The global economic battle between the U.S. and China
In the second quarter of 2025, China's economy grew by 5.2%. This was slower than the 5.4% in the first quarter, but still better than experts expected. However, some signs of weakness are showing—exports are slowing down, consumer confidence is dropping, and prices are falling. On the other hand, the U.S. economy grew by 3.0% in the same quarter, supported by strong consumer spending and a steady job market.
Since 2018, the U.S. has put tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of Chinese goods. China hit back with its own tariffs, especially on American farm products. As a result, many companies started moving their factories to other countries like Vietnam, India, and Mexico. China responded by boosting its own industries especially in important areas like semiconductors and green energy through a strategy called 'Made in China 2025.'
The trade war has affected many industries. In the U.S., companies that rely on Chinese parts like tech and car firms faced higher costs. Farmers lost business because of China's tariffs, which forced the U.S. government to offer billions of dollars in financial help. China also suffered from weaker demand for its goods abroad, but tried to make up for it by building more infrastructure, cutting interest rates, and giving tax breaks to encourage innovation.
Now, both countries are trying to reduce their economic ties to each other. For example, China's share of U.S. imports dropped from 21% in 2017 to less than 14% by mid-2025. This shows that U.S. efforts to reduce dependence on China are working to some extent.
Looking to the future, there are three possible paths. First, tensions could rise, which would hurt both economies and the global market. Second, the two sides might reach short-term deals without fully solving the problem. Third, they could continue slowly separating their economies, which could reshape global trade and create new chances for other countries.
Right now, there's no clear winner. The U.S. has strong financial tools to handle economic pressure, and China is showing flexibility by adjusting its policies. But the conflict is expensive for both, and the effects are being felt around the world. This trade war has become a long-term strategic competition that will help decide who leads the global economy and technology in the years ahead.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
16 hours ago
- Roya News
Iran's secret weapon to 'cripple Israel' revealed: WaPo
American and 'Israeli' strikes against Iran in June have reportedly delivered a significant blow to Tehran's advanced weapons programs, most notably the development of a sophisticated "electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapon". This device was purportedly designed with the specific intent to "cripple Israel electronically", according to a report by The Washington Post based on 'Israeli' sources. The 12-day war targeted Iran's efforts to develop two distinct types of nuclear warheads: a standard fission warhead and a more complex fusion warhead, the report added. Beyond these nuclear ambitions, the military campaign significantly degraded Iran's ballistic missile arsenal, with approximately half of its estimated 3,000 ballistic missiles and 80% of its 500 missile launchers reportedly destroyed or rendered inoperable. An Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) is a powerful, instantaneous burst of electromagnetic energy, typically generated by a high-altitude nuclear detonation. Unlike conventional kinetic weapons, an EMP attack causes no direct physical damage to structures and no immediate loss of life. Instead, its destructive power is concentrated solely on electronic devices and equipment, rendering them inoperable. Dr. Lowell Wood, a nuclear weapons designer, describes the phenomenon as "really severe static electricity, everywhere, all at once". The potential impact of an EMP attack on critical infrastructure is catastrophic. Such an event could destroy a society's electronic systems, including the power grid, telecommunications networks, transportation systems, banking and finance, and essential services like food, water, and medical care. Iran's Revolutionary Guard reportedly advocated for the development of an EMP device as an "alternative to nuclear arms". The reported assassinations of Iran's top physicists and nuclear scientists, combined with the military strikes, are believed to have halted the development of both the EMP device and the fusion-warhead project. The damage inflicted upon these programs is described as extensive and difficult to reverse. However, the military operations also revealed an "unwelcome surprise": 'Israel' discovered that Iran possessed a larger-than-expected arsenal of solid-fuel missiles, which are inherently "more difficult to shoot down". A 'well-informed Israeli source' cited in The Washington Post claimed that "Iran is no longer a nuclear threshold state". While Iran still possesses uranium enriched to 60%, a level far beyond what is needed for civilian use, weaponization would now be extremely challenging, estimated to require one to two years if attempted covertly, with 'Israel' likely able to detect and destroy such efforts.
Jordan News
a day ago
- Jordan News
Artificial Intelligence Swallows Billions… Spending Surpasses U.S. Education and Labor Budgets - Jordan News
Artificial Intelligence Swallows Billions… Spending Surpasses U.S. Education and Labor Budgets By 2025, leading American companies had spent nearly $155 billion on AI development, competing fiercely to outspend one another—an amount that exceeds the U.S. government's total expenditure on education, training, employment, and social services in the current fiscal year. اضافة اعلان According to the latest financial disclosures from major Silicon Valley firms, this spending race is expected to accelerate, potentially reaching hundreds of billions of dollars in a single year. Over the past two weeks, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google's parent company) released their quarterly financial reports. Each company revealed that their year-to-date capital expenditures (CapEx)—which represent spending on physical assets such as servers and data centers—had already reached tens of billions of dollars. "CapEx" has become a shorthand indicator for tech giants' AI investments, as AI requires massive physical infrastructure: high-performance data centers that consume enormous amounts of electricity, water, and costly semiconductor chips, according to a report by The Guardian. Google stated its CapEx 'primarily reflects investments in servers and data centers to support AI.' Meanwhile, Meta reported CapEx of $30.7 billion year-to-date—double the $15.2 billion it had spent in the same period last year. In the last quarter alone, Meta spent $17 billion, again double the $8.5 billion it spent in Q2 2024. Alphabet reported nearly $40 billion in CapEx for the first two quarters of this fiscal year, and Amazon reported $55.7 billion. Microsoft announced plans to spend over $30 billion in the current quarter alone to build AI data centers. CFO Amy Hood said this would be at least 50% more than what was spent during the same period last year and higher than the company's record CapEx of $24.2 billion in the quarter ending in June. Hood emphasized: 'We will continue investing in upcoming opportunities.' Looking ahead, Big Tech's total CapEx is expected to skyrocket in the next fiscal year, surpassing even last year's record figures. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said Wednesday that the company plans to spend approximately $100 billion on AI in the next fiscal year. Meta is planning to spend between $66–72 billion, Alphabet aims for $85 billion (up from its earlier estimate of $75 billion), and Amazon projects spending $100 billion, primarily through Amazon Web Services, which analysts expect to hit $118 billion. Collectively, these four companies are forecasted to spend over $400 billion on CapEx in the coming year, according to The Wall Street Journal—a figure that exceeds the EU's quarterly defense budget. Despite these mind-boggling sums, some investors believe Big Tech still isn't spending enough. Microsoft, Google, and Meta each told Wall Street analysts last quarter that their CapEx would exceed earlier estimates. Investor reaction was overwhelmingly positive: the stock prices of all three surged following their earnings reports. Microsoft's market cap soared to $4 trillion the day after its report. Even Apple, traditionally the most cautious of the tech giants, signaled a significant ramp-up in AI spending next year, through internal investments or acquisitions. Its quarterly CapEx rose to $3.46 billion, up from $2.15 billion in the same period last year. On Thursday, Apple announced robust earnings, buoyed by strong iPhone sales and better-than-expected performance in China, though it still lags behind other tech giants in rolling out AI products. CEO Tim Cook said Thursday that Apple is reallocating "a fair number" of employees to focus on AI, adding: 'The core of our AI strategy' is to increase investment and integrate AI into all devices and platforms. However, Cook declined to disclose how much the company plans to spend, saying only, 'We are significantly expanding our investments, but I won't put specific numbers on it.' According to The Guardian, smaller firms are scrambling to keep up with the AI spending spree. OpenAI recently announced it had raised $8.3 billion as part of a planned $40 billion funding round, bringing the startup's valuation to an estimated $300 billion—just three years after launching its groundbreaking chatbot, ChatGPT, in 2022. — (Agencies)
Ammon
a day ago
- Ammon
The global economic battle between the U.S. and China
Raad Mahmoud Al-Tal More than six months after the latest round of tensions between the United States and China, it's clear that this is more than just a trade dispute. It has become a larger fight over who will lead the world economy and technology in the future. The U.S. wants to slow down China's rise by adding trade and tech restrictions. China, in return, is trying to protect its economy through stimulus plans, finding new markets, and becoming more self-reliant. In the second quarter of 2025, China's economy grew by 5.2%. This was slower than the 5.4% in the first quarter, but still better than experts expected. However, some signs of weakness are showing—exports are slowing down, consumer confidence is dropping, and prices are falling. On the other hand, the U.S. economy grew by 3.0% in the same quarter, supported by strong consumer spending and a steady job market. Since 2018, the U.S. has put tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of Chinese goods. China hit back with its own tariffs, especially on American farm products. As a result, many companies started moving their factories to other countries like Vietnam, India, and Mexico. China responded by boosting its own industries especially in important areas like semiconductors and green energy through a strategy called 'Made in China 2025.' The trade war has affected many industries. In the U.S., companies that rely on Chinese parts like tech and car firms faced higher costs. Farmers lost business because of China's tariffs, which forced the U.S. government to offer billions of dollars in financial help. China also suffered from weaker demand for its goods abroad, but tried to make up for it by building more infrastructure, cutting interest rates, and giving tax breaks to encourage innovation. Now, both countries are trying to reduce their economic ties to each other. For example, China's share of U.S. imports dropped from 21% in 2017 to less than 14% by mid-2025. This shows that U.S. efforts to reduce dependence on China are working to some extent. Looking to the future, there are three possible paths. First, tensions could rise, which would hurt both economies and the global market. Second, the two sides might reach short-term deals without fully solving the problem. Third, they could continue slowly separating their economies, which could reshape global trade and create new chances for other countries. Right now, there's no clear winner. The U.S. has strong financial tools to handle economic pressure, and China is showing flexibility by adjusting its policies. But the conflict is expensive for both, and the effects are being felt around the world. This trade war has become a long-term strategic competition that will help decide who leads the global economy and technology in the years ahead.
