
Washington faces billions in Medicaid cuts under spending bill
The big picture: Nationwide, the legislation will cut Medicaid funding by an estimated $930 billion over 10 years, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis.
Catch up quick: The new law — which Trump has called the "big, beautiful bill" — also increases immigration enforcement funding and extends tax cuts.
Among other changes, the legislation will impose new work requirements for Medicaid recipients.
By the numbers: Ferguson's office estimates at least 250,000 Washingtonians will lose Medicaid coverage under the law's provisions.
Another 150,000 will no longer be able to afford plans on the state insurance exchange, due to the ending of certain federal subsidies, he said.
Hospitals — both urban and rural — will close due to the loss of Medicaid reimbursements, the Democratic governor said.
What they're saying: "It's difficult to overstate how devastating these cuts will be to Washingtonians," Ferguson told reporters Wednesday.
"They will bring our health care system to the brink and harm people in every corner of our state."
State of play: An analysis by KFF, a health policy research group, estimated the legislation will cause Washington to receive about $41 billion less in federal Medicaid funding over 10 years.
That's roughly 19% less than the state would have received without the law, the outlet found.
The fine print: Trump's tax and spending package also included a one-year moratorium on Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood.
That provision is on hold for now, due to a federal court ruling.
But, if it were to go into effect, Ferguson said Wednesday that he would direct $11 million in state money toward backfilling Planned Parenthood's lost Medicaid dollars in Washington.
The other side: U.S. Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-Spokane), who voted for the law, issued a written statement praising its efforts to "rein in the wasteful spending Washington has ignored for too long."
The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Texts Show Jeanine Pirro Gloating About Aiding Trump Campaign While Working At Fox
Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host who's now the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, boasted about helping the Trump campaign while she was working at Fox News, according to texts revealed in newly unredacted court documents. The September 2020 texts from Pirro to Ronna McDaniel, then the chair of the Republican National Committee, were made public Tuesday in filings by voting technology company Smartmatic, which is suing Fox News for defamation related to its election fraud coverage. Related: 'I work so hard for the party across the country,' Pirro texted McDaniel, according to the filings. 'I'm the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party.' The U.S. attorney's office in D.C. did not immediately return requests for comment on the texts, which were first reported by The Washington Post on Wednesday. In a text from another newly unredacted filing, Pirro discussed being with Trump in the Oval Office shortly before the 2020 election. In the messages sent to a friend, Pirro said her fellow Fox News host Sean Hannity stormed into the room and used the president's private bathroom. She referred to him as an 'egomaniac.' Pirro, along with Fox News hosts Jesse Watters and Maria Bartiromo, are all named in the lawsuit alongside the network. The filing features several instances of Fox News hosts and guests suggesting that Smartmatic's software altered votes to steal the election from Donald Trump and hand the victory to Joe Biden, which is not backed by any evidence. The network featured Trump lawyer Sidney Powell on Pirro's show, 'Justice with Judge Jeanine,' in November 2020, allowing him to attack Smartmatic on air. When reached for comment, Fox News denied any wrongdoing. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on FOX News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' the statement said. Related: 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms,' the statement continued, referring to the Justice Department charging Smartmatic executives last year for allegedly bribing the former top election official in the Philippines. Related: Federal prosecutors alleged this week that the executives overbilled Los Angeles County for voting machines used during the 2020 election, then put the difference into a 'slush fund' for bribing officials. Both Smartmatic and Fox News have asked for a summary judgment, bypassing a trial. A decision on the lawsuit from Manhattan Judge David Cohen is expected in the coming months, according to The New York Times. Related... The Guy Who Threw A Sandwich At A Federal Officer In D.C. Has Been Charged With A Felony Senate Confirms Former Fox News Host As Top Federal Prosecutor For The Nation's Capital Gavin Newsom's Troll Job Of Trump Is Working Incredibly Well
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury
An investigation into the death of Xavier Guadalupe Hernandez during an arrest on the side of a freeway is now in the hands of the El Paso District Attorney's Office. It will likely go to a grand jury to determine if criminal charges will be filed against police officers. Hernandez, 30, died in a controversial case recorded on an El Paso Police Department body camera video that raised criticism over how police handled what started as a call about a pedestrian on Interstate 10 and ended with Hernandez's death on July 13. More: El Paso medical examiner rules man who died in police struggle as a homicide El Paso District Attorney James Montoya, in an emailed statement on Wednesday, Aug. 20, said his office has now received the investigation conducted by El Paso police. "While the case is pending, we cannot offer any other comment about it specifically," Montoya stated. "However, it is the policy of the DA's Office to present all in-custody deaths and officer-involved shootings to a grand jury of El Pasoans for their review and determination of potential criminal liability." EPPD body camera video released this week showed Hernandez in an agitated state on the shoulder of the busy freeway in a situation that quickly escalated into a struggle as an officer repeatedly shocked him with a Taser. "Officer, what's your badge number?" Hernandez repeatedly yells in the video, which shows Hernandez stop breathing while handcuffed behind his back and held facedown on the asphalt by officers. An autopsy by the county medical examiner's office deemed Hernandez's death a homicide caused by "asphyxia due to chest compression during law enforcement subdual and restrain" with cocaine toxicity as a "significant" factor. DA: Grand jury to look at police deadly force cases Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating former Republican DA Bill Hicks in the November 2024 election. Montoya previously had an unsuccessful run for DA, losing to Yvonne Rosales in the 2020 Democratic primary. Rosales later ended up resigning from office amid accusations of incompetence and Hicks was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to fill in the remainder of her term. During the 2020 campaign, police brutality was a hot topic amid the George Floyd protests, Black Lives Matter movement and the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, Montoya said in an El Paso Times interview that incidents in which police use deadly force should be automatically investigated. "Whether that is a discharge of a firearm, some kind of chokehold, any type of deadly force, including a Taser, which I believe is deadly force, will be presented to an El Paso grand jury for their review for potential criminal charges," Montoya said in 2020. Daniel Borunda may be reached at dborunda@ and @BorundaDaniel on X. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: El Paso police bodycam video death case likely to go to grand jury
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
New Chip Deals Are Starting to Look More Sticks Than Carrots. What That Means for Chipmakers
Key Takeaways Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the Trump administration is exploring how the U.S. could receive equity stakes in semiconductor companies with CHIPS Act grants. Such deals could extend to Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor, and Samsung, along with Intel. Though the Trump administration appears to have made inroads with embattled chipmaker Intel, Wall Street analysts suggested swaying others might require better terms. Chip stocks fell Wednesday, amid a broader decline in the tech sector. Wall Street could be starting to sour on the terms of new deals in the works for chipmakers. While investors first appeared sanguine about the White House's steps to become more involved in chipmakers' businesses in an effort to boost America's manufacturing capabilities, analysts' opinions have started to turn as more details about potential deal terms emerge. The PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOX) fell close to 1% Wednesday amid broader tech losses, extending declines yesterday. Intel (INTC), Micron Technology (MU), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), were among the biggest decliners in the index—the latest companies to land in policy crosshairs. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview with CNBC yesterday that along with Intel, the U.S. government could look to take equity stakes in other semiconductor firms in exchange for CHIPS Act funding. Those companies could include Micron, TSMC, and Samsung, according to Reuters. The White House did not immediately respond to an emailed query about the development, nor did Micron, TSMC, and Samsung. "We see this potential outcome as negative for the broader U.S. semi landscape and specifically bad for the companies that might be directly affected by this shift in policy," Wedbush analysts Matt Bryson and Antoine Legault wrote in a Wednesday report. The carrot could now appear to be more stick. Whereas the CHIPS Act, signed into law in 2022, incentivized chip production in the U.S. with funding, "changing these grants to ownership stakes effectively destroys this economic benefit," Wedbush said. "Not to mention, such a result would necessarily be unexpectedly dilutive to shareholders of the affected firms." Bernstein analysts in a note Tuesday similarly observed that Intel giving up 10% of the company for money that was supposed to be "free," albeit tied to some milestone-based requirements, "seems worse." Though the Trump administration appears to have made inroads with embattled chipmaker Intel, swaying others might require better terms. Relative to Intel's CHIPS awards, grants given to Micron, Samsung, and TSMC are relatively smaller as a percentage of market cap, or roughly 4% or less, according to Bernstein. "If presented with such a bargain however, we wonder how many of these companies might simply just say 'no.'" Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data