
Scale of Britain's junk food crisis laid bare
Ultra-processed foods – such as ice cream, processed meats such as ham, mass-produced bread, breakfast cereals, ready meals, biscuits, and fizzy drinks – are being increasingly linked to bad health.
The concept of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been popularised by figures such as Prof Tim Spector, founder of the wellness project Zoe, and Dr Chris van Tulleken, the TV doctor and author.
UPFs have previously been linked to increasing rates of obesity, heart disease and cancer, and now experts believe they may be behind thousands of early deaths each year.
They often contain high levels of saturated fat, salt and sugar, and typically include additives, preservatives and other ingredients not used in home cooking – such as emulsifiers and artificial colours and flavours – which are added by manufacturers.
They have been the result of society's shift toward buying food that can be eaten quickly or on-the-go, like meal deals and ready meals, combined with extending shelf life of products and what experts say are the addictive characteristics of UPFs.
But concerns are growing about the impact these types of food are having on our health.
Stop signs on food packaging
Researchers from Brazil's scientific institution, the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, analysed the impact of UPFs on the rates of premature deaths in eight separate countries.
The study, published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, found UPFs made up 53 per cent of people's food energy consumption in the UK.
This was the second highest behind only the US at 55 per cent.
Using mathematical modelling, the authors found the proportion of premature deaths attributable to UPFs ranged from 4 per cent in Colombia, where consumption is lower and regulations are stricter, up to 14 per cent of premature deaths in the UK and US.
The researchers said that in 2018-19, some 17,781 premature deaths in the UK could have been linked to UPFs, according to their model.
Many countries in South America require UPFs to have black octagonal stop signs on their packaging so consumers are aware, with proposals for them to be used in the UK put forward by former government food tsar and National Food Strategy author Henry Dimbleby.
Eduardo Nilson, lead investigator of the study from the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, said the impact of UPFs on health went 'beyond the individual impact' of high levels of salt, fat and sugar.
He suggested this was 'because of the changes in the foods during industrial processing and the use of artificial ingredients, including colourants, artificial flavours and sweeteners, emulsifiers, and many other additives and processing aids'.
'So assessing deaths from all causes associated with UPF consumption allows an overall estimate of the effect of industrial food processing on health,' he said.
Dr Nilson added that the study found 'each 10 per cent increase in the participation of UPFs in the diet increases the risk of death from all causes by 3 per cent.'
The research team also looked at data from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile and Mexico.
'Health harms of UPFs'
Scientists are not sure whether the link to poor health and early death is just because of the high content of known risk factors – salt, sugar and fat – or whether there is something additional at play when foods are 'ultra-processed'.
Prof Nita Forouhi, professor of population health and nutrition at the University of Cambridge, said the study had limitations but 'nonetheless, evidence on the health harms of UPFs are accumulating and this paper does add to that body of evidence'.
She said while this study was observational and could not prove a link between the two, it was 'the best we are going to get realistically', adding that 'we should not ignore such findings, especially as the current research has reported consistently similar associations in several countries which increases the degree of confidence'.
Stephen Burgess, statistician at the University of Cambridge, said it was possible the actual cause was a 'related risk factor such as better physical fitness', but the replication of the trend across countries and cultures 'raises suspicion that ultra-processed foods may be more than a bystander'.
Nerys Astbury, associate professor from the University of Oxford, disagreed with the study authors' call for UPFs to be added to national dietary guideline recommendations, such as the suggested limits on daily sugar and salt intake.
' Many UPF tend to be high in these nutrients, and studies to date have been unable to determine with certainty whether the effects of UPF are independent of the already established effects of diets high in foods which are energy dense and contain large amounts of fat and sugar,' she said.
'Rushing to add recommendations on UPF to these recommendations is not warranted based on this study in my opinion.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
3 days ago
- The Sun
The bruising on my arm was blamed on ageing but now it bleeds – should I see my GP?
OUR resident specialist and NHS GP, Dr Zoe Williams, shares her expert advice. Today, Dr Zoe helps a reader whose bruising on their arm was blamed on ageing - but now it bleeds. 2 Q: I am a 60-year-old male and for about a year now, I've noticed I am getting bruise-like blemishes on my right arm, but nowhere else. I pointed this out to a nurse who administered my B12 injection. I was diagnosed with B12 deficiency about 18 months ago, after having forgetfulness. I also suffer from COPD. The nurse brushed off the blemishes saying it's a sign of skin ageing. But during the past few months they sometimes bleed. Should I make an appointment to see my GP? A) Thank you for sharing the images, which show a reticular, or net-like, bruising pattern on the lower arm, with some areas of scab formation. The short answer to your question is 'yes' – you should see a doctor, and sharing these images via e-consult would be a great way of preparing for that appointment. There are a number of potential causes that your GP might want to consider investigating. They include vasculitis, a blood clot or autoimmune conditions – for example, lupus. Any abnormal bruising or bleeding should always be checked out. TIP Lyme disease, which can be caught from infected tick bites, peaks in summer. The UK Health Security Agency has warned the public to be vigilant. Protect yourself by sticking to main pathways in green spaces, covering your skin and checking all over your body for ticks after a walk. Only use a tick removal tool to get the bug out if it has bitten and latched on to you. What is Lyme disease and how do ticks spread it?


Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
‘Non-greasy' sweat-resistant SPF 50 that doesn't sting eyes called perfect for runners
Sunscreen is an essential in summer, but stinging eyes can be one unwanted side effect. Luckily one of our favourite sun cream brands has just launched a new SPF that's ideal for exercising One of the most common reasons we hear why people don't enjoy wearing sunscreen in summer is that, if you're sweating or getting wet, it can run into your eye and irritate them. Luckily, we think we've found a solution that's being hailed as perfect for wearing when exercising in summer. One sun care brand has impressed the whole Mirror shopping team this year for its high-quality formulas: Ultra Violette. We all love the brand's Future Fluid SPF 50+ Superlight Mineral SKINSCREEN, but now there's a new formula out that could be set to take this top spot. Ultra Violette's new Vibrant Screen SPF50 Active Facial Skinscreen, £32, is 'a breathable, water-resistant facial SPF' in a super-lightweight, transparent, gel-like texture (so absolutely no white cast). It offers up to two hours of water-resistant sun protection, plus is marked as 'sweat-safe' – and shoppers agree. "I love 90% of UV's sunscreens and this is another addition to the love pile.," one comment on the Sephora website reads. "Lightweight and non-greasy. Perfect for summer and I also run and this feels comfy and doesn't sting my eyes." Over on Space NK, someone wrote: "Normally use Supreme Screen but this is also lovely so I would repurchase. Never had any issue with Ultra Violette like some other SPF that can sting your eyes. Would highly recommend. I tend to stock up when on offer. It's lighter than Supreme Screen but still feels hydrating and works well under make-up as well." Another person put: "I've tried a lot of the Ultra Violette sunscreens and they always give great protection, even if some of them aren't my favourites. I really like this one, it's very light in texture, but doesn't feel full of alcohol (which often irritates my skin). I have combination skin and it's hydrating without being super shiny." They do, however, go on to mention an issue they found with the packaging: "My only issue, and I might have a dodgy bottle, but the watery texture doesn't fit that well with the packaging - it squirts out unreliable and messily. I think a bottle without a pump would have been better." More facial SPFs we've been testing and loving this summer include Lancaster Sun Beauty Sensitive Skin Mineral Face Cream SPF50, currently £21.60 (our head of shopping Zoe's favourite), Bioré UV Aqua Water Essence Sunscreen SPF50, £15.99, which feels so refreshing and is great for guys too, and Garnier Ambre Solaire Over Makeup Super UV Protection Mist SPF50, currently £8.67, but top-up over make-up.


Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Ultra-processed foods scientists say you should ditch after finding link to 32 health conditions
A report published in the BMJ has delved into the health implications of consuming ultra-processed foods (UPF), which are pre-packaged items often laden with a long list of ingredients It's widely recognised that excessive consumption of ultra-processed food (UPF) can lead to severe health consequences. These ready-made products, typically packed with an extensive list of ingredients, have been connected to obesity and countless other health concerns. But a study published in the BMJ has gone one step beyond this. It has linked UPF to a heightened risk of 32 damaging health outcomes including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and depression. The investigation, carried out by an international team from Deakin University in Australia, examined data from nearly ten million people across multiple previously published studies. The results showed that individuals who routinely ate the largest quantities of UPF faced a 21% greater risk of early death and a 50% elevated risk of dying from heart disease. Additionally, UK households who eat chips 'three times a week' have been given an urgent warning. Elevated UPF consumption was additionally associated with a 22% greater risk of depression, and approximately a 50% increased risk of anxiety and disrupted sleep patterns. Alarmingly, it's calculated that 57% of daily energy intake for UK adults comes from UPF, with an even greater proportion of 66% observed in teenagers. "These sweeteners used to be limited to little sachets and diet soft drinks," explained Dr Chris van Tulleken, author of Ultra-Processed People: Why Do We All Eat Stuff That Isn't Food ... and Why Can't We Stop? and associate professor at UCL to the Times. "Now they're in everything: breads, cereals, granola bars, 'lite' yoghurts, no-added-sugar ice cream, flavoured milk." Compared with natural and minimally processed foods, UPFs tend to be less nutritious and often packed with additives, colourings, and preservatives, reports Wales Online. Dr Van Tulleken has even claimed that if a food contains artificial sweeteners, it is, by definition, classified as a UPF. So, what are some of the worst offenders you should steer clear of? Here are 9 to look out for. Sugary breakfast cereals Research conducted at Queen Mary University of London has shown that some breakfast cereals consist of a third of their weight or more from sugar, totalling 8 teaspoons per 100g. Any cereals that are artificially coloured, shaped or flavoured should also fall into the category of ultra-processed. Choose minimally processed and lightly sweetened alternatives like porridge oats. Ready meals It's estimated that 90% of the UK population eats ready meals, with two-fifths doing so once a week. However, these UPF meals are likely high in salt, sugar, fat, and additives. A study from the University of Aberdeen Rowett Institute discovered the levels of sugar in ready meals to be significantly higher than those in equivalent homemade meals. Scientists from Newcastle University and the University of Cambridge have also reported that supermarket ready meals are "high in saturated fat and salt." Where possible, cook from scratch. Store-bought pre-packaged cakes and biscuits Mass-produced cakes and biscuits aren't brimming with wholesome goodness. Rather, they're packed to the rafters with additives, synthetic flavourings, and preservatives. Research from London's Queen Mary University revealed that a staggering 97% of shop-bought cakes and 74% of biscuits would warrant a "red" (high) alert label for sugar levels. This indicates they contain more than 27g of sugar per 100g. Pre-packaged meat products Indulging in processed meats such as classic British sausage rolls, ham slices, and crispy bacon could heighten your chances of developing bowel cancer, Britain's fourth most prevalent type. The manufacturing process frequently includes nitrites that have been connected to producing cancer-causing compounds. UK health authorities recommend limiting daily consumption of processed meat to 70g. Nevertheless, it would be ideal if these items were cut out completely. Vegan meat alternatives Embracing a plant-based lifestyle can bring undeniable health advantages, but many plant-based "meat" options are overly processed and crammed with extra salt and taste boosters. Research by Action on Salt found that 28% of all examined vegan meat substitutes had worrying sodium levels. Plant-based alternatives frequently lack the iron and B vitamins present in real meat. Ultra-processed cheeses Traditional cheese provides vital protein, abundant calcium, and numerous essential vitamins. Nevertheless, heavily processed cheese slices typically contain approximately only about 60% genuine cheese, mixed with emulsifying agents and other ingredients such as vegetable oils, extra salt, food colourings, and sugar. Be certain to check the labels. Artificially flavoured corn chips Whilst some basic, salted snacks can be non-UPF, numerous types of corn tortilla chips bear little resemblance to natural corn. "Some of these corn chips are more highly processed than others, having been cooked in refined oils with artificial flavours and preservatives added," says dietitian Rhiannon Lambert, author of The Science of Nutrition (DK). "A 100g serving can contain nearly 30g of fat, over one third of the maximum daily amount." If it tastes heavily flavoured, it's best avoided. Flavoured yoghurts Yoghurt may sound like a healthy option, but many flavoured varieties are so intensively altered and refined that they no longer resemble the natural product. A survey by the Food Foundation found that 53% of yogurts on sale contain four cubes or more of sugar per pot. The daily allowance for children aged 4-6 is just five cubes. Even some plain yoghurts can veer into UPF territory if they contain thickeners like pectin. Fizzy drinks Nearly a quarter of the sugar in our diets comes from sweet drinks like squashes, cordials and fizzy drinks, says Lambert. And diet versions aren't much better. "As well as the sweetener Acesulfame K, caffeine, flavouring and colouring, it contains phosphoric acid, which rots teeth and leaches the minerals out of our bones," warns Dr Van Tulleken. "Whether or not it's a tiny bit better or worse than full-sugar [cola] is moot - they're both terrible for your body." The message is crystal clear - if we're serious about boosting our health and wellbeing, we must significantly cut down on ultra-processed foods. The best bet is to stick to minimally processed, natural whole foods.