deceased. The injured would be given Rs. 50,000: PM @narendramodi.'
V Satyanaryana, Inspector General, Multi Zone II, said the fire was brought under control with the help of 10 fire engines and specialised rescue teams, including the NDRF and SDF. He further added that six people died on the spot, while two succumbed to injuries during treatment at Chanda Nagar.
'A total of eight deaths, 26 injuries, and 2 or 3 people are in critical condition. Government officials are providing all necessary medical facilities. Firefighting efforts are still ongoing, and the rescue operation continues,' he said.
Former Telangana Minister and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader T Harish Rao, who visited the site, claimed that 50-60 individuals may still be trapped inside the facility.
'So far, eight people have lost their lives, and 26 others have been admitted to the hospital. Approximately 50-60 people are still inside the factory, and we have yet to locate them. The rescue operation is underway,' T Harish Rao told ANI.
He added, 'We have demanded that the government provide Rs 1 crore to the family members of the deceased and Rs 50 lakh to the injured. The injured should be shifted to the Corporate Hospital immediately. Strict actions should be taken immediately. Skilled workers are not working here, and that is why such incidents are taking place...' (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
India is an essential partner, we want fair and reciprocal trade: US State Department's Mingon Houston
US State Department Deputy Spokesperson Mignon Houston on Wednesday (local time) said that India is an "essential partner" for Washington in the Indo-Pacific region , as talks continue for a bilateral trade agreement between the two nations. Speaking to ANI, Houston underlined the United States' aim of establishing a "fair and reciprocal" trade relationship with its partners, in line with the Trump administration's "America First" agenda. "We want trade that is fair and reciprocal. Working closely, India is an essential partner in the Indo-Pacific and the Quad. We expect that all our partners understand why this is so important to the 'America First' agenda, that we look for trade policies that have a fairness, reciprocal, balanced way to ensure that all parties benefit," Houston told ANI. She defended the Trump administration's decision to impose tariffs, saying unfair trade practices had harmed American farmers and industries. "I can say writ large as it relates to the United States' position that these tariffs are a way for countries to meet us at a place of fairness. The United States has an open economy, but there are unfair trade policies that have impacted US farmers and industries," she said. Live Events Talks between India and the US on a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) are underway, with a July 9 deadline fast approaching. The deadline marks the end of a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariff hikes. On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said that a trade deal between India and the United States was likely soon and promised reduced tariffs. "I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs," Trump said. Meanwhile, India has taken a firmer stand on agricultural issues as the negotiations continue. According to government sources, India's negotiating team, led by Chief Negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, has extended its stay in Washington. The trade talks were initially scheduled for Thursday and Friday but were extended as both sides work to finalise an interim agreement before the July 9 deadline. A senior official warned that failure to reach an agreement would result in the return of a 26 per cent tariff structure that had been temporarily suspended for 90 days. These tariffs were first imposed during the Trump administration on April 2. "The failure of these trade discussions would trigger the immediate reimplementation of the 26 per cent tariff structure," the official said.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
South China Sea issue of ‘great concern' for Quad: S Jaishankar
The world's most watched waterway just got a fresh show of solidarity. At the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Washington, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar made it clear: the South China Sea isn't just murky geopolitics — it is a shared concern and a common priority for India, the US, Australia, and Japan.'On South China Sea, there was some discussion as it is an issue of great concern... how to ensure that it stays calm and free of conflict is something which is a common priority,' Jaishankar told reporters following the high-level comments were backed by a sharply worded Quad joint statement, which took direct aim at rising tensions and aggressive manoeuvres in the disputed waters. The ministers strongly opposed 'any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion.' In a rare level of detail, the joint statement cited specific provocations: interference with offshore resource development, obstruction of navigation and overflight, and 'unsafe use of water cannons,' ramming incidents, and harassment by maritime militia.'These actions threaten peace and stability in the region,' the Quad said. 'We are seriously concerned by the militarisation of disputed features.'"We remain seriously concerned about the situation in the East China Sea and South China Sea. We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion. We express our serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions, including interference with offshore resource development, the repeated obstruction of the freedoms of navigation and overflight, and the dangerous manoeuvres by military aircraft and coast guard and maritime militia vessels, especially the unsafe use of water cannons and ramming or blocking actions in the South China Sea," the statement read."These actions threaten peace and stability in the region. We are seriously concerned by the militarisation of disputed features. We emphasise the importance of upholding freedom of navigation and overflight, other lawful uses of the sea, and unimpeded commerce consistent with international law, as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)," it added.- Ends(With inputs from ANI)Tune InMust Watch
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Express View on Karnataka's draft bill on fake news: Don't make it law
Several elements go into making legislation 'bad in law': Vague provisions and definitions that invite misuse; arrogation of power to government authorities without necessary checks and guardrails; difficulties of enforcement or possibilities of selective enforcement and, most importantly, legitimate concerns about infringement on fundamental rights and violation of due process. The Karnataka Mis-Information and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill fulfils these criteria, and more. It constitutes an 'Authority' — headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister and made up mostly of lawmakers and officials selected by the government — that is all but certain to act as a censor. It is a bill of bad faith — it enables an exercise of arbitrary power under the garb of rooting out falsehood. It is an overzealous government addressing a complex issue through the bluntest of instruments. India has approximately 700 million smartphone users, and Karnataka is among the states with the highest internet penetration. Can the proposed Authority mine and analyse the vast amounts of data on social media while ensuring that no citizen's right to free speech is violated? More importantly, even if it could, should it? 'Fake news' is defined by the Bill as false or inaccurate reporting, editing that distorts facts and purely fabricated content. Misinformation is 'knowingly' or 'recklessly' spreading falsehoods, with exceptions for religious sermons, satire, and 'artistic expression'. Evidently, the government of Karnataka, not satisfied with setting itself up as the arbiter of Truth, seeks to define Art as well. It also wishes to prosecute what it deems as going against 'feminism' and 'Sanatan Dharma'. The Bill compounds the sin of loosely worded and vague provisions with harsh punishment: Offenders face fines up to Rs 10 lakh, seven years' imprisonment or both. It flies in the face of the letter and spirit of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shreya Singhal (2013) case and the Bombay High Court verdict on the Centre's IT Rules in 2024, both of which warned against the dangers of ill-defined legal provisions encroaching on free speech. India already has laws on defamation and for protecting 'hurt sentiments', which are often weaponised by governments to curb fundamental freedoms. Karnataka's capital is a hub of innovation, and of a start-up culture that has the potential to propel the state's and the country's economy forward. The government must recognise that innovation and censorship do not go together. Fifty years after the Emergency, the lesson on the dangers of state excess and overreach should have been internalised by Congress governments, including in Karnataka. As Justice Gautam Patel noted in the Bombay HC's 2024 verdict, 'Every attempt to whittle down a fundamental right must be resisted root and branch.' Misinformation and fake news are indeed problems of the present and future. Addressing them requires digital literacy, which involves going to schools to ensure that the next generation is equipped to sift fact from falsehood. Such programmes require finesse, time and the right intent. Not a draconian law — the Bill needs to be binned.
