Data scientist vs biomedical scientist: Which science career suits you best?
Data scientist vs biomedical scientist: Which career is better for you?
Choosing a science career today is more exciting—and more confusing—than ever. With so many options, students around the world often find themselves deciding between two fast-growing paths: data science and biomedical science.
One deals with numbers and algorithms that power everything from Netflix recommendations to climate models. The other works at the frontlines of healthcare and disease research, shaping the future of medicine. Both are deeply impactful, but they lead to very different kinds of work.
So, how do you know which one is right for you? Let's explore what each career really involves, how they compare, and which might be a better fit for your interests and goals.
What do they really do?
Data Scientists are digital detectives. They collect, process, and analyze huge amounts of data to uncover patterns, make predictions, and guide business or scientific decisions. From tech companies to healthcare systems and financial services, their work is shaping how the world functions.
Biomedical Scientists, on the other hand, are the backbone of medical research. They examine cells, tissues, and bodily fluids to diagnose diseases, develop treatments, and contribute to advances in healthcare.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Here's The Average Price of a 6-Hour Gutter Guards Upgrade
Homebuddy.com
Read More
Undo
Whether it's understanding cancer or developing vaccines, their role is essential in saving lives.
Required education and skills
To become a Data Scientist, students typically pursue a degree in computer science, statistics, or mathematics. Advanced roles often demand a master's or PhD, especially in machine learning or AI. Skills in coding (Python, R), databases, and data visualization tools are a must.
Biomedical Scientists usually hold degrees in biology, biochemistry, or biomedical sciences.
A master's or doctorate is common for research roles. Core skills include laboratory techniques, attention to detail, and strong knowledge of human biology and disease.
Work environment and daily life
Data scientists often work in corporate offices, research labs, or remotely. Their workday revolves around datasets, algorithms, and dashboards. It's fast-paced but usually predictable and project-based.
Biomedical scientists usually work in hospitals, diagnostic labs, or research institutions.
Their day might involve handling biological samples, running experiments, and interpreting lab results. The work can be more hands-on and rigid due to safety and accuracy protocols.
Job demand around the world
Both careers are in demand globally, but in different ways.
Data science
is growing rapidly across industries like tech, finance, healthcare, and climate research. Countries such as the US, Germany, India, and Australia are investing heavily in AI and analytics, creating strong job growth.
The field is also highly flexible, with opportunities for remote and cross-sector work.
Biomedical science
is essential to healthcare and medical research. Demand is high in countries with strong public health systems like the UK, Sweden, and Singapore, and it's rising in developing regions as healthcare expands. However, job availability often depends on government or research funding.
Global opportunities and mobility
Data science has a universal language: code.
That means it's easier to find jobs across borders, especially in tech hubs like Silicon Valley, London, Bangalore, or Berlin. Plus, remote work is a real option.
Biomedical science, while vital, may require local certifications or licensing (especially for clinical roles). However, global research collaborations and healthcare demand do open doors for those with advanced degrees and experience.
Which career is better for you?
If you love numbers, logic, and building solutions that can be applied across sectors, data science offers flexibility, high income, and strong growth.
If your passion lies in human health, lab work, and contributing to the fight against diseases, biomedical science brings fulfillment and real-world impact.
Both are deeply scientific, equally valuable, and intellectually rewarding—but the
'better'
career depends on what inspires you more: solving data puzzles or decoding life itself.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why it's perfectly fine to say 'no'—and ways to say it without hurting someone
Saying 'yes' to everything may seem virtuous, but it often signals that we're neglecting our own well‑being. And as it keeps getting piled up, overcommitting leads to stress, burnout, and even bitter resentment. So, here's the unpopular path to pave. To learn to say no. Now, here's the thing. Learning to say 'no' is not just about refusing requests—it's about protecting your time, energy, and emotional health. When you say yes to everything, you're often saying no to what truly matters—your passions, your rest, your values. As documented in Very Well Health , one person-pleaser's week‑long 'just say no' experiment resulted in reduced stress, stronger self‑respect, and clarity on personal priorities, showing that refusing requests becomes easier and healthier over time. When you learn to look through that lens, 'No' is a full sentence; it declares your priorities without apology. Psychologists and life coaches emphasize that 'no' helps protect our mental health and preserves energy for the things we truly care about. In fact, saying 'no' isn't selfish—it's an act of self‑care, a fundamental boundary that enables us to thrive. Psychotherapist Moya Sarner shared with The Guardian that using a simple phrase like 'I'd rather not' helped her mother cultivate a life aligned with her own needs and desires, not social obligation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo Ironically, the fear that saying 'no' will damage relationships is often unfounded—studies show that declining with clarity doesn't harm connections, and may even earn more respect and authenticity. Why saying 'no' is a necessity It shields you from stress and burnout: Constantly consenting to requests we can't accommodate leads to overwhelm and exhaustion. Every time we decline an invitation or task, we free up space to nurture our values, aspirations, and relationships involving presence and quality. Studies affirm that the simple act of saying 'no' can dramatically reduce stress and fortify our well-being. It helps set clear boundaries: Boundaries are essential for nurturing healthy relationships—at work, at home, with friends. They communicate what we can and cannot do without resentment. Each 'no' reinforces your worth, reminding others—and yourself—that your boundaries matter. It strengthens self-worth: Consistently honoring our own needs builds self-esteem and demonstrates to others that we value ourselves—something essential in cultivating healthy relationships. Each refusal reinforces your value. By saying 'no,' you're signalling that your needs deserve attention and that your time matters. It sharpens focus and clarity: 'No' helps you concentrate on your priorities—guiding you toward goals that align with your values rather than diffusing your energy across too many fronts. Saying 'no' fosters clarity about what aligns with our goals and what doesn't—boosting focus, effectiveness, and decision-making abilities. How to say 'no': Politely but effectively It might be our innate conditioning or the fear of not being able to please someone that stops us from saying 'no' to people. But here's the thing: there are certain ways of saying it without sounding rude, or arrogant, or even disrespectful. Take a look. Opt for simplicity You don't owe an explanation. A succinct 'No, thank you' carries confidence and firmness. A simple, 'Thank you for thinking of me, but I can't' is powerful—clear, kind, and unambiguous. Use the sandwich technique Begin with appreciation, insert your refusal, and end warmly: 'Thanks so much for thinking of me. I'm swamped right now and can't commit. Let's catch up soon!' This cushions the 'no' with care. Set gentle boundaries Statements like: 'I'm honoured you asked, but I need to focus on my priorities right now' or 'I can't give this the attention it deserves,' communicate limits respectfully and clearly. Softening words like 'sadly' or 'I'm afraid' show empathy without weakening your decision. Pause before answering 'Let me check my schedule and get back to you.' This prevents knee-jerk yeses and gives you space to reflect. Show empathy Acknowledge the importance of the request: 'I know this matters a lot to you, and I wish I could help. Unfortunately, I'm at full capacity.' This validates feelings while stating your position. Offer an alternative (if you can) For example: 'I can't help this weekend, but I can recommend someone who might.' This shows caring and helpfulness, even when declining. Use 'I' statements Shift the focus to your feelings or capacities: 'I don't have the bandwidth right now' keeps it personal and respectful. Delay your answer If caught off guard, buy time: 'Let me check my schedule and get back to you.' This prevents immediate guilt and gives space to choose wisely. Don't retract your stance Reaffirm politely if pressed: 'I know it's disappointing, but my answer is firm.' This protects your boundary without defensiveness. To sum it up… Saying 'no' isn't about rejection—it's about redirection. It gives your energy a purpose. A thoughtful 'no' lets you protect your boundaries while preserving your relationships. It's a common notion to think that saying 'no' is rude or selfish, or that people will be upset over the rejection. In reality, respecting yourself, your time, energy, and boundaries isn't selfish. It's necessary to prevent resentment and maintain emotional balance. Hope this helps! 8 ways you can 'I love you' over text without actually saying it One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
All adults of one in five households in India are overweight, reveals new study
An alarming new study has found that all adults in two out of 10 households are either overweight or obese. Overweight is defined as a body weight higher than what is considered healthy for a given height, commonly assessed using Body Mass Index (BMI). A person is considered overweight if his or her BMI is between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2. On the other hand, obesity is defined as a BMI of 30.0 kg/m2 or greater. The study was conducted by researchers from ICMR-National Institute for Cancer Prevention and Research (NICPR), TERI School of Advanced Studies and Symbiosis International analysed data from the fifth round of National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21) to assess the prevalence of overweight and obesity in over 6 lakh households. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo The results found that nearly 20 per cent of the households had all adult members classified as overweight while 10 per cent of households had all adults classified as obese. Further, the number went higher up in states like Manipur, Kerala, Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim, where over 30 per cent of households had all adults overweight, according to the study, which was published in Public Health Journal. In Tamil Nadu and Punjab, 4o per cent households had all adults classified as obese. Live Events The proportion of households with all obese members was nearly twice as high in urban areas compared to rural regions. The study mentions that families are 'gaining weight together'. It reveals that if one family member is overweight or obese, others are significantly more likely to be obese/overweight as well. "This clustering pattern underscores the urgent need for family-centred approaches to obesity prevention rather than individual-focused interventions," lead researcher from ICMR-NICPR Prashant Kumar Singh. Director ICMR-NICPR Shalini Singh, said, "The household clustering of obesity and overweight represents a paradigm shift in how we understand obesity. This study tells us the family unit is the epicentre of this health challenge." The study warned that individuals in these family obesity clusters face heightened risk of developing multiple non-communicable diseases. It is already known that obesity serves as a marker for poor cardio-metabolic health and is known to be a gateway to numerous chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and heart failure. It is also linked to 13 types of cancer.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
50 years after Emergency: India confronts its sterilisation past, potential of demographic future
In the 1970s, before the Emergency was officially imposed, children in some rural areas often ran around unclothed -- until fear gripped families so tightly that even toddlers were dressed, not for modesty, but out of fear of forced sterilisation. As India marks the 50th anniversary of the Emergency imposed by then prime minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975, memories of mass sterilisation campaigns -- many carried out under coercion -- continue to haunt survivors and influence public health discourse even today. In 1976 alone, more than eight million sterilisations were conducted across India, most of them vasectomies. Many of these were not voluntary. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn The Most Successful Intraday Strategy in Just 2 Hr. thefutureuniversity Learn More Undo "It was a dark, dark period -- no less than a war. We didn't know what would happen the next day. I remember being so afraid that my family didn't travel outside Delhi until the Emergency ended," 78-year-old Ishrat Jahan, a resident of Okhla, Delhi said. Amina Hasan, now 83 and living in Aligarh, still shudders at the memory. Live Events "We were poor but had dignity. They took that away. In our area, men started hiding in fields and wells when officials came around. We felt hunted," she recalled. The pressure was relentless and indiscriminate. In 'Unsettling Memories', anthropologist Emma Tarlo documents how civil servants, factory workers and police personnel were often coerced into undergoing vasectomy. "The officers said you could keep your job only if you got sterilised. I didn't have time to think," a worker told her. "I agreed because I had to save my job and bring up my family." The stigma attached to male sterilisation was severe that in many communities, it was equated with emasculation. One anti-Emergency slogan scrawled across North India at the time summed up the sentiment: "Nasbandi ke doot, Indira Gandhi ki loot" (Agents of sterilisation, Indira Gandhi's loot). One of the most violent episodes unfolded at Delhi's Turkman Gate, a historic Muslim locality. In April 1976, when residents resisted demolitions linked to urban "beautification" drives and refused to undergo sterilisation, police opened fire. Entire families were displaced, homes were razed, but the area remains an enduring symbol of Emergency excesses. Poonam Muttreja, Executive Director of the Population Foundation of India, said coercive measures during the Emergency "set back reproductive rights for both men and women". "India's population for a long time was viewed through the narrow lens of fear and scarcity. But today, there's growing recognition that our people are our greatest asset," she said. "India's strength lies in its youthful population -- its demographic dividend. But being the most populous country also brings enormous responsibility. It's not just about numbers -- it's about investing in every life through education, health and opportunity," she added. Since the late 1970s, India has shifted from coercive family planning to voluntary participation and awareness. Today, female sterilisation accounts for the majority of procedures, although critics point out that the burden has disproportionately shifted to women. The past, however, still casts a long shadow. Some states have proposed limiting government benefits to families with only two children. "Yes, we are seeing troubling signs on both extremes. On one hand, there are calls for coercive population control -- such as punitive two-child policies or conditional welfare schemes," Muttreja said, adding that on the other end there is growing pronatalist rhetoric driven by fear of long-term population decline, with some suggesting incentives for more births. Both approaches risk instrumentalising women's bodies for demographic goals, she said. As India seeks to harness its population as a source of economic strength, experts stress the need for caution. "The way forward lies in ensuring choice, not control," Muttreja said. "India's fertility rate is already below replacement level. The focus should be on addressing unmet need for contraception, improving healthcare access and empowering women through education and economic opportunity," she added. Population stabilisation will come not from pressure, but from trust, dignity and protecting reproductive rights, she said. As the country remembers the Emergency, it also stands at a demographic crossroads - between past trauma and future potential.
