Avocado oil vs. olive oil
Some people also use these oils on their skin and hair. Both oils contain similar quantities of oleic acid, a healthy monounsaturated fat.
Because olive oil is a core component of the popular Mediterranean diet, there is more consistent and higher-quality research on its health effects.
Avocado oil may be a better choice for high-heat cooking because of its higher smoke point.
While health coaches, message boards, and social media may advocate for one oil over the other, no consistent research has found that one oil is superior to the other. Instead, people should choose their cooking oil based on taste and flavor preferences, budget, and individual health goals. Hakase_/Getty Images
Research consistently finds that people who consume more monounsaturated fats have healthier metabolic and cardiovascular health profiles, especially as compared to people who consume large quantities of saturated and trans fats.
This may help explain why people who eat a Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil are, on average, healthier than those who eat a typical Western diet.
While some cooking oils have lower levels of monounsaturated fats, avocado oil and olive oil have similar levels, suggesting that the two may offer similar health benefits.
People choosing a cooking oil solely for its health benefits may want to choose olive oil.
This is because more research has assessed and documented the benefits of this oil. This does not mean avocado oil offers no benefits or that olive oil is superior; many studies have assessed avocado oil. But the focus on olive oil as part of the Mediterranean diet means that research on its benefits is stronger and more exhaustive.
Avocado oil's higher smoke point may appeal to people who prefer cooking at high temperatures or who want a more versatile oil. » Learn more about olive oil
Avocado oil and olive oil are chemically very similar, and both contain high levels of the chemical oleic acid. The benefits of oils containing oleic acid include:
There is no evidence that consuming either oil alone will cure heart disease or any other disease. Instead, research on their benefits usually looks at either population-level data or compares people who consume these oils to people who consume other oils. Certain other health risks and protective factors may contribute to the apparent differences between groups.
Some important differences between the oils include: The precise amount of oleic acid varies depending on the subtype of oil a person uses. For example, a 2024 paper emphasizes that Hass avocado oil may contain higher levels of oleic acid.
The oils have different flavors, and switching from one to the other may shift the taste of food. Some people perceive avocado oil as sweeter and olive oil as lighter.
Avocado oil has a higher smoke point, making it a better choice for high-temperature cooking. Its smoke point is around 500 degrees Fahrenheit, while extra virgin olive oil smokes around 350 degrees, and pure olive oil smokes around 465 degrees. » Learn more about healthful oil for frying
The specific nutritional composition of each oil varies depending on the manufacturer and the plants used to make it.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture, the nutrition facts for 100 milliliters of extra virgin olive oil are as follows : 85 grams total fat
14 g saturated fat
62 g monounsaturated fat
8 g polyunsaturated fat
The same quantity of avocado oil offers the following nutritional profile : 93 grams total fat
16 g saturated fat
The USDA offers only a breakdown of nutrition by brand for avocado oil, and these branded comparisons do not contain data on monounsaturated versus polyunsaturated fats.
Both oils can be healthy, flavorful cooking options and may improve health, especially as replacements for butter or lard.
When cooking at high temperatures, avocado oil is a safer option, with a smoke point of over 500 degrees. People who prefer the flavor of olive oil should consider pure olive oil, which has a much higher smoke point (465 degrees) than extra virgin olive oil (350 degrees).
When cooking at lower temperatures, people should consider which flavor and texture they prefer. Olive oil is popular with a wide variety of foods because of its light flavor, but some people prefer the grassy, slightly sweet taste of avocado oil.
The two oils have similar proportions of this acid, though the specific distribution may vary with brand and the type of oil. For this reason, the benefits of the two oils are likely similar. However, research has primarily examined olive oil, so a person who seeks a more 'proven' oil might prefer olive oil.
There is no clear winner when comparing avocado oil to olive oil. Instead, it is important for a person to weigh the specific reasons they are using an oil and to assess research on that oil. In general, the two offer similar nutritional and health benefits, though researchers have devoted more effort to studying olive oil.
A person should also consider the texture and flavor of the oil they choose, and the heat at which they cook. Because the benefits of the two oils are likely very similar, the taste and cooking profile of the oil may determine which is best for an individual to use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
32 minutes ago
- Metro
The school special needs crisis that will impact every one of us
When her son was five, Kirsty McNulty knew he wasn't 'the same as the other little boys in his class.' 'He had very obsessive behaviours where he'd become fixated on certain things,' Kirsty, 35, tells Metro. 'At one point, it was Disney villains – he asked me if he could have his hand cut off and replaced with a hook so he would be the same as Captain Hook.' Diagnosed with autism at a young age, Eli, who is now 14, spent many months out of school in Colne as his mum has battled for him to get appropriate special educational needs and disability (SEND) support. 'Because Eli was judged to be conforming at primary school and meeting his academic targets, we didn't get any help. We coped at home – although barely,' she says. Kirsty's son, who also has ADHD and mild learning disabilities, managed to mask enough at school to make it through the day, but would have huge meltdowns at home. 'He was so dysregulated that he often became violent,' she remembers. 'I'd have to send my mum a text message simply saying 'SOS' when I couldn't manage him, and she would come around to try and help.' Kirsty warned teachers and professionals about what was happening at home, even videoing Eli so 'they could see how serious the situation had become,' but to no avail. 'I begged various services for support but was repeatedly told that I wasn't a safeguarding risk so there was no support available. 'I felt awful, like I was failing him, and had to start taking anti-depressants to manage my own mental health,' she admits. When Eli went to high school, things got worse. 'His friends from primary school began to make new friends, and he started getting involved in more and more risky behaviour to try and fit in with different groups,' Kirsty explains. 'We had visits at home from the police and the fire service, and Eli's mental health got worse and worse. 'School rapidly went from saying he didn't need help to saying they couldn't meet his needs.' Kirsty believes that if her son had one-to-one support or adaptions while in lessons, Eli would have coped better. Instead, at 11, he was admitted to hospital because of his mental health. While the family's story may sound shocking, it's a scenario all too familiar for many with SEND children up and down the UK, who say they are being failed by the education system. 'It's really common for parents not to get the right support,' Anna Bird, Chief Executive of the charity Contact and Disabled Children's Partnership's CEO, tells Metro. One gamechanger is an Education, Health, and Care Plan (EHCP) – a legally binding document which brought into play in 2014, outlining the special education needs of a child. If schools fail to deliver the agreed plans, there are serious consequences. However, not only are these hard to come by, but there are also fears they may be scrapped in the Government's upcoming Schools White Paper – leading to widespread panic among SEND families. The alarm comes after the Educating Secretary Bridget Phillipson claimed that the current SEND system, which the government inherited from the Tories, needed a huge overhaul, and she refused to rule out putting an end to EHCPs. Although Phillipson stated that they would work with parents on a new system, the reality is, the families impacted would rather have something in place, than nothing at all. 'They [families] are worried they are going to lose the small amount of help they get at the moment,' Jane Harris, CEO of Speech and Language UK, tells Metro, adding that even though EHCPs aren't perfect, they're currently the 'only actual way to guarantee support.' 'The reasons they aren't [always] implemented isn't usually because of the legal framework, but because schools don't have enough funding, time, or training and expertise. You can't fix [those problems] by taking away the legal rights they do have.' In response to the Education Secretary's words, the Disabled Children's Partnership has recently launched an action plan as part of their Fight for Ordinary campaign setting out a blueprint for reforming the SEND system in England. 'The system has to be reformed, and we're pleased to hear the government has committed to do that,' says Anna. 'But they have got to get it right.' The DCP is calling for the government to address five key areas so that SEND children enjoy the same 'ordinary' things their peers take for granted. Training for school staff, additional specialist support, adequate funding, and systems in place to measure progress are among the recommendations, as is legally guaranteed support for all children who need it, not only those with EHCPs. The organisation warns that if these needs aren't met, the economical impact will be felt across the UK – and not just within SEND families, as inadequate early years support already costs England alone over £16 billion annually, according to research from LSE. 'Children who aren't supported during school are less likely to succeed at school. They'll then find it harder to get work. That'll create problems for the economy later down the line,' explains Anna. As it stands 170,000 children in England are missing at least half of their classes in 2024, while three out of four parents of children with SEND have already been forced to give up work or cut their hours – causing another potential blow to the economy. 'On average, they [families] are losing about £21,000 a year in lost income,' Bird says. 'That's a huge impact and makes a huge difference in how they can look after their children.' Although Kirsty was eventually successful in getting her ECHP, the financial knock-on the family felt can't be ignored. With Eli missing several months of school and being four years behind, Kirsty says her son has been 'stripped of his right to an education.' 'The impact has been felt by everyone,' Kirsty says. 'My mental health has taken a huge downturn, and I've lost my career as duty worker with a domestic abuse service.' Even though Kirsty is desperate to return to work once her son's reduced timetable starts next year, she is fully aware that no employer will allow her the flexibility she needs. 'If the Government is serious about sorting out the SEND system, then they must fund schools to provide our children with the support they need,' she adds. 'Every child has the legal right to an education, and there should be no exceptions to that.' Tobias Lambe spent most of primary and early high school years masking his struggles at school. 'It was the small things in school that felt overwhelming,' the 21-year-old tells Metro. 'The set up of the room, the bright lights. I never went into the canteen to eat my lunch in high school – it was too loud and smelly. Teachers didn't understand that I took things very literally. I never really had friends because I couldn't understand people – they were often not the nicest.' It was only when Tobias had a breakdown on a school trip when he was 14, that he eventually got some support and he was eventually diagnosed with autism. 'I was completely overwhelmed and was having auditory hallucinations telling me negative things about myself,' he says. 'It was enough to tip me over the edge. I felt like I didn't belong in this world, no one struggled or thought like me.' Although his mother's first request for an ECHP assessment was rejected, her second was accepted and the school adjusted Tobias' routines, made teachers aware of his needs and the simple things he struggled with, and was given an autism mentor. With smaller class sizes, specialist intervention, and a routine that suited him, Tobias thrived. He's now in his third year of medical school and on his way to becoming a doctor within the NHS. It's no wonder he feels 'scrapping EHCPs is a terrible idea.' Tobias explains: 'While the government might want to reduce the number because of their cost, they should be working at the underlying problem – children aren't treated as people. They are just numbers in a system.' To reform the SEND system is clearly going to cost money. In the 2024 autumn budget, Labour announced an increased education spending of £11.2b from 2023/24 by 2025/26, with £1b earmarked for SEND. It's suspected more will be needed to follow recommendations set out by the DCP. More Trending 'We know if you give children help up front, they are far more likely to go into employment. If you try and make short term savings in this area, all you do is massively increase the long-term cost,' Jane Harris points out. However, if the Government truly listens to families and those working with SEND children, reform could be transformative, believes Anna Bird. 'There are currently around 2 million with special educational needs. If done right, the positive impact of change would mean those children would feel happier at school, achieve their full potential, and contribute to the economy. That's a huge prize,' she says. 'There is every opportunity to get these reforms right, but it does involve us working together.' MORE: Infant dies in hot car after being left by dad who 'forgot about him' MORE: Labour's school guidance is Section 28 all over again for LGBTQ+ people MORE: Never heard of bruxism? You're probably suffering from it
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
McDonald's fan shares how he halved his weight
Fast food fan Joshua Hilton has lost the equivalent of a great Dane in weight after ditching his £5,000-a-year takeaway 31-year-old mostly ate at McDonald's but would also binge on KFCs and Chinese and Indian hairdresser, from Lyneham, Wiltshire, said he became so embarrassed by his weight, he would avoid leaving his home as he did not like seeing after changing his diet, he has halved his weight from 20 stone (127kg) to 10 stone (63.5kg) in about 18 months. Remembering his former self, he said: "I did not do any walking or exercise as it would make me feel exhausted and I would be sweating."I would also want to avoid people so I would never really want to be out in public." At the time the money he was spending did not seem significant as it would be "£10 here, £20 there". On bad days, Mr Hilton would start the day with McDonald's."But it would be two of everything. I would quite often skip lunch so I could pre-plan my binge for the evening. "That could be going back to McDonald's. It could be Chinese, Indian, KFC," he the beginning of 2024, a photograph taken in work made him realise it was time to change his said the key to losing weight has been to eat the correct portion sizes and avoid takeaways, although he does still eat the odd burger. When it comes to exercise, he does not go to the gym. "I'm on my feet all day and along with dog walks, that was enough for me," he new slim self has left him feeling happier and his sleep has improved. "It's 100% made me more confident," he said. Mr Hilton recommended others looking to lose weight should make steady changes to their diet over added by doing this, he has "lost the equivalent of a great Dane".
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Cruz Beckham is right – you can't beat wearing white Speedos on holiday
A grown man can get serious beach body envy at this time of year. The physique in the mirror and on the sun lounger does not always compare favourably to the form on social media. Guys flexing their abs and glutes dominate social media, with even older fellas – like the permanently vacationing playboy Gianluca Vacchi, and the gold standard, David Beckham, still magnificent in his tighty-whitey briefs – eliciting a Proustian splash of memories soaked in sun and chlorine. And now his son Cruz has been spotted in a pair of similarly tiny trunks – a pair of £410 Prada budgie-smugglers. Twenty summers ago, I took a swimming lesson with the world's greatest pool boy. Pierre Gruneberg, then a spry 73, was lithe and tanned; a magnificent poster boy for daily aerobic exercise and very good living. He had spent the last 55 years as maître nageur at Club Dauphin, the idyllic Med-side swimming pool at the Grand-Hôtel du Cap-Ferrat in the south of France. Even more impressive than Gruneberg's pecs was his roster of students. Down the years, he dished out advice on stroke, rhythm and breath to superstars including Picasso, Charlie Chaplin, Ralph Lauren, Liza Minelli, Tina Turner and a suite of presidents, each leaving their egos in the changing rooms to listen to his aquatic wisdom. As Gruneberg told me: 'All men are equal when they are wearing nothing but their swimming costumes." For 'swimming costume', of course, read 'Speedo'. Gruneberg wore Speedos every day of his working life. His male clients, too, were obliged to dress thus. In 1903, a law was passed by the French government stipulating that men must only wear tight-fitting swimming trunks at public pools – the idea being that less material housed less dirt and bacteria and was therefore more hygienic. Egalitarian swimming attire was a great social leveller, just as my pool pal Pierre had noted. Founded in Sydney in 1914 by the Scottish emigrant Alexander MacRae, the Speedo brand (or, as the French like to call the trunks, ' un Speedo ') saw an opportunity and quickly became the default setting and nickname for men's briefs during summer vacations. These were the days when men aspired to look athletic and competitive during the holidays, all-over-tanning like a pro swimmer. From Mykonos to Marbella, Bridlington to Bournemouth, even the most terminally un-Olympic men wore the 'Aussie cossie'. Long before Orlebar Brown and Villebrequin luxed-up swimwear, a boy purchased his trunks from a sporting retailer, and it was Speedo or nothing. (My parents knew families who preferred 'nothing', by the way, but let's not go there – it's too triggering.) In the 1968 Mexico City Olympics, 27 of the 29 gold medalists wore the brand. At the 1972 Olympics, Mark Spitz became the pin-up boy for health, efficiency and homoeroticism thanks to his seven gold medals and iconic stars and stripes Speedos. Me? I wore them at school; we all did. It wasn't embarrassing because, just like verucas and watery vending machine hot chocolate, Speedos were an integral part of the public swimming pool experience. It was a bit different squeezing my thirtysomething frame into a pair years later when taking to the water with the buff Pierre Gruneberg. Would I do that now? With the likes of David Beckham to compete with, and young Cruz following suit? Not. A. Chance. And yet… As the occasionally Speedo-clad James Bond might say: never say never. With each passing summer, men's swimming clobber is getting briefer and shorts shorter. Designer poolside collections are currently dominated by Speedo-like swimmers from Gucci, Hermès and Dior. And right now, with another heatwave up on us, a man's biggest summer flex is not his wristwatch or his girlfriend – it's his body.
