Sheikhpura man held for brutal dowry assault after love marriage
atna: In a shocking case of domestic violence and dowry harassment, a man from Sheikhpura was arrested on Sunday for allegedly torturing his wife following their love marriage.
The accused, Shivam Kumar (24), allegedly assaulted his wife, cut her hair and shaved her eyebrows with a blade while demanding a dowry.
The 20-year-old victim had married Shivam at a temple in Jamui on April 10 this year. The couple enjoyed a harmonious relationship for the first month, but tensions soon escalated when Shivam and his family allegedly began pressuring her for a dowry of Rs 5 lakh. Estranged from her own family after eloping, the woman was unable to meet the demands, leading to repeated abuse.
The situation reached a breaking point on June 20 when Shivam allegedly attempted to kill her. The woman managed to escape and lodged a complaint at the women's police station the same day. Following her report, police launched a manhunt and arrested Shivam in Lakhisarai on Sunday.
A police officer said, "The victim's ordeal began when she met Shivam through social media one year ago. Their relationship blossomed, but her family opposed the union.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Senior Living Homes in Palembang May Surprise You
Senior Living | Search Ads
Undo
Defying her family's wishes, she eloped with Shivam and married him in a temple, only to face abuse shortly after."
Women's police station in-charge Anamika Kumari said, "The victim met Shivam through social media a year ago. They started talking and, six months later, began meeting each other. Both informed their families about the relationship. The girl's family opposed it and refused to accept the relationship."
Distressed by her family's disapproval, the young woman eloped and married Shivam at a temple in the Sikandra police station area in Jamui. She then moved in with Shivam's family in Sheikhpura, who initially accepted her.
"All was well for about a month," Kumari said. "However, at the beginning of June, her husband and in-laws began demanding ₹5 lakh as dowry. The woman told them that she had severed ties with her family, who had stopped speaking to her after she ran away.
She asked how she could possibly provide the money. In response, her in-laws began verbally abusing her," she added.
Disputes over the dowry increased between the couple. On June 20, in a fit of rage, Shivam allegedly beat her severely. "Not satisfied, her husband then cut her hair with scissors and shaved her eyebrows with a blade. Terrified by this behaviour, she managed to escape from her in-laws' house and reached the women's police station, where she filed a complaint. She then returned to her parental home in Nawada," the station in-charge added.
Shivam is set to be presented before the court on July 28.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kharar realtor Ranjeet Singh Gill seeks anticipatory bail after Punjab VB raids, alleges political vendetta
Chandigarh: Apprehending arrest by Punjab Police, Kharar-based realtor Ranjeet Singh Gill approached the Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday to seek anticipatory bail. After hearing his plea, a single bench headed by Justice Aaradhana Sawhney referred the matter to the chief justice for directions after the Punjab govt informed the court that the matter is connected with an already pending petition filed by former minister Bikramjit Singh Majithia. A separate bench is hearing all cases that are related to the former and sitting MPs and MLAs. In his petition, Gill claimed that he was falsely and maliciously targeted by the vigilance bureau (VB), Punjab, solely on account of his political affiliation. Immediately after formally joining the Bharatiya Janata Party on Aug 1, Gill said, he became the subject of a politically motivated action by the state machinery. It was contended that acting under the influence of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the VB procured search warrants in an arbitrary and clandestine manner, without issuing any summons, notice, or requisition as mandated under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Paperela Undo The court was informed that multiple raids were conducted on Aug 2 at four of the petitioner's properties, including his residence, yet no incriminating material was found. However, now the notices under Section 179 of BNSS (corresponding Section 160 CrPC) have been issued, whereby he was summoned as a witness. "The petitioner is neither named in any FIR nor linked to the case by way of any disclosure or evidence, and the jurisdictional authority of the Vigilance Bureau does not extend to him as he is not a public servant. The entire sequence of events demonstrates a clear abuse of process, malafide intent, and political vendetta aimed at coercing and humiliating the petitioner for exercising his constitutional right to political association under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India," his counsel submitted. On Aug 1, Gill joined BJP in a hurriedly called meeting with Haryana chief minister Nayab Singh Saini at his residence. On Saturday, the bureau raided his residences.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Thane MACT Awards ₹87 Lakh Compensation in 2015 Road Accident Death
Thane: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Thane, awarded a compensation of Rs 87.13 lakh to the family of a 55-year-old school teacher who succumbed to injuries sustained in a road accident in 2015. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The tribunal, presided over by Member R.V. Mohite, held the driver of a tempo solely responsible for the mishap. The accident occurred on July 31, 2015, near Sunita Apartment in Ulhasnagar-3, when the teacher was riding his motorcycle. According to case records, a tempo driver suddenly opened the vehicle door, causing the motorcyclist to crash into it. The victim suffered a severe head injury and remained in a coma for nearly a year before passing away on July 31, 2016. The tribunal relied on various pieces of evidence, including the FIR, spot panchanama, medical records, and crucial CCTV footage, which was presented in court by the investigating officer. Although the registration numbers and identity were not clearly visible in the footage, the tribunal accepted corroborative statements, including that of the tempo owner, who confirmed the vehicle and driver involved. The tribunal rejected objections raised by the insurer, which challenged the admissibility of the CCTV footage and raised concerns about an alleged policy breach. Member of MACT, Mohite, ruled that strict evidentiary rules under BNS do not apply to claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, and there was no evidence of footage tampering. The court also dismissed the claim of a licensing issue, confirming there was no breach of the insurance policy. The deceased was a permanent teacher at a Ulhasnagar municipal school, earning Rs 63,594 per month. The court considered his income, age, and number of dependents to compute compensation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The awarded amount includes loss of future income, future prospects, medical expenses, along with amounts for consortium, estate, funeral expenses, and love and affection. The tribunal directed the tempo owner and insurer to jointly and severally pay the total amount with 9% annual interest from the date of petition filing until full payment. The compensation will be distributed among the widow and two adult children of the deceased, with part of the amount to be invested in fixed deposits in nationalised banks.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Sgt. Quornelius Radford— the Army soldier behind the Fort Stewart shooting that shocked America?
A typical workday at Fort Stewart, one of the largest U.S. Army installations in Georgia, turned into a shocking scene of violence on August 6, 2025. Sgt. Quornelius Radford , a 28-year-old Army logistics specialist, opened fire inside the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) area, injuring five fellow soldiers. He was quickly subdued by others in the unit and taken into custody. While all five victims are expected to survive, many are still asking: Who is this soldier, and what led him to commit such a brutal act inside his own workplace? What do we know about Sgt. Quornelius Radford? Sgt. Quornelius Radford joined the U.S. Army in January 2018 and had been stationed at Fort Stewart since 2022, according to AP News. His role was as an automated logistics specialist within the 2nd ABCT. Despite holding the rank of sergeant, Radford had never been deployed to combat and had no notable disciplinary history within the military. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program However, outside the base, he had been arrested in May 2025 for a DUI and running a red light, a record that wasn't known to his commanding officers. That detail has sparked internal discussion around communication gaps between military leadership and civilian law enforcement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Greatest Enemy of Blood Sugar? Try This Tonight! Cinnamon Help Learn More Undo How did the Fort Stewart shooting unfold? The shooting started around 10:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Sgt. Radford reportedly used a personally owned handgun, which is not issued by the military, to fire on his coworkers inside the brigade area. Within minutes, several soldiers responded swiftly by tackling Radford to the ground. He was in custody by 11:35 a.m., according to the U.S. Army's Public Affairs Office. A base-wide lockdown was issued at 11:04 a.m. and lifted gradually by early afternoon, with the 2nd ABCT complex staying secured for longer. Live Events Who were the victims and how are they now? Five soldiers were injured during the shooting. All were active-duty service members who served in the same unit as Radford. According to Fort Stewart officials, the wounded soldiers were given on-site emergency care before being transferred. Three soldiers required surgery Two were moved to Memorial Health University Medical Center in Savannah The remaining were treated at Winn Army Community Hospital As of the latest update, all five were reported to be in stable condition and expected to recover. What could be the motive behind the shooting? Right now, investigators say they have no clear motive. The attack appears to have been targeted, but there's no confirmed information about prior conflicts or threats. The investigation is being jointly handled by the Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) and the FBI's Savannah field office. Military leaders are also examining Radford's personal history and mental health, although no official statement has been made linking the incident to any specific issues. What has the military and public response been like? Reactions from both military officials and public leaders were swift. The Army commended the quick action of the soldiers who disarmed Radford. President Donald Trump and Georgia Governor Brian Kemp were briefed shortly after the event. Kemp wrote on X (formerly Twitter), 'We are praying for the wounded and their families and deeply thankful for the fast action taken to secure the base.' Fort Stewart has also increased counseling support for soldiers and their families, and military leadership has promised a full review of safety protocols and mental health support services. Has Fort Stewart seen similar incidents in the past? Fort Stewart, home to the 3rd Infantry Division, is no stranger to tragic events, though shootings like this are rare. Earlier in 2025, the base had faced training-related fatalities and the loss of soldiers overseas, but this kind of internal attack marks one of the most serious security breaches in recent years. The shooting has raised concerns across military communities about stress, internal disputes, and the ease with which personal firearms can be brought onto military property. What happens next for Quornelius Radford? Sgt. Radford remains in military custody, and charges are pending. Once formal charges are filed, more information about the potential consequences he faces—including military court-martial or civilian charges—will be released. The Army has not confirmed whether he will face charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) or in civilian court, but legal action is expected soon. FAQs: Q1: Who is Sgt. Quornelius Radford? Sgt. Radford is a 28-year-old Army logistics specialist stationed at Fort Stewart since 2022, accused of shooting five fellow soldiers. Q2: What happened during the Fort Stewart shooting? Radford allegedly opened fire with a personal handgun, injuring five soldiers before being tackled and arrested by his unit.
