
VA report: No environmental review needed for new Bakersfield clinic
"VA concludes that implementing the Proposed Action would not have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the natural or human environment, the report said. "Therefore, preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required."
The proposed action is the construction of a new VA outpatient clinic in Bakersfield, one that's been planned — and held up in court — for years.
Congress approved the clinic in 2009 but construction on the new facility has been frustrated by a series of legal filings by a group called Progress for Bakersfield Veterans, LLC, or PBV.
Since 2018, PBV has filed a series of complaints alleging violations of the California Environmental Quality Act and other regulations. PBV is a subsidiary of Beverly Hills-based Cardinal Equities Group, which owns the building housing the existing clinic on Westwind Drive.
Critics have accused PBV of filing frivolous lawsuits in order to prolong the current clinic's tenure at its aging building. Because the terms of the lease are expired, PBV can raise the rent on the building every six months.
The Californian reported last year the VA was paying more than $400,000 a month to lease the current clinic location.
"We are paying millions of dollars to somebody that doesn't even care for the rental of the current clinic. We are dumping tons of money, monthly," said Rick Knight, a 77-year-old U.S. Marine Corps veteran who uses the clinic.
Knight said he'd heard supposedly good news about the clinic before, only to see PBV file a lawsuit to stop progress.
"I am a pro-VA advocate to get us a clinic built and get away from this snake that is out to strike us and poison us again," Knight said.
Casey Schaubschlager, a social worker with the Wounded Heroes Fund, called the VA's finding "one more hoop jumped."
"That being said, this project has been over a decade since the approval, but with the current court process going on, who knows how the lawsuit will go on, or how long," Schaubschlager said.
The VA did not immediately respond to request for comment Thursday.
U.S. Reps. Vince Fong, R-Bakersfield, and David Valadao, R-Hanford, both praised the news, saying the clinic was too long delayed.
"My office is working closely with the House Veterans Affairs Committee and in contact with the Veterans Affairs Department to find ways to remove the frivolous legal hurdles that have stifled this project well beyond its expected completion date," Fong said in an email Thursday.
"Our veterans deserve to receive the best possible care, and I will continue to fight to deliver the services our nation's heroes have rightfully and dutifully earned," he said.
Valadao said the clinic is a topic priority.
"After years of delays and frivolous lawsuits, the release of the no significant impact report for the Bakersfield VA clinic is a welcome update,' Valadao said. 'This project has always been one of my top priorities, and I'll continue working closely with the VA to ensure we are doing everything we can to construct the new clinic valley veterans deserve.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Costco won't sell abortion pills after outcry from religious groups
Costco said it will not offer abortion pills at any of its more than 500 pharmacies nationwide, a move celebrated by religious groups that lobbied against the drug being dispensed by retailers. The Washington state-based wholesaler insisted its decision was based on a lack of customer interest in the medication, Mifepristone, which together with another medicine called misoprostol, is used to end a pregnancy within 10 weeks of gestation. It didn't address whether pressure from conservative organizations influenced the move. 4 A Costco location in the US, one of more than 500 company pharmacies that will not provide Mifepristone. Getty Images A coalition of religious groups including Idaho-based Inspire Investing, the conservative legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom and treasurers and other financial officials from Ohio, Texas, Nevada and Utah had contacted the retailer last year requesting it not carry the drug, according to Bloomberg News. 'It's a very significant win and it's one we hope to build on this coming year,' said Michael Ross, an attorney working with Alliance Defending Freedom's corporate engagement division. Ross indicated the coalition plans to target Walgreens Boots Alliance and CVS next. Both pharmacy chains currently provide mifepristone in states that don't have abortion restrictions. People living in states that have severely limited abortion can obtain the medication by mail from states without such bans. The religious investors sent similar requests last year to Kroger, Walmart and Albertsons alongside Costco, urging them against carrying the medication. Kroger responded that it has never provided abortion pills and continues monitoring regulatory developments. Neither Walmart nor Albertsons currently stocks the medicine. Costco's decision intensifies the ongoing debate about access to the medication. 4 Mifepristone tablets are part of a two-drug regimen to terminate early pregnancies. AP New York City Comptroller Brad Lander had written to various retailers in July last year representing city pension funds, encouraging them to pursue authorization for offering the drug. 'Costco's decision to refuse to dispense mifepristone is disappointing and short-sighted,' a representative from Lander's office told Bloomberg. 'Failure to provide access to proven safe and FDA-approved medication under the guise of 'weak demand' risks isolating customers and undermines the company's credibility.' The Post has sought comment from Costco and Lander. The religious organizations have promised to continue to ramp up pressure. 'We have this momentum,' said Tim Schwarzenberger, who leads corporate engagement at Inspire, which manages the biggest religious exchange-traded fund. 'Now there is a chance to turn to some of the other retailers.' doesn't presently sell the medication, and Schwarzenberger indicated his organization will work to maintain that status. 4 A patient prepares to take mifepristone, which blocks progesterone to end an early-stage pregnancy. AP Amazon didn't provide a response to inquiries. Walgreens declined to comment but referenced information on its website stating: 'The US Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone access allows Walgreens to continue to dispense mifepristone under the FDA guidelines.' CVS confirmed it distributes mifepristone in certain states where permitted after completing what it called a thorough certification procedure. 'We have a long history of supporting and advancing women's health and we remain focused on meeting their unique health needs. This includes providing access to safe, legal, and evidence-based reproductive health services,' the company stated. The elimination of nationwide abortion protections has resulted in uneven access throughout the US, leading telehealth providers to address some service gaps. Various state legislators have proposed legislation to designate mifepristone as a restricted drug and reduce telehealth availability. According to tracking by the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit research organization, lawmakers introduced 32 proposals to prohibit medication abortion and 38 to restrict access during the 2025 legislative period, representing the highest number since the overturn of Roe v. Wade. Data from the Society of Family Planning, an abortion rights organization, shows most abortions in America still occur either at medical facilities or through prescriptions from doctors filled at pharmacies like CVS or Walgreens. A smaller percentage involves prescriptions delivered by mail. 4 Anti-abortion demonstrators rally outside the US Supreme Court in March of last year as debate over medication abortion continues. AP Following increased state-level abortion restrictions, more women have pursued online mifepristone prescriptions for mail delivery. These shipments now represent approximately 25% of American abortions, up from 5 percent before the 2022 Supreme Court decision that ended federal abortion protections. Eight states permitting abortion have enacted protective legislation shielding doctors from prosecution when prescribing mifepristone to patients in states with abortion prohibitions. Ushma Upadhyay, a reproductive sciences professor at the University of California, San Francisco, explained that CVS, Walgreens and similar pharmacies don't provide the medication in states prohibiting abortion, creating difficulties for women seeking the procedure. Telehealth providers can utilize protective laws to ship pills directly to states with restrictions, she noted. This has generated legal disputes. A Texas resident filed a lawsuit in July against a California physician for prescribing abortion medication to his girlfriend. A New York doctor faces criminal charges in Louisiana and a lawsuit from Texas's Attorney General for shipping pills to patients in those states.


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States With Highest Rates of Organ Donor Registrations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The percentage of Americans who register as organ donors at state motor vehicle agencies fluctuates widely across the country, data obtained by Newsweek reveals. Colorado recorded the highest organ donor designation rate nationwide in 2023 — with 66.2 percent of residents affirming their choice when given the opportunity to register their decision at state DMVs, followed by South Dakota and Iowa. The lowest rates were reported in California, Georgia and Mississippi, according to the most recent available data from Donate Life America, a nonprofit that manages the National Donate Life Registry. Due to variability in registry data-cleaning practices regarding removal of deceased individuals from databases, the percentage of residents registered in each state can be misleading. DLA officials instead consider the donor designation rate as a "more accurate" metric, spokeswoman Hilary Kleine told Newsweek. "This measures the percentage of people that say yes when presented with the registration opportunity at their state DMV in a given year," Kleine said. The national donor designation rate in 2023 based on state reported data was 47.4 percent, Kleine said, adding that the Virginia-based national nonprofit is currently finalizing 2024 state data. Read more Thousands more remove themselves from organ donor registries Thousands more remove themselves from organ donor registries Some state agencies did not provide complete donor designation rate data for 2023, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona and Arkansas. Indiana and the District of Columbia, meanwhile, reported rates of 67.6 percent and 51.6 percent, respectively, in 2022, DLA internal figures show. Donor designation rates from 19 states were not supplied by relevant local agencies in 2023, including the Delaware Department of Transportation and the Michigan Department of State, DLA's data shows. Texas, for example, does not report its donor designation rate to Donate Life America, according to Chad Carroll, executive director of Donate Life Texas, which manages the state's official organ, eye and tissue donor registry. "We are currently refining our data collection process with our state Department of Motor Vehicles to more accurately report that number," Carroll told Newsweek in an email Thursday. Roughly 64 percent of Texans indicate "yes" when asked to register as an organ donor, including a current list of more than 15 million residents, Carroll said. That total number appears to be eclipsed only by California, where more than 19.7 million people are registered, according to Donate Life California's website. California has roughly 8 million more residents than Texas. The donor designation rate in California stood at 31.3 percent in 2023, but has dipped to 27.75 percent during the first half of this year, Donate Life California officials told Newsweek Thursday. From California to Texas to Colorado, thousands of people have removed themselves from donor registries following federal scrutiny and in-depth reporting by the New York Times on problems within the nation's organ transplant system. Medical staff at a hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, pause for a moment of silence prior to organ procurement surgery on June 15, 2023. Medical staff at a hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, pause for a moment of silence prior to organ procurement surgery on June 15, 2023. AP Photo/Mark Humphrey The Department of Health and Human Services vowed to overhaul organ procurement and transplant policy late last month following an investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration that revealed disturbing practices, including instances of where patients "showed signs of life," HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. "The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable," Kennedy said on July 21. "The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves." More than 103,000 men, women and children are currently on the national transplant waiting list and roughly 13 people die every day as they await operations, according to the Heath Resources and Services Administration's website. Roughly 90 percent of U.S. adults support organ donation, but just 60 percent are registered as donors, a 2019 federal survey found. The overwhelming majority of patients on the nation's waiting list as of September need kidneys, followed by those awaiting a healthy liver or heart.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Nike co-founder Phil Knight to donate $2 billion to University of Oregon's Cancer Institute
Nike co-founder Phil Knight is donating $2 billion to the Oregon Health and Science University's Cancer Institute, the single largest donation ever to a U.S. university, college or health institution, according to the Knight Foundation. The foundation said on Thursday the gift that will be used to shift the scientific approach to cancer treatment, research and patient care outcomes. As part of the gift, the Knights will partner with cancer research pioneer Dr. Brian Druker. A decade ago, Druker and OHSU took on a challenge to raise $500 million for cancer research, and the Knights signed on to match the raise dollar-for-dollar. "We are grateful for the opportunity to invest in the next stage of the Druker-led revolutionary vision of cancer research, diagnosis, treatment, care, and some day, eradication," Phil and Penny Knight said in a statement. "We couldn't be more excited about the transformational potential of this work for humanity." Knight's fortune stems from his success with the swoosh, the company he founded in 1964. Originally called Blue Ribbon Sports, the business began humbly, with Knight selling sneakers out of the trunk of his car, as he recounted in his 2016 memoir, "Shoe Dog." Nike went public in December 1980 and quickly became the most dominant sneaker brand, partnered with some of the top athletes across sport. During Knight's tenure at the public company, from its IPO to his June 2016 retirement, Nike shares soared almost 30,500%. Although Nike stock has had a painful few years, down more than 50% from its peak in late 2021, it remains the most valuable public company in athletic footwear, valued at more than $110 billion. The Knights are regularly found on lists of top philanthropists. In May, Time Magazine estimated their lifetime giving at $3.6 billion, including $370 million gifted in 2024 alone. According to the Knight Foundation's latest tax documents the foundation held more than $5 billion in assets at the end of 2023. "I wanted to build something that was my own, something I could point to and say: I made that. It was the only way I saw to make life meaningful," Knight said in his 2016 memoir.