Asian Paints sees green shoots in Q1, but growth concerns persist
Consolidated revenue thus dipped 0.3% year-on-year in Q1, marking the sixth straight quarter of decline. The gap between volume and value is likely to persist a little longer. While urban demand is starting to stabilise and a favourable monsoon could support a rural recovery, management doesn't expect a sharp turnaround in the near term and is guiding for single-digit revenue growth despite a soft base. Simply put, stiff competition could prevent a sharp acceleration in demand.
'We believe Q2FY26 volumes could see some benefits of an early Diwali, while Q3 may be affected by the shift in season," said Nomura Research. The broking firm projects flattish year-on-year revenue for FY26 despite an improvement in volumes.
Needed: growth where it counts
The challenge is clear: Asian Paints is seeing growth, but not where it wants. Luxury emulsions underperformed in Q1 while the economy and mid-tier categories drove growth. The home décor segment remained a drag, with bath and kitchen segments declining 5.1% and 2.3%, respectively. Both made losses before tax. Meanwhile, revenue from the industrial segment grew 8.8%, led by automotive and protective coatings.
Margins were a sore spot. While gross margin was flat, Ebitda margin slipped 70 basis points to 18.2%. The company maintained its margin guidance at 18–20% but highlighted that potential anti-dumping duties on titanium dioxide imported from China could reduce gross margin from Q2 onwards, offsetting the benefits of softening crude-linked input costs.
Asian Paints is doubling down on innovation and service differentiation. New product launches contributed 14% of Q1 revenue, and backward integration projects including VAM-VAE and white cement are on track. These should improve cost efficiency and support more differentiated offerings.
Priced for perfection
The stock, which trades at 47 times estimated FY27 earnings, leaves little room for disappointment despite dropping 20% over the past 12 months. It currently trades around ₹2,415, up 4.9% so far this year.
'The entry of deep-pocketed new players with notable investment commitments could drive shifts in market share and cost structures across the industry," said Motilal Oswal Financial Services.
Without clear signs of a sustained recovery in value-led growth, Asian Paints could fail to meet investors' already-subdued expectations. Nomura's analysts summed it up well:'Given the heightened competitive intensity, we still think Asian Paints is not yet out of the woods."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Plans afoot to increase sales in Aavin Trichy: Minister
Trichy: Besides increasing the quantity of milk procurement, Tamil Nadu Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (Aavin) has started focussing on marketing and sales as well, said minister for milk and dairy development T Mano Thangaraj. The minister on Friday inspected work for a new ice cream plant at the Kottapattu dairy complex here. Ice cream, curd, and lassi produced at the plant will be supplied to Aavin parlours in Trichy and delta districts. He also inspected modernisation work carried out at 3.3 crore to automate the milk processing unit there. "Aavin's sales in Chennai have been increased by 6-7 crore. Similarly, we would set a target for the Trichy Aavin to increase sales. Focussing on the Diwali festival, we would initiate plans to increase the supply of our products and meet the demand," he said. The Trichy unit procures around 2 lakh litres of milk every day and supplies around 4.5 lakh milk sachets in four variants. To improve milk quality and ensure economic production, Trichy Aavin's second generation unit is being upgraded by the state govt. The minister added that required workforce is being recruited by Aavin through TNPSC or on a contractual basis. "We ensure that new recruits were provided with insurance and provident fund benefits."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 hours ago
- Business Standard
Amid lab-grown rise, Tanishq launches diamond expertise centres
Amid the growing popularity of lab-grown diamonds, jewellery giant Tanishq has launched three new diamond expertise centres in collaboration with the De Beers Group. These centres aim to provide buyers with clarity and transparency, ensuring value to the customer through a technology-backed evaluation system. "There is a lot of confusion caused by the emergence of lab-grown diamonds, and we expect the prices of lab-grown diamonds to keep decreasing as the technology to create them evolves. More customers are now asking if we're selling natural or lab-grown diamonds, and it is this confusion we want to eliminate," said Ajoy Chawla, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the jewellery division at Titan Company. Currently, these centres are located in three stores in Bengaluru, but the company plans to expand them to 200 stores in the ongoing financial year (FY26) and eventually roll them out across all 599 stores nationwide. Commenting on gold prices, Chawla told Business Standard that the surge in gold prices has led to ticket-size driven growth, with diamond-studded jewellery also witnessing increased buyer demand. In its quarterly update to the exchanges in early July, the company reported an 18 per cent growth in its jewellery domestic operations for the first quarter (Q1FY26), which was marked by gold price volatility. The company is also observing a shift towards lightweight and lower caratage jewellery among customers. In response, Tanishq has piloted 9-carat gold jewellery under its Mia brand in several coastal markets to assess the impact of humidity. A Mia official told Business Standard earlier this week that the collection, consisting of 25 offerings, will be fully launched before Diwali. Having become a household name over the past 30 years, Tanishq has catered to over 1.3 crore customers to date, with almost 52 lakh purchasing diamond-studded gold jewellery. Speaking about the US tariffs of 25 per cent imposed on Indian exports, Chawla said, "It's too early to react. We should not get carried away, as these tariffs may change over time."
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
Can corporations be victims? The debate is on after Supreme Court verdict
Even as companies are increasingly found culpable for corporate crimes, their recognition as victims of crime has also been jurisprudentially established. On July 14, the Supreme Court in Asian Paints vs Ram Babu (2025) ruled that companies aggrieved by any injury owing to criminal conduct can challenge an acquittal or seek enhancement of the sentence, in line with the established jurisprudence on victim justice. The judgment is a landmark one in as much as it grants due recognition to corporates as victims under the criminal justice system. The implications of such recognition are far-reaching, as it enables and grants corporations access to a host of rights available to victims under our criminal procedure. Under section 2(wa), CrPC (now section 2(y) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhita, 2023 (BNSS)), a 'victim' refers to any person who has suffered injury or loss as a result of the accused's act or omission. Section 2(26) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita, 2023 (BNS) and section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, define a person to include any 'company or association or body of persons.' BNS and criminal law, therefore, generally apply not only to natural persons, but also to legal persons. Given this, a crucial question is whether a corporate entity can suffer an 'injury', as conceived in criminal law, at par with natural persons. Section 2(14) of the BNS defines an injury to mean any harm, illegally caused, to the 'body, mind, reputation and property' of any 'person'. Criminal acts that cause loss or injury to any company, including economic loss, reputational harm, or violation of intellectual property (IP) rights, therefore, amount to victimisation. The reasoning of the Court in the Asian Paints case is based on this interpretation of 'injury'. The company, Asian Paints, suffered both revenue loss as well as weakened market competitiveness due to a loss of reputation, due to a clear IP infringement. The case pertains to a complaint by Asian Paints through a third party authorised on its behalf (complainant) relating to the sale of counterfeit products under its brand name. The accused was acquitted by the trial court, and Asian Paint's appeal to the Rajasthan High Court was rejected with the reasoning that only the original complainant could contest the acquittal, not the affected company. In this context, the Supreme Court ruled that the term 'victim' applies to any entity, individual or juristic that suffers harm from a criminal act and that a company need not be the initial complainant to be recognised as a victim. It further reiterated that the victim's right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) stands independently and does not rely on Section 378. Since the Court clarified that the term 'victim' under this provision includes any person or legal entity that has suffered harm or loss as a result of a criminal act, not merely those who initially filed the complaint, consequently, entities like Asian Paints are entitled to appeal not only in cases of acquittal but also where the conviction is for a lesser offence or the compensation awarded is insufficient. This decision marks a shift from passive tolerance to active enforcement. The ruling emphasised that victimhood is determined by the harm endured, rather than procedural status. Citing Mahabir vs State of Haryana, the Court affirmed that the legislature aimed to empower victims, recognising them as central to the justice process. Companies can be victims of crime, corruption, and human rights abuses in various countries, but legal, jurisdictional, and reputational challenges often limit their ability to seek justice. The recognition of companies as victims and the effectiveness of remedies vary significantly, with substantial barriers remaining, particularly in cross-border cases and in countries with weak governance. Corporations rarely invoke the imagery of a crime victim in the public imagination. The same may be attributed to the fact that the stereotypical notion of the ideal victims in Nils Christie's conceptualisation requires the victim to be someone who is weak, carrying out a respectable project, cannot be blamed for the offence, and is victimised by a powerful but unknown offender. While companies may satisfy some of the traits, such as that of involvement in a respectable project and blameless conduct, they often fall short on other traits, such as being weak or victimised by a bad and powerful offender. A recognition of corporations as victims, however, must be accompanied by a caveat. Hopkins' (2016) research titled Business, Victimisation, and Victimology conceptualises that the idea of 'crimes against businesses' has been strategically employed by both governments and corporate entities to construct a narrative of business victimhood. Critics argue that such recognition diverts attention from the illegal activities committed by the businesses by portraying themselves as victims rather than victimisers, and that it may enable powerful corporations with deep pockets to dominate the public discourse on victim justice. Traditionally, India's criminal justice system placed the responsibility for prosecution primarily on the state, leaving victims, especially corporate entities, with a minimal role. While this approach suited conventional crimes involving physical harm, it fails to address the complexities of contemporary corporate offences such as financial damage, brand erosion, and fraud in the supply chain. The Supreme Court's ruling opens up avenues for companies to actively pursue criminal proceedings. It also removes the longstanding reliance on the public prosecutor's discretion, which often impeded companies from seeking justice when the state opted not to appeal. Additionally, this judgment holds particular significance for industries frequently affected by counterfeit and unauthorised market activities. The jurisprudential shift, with the Supreme Court explicitly bringing a corporate entity under the ambit of a victim, expands the scope for judicial interpretation, extending several other victim rights under our criminal justice system to corporate entities. Bajpai is Vice Chancellor at National Law University Delhi, where Ankit is Assistant Professor
