Trump signs executive order lifting Syria sanctions
The move removes a series of longstanding restrictions aimed at the former Assad regime, though key sanctions on individuals and terror-designated groups remain intact.
The decision follows Trump's May 13 declaration to lift all sanctions and open diplomatic channels with Syria's new president, Ahmed al-Sharaa.
"This is a blanket opportunity around all the things that we need to turn back on this economy," US Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack told reporters during a phone briefing. "But one thing is clear: Neither the president nor the secretary of state are nation building. They're saying we are going to give you an opportunity."
The order, effective Tuesday, revokes five executive orders and lifts the 2004 national emergency declaration on Syria, effectively removing the legal basis for most US sanctions against the country. It also instructs federal agencies to begin lifting export controls and other restrictions related to Syrian commerce and financial institutions.
However, the order stops short of fully normalizing US relations with Syria. Sanctions on former President Bashar al-Assad, his allies, and individuals tied to human rights abuses, terrorism, weapons proliferation, or Captagon trafficking remain in place. Additionally, Syria's 1979 designation as a state sponsor of terrorism remains, though officials say it's under review.
The executive order does not affect the terrorism designation of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the group that formerly aligned with Al-Qaeda and now plays a central role in the new Syrian government. While HTS controls key ministries, the group has distanced itself from global networks and fought both Daesh and rival militants in recent years.
'The order instructs the State Department to take appropriate action on HTS-related counterterrorism designations,' an administration official said, noting Syria's renewed interest in confronting Daesh and other militias.
The Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, passed with bipartisan support to isolate the Assad regime economically, remains in effect, though the Trump administration issued a six-month waiver last month along with a general license to facilitate transactions with Syrian state institutions. Lawmakers from both parties are now pushing legislation to repeal the Caesar Act, which may be folded into the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act.
Administration officials argue that the rollback will help attract foreign investment and support Syria's reconstruction efforts, signaling a dramatic US pivot toward engagement rather than isolation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan News
11 hours ago
- Jordan News
Syrian Government Will Not Participate in Paris Meetings - Jordan News
A senior official in the Syrian government commented on the so-called SDF conference, stating that the government will not participate in any scheduled meetings in Paris and will not sit at the negotiating table with any party seeking to revive the era of the previous regime under any name or cover. اضافة اعلان The official told the Syrian News Agency (SANA) that the government considers this conference as "a blow to ongoing negotiation efforts." The government called on the SDF to seriously engage in implementing the March 10 agreement and urged international mediators to transfer all negotiations to Damascus, which it regards as the legitimate and national venue for dialogue among Syrians. The Syrian government affirms that Syrians have the right to peaceful assembly and constructive dialogue, whether at the local or national levels. This right is protected and encouraged by the state, provided it is within the framework of a comprehensive national project that unites Syria in its land, people, and sovereignty. The official added that religious or ethnic groups have the full right to express their political views, hold meetings, and establish parties within the framework of national laws, provided their activities are peaceful, they do not bear arms against the state, and do not impose their vision on the form of the Syrian state. The government stresses that the form of the state is not decided through factional understandings but through a permanent constitution ratified by popular referendum, ensuring the equal participation of all citizens. Any citizen has the right to propose their vision for the state, but this must be done through public dialogue and ballot boxes, not through threats or armed force. The official pointed out that what happened in northeastern Syria does not represent a comprehensive national framework but a fragile coalition comprising parties harmed by the victory of the Syrian people and the fall of the previous regime. Some of these parties monopolize or attempt to monopolize the representation of Syria's components by force of fact and rely on external support. These parties resort to such conferences to evade future responsibilities and deny the fundamentals of the Syrian state, which are based on one army, one government, and one country. The official noted that this conference was an attempt to present proposals contradicting the March 10 agreement, whether by calling for the formation of a 'core of a new national army,' reconsidering the constitutional declaration, or amending administrative divisions. The agreement explicitly states the integration of all civilian and military institutions in northeastern Syria into state institutions and guarantees rights based on competence, not affiliation.
Jordan Times
12 hours ago
- Jordan Times
Russia cautious on Armenia-Azerbaijan deal, Iran reject border corridor
MOSCOW — Russia cautiously welcomed a US-brokered draft deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Saturday, but Moscow's regional ally Iran rejected the idea of a new border corridor backed by President Donald Trump. The two former Soviet republics signed a peace deal in Washington on Friday to end a decades-long conflict, though the fine print and binding nature of the deal remained unclear. The US-brokered agreement includes establishing a transit corridor through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States would have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. But Russia's ally and the warring parties' southern neighbour Tehran said it would not allow the creation of a such a corridor running along the Iranian border. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Akbar Velayati, an advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the Tasnim news agency. The planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries", he added. In a similar tone, Moscow said it would "further analyze" the corridor clause, noting there were trilateral agreements in place between Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, from which no one had yet withdrawn. "It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards," said Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Moscow, previously a key backer of Armenia, still has a military base there. Embroiled in its Ukraine operation, launched in 2022, it did not intervene in the latest conflict. This has strained the historically warm ties between Yerevan and Moscow, home to a large and influential Armenian diaspora, triggering Armenia's drift towards the West. Waning influence Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan went to war twice over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. Moscow, once the main power broker in the Caucasus, is now bogged down in its more than three-year offensive in Ukraine, diverting political and military resources into the grinding conflict of attrition. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan praised the US efforts in settling the conflict. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev even said he would back President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US-led NATO alliance welcomed the deal as a "significant step forward". But in Moscow, Zakharova refrained from even calling it a deal, referring to it merely as "the meeting of the leaders of the South Caucasus republics in Washington" -- adding, however, that it still deserved "a positive assessment". Repackaging for Trump? Analysts also sounded a note of caution, with the International Crisis Group pointing out that the deal left "a lot of questions unanswered". The two countries went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. Much of the White House agreement was a "repackaging" of that, which helped both countries get on Trump's good side "by giving him a role," the Crisis Group's senior South Caucasus analyst Joshua Kucera said. Azerbaijan later added a host of demands to that March deal, including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh, before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with Kucera warning that this could yet derail the process. Kucera called the corridor "one potentially significant development" from the White House meeting, but added that missing key details could prove "serious stumbling blocks". The US-brokered deal was "definitely a testament to the fact that Russia has been losing its influence" as its Ukraine operation had "diverted its attention and resources from some other areas of its traditional interest", Olesya Vardanyan, an independent analyst on the South Caucasus, told AFP. Nevertheless, she added, even if many details were still missing and nothing was guaranteed, the deal still gave Armenians "a promise of a better life and then maybe even more peace in the region".
Roya News
14 hours ago
- Roya News
US, Egypt, Qatar push for ‘comprehensive deal' to end Gaza war
Intense diplomatic efforts are underway, led by the United States alongside Egypt and Qatar, to reach a 'comprehensive deal' that would end the war on the Gaza Strip, in a race against time to prevent a new full-scale invasion being prepared by the occupying forces for Gaza City. In a sign of the seriousness of the talks, 'Israeli' newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported that US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff met Saturday with the Qatari prime minister on the Spanish island of Ibiza to discuss the plan in detail. Outlines of the comprehensive deal Sources cited by Yedioth Ahronoth said mediators are holding 'marathon contacts' with 'Israel' and Hamas, exploring a 'package of proposals' that could form the basis for an agreement. These proposals reportedly include: Ending the war and a complete withdrawal of occupying forces from the Gaza Strip. Releasing all captives held by Palestinian factions. Disarming Palestinian factions. Exiling a number of Hamas military leaders from the Strip. Forming a professional, non-political local administration to govern Gaza, supported by a professional police force. The sources added that the three mediators - the US, Egypt, and Qatar - are discussing the proposals among themselves before presenting them to both sides, noting that a deal could be reached 'unless Israel is determined to continue the war for its own calculations.' Positions of the 'Israel' and Hamas Officials from 'Israel' said US President Donald Trump's stance is to 'go all the way,' imposing conditions to end the fighting that include dismantling Hamas and disarming the Strip, according to Yedioth Ahronoth. They noted that the Israel' currently prefers reaching a 'comprehensive deal.' For its part, Hamas has said it is showing flexibility in an effort to reach an agreement but is preparing for the worst-case scenario. In an official statement Saturday, the group said: 'We have shown all possible flexibility through the Egyptian and Qatari mediators to make the ceasefire succeed. We are ready for a comprehensive deal to release all occupation captives in a way that ensures ending the war and the withdrawal of enemy forces.'
