FireAid, a benefit for LA wildfire relief, is almost here. Here's how to watch and donate
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Some of the biggest names in music will come together Thursday for the FireAid benefit concert that is raising money for Los Angeles-area wildfire relief efforts.
FireAid will take over two Inglewood, California, venues — the the Kia Forum starting at 6:00pm PST and the Intuit Dome starting at 7:30pm PST.
Whether you were lucky enough to grab tickets before they sold out, or you're gearing up to watch the live stream — here's everything you need to know ahead of the event.
How to watch
FireAid will be broadcast and streamed live on Apple Music, Apple TV+, Max, iHeartRadio, KTLA+, Netflix/Tudum, Paramount+, Prime Video, the Amazon Music Channel on Twitch, SiriusXM, Spotify, SoundCloud, Veeps and YouTube. It will also be shown at select AMC Theatre locations in the U.S.
Who is performing?
Billie Eilish, Gracie Abrams, Jelly Roll, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, Lil Baby, Olivia Rodrigo, Peso Pluma, Rod Stewart, Stevie Wonder, Sting, Tate McRae and Earth, Wind & Fire will perform at the Intuit Dome.
Alanis Morissette, Anderson .Paak, Dawes, Graham Nash, Green Day, John Fogerty, Joni Mitchell, No Doubt, Pink, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Stephen Stills, Stevie Nicks, the Black Crowes and John Mayer will perform at the Kia Forum.
Mayer and Dave Matthews were originally scheduled to perform live together for the first time, but on Wednesday, the official Dave Matthews Band Instagram account announced that 'due to a critical illness in the family,' Matthews will no longer take the stage.
There will also be special guests.
The folk rock band Dawes were directly affected by the Eaton fire. Actor-singer Mandy Moore, who is married to Dawes' Taylor Goldsmith, posted on social media to share that a portion of their Altadena house and Goldsmith's home recording studio were destroyed. Taylor Goldsmith's brother and bandmate, Griffin Goldsmith and his pregnant wife also lost their home in the fire.
Is it just a concert?
Between the performances, there will be celebrity and non-celebrity speakers, including those who lost their homes, first responders and firefighters.
There will also be packages spotlighting those impacted.
How will donations work?
Those who cannot attend the concerts or watch the live feed can contribute donations via FireAidLA.org. The link, which is open now, will also be up on the screen for the duration of the broadcast.
All of the proceeds will go to those affected. A 501(c)(3) was set up, and contributions to FireAid will be distributed under the Annenberg Foundation, which with FireAid has assembled a small committee to advise.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What do young Angelenos think of cellphone bans and Instagram age limits? We asked
"If you're a parent, Lauren Greenfield's new doc about teens and social media 'is a horror movie.'" That Los Angeles Times headline ran on an August story about Greenfield's acclaimed five-part docuseries that followed Los Angeles-area high school students during the 2021-22 school year, tracking their cellphone and social media use for a revealing portrait of their online life. Greenfield remembers the headline. "I've heard that from parents," Greenfield says. "And I keep hearing it whenever we screen the series." Greenfield has taken "Social Studies" to schools around the country since its premiere last summer, airing episodes and answering questions, speaking alongside a rotating group of the show's subjects. And, yes, the most common takeaway remains: Parents have no idea what's going on with their teenagers — though "horror" is in the eye of the beholder. Read more: Column: The disturbing new after-school special that parents of teenagers need to see Today, Greenfield and three of the "Social Studies" participants — Cooper Klein, Dominic Brown and Jonathan Gelfond, all now 21 — are in a Venice bungalow, just back from showing the series to some 6,000 teenagers in San Francisco — young people who, by and large, had a much different reaction than their elders to the depictions of online bullying, body-image issues, partying, hooking up and FOMO culture. These teens were sometimes gasping and talking to the screen, laughing at points, fully immersed, fully relating, even feeling nostalgic for TikTok trends that were popping three years ago. In one episode, teenager Sydney Shear is having a text exchange with a guy Greenfield describes as "creepy." We see the message he sends: "Permission to beat." Right after she tells him no, the group of girls sitting behind Greenfield screamed, "You know he did anyway!" "It's really fascinating how differently adults versus adolescents reacted to the show," says Klein, now a junior at Vanderbilt. "Adults are terrified by it, but young people find it funny. It's like watching reality TV." Much has changed for these "Social Studies" subjects since Greenfield stopped filming in 2022. How could it not? The years immediately following high school usually bring about intense growth and change and, hopefully, a little maturity. The world around them is different. Palisades Charter High School, which many of the students in the series attended, was heavily damaged in the January wildfires. ("The show's like a time capsule," says Gelfond, a Pali High grad. "Looking back, the series is even more special now.") Some things haven't changed at all, though. Technology remains addictive, they all agree. Even when you are aware that the algorithms exist to snare your time and attention, it can be hard to stop scrolling, the self-soothing leading to numbness and deepening insecurities. "You can have a greater understanding about the effects, but it still pulls you in," says Brown, who, like Gelfond and Cooper, has worked at teen mental health hotlines. "It's hard to stay away from what is essentially our lifelines." Which is one reason why they all see the value in the Los Angeles Unified School District's cellphone ban, which went into effect in February. "The pull-away from tech only works if it applies to everyone," Klein says. "When a whole group doesn't have access, that's when the magic happens. You're going to start to connect with the people in front of you because ..." She pauses, smiling. "I mean, you want to be engaging with something, right?" Then you have time to do things like read and solve jigsaw puzzles with friends, two hobbies Klein says she has taken up again recently in a conscious effort to disengage from her phone. Reclaiming your time, she says, can only work if you've got a plan. Read more: With 'Adolescence,' Stephen Graham wants you to consider the unthinkable If the takeaway from the series was that parents couldn't fully comprehend how technology shapes and defines their teens' lives ("They're the guinea pig generation," Greenfield notes), watching "Social Studies," either together or alone, has served as a conversation starter. "I have always had a very open relationship with my parents," Gelfond says, "but the way this really explains social media has led to eightfold more transparency." "It made me more grateful for the way my parents navigated all this," Klein adds. "I thought they were overstepping boundaries, trying to protect me too much. And I think this show validated that they did a really great job. Because we were the first generation, they were kind of flying blind." Now Klein wonders what she'd do differently if she ever has kids. She started on Instagram at 12. If she could go back, she'd probably delay that entry, even though Klein says it now seems normal for kids to join the app when they turn 8 or 9. So what would be the ideal starter age? "Maybe I'm crazy for saying this, but I think it should be 16," Brown says. Greenfield nods her head, noting Australia recently banned social media — Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram and X — for children under 16. "I got on Instagram when I was 10 or 11, and I had no idea of the world that I had just gained access to," Brown continues. "You should wait until you gain critical thinking skills. Sixteen, 17, 18, maybe." "It is the end of childhood," Greenfield says. "You get that phone and everything that comes with it, and it is the end of innocence." In that respect, Greenfield sees "Social Studies" in conversation with "Adolescence," the Netflix limited series about a 13-year-old boy suspected of killing a girl. The boy had been actively exploring incel culture online. "What's scary about 'Adolescence' is how did they not know he was involved in something so terrible," Greenfield says. "But it makes sense. That's the world we live in now." Get exclusive awards season news, in-depth interviews and columnist Glenn Whipp's must-read analysis straight to your inbox. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
What is Oakmont's church pew bunker? History behind distinctive U.S. Open course feature
OAKMONT, Pa. — He didn't even want to set foot in it. The year was 2007. Tiger Woods was scouting Oakmont Country Club, seeing the property for the first time outside of TV highlights and photographs. A group of 82 American Express cardholders walked along, watching Woods, jaws open. A 'small' fee of $900 got those AmEx customers onto Oakmont for the day, but little did they know they'd get to spend it with the then 13-time major champion. Woods helped execute the surprise as a cardholder perk, inviting them for a stroll around that year's U.S. Open venue as he strategized for the tournament ahead. Advertisement When they arrived at No. 3, Woods striped a 3-iron off the tee, splitting the fairway with ease. When the group approached his ball, one onlooker curiously asked, 'Can you hit one from the church pews?' 'No,' Woods replied, according to the AP. Woods eventually agreed to stand in the infamous 108-yard-long bunker, smiling momentarily only for a photo-op, before climbing out again: 'I only practice from where I expect to play.' The monstrosity sits between the third and fourth fairways. It now occupies more than 28,000 square feet of Oakmont real estate. And it lives rent-free in the psyche of any golfer who steps up on that tee box. The bunker creeps into your peripheral vision, even if you don't anticipate playing from it. Oakmont's church pew bunker, one of the most recognizable golf course features in the world, is just as beautiful as it is maddening. So is its history. 'Where Augusta National has Amen Corner, and TPC Sawgrass has the 17th, and Pebble Beach has No. 7, the church pews, that's us. That's our signature feature,' says David Moore, Curator of Collections at Oakmont. The church pews, as they are configured today — 13 long, grassy tufts that act as islands within a seemingly endless pit of sand — were never part of the original Oakmont design. Henry Fownes, a big-time steel mogul, built Oakmont in 1903 when his obsession with golf reached the point of setting out to design his own course. 'A poor shot should be a shot irrevocably lost,' Fownes famously said of his design philosophy. Oakmont was soon constructed by a team of 150 people and a dozen horses. It's the only course Fownes ever designed. There were more than 350 bunkers marked in the original Oakmont layout. The church pew bunker was not one of them. But a peculiar detail emerged in aerial photographs of the club taken in 1927, the year it hosted the U.S. Open for the first time. Six separate bunkers, each long and skinny and not particularly deep, lined the left side of the third hole. Check back on those aerial photos about eight years later, for the next U.S. Open hosted here, and you'll find the point of evolution that made the pews what they are today: Those six individual bunkers had morphed into one, with six floating berms. Whether you were stuck between the berms or your ball somehow managed to get caught up in one of them, the gigantic sand trap acted as a true avoid-at-all-costs hazard from there on out. Advertisement The concept of the church pews, however, was not born until a few decades later. After the debut of the grass berms, the bunker configuration came to be known as the 'snake mounds.' The sections of grass weren't built with straight edges. Their sizing was rather irregular. 'If you looked at them from above, they kind of looked like slithering snakes,' Moore says. The term 'church pew' was first associated with the giant bunker ahead of the 1962 U.S. Open in the Pittsburgh Press's tournament preview. The bunker, now stuck with a permanent name, was tweaked and fiddled with over time. Pews were added, straightened, trimmed and tucked. Ahead of this year's championship, renowned golf course architect Gil Hanse helped put the snake back into the snake mounds, bending the pews to match original photographs. His team also added a 13th pew. 'We deconstructed all of them and used the dirt to build the new pews to more accurately reflect the old style, in an expanded configuration,' Hanse says. For an on-course obstacle so widely recognized in the sport, it is surprising that one simple question proves unanswerable: Who came up with the idea? No one wrote it down. No one thought to document it. No one expected that, almost 100 years later, the club would be hosting its record 10th U.S. Open. With the pews tracing back to the years between the 1927 and 1935 U.S. Opens, there is a working theory that they were not a creation of Henry Fownes himself, but rather his son, William C. Fownes. At the time, W.C. was one of the best amateurs in Western Pennsylvania, competing frequently. Every year, he teed it up in one particular tournament in Atlantic City, New Jersey. And en route to that event, either traveling via the turnpike or the train, he would stop in Philadelphia and stay with his sister, Amelia. Advertisement The murkiness of the story begins about 20 miles outside of Philadelphia. It is loosely believed that W.C. played a course called The Springhaven Club during his visits with his sister. The club was first founded in 1896 by three women who were exposed to golf after trips abroad, much like Henry Fownes. Aerial photographs of Springhaven from 1924 feature a very familiar sight: a series of grass mounds, lined up in a row, along the first hole. It's not a bunker, but the resemblance is striking. At Springhaven, the configuration is referred to as a steeplechase. There are several loose connections between Springhaven and Oakmont. According to Michael Hodges, Springhaven's de facto historian, Springhaven members also participated in the same tournament in Atlantic City, and perhaps even played with or against W.C. in matches. The credit for the design of The Springhaven Club has long been associated with Ida Dixon. Ron Whitten and Geoffrey S. Cornish assert in their book, The Architects of Golf, that Dixon may have been the first female golf architect in the world. She went on to serve as the president of the Women's Golf Association of Philadelphia from 1911 to 1916, and Springhaven was her only design. Mysteriously, Springhaven's pews did not survive longer than a few years. Hodges uncovered photographs documenting the evolution of the club over the years in the Hagley Museum, a small museum in Wilmington, Delaware, and the pews were nowhere to be found by 1927. There is very little evidence that proves Dixon was responsible for the construction of such a unique design, and why they were eventually removed. Multiple golf architects were brought in by Springhaven pre-Great Depression to consult on its routing. Around the time of Englishman Herb Barker's hire, Springhaven also featured several long, skinny bunkers resembling the early stages of the six individual pew bunkers. William Flynn, perhaps best known for his design of Shinnecock Hills, was hired to correct bunker drainage around the course in 1923, which may have contributed to the pews' demise. 'The committee is determined to improve the course as much as possible during the winter and spring. They have consulted with H.H. Barker, the Garden City pro., who staked out fifty pits which will be placed as rapidly as the weather will permit. Most of the new hazards guard the approaches to the greens,' reads an article from the January edition of the 1910 American Golfer Magazine, one of the few pieces of concrete evidence available about the early stages of Springhaven. Advertisement The devilish pew design eventually re-emerged at Oakmont, and they've been reinstated at Springhaven too, as part of a recent renovation. The iconic feature has since been replicated around the world, including at TPC Scottsdale, Bucknell Golf Club and Lonsdale Links in Australia. The pews are alive and well. The Springhaven Club has never claimed to be the original inspiration for the pews. But a series of coincidences and likelihoods make Moore, for one, virtually certain of it. There isn't really another explanation. The church pews were a product of the sincerest form of flattery: Imitation. Whether it was Fownes, Dixon, Barker or Flynn, whoever thought of the church pews knew how to torture a golfer. One hundred years later, as the best players in the world descend upon Oakmont yet again, they're still doing their job.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Summer I Turned Pretty' Cast's Hints About Possible Love Triangle Outcome and Season 3 Changes
The Summer I Turned Pretty cast is just as invested in the love triangle outcome as fans are — but what have they said about potential changes to the endgame relationship? Prime Video's hit series, which debuted in June 2022, is based on a book series of the same name by showrunner Jenny Han. The Summer I Turned Pretty focuses on Belly (Lola Tung) who gets caught up in a love triangle where after exploring her feelings for Conrad (Christopher Briney), she starts to reconsider whether his brother, Jeremiah (Gavin Casalegno), is her perfect match. In the original book trilogy, Belly made her final choice in We'll Always Have Summer, which will presumably inspire the third season of the show. Fans, however, have questioned whether the story will follow the events of the book series or whether there will be changes. Han hasn't given much information away except to confirm that the final season will raise the stakes, writing via Instagram in December 2024, 'One thing I'll say about season 3 of [The Summer I Turned Pretty] ... there are no filler episodes.' Which 'Summer I Turned Pretty' Characters Are — and Aren't — Returning for the 3rd and Final Season There seem to be plans to expand the Summer I Turned Pretty universe — no matter the outcome. "I will say stay tuned, but Jenny's got some exciting surprises. So we're thrilled about a season 3, and she's got a vision for more," Vernon Sanders, the head of television at Amazon and MGM Studios, told Deadline in September 2023. "This show is going to continue to be a huge centerpiece for us, and we absolutely have plans to continue building it. Jenny's got great vision for where she wants to go with all of it, but we're already hard at work developing complementary pieces.' Keep scrolling for everything the cast has said about whether Belly will choose Conrad or Jeremiah: "I do feel like there's a strong chance that that's a possibility," he exclusively told Us Weekly in June 2023 about the show potentially straying from the original events in the books. "Obviously, I know where [my character Jeremiah] ends up going and what ends up happening. But I don't emphasize on that. Because I think Jenny writes it so well that I'm able to kind of get there naturally without having to force it in a certain direction." After season 1 debuted on Prime Video, Han hinted that her vision for the show may not mirror the events in the books. "I really had to weigh what the fans are expecting with where the show is going creatively and find that balance," she told Variety in June 2022. "My priority has always been that I want fans of the book to feel really satisfied by the story we're telling, but also for them to know that this is an adaptation in a new medium, so it's not going to be exactly the same. I think those are sort of the two things that are always in my head. Han added: "I don't want to spoil too much but the books have been out for a while. You never know what could happen with the show. I was open minded going into it. I was considering a lot of different possibilities." More recently, Han teased that changes were coming, telling Entertainment Weekly in March 2025, "There are going to be surprises. There are the things that [book fans] know and then there are things they think they know, and then there's going to be, hopefully, things that surprise them." Two months later, Han told the outlet there would be a 'satisfying' ending for everyone. 'A successful love triangle is one where, no matter what happens, people are going to be devastated and heartbroken," Han hinted. 'Because if the answer feels really clear and easy, then there's no real conflict. No matter what you do, someone's going to be hurt by it.' 6 Book Moments We Want on 'Summer I Turned Pretty' Season 3 — Including Those Belly and Conrad Scenes The actress showed support for onscreen shakeups. "The one thing I've always admired about Jenny is that every season and every decision about what's coming next is purely to serve the story," she explained to EW that same month. "She's never going to do anything that doesn't make sense for the story." Tung continued: "It's all about this beautiful world she's created and giving the fans something really, really special and giving us something really special to work with." Briney hasn't revealed who Belly could choose — but he has some thoughts on the back and forth. 'It's all unreal expectations. It's all ridiculous," he told InStyle in January 2024 before weighing in on Conrad story lines, "You're not going to go to Stanford. You're not going to go to a beach town every summer and fall in love with your mom's friend's f***ing whatever. It's not going to happen. It's stupid. That's not how life works.'