logo
Who are the 12 men acquitted in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case?

Who are the 12 men acquitted in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case?

Indian Express6 days ago
Seventeen years after being charged in one of the most devastating terror attacks in the country's history, all 12 men convicted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case were acquitted by the Bombay High Court on Monday.
The court overturned a 2015 verdict by a special court set up under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) that had handed death sentences to five men and life terms to seven others. One person was acquitted earlier.
The case pertains to explosions on seven western suburban coaches in Mumbai, killing 189 commuters and injuring 824 on July 11, 2006. Calling the prosecution's case flawed and inconsistent, the court flagged unreliable witness testimonies, irregularities in identification parades, and the failure to establish even the type of explosive devices used.
The men, who will walk free this week after spending nearly two decades behind bars, belong to different classes, professions, and regions – from engineers and doctors to shopkeepers and former members of the Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). Here's a look at the men who were once convicted of orchestrating the deadly train bombings and will now walk free.
Those on death sentence:
1) Kamal Ahmed Mohammad Vakil Ansari: deceased in 2021
Kamal Ansari, 50, was a resident of Basopatti in Madhubani district of Bihar. He had been accused of receiving arms training in Pakistan and ferrying two Pakistani terrorists from across the Indo-Nepal border and dropping them in Mumbai. He was also accused of planting the bomb that exploded at Matunga.
The youngest son of Vakil Ansari, who served as a tailor in the Indian Army, Kamal was said to have been a frequent visitor to Nepal, which is a 45-minute ride from his village. Kamal, who dabbled in various businesses, including selling poultry meat and repairing cycles, was on the police radar and had earlier been arrested in a counterfeit currency racket.
He was not known to have overtly shown signs of radicalism and was known for spouting dohas (couplets) from Ramcharitmanas, written by Tulsidas.
2) Mohammed Faisal Attaur Rahman Shaikh
Mira Road-based Faisal Shaikh, 50, was accused of being the head of Lashkar-e-Toiba's (LeT) Mumbai unit and convicted for being the key financier of the Mumbai train blast. He was accused of planning the conspiracy, obtaining hawala money to fund it, harbouring Pakistanis, assembling bombs, and planting them.
Faisal is the eldest of three sons of Attaur Rahman, who worked in Saudi Arabia. The family, which spent some time in Pune, shifted to Mira Road, where Shaikh was allegedly indoctrinated by SIMI. In June 2001, he obtained a legitimate Indian passport, hoping to travel to Pakistan. Six months later, in January 2002, Faisal allegedly crossed the border on the Samjhauta Express and trained with the LeT in Muzaffarabad and Lahore.
The police claimed that he was responsible for indoctrinating both his brothers. One of them was convicted along with him, while another is said to be on the run. It is, however, believed that Faisal was estranged from his family.
3) Ehtesham Qutbuddin Siddiqui
Ehtesham Siddiqui, 42, was charged with harbouring Pakistanis, surveying trains, assembling the bombs, and planting the bomb which went off in Mira-Bhayandar.
The son of Qutbuddin Siddiqui, who worked in the Gulf, Ehtesham Siddiqui left his hometown of Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh and came to Maharashtra, enrolling himself in an engineering college in Pen. He, however, dropped out soon after and was reportedly drawn to SIMI.
In 2001, he was picked up from a library in Kurla run by SIMI and booked. He had been on the police radar since then. Siddiqui subsequently started his own publishing business, printing books under the Shahadah Publishing House brand. Siddiqui also served as an office-bearer of SIMI's Maharashtra unit.
The police claimed to have seized jihadi literature, including books like Jihad Fi Sabilillah (Crusade in the Name of Allah) and Jihadi Azkaar (Tales of Crusaders). Interestingly, these 'objectionable books' were found to be freely available across Mumbai at the time in bookstalls.
4) Naveed Hussain Khan Rasheed
Call centre employee Naveed Rasheed, 44, was supposed to have helped in assembling the bombs and planting the device that exploded in Bandra.
Rasheed was born in Kuwait and is supposed to have returned with his family after the death of his mother. According to reports, his mother was a Pakistani citizen who worked as an Islamic teacher in Kuwait. The family had purchased a flat in Mira Road, and Naveed had developed a strong friendship with Faisal Shaikh, who was said to be the person to chiefly fund the conspiracy.
Rasheed had moved to Secunderabad, where he was working in a call centre. Police, however, claimed that he was in touch with all the accused and was in Mumbai when the blast took place. He was arrested from Secunderabad.
5) Asif Khan Bashir Khan
Asif Khan, 52, was supposed to have harboured the Pakistani terrorists at Mira Road. He was responsible for procuring the pressure cookers and helped in assembling the bombs. He was also accused of planting the bomb that went off in Borivali.
The lanky civil engineer hails from Jalgaon and was a known SIMI member. Two cases were filed against him in Jalgaon, including one involving a pipe bomb. His co-accused were acquitted in the case, but Khan was shown as absconding. He had by then taken up a job at a leading construction firm in Mumbai and was residing in Mira Road.
After the blasts, Khan left the city and shifted to Belgaum. He was the last accused to be arrested in the case. His family, however, claims that he was working in his office when the blast occurred.
Those serving life sentences:
6) Tanveer Ahmed Mohammed Ibrahim Ansari
Tanveer Ansari, 50, is a resident of Agripada and was convicted of attending terror camps in Pakistan and surveying local trains in which the blasts took place.
Tanveer, who has eight siblings, completed his degree in Unani medicine from Nagpur and got associated with SIMI. He denies his association with the outfit but was part of a relief team organised by the group and sent to Gujarat after the January 2001 earthquake. He was picked up months later and booked by the Mumbai police after he was found sitting at a library operated by SIMI, which had been banned by then.
In spite of being booked and under surveillance, Tanveer was allowed to fly to Iran in 2004 for what he claimed was a pilgrimage. He was later picked up by the Mumbai police in 2006 from an Intensive Care Unit of a hospital, where he was treating a patient.
7) Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi
Majid Shafi, 46, was convicted for helping six Pakistanis cross over into India through the Bangladesh border. The youngest of 12 siblings, Majid operated a footwear shop in the Raja Bazaar area of Kolkata. The police claimed that he was operating a hawala racket and would frequently cross the porous Indo-Bangladesh border. His family, however, claimed that they had relatives in Bangladesh and visits to the country were frequent.
His family also asserted that the clean-shaven Majid never had any terror links or showed signs of radicalisation. Interestingly, Majid was known to be friendly with local police personnel, and his shop was a regular haunt for beat constables in the locality. He also claimed to have never visited Mumbai in his lifetime.
8) Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam
Mohammed Ali, 55, was charged with assembling bombs at his house in Govandi with the help of Pakistanis who had sneaked into India.
A resident of Shivaji Nagar, one of the poorest localities in Mumbai, Mohammed Ali worked at a cooperative bank before moving to Dubai. He reportedly returned within a month and started his own business of supplying Unani medicines.
Mohammed Ali used to procure medicines from Hyderabad and distribute them to Unani doctors. During this time, he started working as a SIMI operative and was known to have launched a campaign against video parlours in his locality.
He had been booked for being a member of SIMI and was summoned by the police numerous times, including after the 2002–03 blasts in Mumbai. Constantly under the vigil of local police, his 100-square-foot house was allegedly used by over a dozen of the conspirators to assemble the bombs.
9) Mohammed Sajid Murgub Ansari
Sajid Ansari, 47, a resident of Mira Road, was supposed to have procured timers for the bombs and helped assemble them. He also allegedly harboured two of the Pakistanis.
Sajid ran a mobile repairing shop in Naya Nagar, which was frequented by the other accused. He is said to have fallen under the sway of extremist ideology. The police claimed that his technical know-how was used in the entire conspiracy and that he helped procure the timers for the bombs.
Tragedy seems to have befallen Sajid's family after his arrest, with his sister passing away and his mother in critical health. Like the other accused, Sajid seems to have found solace in filing Right to Information (RTI) applications and collecting literature published by central government agencies.
10) Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh
A software engineer, Muzammil, 40, was supposed to have been trained in Pakistan and had surveyed the local trains that were to be bombed. He is the youngest accused in the case, and two of his brothers — Faisal and Raahil — are believed to be the main planners of the conspiracy. Raahil was never caught.
Muzammil had joined Oracle Corporation in Bangalore as a software engineer a few months before the 2006 blasts. According to news reports, the Bangalore police picked him up on July 13 that year but let him off as he was not in Mumbai on the day of the train blasts. They later tipped off the Mumbai police about him after his brother Faisal was held.
Locals in Mira Road vouch that Muzammil was a good student. He claims that he had nothing to do with the blast and was in Bangalore when the incident occurred.
11) Suhail Mehmood Shaikh
Pune resident Suhail Shaikh, 55, was supposed to have taken arms training in Pakistan and surveyed the trains to be targeted.
A resident of Bhimpura Lane in Pune's Camp area, Suhail is the eldest in the family and earned a living doing zari work and clothing alterations. Known to be pious, he was educated in an English school and also acted as a faith healer.
He is supposed to have visited Iran, which his family claims was to set up a dry fruits business. In police records, he was known as a SIMI operative and was arrested after the organisation was banned. He had been under surveillance since the ban was enforced.
Soon after his arrest, his mother passed away, and his 21-year-old son, who was trying to eke out a living, was denied a passport.
12) Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Shaikh
Worli resident Zameer, 50, was accused of training in Pakistan, surveying trains, and attending conspiracy meetings. He did his schooling at Khairul Islam High School in Mominpura and completed his graduation from Maharashtra College in Nagpada in 1996. He subsequently set up a roadside business making duplicate keys.
It was in the early 2000s that he supposedly came into contact with the other accused. He is also said to have travelled abroad for 20 days in 2005. Zameer's family, however, claimed that he had gone out of the country in search of a job but returned after failing to find one.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

84 enforced disappearances, 33 extrajudicial killings reported in Balochistan in June: Rights group
84 enforced disappearances, 33 extrajudicial killings reported in Balochistan in June: Rights group

Hans India

time4 hours ago

  • Hans India

84 enforced disappearances, 33 extrajudicial killings reported in Balochistan in June: Rights group

Paank, the Baloch National Movement's Human Rights Department, said on Sunday that Balochistan in Pakistan witnessed 84 cases of enforced disappearances and 33 cases of extrajudicial killings in the month of June. In its recent report titled 'Balochistan Human Rights Report – June 2025', Paank has documented cases of particularly enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. Paank noted that the data mentioned in the report is based on verified reports from June 2025 and demonstrates the worsening human rights situation in Balochistan. According to the report, numerous cases of enforced disappearances and illegal detentions were reported across 14 districts of Balochistan in June, including incidents from Karachi and Islamabad. The districts of Kech and Mastung in Balochistan recorded the highest number of disappearances. A total of 84 people were forcibly disappeared in June, as per the report. Among them, many were held without any legal process, and 32 individuals were later released after suffering both mental and physical torture while in custody. In the report, the Paank accused Pakistani forces of carrying out extrajudicial killings without a pause. According to the report, the Pakistani military is reportedly detaining and killing individuals without any legal process, often for unknown reasons. Paank said that 33 cases of extrajudicial killings were reported in Balochistan in June. It said, "These actions reflect a disturbing trend of unchecked violence by state authorities." "The repeated use of enforced disappearances followed by extrajudicial killings has become a hallmark of state policy in Balochistan. Victims are often taken without any legal process and later found dead, bearing signs of torture. The silence of institutions and lack of judicial oversight have allowed this crisis to grow. For families, the trauma is twofold—first the disappearance, then the discovery of mutilated bodies, often dumped in remote areas. This ongoing pattern reflects a deep human rights emergency that demands urgent international attention," said the Paank report. It noted that the abductions of Baloch youth from Karachi and Islamabad have also become increasingly common, which has sparked concerns among families and human rights defenders. It said that the racial profiling case of Baloch students remains pending in the Islamabad High Court despite repeated calls for action. According to the report, Baloch activists Mahrang Baloch, Gulzadi Baloch, Beebow Baloch, Sibghat Ullah Baloch, and Beeberg Baloch remain in custody despite appearing before the court. The Paank said that the Baloch activists were handed over to the police on a 10-day physical remand under newly fabricated terrorism charges instead of being released and said that the "move appears to be a clear tactic by the authorities to silence peaceful activists and leaders, and to keep them locked up without fair trial or evidence."

Pakistan has crossed the red line in Balochistan: Human rights body
Pakistan has crossed the red line in Balochistan: Human rights body

Hans India

time4 hours ago

  • Hans India

Pakistan has crossed the red line in Balochistan: Human rights body

Paank, the Human Rights Department of Baloch National Movement (BNM), said on Sunday that the Pakistan military establishment has crossed the red line in the resource-rich province of Balochistan with the abduction of various women activists. 'In recent years, Pakistan has crossed the red line of human rights violations, religious, and humanitarian in Balochistan. The Pakistani military establishment is torturing, detaining and abducting young Baloch women, which is a grave concern for human rights defenders. They are even violating their laws in the province,' said the human rights body in a statement. Paank further emphasised that despite being a region rich in natural resources and coastal trade benefits and a feeder to the Pakistani state, Balochistan is suffering inhumane behaviour and human rights violations at the hands of the Pakistani military establishment. The human rights body pointed out that Balochistan is facing extreme military violence, like resource extraction, deprivation of basic facilities, military operations, enforced disappearances, extra-judicial killings, criminalisation and collective punishment. 'The Pakistani military establishment is torturing, detaining and abducting young Baloch women. Paank said that the torturing, detaining and abducting of the young Baloch women is a grave concern for human rights defenders. 'This new trend started in 2006. Zarina Marri, a Baloch schoolteacher, has been incommunicado. She was picked up by the Pakistani military. Reports from whistleblowers and human rights observers indicate that she has suffered physical, psychological, and sexual torture in custody, used as a tool of repression, humiliation, and control,' the body said. It added that Zarina Marri's case is not isolated but part of a sustained, deliberate campaign of state terror waged by the Pakistani military establishment against Baloch women and activists. Paank said that the arbitrary arrests and harassment of Mahrang Baloch, Bebow Baloch, Gulzadi Baloch, and Mahjabeen Baloch for peacefully demanding justice and human rights expose a system built on the brutal suppression of dissent. 'We (Baloch) have knocked every door of justice but only received condemnation from you, not practical action against the barbaric practice of the Pakistani state against the Baloch people. And yet, despite years of escalating abuse, where is your outrage? Where is your intervention? Where are the investigations, the condemnations, the demands for accountability?' the body said. Paank said that human rights and feminist groups have never hesitated to condemn state violence in Palestine, Iran, India, Myanmar, and elsewhere. 'But when it comes to Balochistan, your silence is loud, and your inaction is complicity,' Paank added.

When terror walks free: 7/11 verdict and crisis of India's criminal justice system
When terror walks free: 7/11 verdict and crisis of India's criminal justice system

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

When terror walks free: 7/11 verdict and crisis of India's criminal justice system

Nearly two decades after the deadly 7/11 Mumbai train blasts, which killed over 180 people and injured more than 800, the Bombay High Court's decision to acquit all 12 convicted accused has sent shockwaves across the country. While judicial independence and the rule of law are the pillars of our democracy, the complete collapse of the criminal justice system in a case of this magnitude raises grave questions—not just legal, but also national September 2015, after a nine-year-long investigation led by the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), a special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court convicted 12 of 13 accused in connection with the coordinated bombings. Five were sentenced to death, seven to life imprisonment, and one was acquitted. One of the death-row convicts later died in 2021 in jail due to COVID-19. However, on 21st July 2025, the High Court ruled that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and acquitted all 12, including the Hurdles Then, Judicial Acquittal NowThe court's observations on the unreliability of eyewitness testimonies, delayed identifications, lack of corroborative material, and doubts over the voluntariness of confessions are rooted in procedural rigour. It is worth noting that the special court found sufficient ground for conviction based on the same evidence. To summarily discard all evidence and confession-based inputs is not only unfair to the victims and the investigation but also potentially dangerous. These were not petty offenders; they were individuals linked to known terrorist organisations. To assume they will peacefully reintegrate into society is nave. On the contrary, there is a very real and chilling possibility that their release could enable them to re-establish ties with militant networks and plot future attacks under the cover of judicial Trust, Empowering TerrorThis verdict impacts more than just victims' families or police credibility; it undermines public trust in the entire criminal justice system. When justice appears denied in major terror cases, people begin to lose faith in due process, leading to calls for media trials or even extrajudicial actions, as seen in the Hyderabad rapists encounter case. This risks pushing India toward a vigilante mindset where emotion overrides judgments also weaken India's global image as a nation tough on terrorism. Actions like the Balakot strikes, Operation Sindoor, and strong declarations such as 'Any act of terror will be considered an act of war' projected strength, but the 7/11 acquittals create an impression, both domestically and abroad, that India remains a 'soft state' on agencies like the ATS and NIA, the outcome is deeply demoralizing. Years of high-risk investigation and sacrifice feel dismissed, potentially deterring future action. At a time of rising global threats, India cannot afford a justice system that weakens morale and signals impunity to its and National Security Must CoexistThis is not an argument for abandoning due process or fair trial, but a call for judicial sensitivity in cases involving national trauma and security threats. A purely procedural lens risks undermining public trust, morale, and the Supreme Court staying the Bombay High Court's acquittal in the 7/11 case on July 24, 2025, it must now re-examine the matter with a security-conscious approach. Mass-casualty terrorism cannot go unpunished, nor can suspects be freed only to rejoin militant acquittals are a wake-up call for systemic reform across investigation, prosecution, and colonial-era criminal justice system, rooted in rigid procedures and outdated evidentiary norms, is ill-equipped for modern terrorism. Terrorists exploit encrypted tools and leave little evidence, yet the system still demands traditional proofs like eyewitnesses years protecting civil liberties remains vital, blind adherence to outdated norms must not compromise justice in high-risk national security Must IntrospectThe recent acquittal compels the judiciary to engage in serious self-reflection. How can two courts, examining the same evidence, arrive at such radically different outcomes—one imposing death sentences, the other granting complete acquittals? This stark divergence raises troubling concerns about the consistency, objectivity and internal coherence of our justice delivery system. Was the evidence so ambiguous that it led to a miscarriage of justice at the trial stage? Or does this contradiction reflect deeper issues, such as subjective judicial interpretation or the sway of elite legal advocacy?The involvement of Dr. S. Muralidhar, former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court and now Senior Advocate, in representing two terror-accused adds complexity. While fair legal representation is a fundamental right, the participation of a former top judge raises ethical and institutional concerns. His stature could unintentionally influence judicial peers or affect how proceedings are perceived. Even without legal impropriety, such involvement in high-stakes cases calls for regulatory scrutiny toensure judicial processes remain above reproach, both in law and in public perception, especially in matters of national Reforms NeededTo protect India's internal security and ensure justice in terrorism cases, judicial reform and institutional introspection are essential. The criminal justice system comprises of the police, prosecution, and judiciary. While courts often question the competence of investigators and prosecutors, they too must be held accountable, especially in high-stakes terror trials and sensitive criminal investigative agencies like the ATS and state intelligence wings, though rooted in colonial-era policing, have tried to keep pace with changing technology like electronic surveillance, cyber forensics, and multilingual intelligence, the judiciary must now catch up to ensure these technological advances result in effective convictions and timely like the UAPA, MCOCA, and CrPC are evolving to address encrypted data, foreign handlers, and proxy warfare. Yet, judicial delays, inconsistent rulings, and external influences continue to hinder must include specialized training not only for investigators but also for judges and prosecutors in national security law to help balance civil liberties with national interest. Simultaneously strengthening witness protection and forensic protocols is equally crucial. Eyewitnesses mostly succumb to threats even from big criminals, not to mention terrorists having support from our neighbouring country. While the investigative and legal frameworks are adapting, the judiciary must evolve in parallel to preserve coherence, credibility, and integrity in India's fight against isn't about overriding judicial independence, but aligning it with modern security needs. Justice cannot function in isolation, blind to its consequences. The 7/11 acquittals are more than a legal outcome; they test India's institutional the Supreme Court staying the High Court's order, it must now revisit the case not just in legal terms, but in the spirit of national accountability. Can a system that finds no one guilty for Mumbai's deadliest train attack truly claim to have delivered justice?India must ensure its justice system is not only fair and impartial, but alert, modern, and strong enough to face any challenge, including terrorism. The time to introspect is now.(Ashok Kumar is a Retd IPS officer and former DGP of Uttarakhand. He is presently serving as Vice Chancellor of the Sports University of Haryana, Rai, Sonipat, Haryana.)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store