Militant Georges Abdallah arrives in Lebanon after more than 40 years in French detention
BEIRUT — A Lebanese pro-Palestinian communist militant arrived in Lebanon Friday following his release after more than 40 years in detention in France.
Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, 74, was serving a life sentence for complicity in the murders of two diplomats, one American and one Israeli, in Paris in 1982.
The Paris Court of Appeal ruled last week that Abdallah, who has been imprisoned in France since his arrest in 1984, could be released on the condition that he leave the country and never return.
Abdallah was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1987 for complicity in the assassinations of U.S. Army Lt. Col. Charles Ray, who was stationed in Paris as an assistant military attaché, and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov.
He became eligible for parole in 1999 but multiple requests he filed since then were denied.
In Lebanon, many saw Abdallah as a political prisoner. While there was no official event marking his return, a crowd of supporters, including a number of members of Parliament, gathered outside of the Beirut airport to wait for him.
Some banged on drums and held up Palestinian and Lebanese Communist Party flags and a banner reading, 'George Abdallah is free — a Lebanese, Palestinian and international freedom fighter on the road to liberating Palestine.'
The crowd broke out in cheers upon hearing the plane carrying Abdallah had arrived.
The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's recognition of Palestinian state will likely have minimal impact without U.S. support, analysts say
The Canadian government's plan to recognize a Palestinian state in September reflects Ottawa's deep frustration with the Israeli government and sends a strong message that it supports a two-state solution, but analysts say it likely will have little impact without U.S. support. Prime Minister Mark Carney made the announcement on Wednesday, saying that Canada intends to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly. He said this is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to important reforms, including president Mahmoud Abbas's promise to hold general elections in 2026, in which Hamas could not take part, and the demilitarization of the Palestinian state. The announcement marks a change for Canada, which has long supported a two-state solution, but has maintained, like many of its allies, that such recognition would follow peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine. Explainer: What does Canada's recognition of a Palestinian state mean in practice? Carney's policy shift on Palestinian statehood met with cautious hope, criticism by Canadians Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University, called it a 'major decision' and said it marks a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy. 'I think it obviously reflects frustration with the Netanyahu government and it's very much being driven by the humanitarian situation on the ground in Gaza,' he said, adding that other countries have expressed similar frustration. With the prospect of peace talks seemingly distant, Canada has joined France, which has said it will also recognize a Palestinian state, and Britain, which will also recognize Palestine if Israel does not agree to a ceasefire. Prof. Hampson said Canada's intention is 'part of a pressure tactic on Israel' that is shared with a new political axis between Ottawa, London and Paris. He said that while Israel has responded to international pressure in some ways – such as deploying air drops of aid and relaxing some restrictions on food entering Gaza – 'as far as Mr. Netanyahu is concerned, there's only one key ally that matters, and that's the United States.' Thomas Juneau, a professor at the University of Ottawa and a Middle East expert, said he supports Canada's decision to recognize Palestinian statehood, but he was surprised by the timing given the trade negotiations with the United States. Trade deal aside, Prof. Juneau said Mr. Carney's decision comes at a time when there's 'growing frustration in the international community with Israel's continuation of the war in the Gaza Strip.' 'On its own, Canada has no influence on this conflict, and this is not criticism of this or any other government. We're too far and we're too small. France on its own has no influence, or the U.K. on its own. Where other members of the international community, i.e. pretty much anybody except the U.S., can have some impact, limited but real impact, is if they act all together.' He said that if more states recognize Palestine, it will have a limited but cumulative impact. On Thursday, Portugal signalled it is also considering the recognition of a Palestinian state. Prof. Juneau said with France, Britain and Canada making such announcements, they are creating an opening for other countries to follow suit. However, like Prof. Hampson, he stressed the importance of the U.S. 'One thing that we've known for years, but that has been very clear since October, 2023, is that there's only one country that can have influence on Israel and it's the U.S.' However, Prof. Juneau said that if there is progress to be made on a peace process – and while very few are optimistic about that happening in the near future – then collective action by Western countries and others in the region does matter. 'On its own, this has no impact. The reason why it is a positive step is that as part of a broader strategy to move toward peace, to create the conditions to be able to relaunch a peace process, it is one useful step among many others.' On Tuesday, ahead of Mr. Carney's announcement, nearly 200 former ambassadors and senior diplomats signed a letter urging him to recognize a Palestinian state. Among the signatories was Jon Allen, who served as ambassador to Israel from 2006 to 2010. Mr. Allen said Mr. Carney's intention to recognize the state of Palestine is 'symbolically and historically and substantively important,' saying that one significant message it sends is to Palestinians that the West continues to support a two-state solution. 'Now, is recognition going to do something on its own? No, it's not, but it's sending an important signal.' He said what's most troubling is that Israel's actions in the West Bank and Gaza risk making the two-state solution impossible – and that's why the recognition is important now. 'And even without the United States, sending a signal, recognizing Palestine, is sending a signal to Israel, to the United States, to the world, and to Palestinians, most importantly, that the two-state solution is important. We believe in it and we're going to keep trying to work toward it.' 'I am one that continues to strongly believe that it's possible, but if Israel were to continue to act as it is, it would disappear. And so countries are saying to Israel and Palestine, 'we still believe in that.'' Mr. Allen said he doesn't see it as a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy because Ottawa has long supported a two-state solution. 'This is, one could say, one more step in an effort to try and preserve what we want and hope for these two peoples, which is two states.'
Montreal Gazette
2 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Trump signs executive order pushing tariffs on Canada to 35%
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order pushing tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent beginning on Friday, following through on a threat to raise duties if Ottawa didn't make a trade deal. The White House confirmed the tariffs would not hit goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, commonly known as CUSMA. A fact sheet from the White House said Canada 'failed to cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl' and also pointed to Ottawa's implementation of retaliatory tariffs. Canadian officials had been tempering expectations that a trade deal would materialize ahead of Trump's deadline and Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he'll only make an agreement that is good for Canada. Trump said earlier Thursday he had not 'spoken to Canada' but did reference that 'he's called' — suggesting Carney may have reached out hours before the 35 per cent tariff was set to hit. The Canadian Press has contacted Carney's office for confirmation but has not yet received a response. Ontario Premier Doug Ford posted on social media that 'Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal.' He repeated his call for the federal government to respond with a 50 per cent tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum. 'Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground,' Ford said. Trump dampened the prospect of a deal with Canada in a post on social media early Thursday morning that said it would be very hard to make a deal after Carney announced Wednesday that Ottawa intends to recognize a Palestinian state. Trump told reporters at the White House that he 'didn't like that' but that it was 'not a deal-breaker.' When asked about the holdup in Canadian negotiations, Trump said 'they have to pay a fair rate.' The president also misrepresented agricultural duties, complained about Canadian military spending and said Canada has been treating the United States badly for years. While Trump didn't mention fentanyl, the White House fact sheet focused on the drug to justify increasing the tariffs. 'Given Canada's continued failure to arrest traffickers, seize illicit drugs, or coordinate with U.S. law enforcement and Canada's retaliation against the United States for the President's actions to address the unusual and extraordinary threat to America, further presidential action is necessary and appropriate to protect American lives and the national security and foreign policy of the United States,' the White House said. U.S. government data shows a miniscule amount of fentanyl is seized at the border with Canada compared to Mexico. Ottawa responded to Trump's concerns of cross-border trafficking with a $1.3 billion boosted border plan. Ottawa appointed a 'fentanyl czar' and announced a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl trafficking and money laundering, and deployed additional helicopters and drones along the border. Trump announced a 90-day extension on trade talks for Mexico Thursday after a phone conversation with President Claudia Sheinbaum. He said it was because the 'complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border.' 'Additionally, Mexico has agreed to immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many,' Trump said. In a separate executive order Thursday Trump increased his so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs on many other nations, with those duties to be implemented in seven days. The order applied to 68 countries, as well as the 27-member European Union, which negotiated its new tariff rate in a deal announced earlier in the week. Countries that were not listed would face a baseline 10 per cent tariff. While Trump continued to claim in posts on social media that tariffs are making 'America GREAT & RICH Again,' the president's main tool for realigning global trade faced some sharp questions from federal appellate judges in court earlier Thursday. The Trump administration's lawyer argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that there are still checks and balances on the president's powers and he has the authority to use a national security statute to impose duties — despite the fact that the word 'tariff' is found nowhere in the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution reserves power over taxes and tariffs for Congress. Members of the 11-judge panel on Thursday repeatedly questioned the Trump's administration's justifications for using IEEPA to implement the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs 'If the president says there's a problem with our military readiness and he puts a 20 per cent tax on coffee, that doesn't seem to necessarily deal with (it)' said Chief Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore. No decision was issued from the bench Thursday and a White House spokesperson has said the case is expected to go before the Supreme Court.
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Mark Carney tossed grenade into trade talks
Announcing Canada's support for an independent Palestinian state in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump's position defies logic Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on July 30, 2025. Photo by Dave Chan / AFP via Getty Images Why Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada's support for an independent Palestinian state in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump's position – two days before the Aug. 1 deadline for negotiating a tariff and trade deal with Canada – is inexplicable. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Initially, Trump said on social media that Canada's actions would make it very difficult to reach an agreement on trade by the deadline, although he later said in response to questioning in the Oval Office that it wasn't a deal breaker. Regardless, it was an unnecessary distraction from the trade negotiations with Trump, who signed an executive order Thursday raising U.S. tariffs on imported goods from Canada not compliant with the 2020 Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement to 35% from 25%. The White House also announced a 40% tariff on any goods shipped to another country to avoid the tariffs. As for the current state of the negotiations, Trump revealed that before the new tariffs were announced when he said, 'We haven't spoken to Canada today. He's (Carney) called and … we'll see.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Meanwhile Mexico, which didn't impose retaliatory tariffs on the U.S. – in fact, Canada and China were the only two countries to do so – received a 90-day reprieve from any new tariffs while negotiations continue. None of this evokes confidence in Carney's ability to achieve a deal on trade with the U.S., which was why Canadians elected him. To be clear, while we disagree with Carney's intention to recognize an independent Palestinian state – particularly as he heads a minority government with Parliament in recess and thus with no debate in the House of Commons – we do not question his authority to make that decision. RECOMMENDED VIDEO We are a sovereign nation with the right to declare our own foreign policies, regardless of the views of the American president. But why Carney announced it just before a deadline on efforts to arrive at a deal on trade with Trump, affecting the livelihoods of millions of Canadians, defies logic. As for what comes next in these negotiations, who knows, given Trump's habit of changing his mind and reversing course on his decisions within days and sometimes mere hours after making them. But there was no need for Carney to add fuel to the fire. Toronto & GTA Canada Toronto Blue Jays MLB World
