
US Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as Trump tells Schumer to ‘go to hell'
Without a deal in hand, Republicans say they may try to change Senate rules when they return in September to speed up the pace of confirmations.
Trump has been pressuring senators to move quickly as Democrats blocked more nominees than usual this year, denying any fast unanimous consent votes and forcing roll calls on each one, a lengthy process that can take several days per nominee.
'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune said of Senate rules Saturday after negotiations with Schumer and Trump broke down. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.'
The latest standoff comes as Democrats and Republicans have gradually escalated their obstruction of the other party's executive branch and judicial nominees over the last two decades, and as Senate leaders have incrementally changed Senate rules to speed up confirmations — and make them less bipartisan.
In 2013, Democrats changed Senate rules for lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations as Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's judicial picks. In 2017, Republicans did the same for Supreme Court nominees as Democrats tried to block Trump's nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Trump has been pressuring Senate Republicans for weeks to cancel the August recess and grind through dozens of his nominations as Democrats have slowed the process.
But Republicans hoped to make a deal with Democrats instead, and came close several times over the last few days as the two parties and the White House negotiated over moving a large tranche of nominees in exchange for reversing some of the Trump administration's spending cuts on foreign aid, among other issues.
But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told them to pack it up and go home.
'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country.'
Thune said afterward that there were 'several different times' when the two sides thought they had a deal, but in the end 'we didn't close it out.'
It's the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn't allowed at least some quick confirmations. Thune has already kept the Senate in session for more days, and with longer hours, this year to try and confirm as many of Trump's nominees as possible.
But Democrats had little desire to give in without the spending cut reversals or some other incentive, even though they too were eager to skip town after several long months of work and bitter partisan fights over legislation.
'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as we have right now,' Schumer said Saturday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Sanatanis Killed Shahu, Oppressed Women' Jitendra Awhad Stands by His Statement
'Heard India Will Stop?' Trump Reacts After India Defends Buying Russian Oil Amid 25% US Tariff Bomb In a bold claim, US President Donald Trump has said India is 'no longer going to be buying oil from Russia'. He called it a 'good step,' though he wasn't sure of its accuracy. His remark follows Washington's 25% tariff blow and veiled threats of penalties. But India has pushed back with clarity. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal reaffirmed New Delhi's 'time-tested' partnership with Moscow and clarified that India's choices are market-driven and sovereign. While state refiners reportedly paused Russian oil purchases last week, officials say no final decision has been made. Is this a shift in India's energy policy or a short-term pause due to changing prices? As Trump dials up the pressure, New Delhi remains focused on balancing strategic ties with national interest. Watch this detailed analysis of diplomacy, oil politics, and the future of Indo-US-Russia equations.#donaldtrump #india #russia #usindiarelations #russianoil #moditrump #trumptariff #indiaoilimport #energytrade #foreignpolicy #externalaffairs #randhirjaiswal #modigovernment #trumpnews #russiaukrainewar #globaldiplomacy #indiarussia #useconomy #indiaeconomy #breakingnews #trending #bharat #toi #toibharat #indianews 67.0K views | 1 day ago
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Russian, Chinese navies carry out anti-submarine drills in Sea of Japan: Is it Putin's signal to Trump?
The manoeuvres, part of the 'Maritime Interaction-2025' drills, involve a large Russian anti-submarine ship, two Chinese destroyers, diesel-electric submarines from both countries and a Chinese submarine rescue vessel read more Russian leader Vladimir Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are seen at the Victory Day parade in Moscow, Russia. (Sergei Bobylyov/Reuters) The Russian and Chinese navies are holding joint artillery and anti-submarine exercises in the Sea of Japan, Russia's Pacific Fleet has said. The move comes just two days after Donald Trump announced he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to be deployed. The manoeuvres, part of the 'Maritime Interaction-2025' drills, involve a large Russian anti-submarine ship, two Chinese destroyers, diesel-electric submarines from both countries and a Chinese submarine rescue vessel, according to Interfax news agency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The exercises, which began before Trump's announcement, are scheduled to conclude on Tuesday (August 5). What do the drills involve? Russian and Chinese sailors will carry out artillery firing, practise anti-submarine and air defence missions, and conduct joint search and rescue operations at sea, the Pacific Fleet said. The drills are the latest in a series of regular military exercises between the two countries, which signed a 'no-limits' strategic partnership shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Moscow and Beijing have increasingly coordinated their armed forces in recent years, seeking to send a deterrent message to western adversaries. The significance of the timing of drills US President Donald Trump on Friday (August 1) said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in 'the appropriate regions' in response to remarks from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries. Trump's comments on Friday about deploying US nuclear submarines came after former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev made 'highly provocative' remarks about the risk of war between the nuclear powers. Russia and the US possess the world's two largest nuclear arsenals, and it is extremely rare for either side to reveal details about submarine deployments. The timing of the joint drills is likely to be seen as symbolic, even though they were planned in advance. They come amid mounting tension between Washington and Moscow, as Trump grows increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress in ending the war in Ukraine.


Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Mortgage Lenders Are Ignoring Trump's Rollback on Home Appraisal Reviews
At one midsized US mortgage lender, almost a quarter of customers who dispute property appraisals find that the value of their home had been miscalculated. It's an industrywide issue that has historically penalized minority groups, and now President Donald Trump has offered lenders the chance to ignore his predecessor's attempts to make it easier for homeowners to question the valuations assigned by property appraisers. Trump has scrapped some of the guidelines, part of his team's vow to stamp out what it sees as initiatives that support diversity, equity and inclusion. Many financial professionals agree that home appraisals can be unreliable, and that Black homeowners and other minorities are often put at a significant disadvantage. This can be especially damaging given that home ownership is the top wealth-creation tool in the US — and an appraisal is a key determinant of how much, if anything, someone can borrow. With their decision to end some of the requirements related to home valuations, however, Trump and his cabinet members may have little impact on lenders' practices. That's because there's fresh evidence that the changes the Biden administration put in place are supported by the industry. Some of the country's biggest lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and U.S. Bancorp, said they would make no policy changes as a result of the rollback. New American Funding, which also isn't planning to change its approach, was the only financial institution of more than 10 contacted by Bloomberg to disclose information about disputed home valuations. The Tustin, California-based mortgage lender, which provided roughly $14 billion of mortgage loans last year, said an average 2.5% of its customers request new valuations each month. Of those contested, roughly 22% are found to need an adjustment. New American didn't share a breakdown of borrowers' requests by race. 'The changes have made it much easier for the borrower,' said Michelle Rogers, New American's chief valuation officer. 'It's more transparent and the borrower knows they can initiate it.' The appraisal directives were put in place following a deep dive by the Biden administration into prejudices in the business. One of Trump's housing regulators, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, said rolling them back was part of an attempt by the president to put an end to the 'obsession' with DEI. The administration also has vowed to make deep cuts to the federal apparatus that enforced fair housing and fair lending laws, from slashing Consumer Financial Protection Bureau staff to gutting the Justice Department's Civil Rights division. A HUD official who spoke on background said the department's recent reforms simply reverted its stance to the way things were before Biden-era regulators imposed their standards. Lenders aren't being barred from letting borrowers dispute their appraisals, said the official who declined to be identified. The White House hasn't responded to a request for comment. Black homeowners have long reported having their homes valued more highly after taking down all evidence of their race. Research from the Brookings Institution and the federally controlled housing finance agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has shown that home appraisals can be affected by racial bias, which in turn affects the value of homes in entire neighborhoods. Brookings found, for example, that homes in neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black are valued between 21% and 23% lower than comparable homes in white neighborhoods, with appraisal bias as one of several contributing factors. Economists at Freddie Mac reported in 2021 that greater percentages of homes in majority Black and Latino census tracts were undervalued compared with those in white census tracts, leading them to conclude that there was a 'valuation gap' between homes in different neighborhoods. The appraisal problem for minority borrowers also is a problem for lenders, since having low appraisals can prevent a homeowner from qualifying for a mortgage refinancing or a new home loan. That means the lender loses out on valuable business. Banks also suffer when appraisers make mistakes in the opposite direction, valuing properties too highly, because it means the bank can't safely rely on the value of a property as collateral for a loan. The reforms that the mortgage industry recently adopted to try to make the appraisal process fairer originated with a Biden administration task force called PAVE , which was formed in 2021. The group consisted of public officials from 13 different agencies, and its goal was to produce a report with recommended changes to a suite of different mortgage industry standards. PAVE recommended more training for home appraisers and higher standards for appraisers seeking to qualify for professional licenses. Those changes were handled by the Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization that serves as the regulator for home appraisers. A spokeswoman for the foundation declined to comment on the Trump administration's recent changes, but said that new education and licensing standards put in place last year are still in effect. PAVE also called for an industrywide requirement for mortgage lenders to let borrowers request 'a reconsideration of value' if they disagreed with an appraiser's determination. Last year, regulators began requiring mortgage lenders to decide how they would standardize their procedures and to explain them clearly to their customers. In a rare win for the government, the policy received support from the Mortgage Bankers Association. Federal housing regulation includes a web of rules issued by different agencies, including HUD and also Fannie and Freddie. The new home-appraisal guidance went into effect for all of the housing agencies. But so far, the Trump administration has only rolled back the policy for mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which help low- to moderate-income families attain home ownership. On July 17, Senator Raphael Warnock, a Democrat from Georgia, proposed a bill that would make mortgage lenders' ROV policies required by law. It also would expand public access to data on mortgage appraisals by forcing a federal housing regulator to more regularly share details. While fair-housing advocates support the proposal, the bill also has backing from a more unlikely source: the National Association of Mortgage Brokers. The group represents more than 500,000 mortgage brokers across the US. Its president, Jim Nabors, called the proposed bill 'critical' for ensuring fairness for homebuyers and added: 'Our entire board of directors and membership applaud Senator Warnock.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.