Opposition to Punjab's land-pooling policy brings together farmers
BATHINDA: Resistance to AAP-led Punjab government's land-pooling policy is acting as the glue to bring together fractured farm organisations and individual farmers beyond political affiliation, reports Neel Kamal.
It appears to be rekindling farm struggles that seemed to be losing momentum - seeing that there was not much hue and cry after Punjab Police slammed shut the protests at Shambhu and Khanauri borders with Haryana.
The Bhagwant Mann government has been trying to convince people that land-pooling scheme was beneficial to farmers but it hasn't been able to dispel farmers' apprehension of losing land. Individual farmers from villages where land is being 'pooled' - those so far not associated with farm organisations - are now turning towards them to oppose the scheme.
The policy aims to pool over 40,000 acres of farmland to promote planned urban development. It's a land-for-land scheme, where landowners voluntarily give up land and are given developed residential and commercial plots in exchange.
SKM's green light to its Punjab chapter to hold tractor rallies on July 30 in villages that are likely to be brought under land-pooling scheme has come as a boost to forces opposing the scheme. The national committee of KMM has also backed the SKM call, further emboldening resistance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
NIA unlikely to challenge 2008 Malegaon blasts case verdict
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is unlikely to challenge the acquittal of Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit and five others in 2008 Malegaon blast case, just as it hasn't in other similar cases, people familiar with the matter said on Thursday. NIA unlikely to challenge 2008 Malegaon blasts case verdict They cited the Samjhauta train, Ajmer Dargah and Mecca Masjid blasts in 2007, in which Swami Aseemanand was acquitted by different courts. 'As soon as we get the copy of judgment in the 2008 Malegaon case, we will examine it and take a legal opinion. However, our experience has been that in such cases where there is no fresh evidence other than already presented before the trial court, going into appeal may not serve any purpose,' said an NIA officer, who didn't want to be named. 'Most of these cases didn't have robust material evidence and were built on identical confessional statements by accused persons or witnesses, who later retracted,' this officer added Commenting on evidence, the NIA special court in Mumbai observed on Thursday that the prosecution failed to conclusively link the motorcycle found at the site to an explosive device. The federal agency didn't officially comment on the judgment on Thursday. To be sure, the NIA court's acquittal was a qualified one: 'A grave degree of suspicion is established, but not enough to convict them; hence, the court has given them the benefit of the doubt.' The Malegaon 2008 blast case was first investigated by Maharashtra ATS, which claimed that Sadhvi Pragya Thakur and a right wing group Abhinav Bharat, involving Lt Colonel Prasad, were behind the blast. It named 14 accused , Pragya Thakur, Ramesh Upadhyay, Shrikant Prasad Purohit, Sameer Kulkarni, Rakesh Dhawade, Sudhakar Dwivedi alias Dayanand Pandey, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Pravin Takalki, Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Shyam Sahu, Ajay alias Raja Rahirkar, Jagdish Mhatre, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange in the charge sheet. NIA, which took over the probe in April 2011 filed a fresh charge sheet in 2016 dropping charges against Sadhvi Pragya Thakur and five others , Shiv Narayan Kalsangra, Shyam Bhavarlal Sahu, Praveen Takkalki, Lokesh Sharma and Dhan Singh Choudhury. However, the NIA court in December 2017 said Sadhvi Pragya and Purohit would stand trial under terror charges. In the Samjhauta Express, Ajmer and Mecca Masjid blast cases officers handling the probes , including the public prosecutors, investigating officers, SPs, DIGs, IGs, and legal advisors of NIA felt that there was no need to appeal, according to a second officer, who also requested anonymity. He asserted that 'investigation into these cases was over long back as far as NIA was concerned'. The BJP has claimed that the so-called saffron-error probes launched by the Congress-led UPA government were a conspiracy to malign the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh and its affiliates.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC to T speaker: Decide pleas on BRS turncoat MLAs in 3 months
New Delhi: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Thursday said to protect foundations of democracy, Parliament must take a call on the effectiveness of the anti-defection law mechanism, which has been virtually blunted due to the widely perceived partisanship of speakers, leading to delays in deciding disqualification petitions against political turncoats. Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih gave this ruling while directing the Telangana assembly speaker to decide within three months the disqualification petitions filed against 10 BRS MLAs who defected to Congress after it formed govt in the state following the Nov 2023 elections. The verdict marks a departure from the restraint that courts have shown in setting deadlines for speakers and could well be a precedent in settling defection-related cases in the future. The CJI-led bench also directed the speaker not to allow the 10 MLAs, facing disqualification proceedings, to protract proceedings. "In the event, any of such MLAs attempt to protract the proceedings, the speaker would draw an adverse inference against him," the bench said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Constitutional courts have generally refrained from fastening speakers with a timeline to decide pending disqualification petitions. However, SC said since the Telangana speaker has delayed adjudication of the disqualification petitions by more than a year, it warranted issuance of directions to him. The bench was critical of the way the speaker issued notice on the disqualification petitions seven months after they were filed, and said such a delay breached the trust Parliament reposed in presiding officers to adjudicate defection cases fearlessly and expeditiously. In the 2023 elections to the 119-member assembly, Congress had won 64 seats, BRS 39, BJP eight, AIMM seven and CPI one. However, Congress's numbers rose after the defection of the10 BRS MLAs. Writing the 74-page judgment recording numerous instances of speakers' deliberate inaction in speedy adjudication of disqualification petitions against MLAs, CJI Gavai said, "It is for Parliament to consider whether the mechanism of entrusting speakers the important task of deciding the issue of disqualification on the ground of defection is serving the purpose of effectively combating political defections or not?" "If the very foundation of our democracy and the principles that sustain it are to be safeguarded, it will have to be examined whether the present mechanism is sufficient or is for Parliament to take a call on that," the CJI said. SC reiterated the settled law that speakers/chairman of assemblies, Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha function as tribunals while deciding disqualification petitions under the anti-defection law, and that their decisions can be scrutinised by the HCs and the apex court. CJI Gavai examined the purpose behind enactment of the anti-defection law in 1985 through a constitutional amendment and said the only purpose of entrusting the work of adjudicating the disqualification petitions to the speaker/chairman was to avoid dilly-dallying and resultant delay in the courts of law or the Election Commission's office. He said, "Parliament decided to entrust the important question of adjudication of disqualification petitions, on account of defection, to the speaker/chairman expecting him to decide them fearlessly and expeditiously." CJI Gavai and Justice Masih said, "With the experience of over 30 years of working of the 10th Schedule to the Constitution, the question that we will have to ask ourselves is as to whether the trust which the Parliament entrusted in the high office of the speaker or the chairman of avoiding delays in deciding the issue with regard to disqualification has been adhered to by the incumbents in the high office of speaker and the chairman or not?" Referring to a chain of cases under the anti-defection law marred by inordinate delay in adjudication by speakers across states, already frowned upon by SC in as many cases, the bench said, "We need not answer this question, since the facts of the various cases themselves provide the answer."
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP says Congress govt. has turned Karnataka into a ‘safe abode of anti-nationals'
Expressing concern over the Gujarat Anti-Terrorist Squad arresting a woman from Bengaluru for amplifying the digital propaganda of Al-Qaeda in India and the Mumbai police detecting a narcotics drug manufacturing unit in Mysuru, the BJP has accused the Congress government of protecting anti-nationals. Speaking to presspersons in Delhi, BJP MP and former Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai accused the government of protecting anti-nationals, and said law and order in Karnataka had completely deteriorated. 'The police have lost control over criminal elements. Just last week, the Maharashtra police came to Mysuru and seized drugs worth around ₹394 crore. Yet, the Karnataka Home Minister claimed that he had no information regarding the drug operation,' he said. He further said that a Gujarat ATS team came to Bengaluru and arrested a woman who is a member of Al-Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent. 'This woman was recruiting for Al-Qaeda in the subcontinent. It was the Gujarat ATS team that arrested her. What were the Karnataka police doing?' he said. Another BJP MP, Capt Brijesh Chowta, alleged in Delhi that Karnataka was becoming a safe abode of anti-nationals and terrorists because of the maladministration of the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government. The Home Minister had become helpless in the power tussle between the Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister that had weakened the administration, he alleged. This had made people to live under fear as the political situation had weakened the law and order situation, turning the State into a safe abode for anti-national activities, he argued.
