
Mortgage Rate Forecast for May: Can Rates Fall Without Fed Cuts?
Mortgage rates can change daily and even hourly.
Tharon Green/CNET
The Federal Reserve may be stand its ground on interest rates, but the outlook for mortgage rates is still on shaky footing.
Since early spring, average 30-year fixed rates have been moving between 6.5% and 7%, with no clear direction forward.
Despite concerns over a potential recession and pressure from the White House to reduce interest rates, the central bank voted to leave its benchmark federal funds rate unchanged on May 7 to better evaluate the impact of the administration's trade and austerity measures.
Though the Fed's policy changes have a ripple effect on all short-term lending rates, the central bank doesn't directly set the rates on home loans. Mortgage rates are primarily driven by movement in the bond market, specifically on the 10-year Treasury yield.
Bond yields and mortgage interest rates rise and fall depending on how new economic data and policy changes shift market speculation and risk assessment, said Odeta Kushi, deputy chief economist at First American Financial Corporation.
Given contentious debates over tariffs and President Trump's political posturing against Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, investors are still divided over the central bank's projected path of rate cuts in 2025. Right now, markets are anticipating anywhere between two and four rate cuts this year, with the first coming this July.
Early in the year, many economists optimistically predicted that mortgage rates would gradually decline, potentially reaching 6% by the end of 2025. But economic uncertainty — sparked by Trump's aggressive tariff regime and fears of higher inflation and a potential recession — have thrown a wrench in those forecasts.
With so many unknowns in today's economy, experts say there are plausible scenarios for both upward and downward movement in rates by the end of the year
Why is the Fed holding off on interest rate cuts?
The central bank is responsible for maintaining maximum employment and containing inflation via adjustments to its benchmark interest rate. Usually, when prices go up too fast (inflation), the Fed raises interest rates to slow price growth and reduce spending by making borrowing more expensive. Then, when the economy shows signs of weakness and unemployment rises, the Fed tends to lower rates to boost demand and stimulate growth.
"Coming into the year, the Fed was prepared to cut rates if the labor market began to weaken, since it seemed like inflation risk had mostly eased," said Alex Thomas, senior research analyst at John Burns Research and Consulting. "Now, given the potential inflationary impact of wide-reaching tariffs, the Fed will be more hesitant to cut until the labor market weakens significantly.'
Trump's aggressive tariff agenda has created a dilemma for the Fed. On one side, tariffs act like a supply shock that makes prices go up, leading to more inflation, said Brett Ryan, senior economist at Deutsche Bank. On the other side, tariffs can slow down the economy and threaten jobs, Ryan said.
Since the Fed can't address both sides of its dual mandate at once, it will have to choose between keeping inflation in check and avoiding a severe recession.
Can mortgage rates still fall in 2025?
The big question hanging over the housing market is whether rates will rise due to tariff-induced inflation or fall due to a recession.
'The rapidly evolving tariff policy landscape has already prompted the Federal Reserve to recalibrate its outlook, revising up its forecasts for inflation and revising down its outlook for growth and employment this year,' said Kushi.
Typically, bad economic news tends to bring good news for mortgage rates. With a recession in 2025 looking more likely, rates could drop. The worry of a downturn can push mortgage rates down as investors often flock to safer investments like US Treasury bonds, which lowers long-term yields. However, given declining confidence in the US economy, that might not happen this time.
The most recent economic reports don't yet reflect a surge in unemployment, but layoffs and cutbacks can take time to appear in the data. The figures economists and the Fed rely on tell us what happened in the past, whereas investors act on what they anticipate for the future, said Logan Mohtashami, lead analyst at HousingWire.
Even if a recession brings down mortgage rates, the relief might be short-lived or irrelevant for households facing job losses and financial hardship.
Buy now? Or wait?
Today's rates may seem high compared to the 2% rates of the pandemic era. But experts say getting below 3% on a mortgage is unlikely without a severe economic downturn.
If you're waiting for mortgage rates to come down before buying, keep in mind that the large-scale economic issues affecting the housing market are beyond your control.
"Trying to time everything perfectly is a losing proposition. Rates could go up or they could go down," said Gregory Heym, chief economist at Brown Harris Stevens. "The question is: Do you want a home?"
If the answer is yes, experts recommend focusing on two key fundamentals:
Make a homebuying budget and stick to it: Creating a realistic homebuying budget can help you decide if you can handle the costs of homeownership, and provide you with some figures for how large your mortgage should be.
Shop around for mortgage rates: Each home loan lender offers different mortgage rates and terms. Comparing offers from multiple lenders can help you negotiate a better rate. If you can't snag a low rate but are ready to buy, you can always refinance down the road.
Watch this: 6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More
02:31
More on today's housing market
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bankruptcy Was Good for 23andMe
Sometimes a public company has a controlling shareholder who wants to take it private by buying out all of the other shareholders, and that's always messy. 1 The controlling shareholder will to some extent be negotiating with herself: She will want to buy the company for a low price, but the company's shareholders will want to get a high price, but she's the controlling shareholder and can vote for the low price. There are standard solutions to the problem, but they are only partial solutions: In the past few months, I have written a few times about 23andMe Holding Co. as an illustration of these problems. 23andMe is a publicly traded genetic testing company that was once worth about $6 billion, but it has now fallen on hard times. Its founder, Anne Wojcicki, owns about 49% of the voting power of the stock, making her effectively a controlling shareholder. She offered to buy all the stock she didn't own, to take the company private and fix its problems 'outside of the short term pressures of the public markets.' But the board of directors, whose job was to find an 'actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders,' didn't think her offer was good enough.


New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump-Musk Alliance Dissolves as They Hurl Personal Attacks
Pinned President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump's election in a way that he never has before. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.


Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Steel Deal Seen Closing by Merger Deadline After Trump Pivot
Nippon Steel Corp. and United States Steel Corp. are on pace to finalize their $14.1 billion combination with US President Donald Trump's administration ahead of a deal deadline later this month, capping an 18-month saga to combine the steelmakers into the world's second-largest producer. Talks on the deal between the companies and the US government are ongoing and expected to reach a conclusion before a June 18 merger agreement deadline, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity given that talks are confidential. US Steel and Nippon Steel declined to comment. A Treasury Department spokesperson declined to comment.