
China strong-armed Japan over rare earths. It's a lesson for the US.
Tokyo vowed in 2010 to be ready for next time and over the years put hundreds of millions of dollars into Australian supplies.
Yet as of last year, it was still relying on China for some 70% of its imports of rare earths, which are widely used in electronics, cars and weapons, according to the government-owned Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security. When China restricted rare-earth exports in April, some of Japan's automakers again got hit.
Japan's experience drives home lessons for the U.S., where the Pentagon recently agreed to take a stake in Las Vegas-based MP Materials so it can mine and refine rare earths on American soil.
Tokyo found that partially reducing dependence still leaves Beijing with plenty of leverage. At the same time, complete independence costs billions of dollars, not millions. After the crisis passed and China resumed exports to Japan, the urgency to diversify supplies waned.
That points to the danger of complacency in the U.S. After it was hit by Chinese rare-earth export controls earlier this year, the U.S. recently got Beijing to reopen the spigot as part of a trade deal.
If costs don't matter, cutting reliance on China might be feasible, but businesses can't swallow high costs, said Kazuto Suzuki, a professor at the University of Tokyo's Graduate School of Public Policy.
People in Japan 'understood that there was a vulnerability, but everyone still relied on China because the conclusion was that there weren't other options," Suzuki said.
Four decades ago, a Japanese scientist named Masato Sagawa invented the most powerful type of permanent magnets containing a rare-earth element called neodymium. The breakthrough underlies the magnets widely used today.
By early this century, it was China, not Japan, that had come to dominate supplies of the 17 rare-earth elements as well as the refining of the metals and manufacture of magnets containing them. In 2009, 85% of Japan's rare-earth imports came from China.
Beijing realized it had a diplomatic tool and used it in 2010, when a Chinese trawler collided with Japanese patrol vessels near islands controlled by Japan and claimed by China. Japan detained the captain and crew, sparking a diplomatic clash. Japanese users of rare earths reported severe delivery disruptions, although Beijing denied doing anything.
The captain was released under Chinese pressure, and tensions eased after a few months. But Japan sought alternative suppliers.
'We're going to pursue a variety of risk hedges," said Japan's foreign minister at the time. 'It isn't good to lean too much on one country."
Tokyo's biggest initiative from that era was a deal with Australia's Lynas Rare Earths that, in hindsight, helped somewhat but didn't go nearly far enough or contribute quickly enough to undercut China's dominance.
The government body now called the Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security, or Jogmec, as well as trading company Sojitz provided Lynas a $225 million loan to secure rare earths for Japan.
The Lynas project didn't help Japan with securing a subset of rare-earth elements known as heavy rare earths, which are generally less common than the light ones. The heavy elements include dysprosium and terbium, which are commonly used alongside neodymium, a light rare-earth element, in strong permanent magnets.
The rare-earth elements tend to be intermingled. Miners are reluctant to invest in specialized equipment for processing the relatively small quantities of heavy rare earths that they extract alongside the light elements.
Meanwhile, in the field of rare-earth magnets that Japan had once led, it actually deepened its dependence on China after the 2010 showdown.
Japan's biggest companies formed partnerships with Chinese magnet makers in the 2010s, reasoning that they could protect themselves from political blackmail if they had friends in China with secure supplies. Among the deals was a joint venture formed in 2013 by Tokyo-based TDK with China's state-backed Rising Nonferrous Metals Share.
The Japanese companies had production know-how that made them attractive partners at the time in China. Afterward, China's dominance grew. In 2013, Japan's share in the global neodymium-magnet market was at 23% while China held about three-quarters. By 2021, Japan's share fell to 15% while China's rose to about 84%, according to government figures based on data from research firm Fuji Keizai.
It took more than a decade for Japan to do something about the gap in its policy. In 2023, the Japanese government body, Jogmec, and Sojitz invested an additional 200 million Australian dollars, equivalent to around $130 million today, in Lynas. The company recently started to produce dysprosium and terbium, up to 65% of which is headed to Japan under the deal.
Separately, Jogmec and energy firm Iwatani said in March they would invest 110 million euros, equivalent to $129 million, in a subsidiary of France's Carester to support a project that could supply a fifth of Japan's demand for dysprosium and terbium.
Japan now says it wants to beef up production of neodymium magnets, develop magnets using smaller amounts of rare earths and step up recycling.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Three held in ₹44 lakh cyber fraud case
Three persons were arrested by the cyber crime wing of the Hyderabad police for defrauding a city-based person of over ₹44 lakh by posing as trading advisors from a fictitious firm named 'Aveshta Study Group-W'. The accused were identified as Milind Manohar Narkar, 34, a private employee from Santacruz, Mumbai; Ranak Jagadish Patel, 31, a businessman from Bhiwandi, Thane; and Salik Imtiyaz Ahmed Siddiqui, 25, a private employee from Mumbra, Thane. All three were working in tandem with a cyber fraudster operating out of Dubai. According to investigators, the trio contacted the victim in June 2025 on phone, claiming to be professional trading advisors offering high return investment opportunities. Lured by the promise of substantial profits, the victim was persuaded to transfer funds into several bank accounts controlled by the accused. When the victim later attempted to withdraw the 'profits', he was asked to first pay a 20% 'service charge' on the returns. Believing the promise that both the profits and the original investment would be returned following this payment, the victim complied. In total, he was cheated of ₹44,04,753. During the investigation, it emerged that Milind Narkar was actively assisting the Dubai-based kingpin by converting fraudulently acquired funds into cryptocurrency. He also played a key role in sourcing and operating mule accounts, and was found to be accommodating account holders at various hotels in Mumbai. His network extended across seven other States in India where he allegedly facilitated the conversion of illicit gains into digital currency. The Hyderabad police seized three mobile phones from the accused. All three are believed to be working on commission for the overseas fraudster, by providing access to and managing local bank accounts used in the scam. Following the case, the Hyderabad police issued a public advisory warning citizens to be wary of suspicious investment schemes promising unusually high returns. Authorities have noted that scammers often pose as representatives of well-known firms and use forged documents, including fake SEBI certifications, to build credibility. Such fraudsters commonly advertise via platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook, and often share fake profit screenshots to gain victims' trust. Citizens have been urged to verify investment schemes thoroughly before parting with their money and to avoid making hasty financial decisions based on promises of quick returns. Victims of cyber fraud are advised to immediately dial 1930 or visit: for assistance.


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Illegal sale of fireworks, illicit import of Chinese fireworks caused loss of 40% to fireworks traders, says federation
Federation of Tamil Nadu Fireworks Traders have alleged that illegally functioning online sale of fireworks and illicit import of Chinese fireworks has caused a loss of ₹800 crore to the fireworks traders of the country during 2024 Deepavali season. Talking to reporters here on Tuesday, the federation president V. Raja Chandrasekaran said that despite the Supreme Court banning taking online orders and sale of fireworks in 2018, the illegal online sale continued. 'This has been more pronounced in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Before it spreads to other States, the Government should ensure that no online sale of fireworks could be done,' he said. Besides, stealth import of Chinese goods continued, he charged. He pointed out that even recently, Chinese fireworks worth ₹35 crore were seized in Mumbai. 'The combination of online sales and Chinese imports had affected the business of traders to the extent of 40%, which is around ₹800 crore to ₹1000 crore, during Deepavali season 2024,' he said. The federation would proceed with a case of contempt of court for allowing online sale of fireworks besides initiating criminal case, he said. License for fireworks shops Mr. Chandrasekaran complained that applications submitted for permanent cracker shops in February and March 2025 were yet to be processed. 'The process should have been completed within two months,' he said. Besides, the license for permanent cracker shops is issued for five years under Explosives Act 2008. However, since the Department of Fireworks and Rescue gives no-objection certificate for only one year, the Revenue Department was giving license for only one year in many districts, he complained. Besides, he insisted that the inordinate delay in giving license for temporary cracker shops during Deepavali season was taking a huge toll on the traders. 'The applications should be invited 90 days before Deepavali and the 15-day license should be given one month ahead of Deepavali to help the traders plan their business,' he said. The federation secretary, N. Elangovan, was present.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lenskart files IPO papers to raise Rs 2,150 crore, eyes tech and growth
Eyewear retailer Lenskart Solutions Ltd has filed preliminary documents for an initial public offering (IPO) that could raise up to ₹2,150 crore, as the company seeks to capitalise on rising demand for affordable prescription glasses and contact lenses. The offering comprises ₹2,150 crore in new shares and the sale of up to 132.3 million existing shares by current investors and company founders, according to the draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) filed with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). Among the selling shareholders are co-founders Peyush Bansal, Neha Bansal, Amit Chaudhary and Sumeet Kapahi, along with investors including SoftBank's SVF II Lightbulb (Cayman) Ltd, Schroders Capital Private Equity Asia Mauritius Ltd, PI Opportunities Fund – II, Macritchie Investments Pte Ltd, Kedaara Capital Fund II LLP, and Alpha Wave Ventures LP. The company may also conduct a private placement of up to ₹430 crore before filing the final prospectus, which would reduce the size of the fresh issue. Sources said the firm is aiming for an IPO valuation of about $10 billion. According to the DRHP, Lenskart plans to use ₹272.6 crore from the net proceeds to open new CoCo (company-owned, company-operated) stores in India, ₹591.4 crore for lease, rent and licence payments, ₹213.4 crore for technology and cloud infrastructure, and ₹320 crore for brand marketing and promotion. Remaining funds will be used for inorganic acquisitions and general corporate purposes. Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Ltd, Morgan Stanley India Company Pvt Ltd, Avendus Capital Pvt Ltd, Citigroup Global Markets India Pvt Ltd, Axis Capital Ltd, and Intensive Fiscal Services Pvt Ltd are the book running lead managers to the issue. Founded in 2008, Lenskart launched its online platform in 2010 and opened its first retail store in New Delhi in 2013. The company aims to improve access to quality, affordable eyewear through a tech-enabled supply and distribution network. Globally and in India, Gurugram-based Lenskart competes with Titan Eyeplus, Specsmakers, Vision Express, Warby Parker and Italian eyewear conglomerate Luxottica Group. Lenskart currently operates India's largest eyewear retail network with a presence in metropolitan and smaller cities, as well as in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. It runs manufacturing units in Bhiwadi and Gurugram, supported by regional hubs in Singapore and the UAE. It targets a wide customer base with both premium and affordable brand offerings. Nearly 45 per cent of its India revenue comes from customers who engaged digitally within 90 days prior to purchase. India remains Lenskart's largest market in Asia. In FY25, the company recorded over 100 million app downloads and 105 million website visitors globally. It operates 2,723 stores—2,067 in India and 656 overseas. In FY25, Lenskart reported revenue from operations of ₹6,652.5 crore, up 22.5 per cent from ₹5,427.7 crore in FY24. The company reported a net profit of ₹297.34 crore, compared to a net loss of ₹10.15 crore in FY24. EBITDA, excluding other income, stood at ₹971 crore, up 44.5 per cent from ₹672 crore in the previous fiscal. Risk Factors However, the DRHP outlines several risks that could impact the company's operations, financials and growth outlook. Lenskart has incurred losses in the past and may continue to do so. Its geographic concentration is another concern, as a significant portion of revenue is derived from India. The company's brand strategy is heavily reliant on in-house labels, and its international ambitions carry regulatory and operational risks. The DRHP also flags potential funding needs, stating that Lenskart may require additional capital in future. Leadership continuity is another area of concern. The company is dependent on its promoters and senior management. The DRHP states that future success hinges on the continued involvement of Peyush Bansal and other key executives. Additionally, it notes that Sumeet Kapahi, one of the promoters and Global Head of Sourcing, has been unable to locate copies of his (Hons.) degree and marksheets from the University of Delhi. Operationally, Lenskart's private-label model exposes it to inventory and quality-related risks. Its franchise and partner store network introduces third-party vulnerabilities. On the technology front, Lenskart's geo-analytics tools help forecast revenue potential and payback periods. A 500-member technology team builds and maintains its core digital infrastructure—including websites, mobile apps, warehouse systems and AI-powered supply chain tools. The DRHP cites an estimated 1.3 billion people across India, Japan, Southeast Asia and the Middle East—representing 32 per cent of the global population—with refractive errors in FY25. In India, this share increased from 43 per cent (590 million) in FY20 to 53 per cent (777 million) in FY25, and is projected to reach 62 per cent (943 million) by FY30.