logo
The #1 Whole Grain for Better Gut Health, According to a Gastroenterologist

The #1 Whole Grain for Better Gut Health, According to a Gastroenterologist

Yahoo27-07-2025
Reviewed by Dietitian Alyssa Pike, RDN
Whole grains are the MVP of the carbohydrate family. They pack important nutrients like dietary fiber, protein, vitamins and minerals that play an important role in a healthy diet. Whole grains are well known for their heart-health benefits, but they provide a host of benefits for our gut, too.
Gastroenterologist Michael Schopis, M.D., shares more, including his top pick for better gut health: 'Whole grains like rye, wheat and oats have all been shown to be very beneficial for gut health—improving the diversity of gut microbiota, stool frequency and increasing short-chain fatty acid production. Based on this data, I would say all whole grains are a great choice, but if I had to choose one, I would choose oats.'
Read on to find out why oats top the charts as the No. 1 whole grain to include in your diet for better gut health.
Why Oats Are the #1 Whole Grain
They Support Good Gut Bugs
One of the top reasons oats are such a phenomenal food for gut health, according to Schopis—they function as a prebiotic. Prebiotics are nonliving organisms that provide food for probiotics, those good bugs that live in your gut. Beta-glucan, a type of soluble fiber found in oats, contributes to the prebiotic function of oats. When fiber in oats is digested, it provides food for the probiotics in the microbiome, in turn supporting the functions they carry out.
They Improve Gut-Brain Communication
Your mood is highly connected to the health of the microbiome, thanks to the gut-brain axis. Feeling off? The pickup you need could be found through feeding your gut. In fact, research suggests that the increase in short-chain fatty acids that are produced through the breakdown of dietary fiber may play a role in improving mood and disorders of the central nervous system.
When SCFAs are produced, they support the intricately connected nervous, immune and endocrine systems that work together to keep you healthy, especially when exposed to stressors. Through this action, SCFAs also provide support for the blood-brain barrier, protecting the brain from harmful substances while simultaneously influencing mood. Natalie Rizzo, M.S., RDN, shares, 'An important step in supporting a better mood is focusing on feeding your gut. Simple foods, like whole-grain oats, are an easy way to improve your mood and energy levels, in turn supporting a healthier you.'
They Offer Support for Immune Health
A large portion of your immune system is housed within the microbiome, which means supporting gut health may be your ticket to fewer sick days. A recent scientific review explored the research on oats and immune health and found the wide variety of compounds found in oats— including dietary fiber, copper, iron, selenium and zinc—offered pretty impressive benefits when it came to immune health. Additionally, the phytonutrients found in oats have antioxidant properties that help scavenge free radicals (those bad guys that can make you sick over time). Rizzo writes, 'Eating oats supports a healthy microbiome that can adapt to changes (like the annual cold and flu season) and keep you functioning at your prime.'
They Help Increase Satiety
Fiber is a key factor that influences satiety, or the fullness factor that comes with eating. Foods like oats that are high in fiber take longer to digest, meaning they offer more staying power and keep you fuller for longer. Hannah Ackermann, RD, writes, 'Unlike refined carbs, the fiber in whole grains isn't broken down in your small intestine. Hours later, it reaches your large intestine, where beneficial gut bacteria ferment it. This delayed release of hormones several hours after eating whole grains is known as the 'second meal effect.' Fiber in whole grains provides a lasting sense of satisfaction, helping you manage hunger more effectively throughout the day.'
Strategies for Better Gut Health
While diet certainly plays an important role in your gut health, so does how you move your body, your stress levels and more. Consider these tips to support better gut health, too:
Eat a . Schopis' best advice: 'Consume a diet high in different fibers, which includes whole grains, veggies, fruits, nuts and legumes. Diverse, high-fiber diets have been shown to increase the amount of beneficial gut bacteria and improve metabolic health.' If you're not sure where to begin, start with the Mediterranean diet, he suggests.
Limit highly processed foods. Not all foods are created equally, even those with fancy marketing slogans. 'Focus on eating a variety of foods that are rich in fiber first and foremost, and limited in added sugars, salt and preservatives,' writes Rizzo. This doesn't mean you can't rely on convenience foods, like flash-frozen fruits and vegetables or canned beans. Those are A-listers on a diet to support better gut health.
Incorporate regular movement. Movement is a star player in keeping your gut happy, healthy and regular. Rizzo encourages clients to find a form of movement they enjoy and fit it in routinely. She writes, 'Daily movement is key to keeping your gut healthy and mood balanced. Whether it's a run, walk or yoga class, find what you love and do it daily.'
Focus on . High stress levels can negatively impact your gut health. Finding a moment to unwind daily is key to managing your cortisol levels and improving your gut health. Rizzo shares, 'Stress management shouldn't stress you out. Find something that feels natural and doable and fit it in daily. For many of my runners, this is even a 10-minute mobility break where they can stretch and breathe all at once.'
Our Expert Take
A healthy gut is key to a healthy life. Your gastrointestinal system plays an integral role in total body health, not only through helping your digestive system run smoothly but also in keeping your mood stabilized and immunity strong. That's why gastroenterologists and dietitians recommend focusing on adding whole grains to your diet, due to the supportive role they play in better gut health. While all whole grains are great and experts encourage you to eat a wide variety of them, oats are the No. 1 pick based on the research to date. If you're not adding oats into your diet yet, get started today with a box of oats and one of these 12 recipes EatingWell readers love in their kitchens too!
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Even Low Lead Exposure Can Impair Academic Outcomes in Kids
Even Low Lead Exposure Can Impair Academic Outcomes in Kids

Medscape

time3 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Even Low Lead Exposure Can Impair Academic Outcomes in Kids

TOPLINE: Every 1-unit increase in blood lead levels in early childhood — even when below the 'safe' threshold of 3.5 µg/dL — was associated with declines in math and reading scores from grades 2 through 11, similar to those seen at higher lead levels. METHODOLOGY: Researchers used the 2021 US CDC's revision of the blood lead reference value to ≥ 3.5 μg/dL. They analyzed data from birth certificates of children born in Iowa from 1989 to 2010, academic test scores from grades 2 through 11, and blood lead testing data from 1990 to 2017. The analysis included 305,256 children (mean age at lead testing, 1.9 years; 49% girls) and nearly 1.8 million math and reading scores to calculate the national percentile rank (NPR). Primary outcomes included NPR scores across grades 2 through 11, comparing children with blood lead levels < 3.5 μg/dL with those at or above this threshold. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 37.7% of children had lead levels < 3.5 μg/dL. Among children with blood lead levels < 3.5 μg/dL, a 1-unit increase was associated with lower NPR scores in math (-0.47; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.30) and in reading (-0.38; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.20). Similarly, for lead levels at ≥ 3.5 μg/dL, every 1-unit increase was linked to a significant decline in NPR scores for math and reading. The trend of declining scores with increasing lead levels was persistent across grades 2 through 11; only the declines in reading scores for grades 10 and 11 were not statistically significant. IN PRACTICE: 'The present work provides further evidence to support that there are no safe levels of lead and that there is a need to continue to reduce or eliminate lead exposure,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by George L. Wehby, MPH, PhD, of the Department of Health Management and Policy at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, Iowa. It was published online on May 28, 2025, in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: Several laboratories used the old 5 μg/dL cutoff to quantify high lead levels. Researchers lacked data on any lead-related interventions the children may have received. DISCLOSURES: Wehby reported receiving grants from the Gates Foundation during the conduct of this study. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Health Issues More Likely in Rural vs Urban Caregivers
Health Issues More Likely in Rural vs Urban Caregivers

Medscape

time3 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Health Issues More Likely in Rural vs Urban Caregivers

TOPLINE: Caregivers living in rural areas reported poorer general and physical health and were more likely to smoke and have obesity than caregivers in urban areas, according to a recent analysis. METHODOLOGY: Researchers analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey to study the differences in sociodemographic characteristics, experiences, and health of caregivers in rural and urban settings. Participants were identified as unpaid caregivers if they provided regular care to a friend or family member with a health problem or disability in the past 30 days. Rurality was defined using a 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme, and participants were classified as living in rural counties if they resided in micropolitan or noncore counties and living in urban counties if they resided in metro counties. A total of 44,274 unpaid caregivers (60% women) from 47 US states participated, of whom one quarter lived in rural counties. Caregiving attributes, including relationship to the care recipient, duration of caregiving, and assistance with activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, were analyzed. The well-being of caregivers was assessed through their health, health behaviors, and health-related quality of life. TAKEAWAY: Rural caregivers were more likely to have obesity (42.9% vs 37.5%; P < .0001). Rural caregivers were more likely to be current smokers (24.2% vs 15.5%; P < .0001) but less likely to be binge drinkers (12.7% vs 15.3%; P = .003) than urban caregivers. Rural caregivers were more likely than urban caregivers to report fair or poor general health (20.3% vs 17.0%; P = .0003). No significant differences were found in mental health or limited activity in the past month between rural and urban caregivers. IN PRACTICE: 'This study is extremely valuable for members of rural communities as it allows policy makers to better understand the landscape of caregiving amongst minoritized rural residents and help program developers design and implement initiatives for rural caregivers,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Emma Kathryn Boswell, MPH, of the University of South Carolina Rural Health Research Center at the University of South Carolina in Columbia. It was published online on June 13, 2025, in The Journal of Rural Health. LIMITATIONS: The reliance on self-reported data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System may have introduced recall and social desirability bias. The cross-sectional design limited the ability to determine cause-and-effect relationships between caregiving and health outcomes. DISCLOSURES: This research did not receive any specific funding. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

UnitedHealth Group Just Released More Bad News. Should You Avoid the Stock?
UnitedHealth Group Just Released More Bad News. Should You Avoid the Stock?

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealth Group Just Released More Bad News. Should You Avoid the Stock?

Key Points UnitedHealth's recent numbers showed a deep decline in profit. The company's earnings forecast for 2025 came in well below analyst expectations. The stock is trading at a significant discount and is well below where it has been in recent years. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › Things are going from bad to worse for UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH). Investors were already enduring a tough year in 2025, with the company facing myriad bits of bad news, including poor financial results, a change in CEO, and an investigation involving the Department of Justice. Then, the company reported its latest earnings numbers last Tuesday, and shares fell again. As of the close of trading on July 31, the stock had lost half of its value in 2025. And worst of all, it may not have bottomed out just yet. After the company's recent earnings report, which featured even more bad news, investors shouldn't be surprised to see this struggling stock fall even lower in the weeks and months ahead. Are you better off simply avoiding it, or could UnitedHealth actually make for a good contrarian investment? UnitedHealth's forecast badly missed expectations On July 29, UnitedHealth reported its latest earnings numbers, and while the business was growing, its bottom line wasn't. Revenue for the period ending June 30 totaled $111.6 billion and rose by a modest 2% from the same period last year. But what was concerning was that its earnings (the bottom line), which totaled $5.2 billion, were down a staggering 43%. A big problem for the health insurer is rising medical costs. Its medical care ratio rose from 85.1% a year ago to 89.4% this past quarter, which signifies that it's paying out a higher amount of medical expenses relative to the premiums it collects. The higher the ratio, the less profitable the company. In recent years, patients have been resuming treatments and electing to take surgeries that they put off during the earlier days of the pandemic, which has contributed to this increase. Earlier this year, the healthcare company suspended its guidance amid uncertainty around healthcare costs. But under CEO Stephen Hemsley, who took over from Andrew Witty a few months ago, it has released new guidance. The problem is, it's far below what analysts were expecting. UnitedHealth's adjusted earnings per share is projected to come in at $16 or better this year, but Wall Street was expecting $20.91 in adjusted per-share profit. Unsurprisingly, amid such a drastic shortfall, the stock proceeded to drop yet again after the news. How cheap is UnitedHealth stock right now? Shares of UnitedHealth haven't been trading this low since the COVID-19 crash of 2020. Its five-year return is now -16% before factoring in dividends. Based on analyst earnings estimates, the stock is trading at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 13. But if analysts reduce their expectations for the stock, then that earnings multiple could end up rising. Based on the company's trailing earnings, investors are paying a multiple of around 11. The chart below shows just how extremely low that is compared to where UnitedHealth stock has traded in the past. The stock is trading at a significant discount and could potentially make for an intriguing investment option. Should you avoid UnitedHealth stock, or take a chance on it? Things look bleak for UnitedHealth's stock as the bad news just keeps coming. But if you're willing to take a contrarian position in the company, be patient, and plan to hang on for multiple years, it may not be a bad move to invest in the business today. Given how significantly discounted it is, there's a good margin of safety here for investors. Consider that the average stock on the S&P 500 trades at a price-to-earnings multiple of 25 -- UnitedHealth is nowhere near that. It could take time for the business to turn things around, but it is working on improving profitability, including exiting some Medicare Advantage markets to curb costs. And with an attractive dividend that yields more than 3% as I write this, there's plenty of incentive just to buy and wait. There's some risk with the stock, but I think the sell-off is a bit overblown. While I wouldn't expect a quick turnaround, UnitedHealth can be a good long-term stock to buy on weakness. Should you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group right now? Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $631,505!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,103,313!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,039% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. UnitedHealth Group Just Released More Bad News. Should You Avoid the Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store