Sheryl Crow on selling Tesla to protest Musk: ‘I'm fighting for my kids'
The 'Soak Up the Sun' singer shared a video on Instagram in February of her Tesla being towed away, saying she was donating funds from the sale of the vehicle to NPR in response to Musk and President Trump's calls to slash federal funding for public broadcasters.
NPR, Crow said at the time, is 'under threat' by Musk, the CEO of Tesla and head of the Department of Government Efficiency.
In an interview with Variety published Wednesday, the Grammy Award winner described the reaction she received for the move, which was mocked by critics, including Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr.
'This feels different, because when I came out against Walmart carrying guns, not everybody was armed — and certainly I didn't live in Tennessee, where everybody is armed,' the Nashville resident said, making a reference to her 1996 song, 'Love Is a Good Thing.'
'So yeah, there was a moment where I actually really felt very afraid: A man got on my property, in my barn, who was armed. It doesn't feel safe when you're dealing with people who are so committed,' Crow said.
But, she told the publication, the response wouldn't deter her from doing it all over again.
'I can't help it,' the 63-year-old musician said.
'I feel like I'm fighting for my kids. Also, that's the way I was raised. There have been times when it hasn't really been fun, but I follow my Atticus Finch dad; I'm very similar to him if I see something that seems unfair, you know?'
With her outspoken political views, Crow told Variety that living in the Volunteer State can be a challenge.
'Tennessee is a hard place for me. I mean, I struggle,' she said.
'I call my representatives every single morning — Andy Ogles and Marsha Blackburn hear from me every day — because we have to stand up and be vocal and fight for the future for our kids,' Crow said of the Tennessee Republican congressman and senator, respectively.
An Ogles aide told ITK that Crow has contacted the congressman's office fives times this year, according to office records.
The most recent call in March, chief of staff Grant Henry said, was 'a moment our team recalls vividly,' saying staffers 'love her music' and were 'absolutely thrilled to speak directly with an icon in the industry.'
'During that call, Ms. Crow expressed concerns regarding actions taken that might impact the Department of Education. We had a thoughtful and respectful conversation with her, documented her concerns in detail, and Congressman Ogles sent a formal response through his official office the following day,' Henry said.
'Although we have only had the opportunity to interact with her about once a month, we would relish the opportunity to hear from her every single day,' Henry said, praising Crow as a 'rock legend but also a tremendously influential voice for Nashville and the broader Tennessee community.'
'Her platform gives her access to perspectives we might not otherwise encounter, and her continued insights would be invaluable to us,' Henry said.
Blackburn's office didn't immediately respond to ITK's request for comment about Crow's remarks.
'I do think, 'Are they laughing?'' Crow said of her outreach to lawmakers.
'But it's like what Jimmy Carter said: As long as there's legal bribery, we won't ever have fair elections,' she said.
'So we have to keep raising our voices and showing up to these organized rallies.'
—Updated at 1:22 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Wild footage captures massive Carnival Cruise ship brawl that erupted over ‘chicken tenders'
Fried and furious. Disturbing footage captured the moment a massive melee broke out on a Carnival Cruise ship between fuming passengers seemingly upset over 'chicken tenders.' The violence erupted between about a dozen brawlers who were captured trading blows and slamming each other to the ground as onlookers screamed and filmed the mayhem, according to wild footage shared on social media Monday. Advertisement 'Where the f–k is security?!' one bystander could be heard yelling. The violence erupted between about a dozen cruisers who were captured trading blows and slamming each other to the ground. Mike Terra/Instagram Multiple security guards could be seen trying to break up the fight, with one overwhelmed officer fleeing the chaos and reaching for his radio as shoes went flying. Advertisement @bigterra1 😂😂😂 I always hear carnival is ghetto/ratchet I been cruising for years but this my 1st time seeing some action on a ship I was on YNs was tripping #TERRAbleVision #ImOutSide ♬ original sound – BigTERRA At one point, Bronx content creator Mike Terra — who filmed the uproar and shared it on his social media channels — flipped the camera to record his own reaction. 'Over chicken tenders is crazy,' Terra said. The avid cruiser later responded to intrigued commenters, calling the ruckus an 'isolated incident' that escalated over 'more' that just food around 2 a.m. after the ship set sail from Miami. Advertisement The content creator who captured the wild melee said it happened on a Carnival Cruise ship at 2 a.m. Christopher Sadowski Terra captioned his video: 'I always hear carnival is ghetto/ratchet I been cruising for years but this my 1st time seeing some action on a ship I was on YNs was tripping.' It remains unclear which ship the uproar broke out on or what sparked the commotion. Carnival and Terra did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.