Coca-Cola beats on zero-calorie sodas, higher prices; to launch cane sugar-based drink
Food companies are increasingly looking to include healthier substitutes as they respond to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again campaign. Last week, President Donald Trump said Coca-Cola had agreed to use real cane sugar in the U.S.
While there are some slight differences between cane sugar and corn syrup as sweeteners, experts have said that too much of either is not good for consumers.
Coca-Cola already sells Coke made from cane sugar in other markets, including Mexico, and some U.S. grocery stores carry glass bottles with cane sugar labeled "Mexican" Coke.
The switch to cane sugar will also drive up costs for the company, industry analysts have said. Changes in the formulation of the rest of the Coke sold in the U.S., and other beverages and candies, would involve significant adjustments to supply chains.
Rival PepsiCo (PEP.O), opens new tab, which topped quarterly earnings estimates last week, also said it would use natural ingredients in its products if consumers want it.
Coca-Cola reiterated that the hit to costs due to "global trade dynamics" remained manageable.
The company has said it would look at affordable packaging options such as plastic bottles when Trump imposed a 25% duty on aluminum imports. As of June, tariffs on aluminum imports have doubled to 50%.
Coca-Cola's comparable revenue rose 2.5% to $12.62 billion in the second quarter, beating estimates of $12.54 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Annual comparable earnings per share is expected to be near the top end of its target of a 2% to 3% rise, helped by a weaker dollar.
Volumes fell in North America "due to the continued uncertainty and pressure on some socioeconomic segments of consumers," CEO James Quincey said on a post-earnings call.
Demand for pricey sodas has remained choppy in recent quarters, especially in developed countries as consumers, especially in lower-income segments, turned more price-sensitive.
Coca-Cola's volumes slipped 1% in the three months ended June 27 after rising 2% each in the previous two quarters, largely due to declines in key markets such as Mexico and India, as well as for its Coca-Cola brand in the U.S.
Quincey added that a boycott-related hit to demand in the U.S. and Mexico was now largely resolved.
Volumes had fallen in the first half of the year in North America due to Hispanic consumers in the U.S. and Mexico boycotting the company's legacy brands after a viral video of Coca-Cola laying off Latino staff and reporting them to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Prices rose 6% overall in the second quarter, led by increases in some inflationary markets.
Coca-Cola's shares fell 1% in early trading. They have risen 12.5% this year, as of Monday's close.
Coca-Cola Zero Sugar volume jumped 14%, driven by growth across all geographies, and was a bright spot in the quarter.
Excluding items, the company earned 87 cents per share, beating estimates of 83 cents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Grim new Social Security outlook revealed
Social Security's retirement fund is set to run short in just seven years — which could end up slashing benefits for millions of Americans by thousands of dollars a year. According to latest projections, retirees could face automatic 24 percent benefit cuts as early as the end of 2032. This means a couple who both worked would receive $18,100 less each year if they retire at the start of 2033. The new forecast from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), released Thursday, moves up the insolvency date for both Social Security and Medicare trust funds. A projection just last month had funds lasting until 2033, but that has already been revised. A major factor is the impact of President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill ', which experts warned would speed up the use of funds. Social Security relies on its trust fund to provide monthly benefit checks to around 70 million Americans. Once the reserves are exhausted, federal law requires that benefits be cut to match incoming revenues. This means payments will continue, but at reduced levels. The cuts would also grow over time as scheduled benefits continue to outpace dedicated revenues, the CRFB said. By 2099, the size of the benefit cut would grow to well over 30 percent, the nonpartisan committee said. Depending on a couple's age, marital status and work history, the actual size of the benefit cut would vary. For example, the average single-earner couple would face a $13,600 cut in late 2032, while a dual-earner low-income couple would face an $11,000 annual cut. High-income couples could see a cut of closer to $24,000. While the absolute size of the cut would be smaller for a typical low-income couple than for a high-income couple, it would represent a larger share of their income and their past earnings, the CRFB said. The depletion of Social Security's trust funds would also be compounded by the insolvency of a Medicare trust fund. The hospital insurance trust fund, which is also known as Part A of Medicare, finances health care services related to hospital stays and skilled nursing facilities for eligible beneficiaries, which is mostly those aged 65 and over. This fund is also projected to be exhausted in late 2032, cutting payments by 11 percent. The latest CRFB estimates of potential benefit cuts are somewhat larger than those put forward in the most recent Trustees' report from June . The committee blamed changes brought in by the Trump administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Despite facing bipartisan criticism, the bill was signed into law earlier this month. It extends most of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017, including slashing rates on estates and for corporations. Deductions for state and local taxes, as well as business owners, are included. The CRFB said the tax rate cuts and the increase in the senior standard deduction from the bill would reduce Social Security's revenue from the income taxation of benefits, increasing the required cut by about a percentage point upon insolvency.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Outcry as US agriculture department to cut salaries and relocate staff
Thousands of employees at the US department of agriculture will be forced to take salary cuts and relocate out of the Washington DC area, as part of a major restructuring that experts warn will further weaken support for American farmers and complicate wildfire response. In a memorandum issued on Thursday, agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins outlined the 'key pillars' behind the department's reorganization, focused on reducing its financial footprint, removing resources from the capital, eliminating management, and consolidating workforces responsible for a range of functions, including freedom of information requests, tribal relations, grants, and human resources. More than half of employees working in the Washington DC area will be relocated to five locations – Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis, Indiana; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Salt Lake City, Utah. Several key USDA offices will be shuttered in the capital region. The move follows wide-ranging and often chaotic cuts to staff and services being implemented under Trump 2.0, as the administration seeks to dismantle the federal government and fund tax cuts for the wealthy including the president's billionaire donors. 'President Trump was elected to make real change in Washington, and we are doing just that by moving our key services outside the Beltway and into great American cities across the country,' Rollins said in the statement. 'We will do so through a transparent and common-sense process that preserves USDA's critical health and public safety services the American public relies on.' In a video call, Rollins informed USDA staff that they would be advised about new assignments – and homes – over the next few months. More than 90% of the department's almost 100,000 employees are already based in county and regional offices, including at regional research institutions, farm loan offices and conservation facilities. The reorganization will leave only 2,000 of the current 4,600 USDA staff in the Beltway. The department will also eliminate or scale down regional offices, combining them into 'hub locations to the greatest extent possible', according to the memo. Rollins said that the changes would help the USDA better serve its 'core constituents' of farmers, ranchers and US producers, focus on the administration's priorities and eliminate management layers and bureaucracy. But experts warned that the latest cuts and consolidation of key departments focused on civil rights and small and disadvantaged businesses will further hamstring the agency, which is already reeling The latest upheaval follows widespread cuts to Biden era agricultural programs, research grants and staff across the country, which along with Trump's tariff chaos and deepening climate chaos has caused panic among many farmers. In a written statement, Amy Klobuchar, the Democratic ranking member of the Senate agriculture, nutrition, and forestry committee, condemned the plan as a 'half-baked proposal' and called for USDA officials to appear before Congress. 'A reorganization of this scale will impact USDA's ability to provide critical services to Americans and undermine the agency's trusted expertise that farmers and families count on … we must have an immediate hearing before more damage is done.' 'Today's move further guts the government's ability to protect public health, the environment and food safety. The real-world consequences will be severe, directly affecting people's lives,' said Rebecca Wolf, senior policy analyst at Food & Water Watch Senior Food, a nonprofit research and advocacy group. The re-organization is at least partly a cost-cutting measure, according to Rollins, and the relocated staff could see significant salary reductions due to lower rates paid outside the capital due to difference in the cost of living. But details were scant on how the plan will unfold, especially when it comes to management and administration of firefighters at the US Forest Service, an agency housed within the USDA. The USFS, which employs the bulk of the nation's largest firefighting force, is facing severe staffing shortages, a Guardian investigation found this week, as wildfires rage across the country. Rollins emphasized that the plan will ensure continued support for fire operations and other activities critical to the department's mission, but there are concerns that further workforce cuts and administrative focus lost to the reorganization during the peak of fire season could have disastrous effects. As fire risks sharply rise, crews have already begun to feel the impacts from previous cuts to budgets and workers at the agency that support wildfire mitigation and response. The programs incentivized by the Trump administration to sharply shrink the federal government rely on voluntary resignations and early retirements, which undercut the agency's potential to make strategic decisions about its workforce. Roughly 1,400 workers with fire qualifications signed on for the programs, leaving holes on teams that play crucial roles in emergency response, especially during the busiest times of the season. Acknowledging the need to backfill these positions, Rollins called for some to return to active duty through the end of the season – only 65 have been reinstated, according to a department spokesperson. The Forest Service will also see its nine regional offices phased out over the next year and all research stations will be consolidated into one, housed in Fort Collins, Colorado. Experts were struggling to make sense of the announcement, and shared concerns about how another layer of change could cause more chaos and disorganization as fire risks continue to surge. 'Until we know more specifically about the fire program it's hard to determine what some of the outcomes of this could be,' said Riva Duncan, a retired USFS fire officer and vice-president of the Grassroots Wildland Firefighters advocacy group. Duncan added that the consolidation of USFS research stations could be problematic because each does fire research and has a focus specific to the landscapes where the station is housed. 'This is another example of decisions being made by people who haven't bothered to learn or understand the work,' she said. It's also unclear if the reorganization is designed to align with plans from the Trump administration to combine federal firefighters into a single agency, under the department of interior. Those plans were left in limbo Tuesday, after the House appropriations committee determined 'changes in budgetary and management structure spark concerns about impacted agencies' abilities to consistently meet critical performance benchmarks'. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) study was ordered to evaluate the feasibility of the plan, and the House of Representatives adjourned for its August recess on Wednesday, tabling any budget votes until at least September. More than 15,300 employees have already left the USDA since Trump took office, opting for buyouts and early retirement through the administration's deferred resignation plan. Similar staff-cutting measures have been implemented across the federal government, overseen by the so-called department of government efficiency, the quasi government agency created by the billionaire Trump donor Elon Musk. 'This is less a re-organization and more a dismantling. This mass relocation will be costly. It will also result in the mass resignation of staff, which means a major loss of capacity at USDA,' said Ben Lilliston, director of rural strategies and climate change at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP). 'Contrary to the secretary's statement, the USDA is already under-staffed. There was no effort to get input from Congress, the public, or farmers about this reorganization.' A similar USDA relocation program during the first Trump term led to a smaller, less efficient, less experienced and less diverse workforce, according to the GAO, the bipartisan federal government watchdog. The USDA workforce grew 8% during the Biden administration, while salaries rose 15%, largely on temporary funding, the department said on Thursday, as Rollins confirmed that the cuts would continue. 'This reorganization is another step of the department's process of reducing its workforce,' Rollins wrote in the memo, noting that programs to incentivize early retirements and voluntary resignations will continue to reduce the staff numbers further.
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Brazil to present Lula with credit-based response to US tariff hike, finance minister says
BRASILIA, July 24 (Reuters) - Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad said on Thursday a contingency plan in response to higher U.S. tariffs will be presented to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva from Monday and will include a menu of measures, including credit lines. In an interview with local radio station Itatiaia, Haddad said as many as 10,000 Brazilian companies could be affected by the increase in levies on Brazilian goods to 50% from 10%, set to take effect on August 1. The minister stressed that Brazil remains open to dialogue but suggested that U.S. President Donald Trump is unwilling to engage in negotiations. He said political forces aligned with former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro are working to prevent talks from being initiated. A far-right ally of Trump, Bolsonaro is accused of plotting a coup to overturn his narrow 2022 election loss to Lula. Trump has denounced the case as a "witch hunt" and urged Brazil's judiciary to drop the charges, including in a letter announcing the steeper tariffs on Brazil. Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president's son, is living in the U.S. and has made social media posts about his meetings with Trump allies. Without naming the younger Bolsonaro, Haddad said he believes those ties, along with opposition to Brazil's widely used instant payment system Pix, were factors behind the U.S. decision. Earlier on Thursday, Lula said at a public event that the U.S. government was "afraid" of Pix because it threatens credit cards. The system was listed among unfair trade practices in a recent U.S. investigation. Haddad said Pix undermines those profiting from financial intermediation and represents a valuable homegrown Brazilian technology.
