A German court lifts a government ban on a far-right magazine
BERLIN (AP) — A German court on Tuesday lifted a ban imposed by the government last year on a far-right magazine, ruling that the case against it didn't clear the high bar required to outlaw its publisher.
Germany's previous government banned Compact magazine and the company that publishes it, Compact-Magazin GmbH, in July. Then-Interior Minister Nancy Faeser described Compact as 'a central mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene,' and said that it 'agitates in an unspeakable way against Jews, against people with a history of migration and against our parliamentary democracy.'
Compact appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, which suspended the ban in August pending a full consideration of the case. Following a hearing earlier this month, the court lifted the ban altogether on Tuesday.
The court said in a statement that Germany's constitution guarantees freedom of the press and opinion 'even for the enemies of freedom' and that, on grounds of proportionality, a ban could only be justified if the publisher's anti-constitutional activities were proven to be 'formative' for the group. It said a review of the evidence showed that the material in question didn't reach that threshold.
Compact is run by far-right figure Jürgen Elsässer, and produces the monthly magazine of the same name, which has a circulation of about 40,000, as well as an online video channel, Compact TV. It also runs an online shop selling books, CDs, DVDs and other merchandise.
Compact has been published since 2010. In its annual report for 2023, Germany's domestic intelligence agency said that it 'regularly disseminates ... antisemitic, anti-minority, historically revisionist and conspiracy theory content.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Sen. Grassley calls delays at a benefits program for deceased officers 'absolutely unacceptable'
IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — A powerful U.S. senator on Tuesday called on the Trump administration to fix a growing backlog and longtime management problems at the program that promises benefits when police and firefighters die or become disabled in the line of duty. Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the Public Safety Officers' Benefits program is failing the spouses and children of deceased and disabled first responders and needs new leadership. He said the mismanagement has caused significant hardship for grieving families, who often experience yearslong delays in processing and approving claims. 'This is absolutely unacceptable,' he wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, in which he suggested she consider replacing longtime program leader Hope Janke. Grassley's letter comes days after The Associated Press published an investigation detailing the claims backlog at the program, which provides a nearly $450,000 one-time payment to the families of deceased and disabled officers and firefighters in addition to education benefits. The AP found dozens of families are waiting five years or more to learn whether they qualify for the life-changing payments, and more are being denied. As of late April, nearly 900 claims had been pending for more than one year, more than triple the number from five years ago, with a small number languishing for a decade. Grassley cited a Government Accountability Office report issued last year that detailed deficiencies in the program's management dating back to 2009. He said the program had failed to make changes recommended by outside reviewers but that 'government bureaucrats' such as Janke have never been held accountable. Janke has not responded to AP emails seeking comment, including one Tuesday. A request for comment to the DOJ wasn't immediately returned. DOJ officials said earlier this year that they are adopting several recommendations from the GAO, including improvements to make the program's electronic claims management system more user-friendly. They say they are responding to a surge of claims after Congress has made more categories of deaths and injuries eligible for benefits. Grassley demanded the DOJ provide updates and documents within two weeks related to the status of those changes. Texas widow Lisa Afolayan, who is still fighting the program for benefits 16 years after her husband died while training for the Border Patrol, welcomed Grassley's oversight of the program. 'We need movement. We need change and not only for my family,' she said. 'They've lost sight of why the program was started.'
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump backtracks on ‘regime change' talk in Iran
President Donald Trump said Tuesday he doesn't want to see regime change in Iran, two days after he floated the idea on social media. 'I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible,' Trump said to reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to the NATO summit. 'Regime change takes chaos, and ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos, so we'll see how it does.' Some of Trump's long-time supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Steve Bannon, criticized the earlier suggestion of regime change, worried the effort would bog down Americans in another costly Middle East expedition. Right-wing influencers on Tuesday were quick to cheer the president's apparent pivot. 'Trump is the peace president,' Charlie Kirk, MAGA media personality posted on X. But in a sign of how the issue still divides the GOP, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R. S.C.,), a longtime Iran hawk and ally of Trump, said during a hearing on Tuesday that 'the only way you're really going to have peace is for the regime to change its behavior, either through personnel or ideology.' 'And I just want to say this very clearly, until Iran renounces their regime goal of destroying the Jewish state, until Iran recognizes the right of Israel to exist as a nation and the Jews to exist as a people, we're nowhere closer to peace than we were before the capability of Iran to enact their agenda has been greatly reduced,' he said. 'Hats off to President Trump and our military, but until their desire changes, we need to stick with Israel and understand who we're dealing with.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz's fiery interview saw the pair clash over antisemitism, Iran and the Bible
Tucker Carlson's extended interview with Texas Senator Ted Cruz proved every bit as explosive as its preview clip had promised, with the two conservatives going head-to-head over the prospect of President Donald Trump leading the U.S. into war with Iran. The complete two-hour cut of The Tucker Carlson Show sitdown with Cruz appeared on Wednesday, a day after a brief excerpt circulated in advance, in which the host could be seen taking the senator to task for not knowing the population of Iran. That proved to be a mere appetizer, as the two men, perched in opposing chairs beneath an oil painting of Ronald Reagan, repeatedly clashed. The interview appeared at a pivotal moment, with President Trump weighing joining in Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive against Tehran, having reportedly already approved attack plans. It also served to expose the deep divisions within the president's MAGA movement over the necessity of intervention, a split that has already seen Trump fall out with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the likes of Carlson and Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene speaking out against the possibility of war. Here's a look at some of Tucker and Ted's key exchanges. In one of their most tense interactions, Carlson accused Cruz of accepting campaign donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which the host argued was a lobby group seeking to influence the U.S. government on behalf of a foreign country. 'It's a very weird thing, the obsession with Israel,' Cruz responded. 'You're not talking about Chinese, you're not talking about Japanese, you're not talking about the Brits, you're not talking about the French. The question is: 'What about the Jews? What about the Jews?'' Carlson was angered by the insinuation: 'Oh, so I'm an antisemite now?!' Cruz denied that he had been attempting to 'derail' his line of questioning by implying that Carlson was prejudiced. 'Of course you are, and rather than be honorable enough to say it right to my face, you are, in a sleazy feline way, implying it,' Carlson retorted. 'I don't see a lawmaker's job as defending the interest of a foreign government. Period. That does not make me an antisemite, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise!' Their most viral exchange saw the host ask the senator: 'How many people live in Iran, by the way?' When Cruz admitted he did not know, Carlson became incredulous: 'You don't know the population you seek to topple?' When the senator referred the question back to Carlson, he answered smartly that 92 million people live there, prompting Cruz to dismiss the significance of the point, saying huffily that he does not 'sit around memorizing population tables' in his free time. Carlson, approaching hysteria, pressed Cruz on the ethnic mix of the Iranian population instead, which the senator initially attempted to answer before stopping short and again insisting the question was irrelevant. 'You're a senator who's calling for an overthrow of the government, and you don't know anything about the country!' Carlson squawked with glee. Later, Cruz almost blundered into declaring war by inadvertently admitting the Trump administration's complicity when he said: 'We're carrying out military strikes today.' At Carlson's prompting, he raced to clarify that it was Israel carrying out the strikes 'with our help.' 'Well, you're breaking news here, because the U.S. government last night denied – National Security Council Spokesman Alex Pfeiffer denied, on behalf of Trump – that we were acting on Israel's behalf in any offensive capacity,' Carlson interrupted. 'This is high stakes, you're a senator, if you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening!' The former Fox News anchor was clearly annoyed by the Texan's frequent attempts to invoke the Bible to justify his hawkish stance on Iran. 'Growing up in Sunday school, I was taught from the Bible that those who bless Israel will be blessed and those who curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I wanna be on the blessing side of things,' the senator said. Again challenged by Carlson, Cruz could not name which book of the Bible the passage he quoted derived from, and was informed the answer was Genesis. The host's scoffing resumed: 'So you're quoting a Bible phrase. You don't have context for it, and you don't know where in the Bible it is, but that's, like, your theology? I'm confused. What does that even mean?' Cruz reversed and tried again: 'Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because Biblically, we are commanded to support Israel, but number two…' Carlson again interrupted, demanding that the senator define what he meant by Israel, prompting Cruz to erupt: 'Define Israel?! Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you've asked like 49 questions about.' Carlson made headlines around the world last year when he made a surprise visit to Russia to interview Vladimir Putin. He brought up the Ukraine war again with Cruz, pushing the Republican to renounce his past support for Volodymyr Zelensky's resistance effort. 'We were unable to beat Russia in the war that you supported against Russia!' the host ranted. 'You've been spending the last three years telling us that Vladimir Putin is evil and we're gonna beat him with other people's children. And a million of those kids are now dead! You've never apologized for that. That was a full failure!' 'The number of falsehoods you lay out in one statement is rather stunning!' Cruz volleyed back, before admitting that the war had been 'an absolute disaster' for all concerned and then digging in his heels by saying: 'I'm not going to engage in the demanding of apologies!'
