Indy Council votes against ousting leadership, approves payment for harassment investigation
Before the meeting, Democrat Crista Carlino, who has already called for President Osili and Vice President Brown to resign before walking back those comments, said she was leaving the council's dominant Democratic caucus Monday "after a continued lack of leadership and accountability, abuse of power, and unfair application of our Caucus rules for membership."
The 25-person council includes 19 Democrats and six Republicans. Democrats voted to remove Jesse Brown from the caucus earlier this year over his outspoken stances, he has said.
While Jesse Brown's proposal to force a full council vote on the leaders' removal failed Monday, Carlino and Republicans Hart and Bain supported the attempt, signaling broader concerns dogging the council's top two Democrats.
Jesse Brown said Osili's decision to forcibly remove a victim of alleged sexual harassment from the June council meeting was the tipping point in a series of leadership moves he disagreed with. Osili apologized for the incident two days later and has called for reforms to city policies to protect employees who report sexual harassment.
"I don't have a smoking gun," Jesse Brown said, "but I have enough smoke that I have a lot of concerns that have not been answered."
Staunch divisions among council members weren't enough to derail the approval Monday night of a final payment to the law firm that investigated allegations of sexual harassment within the Hogsett administration.
In last month's council meeting, councilors postponed the remaining two-thirds of the $450,000 owed to Chicago law firm Fisher Phillips after many members and residents objected to a final report's omission of late-night and personal text messages that Hogsett sent to young women he worked with — the same two women alleging that the mayor's former top aide, Thomas Cook, sexually harassed and abused them.
Indy politics: Joe Hogsett wants to move past harassment scandal. Many aren't sure he can
But at the July 7 meeting, councilors approved the payment with an 18-6 vote, with Democrat Jesse Brown and five Republicans — Derek Cahill, Michael-Paul Hart, Brian Mowery, Michael Dilk and Joshua Bain — voting no.
Those who objected said it was wrong to pay the law firm without requiring a follow-up hearing in which councilors could question Fisher Phillips lawyers about their decisions.
"We want to know we're getting what we paid for, what we were contractually obligated to receive, such as the body of work that went into this," Mowery said. "Having not seen any of that ... we'd like to have an opportunity to now ask questions of the law firm."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Where Trump is popular, Democrats look to a new crop of candidates to help win back the House
FAIRVIEW, N.C. — Jamie Ager has spent much of the past year rebuilding his farm in the foothills of western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene tore through the region, cutting power, destroying fences and scattering livestock. Then, earlier this year, Ager lost his beef contract with local schools, a casualty of billions of dollars in cuts to the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Trump administration. Now, the fifth-generation farmer is running for Congress — part of a new crop of Democratic candidates the party is turning to as it tries to compete in the tough, often rural districts it may need to flip to retake the U.S. House in 2026. Democrats say these new recruits are uniquely suited to break through in districts where President Trump's popularity dominates. Many, like Ager, are already a well-known presence in their communities. And in parts of North Carolina, Kentucky, Michigan and elsewhere, the party is betting local credibility can cut through skepticism where the Democratic brand has fallen. Ager says he sees national Democrats as out of touch with rural life: too 'academic' and 'politically correct and scripted.' 'That's just not what people are interested in,' he says. 'The ideas of helping poor people, being neighborly, the ideal of doing those things, I think, are worthy, good ideas that are actually popular. But the execution of a lot of those ideas has been gummed up, you know, not well executed.' Heading into next year's midterms, Democrats believe momentum is on their side. Historically, the president's party loses ground in the midterms. In 2018, during Trump's first term, Democrats flipped 41 seats to take control of the House. Republicans currently control the House by such a slim margin, Democrats need to pick up only a few seats to break the GOP's hold on Washington. The Republican-led tax break and spending cut bill has added to Democrats' optimism. About two-thirds of U.S. adults expect the new law will help the rich, according to a poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. About half say it'll do more harm than good for middle-class people and people like them. Still, Republicans remain confident. They point to having fewer vulnerable seats than Democrats have this cycle. Only three Republicans hold House districts Democrat Kamala Harris won last year, while 13 Democrats represent districts Trump won. They also note Democrats' low opinion of their own party after last year's losses. In a July AP-NORC poll, Democrats were likelier to describe their own party negatively than Republicans, with many Democrats calling it weak or ineffective. In places where local dynamics may give Democrats a shot, it means finding the right candidates is especially important, party leaders say. 'Recruitment matters in these years when the environment is going to be competitive,' Democratic pollster John Anzalone said. With power, water and telecommunications down due to last year's hurricane, Ager's Hickory Nut Gap farm became a hub for the community — hosting cookouts and using propane to grill food for neighbors. Statewide, the storm caused nearly $60 billion in damage and killed more than 100 people. Little federal aid has reached the hardest-hit parts of western North Carolina. 'Helene hitting definitely put an exclamation point on, like, 'Whoa, we need help and support,'' Ager said. Democrats see Ager as a high-risk, high-reward candidate who could be successful in a district where Democrats have struggled. No Democrat has won North Carolina's 11th Congressional District since it was redrawn by the Republican-controlled legislature in 2011. A court-ordered redistricting ahead of the 2020 election made it slightly more favorable to Democrats, encompassing Asheville and much of western North Carolina. Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards still won by nearly 14 percentage points last year and is expected to seek reelection. Grayson Barnette, a Democratic strategist who helped recruit Ager, said in some districts it's a risk to run a candidate who hasn't held elected office before. 'But I would argue that's a good thing, especially when the Democrats just took the big hit we did,' Barnette said. 'We have to look in the mirror and say, 'Let's try something new.'' In a district where nearly 62% of residents live in very low-density areas, Barnette believes Ager's identity — as a business owner, coach and father with deep local roots — could cut through. His unpolished, direct style, he says, may resonate more than a polished political résumé. In the video launching his campaign, Ager shows flooding on the farm and is seen on the porch of his home, feeding chickens, driving a tractor and spending time with his wife and three sons. 'I'm not flashy, but I'm honest,' he says in the video. Ager doesn't call himself a Democrat in the roughly two-minute video and rarely used the word during a three-hour interview. Still, his ties to the party run deep: His brother serves in the state House, following in the footsteps of their father. His grandfather served six years in the U.S. House. Asked whether that might be a liability in the district, Ager shrugged: 'Then don't vote for me.' In western Michigan, state Sen. Sean McCann is a different kind of candidate from Ager. He's buttoned-up and soft-spoken, with a long resume in elected office and deep roots in Kalamazoo, having served for a decade on the city commission before winning a seat in the state House in 2010. In a district anchored by conservative and religious values, Democrats see McCann as the kind of steady, experienced figure who can make inroads — especially as backlash builds to Trump's tax bill, which includes deep spending cuts. At a recent meeting at Kalamazoo's Family Health Center, where nearly 65% of patients rely on Medicaid, the center's president warned the proposed Medicaid cuts would be devastating. 'It's about being home in the community and listening to our community's values — and carrying those to Washington,' McCann said. The district is represented by Republican Rep. Bill Huizenga, who won reelection by nearly 12 percentage points in 2022. But Huizenga hasn't said whether he'll seek another term, and Trump carried the district by only 5.5 percentage points in 2024. Across the country, Democrats are watching similar races in places like Iowa and Kentucky, where local candidates with strong community ties are running. In Iowa's 2nd District, state Rep. Lindsay James — a fourth-term lawmaker and Presbyterian pastor — is weighing a run in the northeast part of the state. In Kentucky's 6th, which includes Lexington and Richmond, former federal prosecutor Zach Dembo is running his first campaign, describing himself as a political outsider. It's a mix of profiles: Ager, the farmer-turned-candidate feeding neighbors after a hurricane. McCann, the public servant meeting with health workers in his hometown. And others like them trying to reconnect a skeptical electorate. 'Yes, the Democratic Party has some taint to it,' Ager said. 'But when I go talk to Republicans who are friends that I've known forever, there's genuine admiration and mutual respect for each other. And that comes from being in this community forever.' Cappelletti writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Maya Sweedler in Washington contributed to this report.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Joe Biden threw open the border to rig the census — and elections for Democrats
We know that the Biden administration deliberately broke the border and ushered in over 20 million illegal aliens, at a huge cost to the nation's social welfare system, and with a reckless disregard for potential criminality and terrorism. Exactly why they did it has always been the burning question. A new Rasmussen poll gives us a clue. It's the census. Advertisement There is mounting evidence that the Biden administration tried to cook the books to give Democrats an unfair advantage, which explains why a minority of Democrats (43% compared to 83% Republicans) approve of President Trump's decision to take a new census that excludes illegal aliens from the population count. Illegal migrants have always been included in the census, so blue states like California, Texas, New York and New Jersey, that bore the brunt of Biden's influx, get increased representation, which means more Congressional seats for Democrats, more Electoral College votes for Democrats, and more funding for Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrat proxy-NGOs, not to mention federal agencies under Biden, like FEMA, were registering them to vote, even though they are not eligible. That's why Democrats fought tooth and nail to prevent voter ID so that ineligible non-citizens could vote. Further down the track, they figured that amnesty would net them tens of millions of new Democrat voters — at least for a generation or so. Advertisement But that was just the icing on the cake. The census was the immediate payoff, and they didn't care how many illegal aliens raped, murdered, robbed, or extorted American citizens. They didn't care that the social safety net in cities like New York was collapsing under the weight of all these new supplicants. Slave labor wages that undercut American workers only make sense if the state picks up the cost of room and board and health care for the slaves. It was the Census that would give Democrats more power, and in April 2021, when Biden Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo announced the 2020 Census results, we started to see 'errors' that mostly only went one way. Red states like Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee were undercounted while blue states like New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Minnesota, and Joe Biden's home state of Delaware had overcounts, skewing political representation and funding allocation. Advertisement 'The miscounts … particularly given that overrepresentation appears to have tended to noticeably skew in favor of one political party over another, demands additional scrutiny of potential political influence by the Biden-Harris Administration or other deficiencies that would explain these errors,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote in a letter to the Census Bureau last year. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Rasmussen teased out public attitudes to these 'errors' with a poll of 1,184 likely voters conducted on August 11-13. Just 37% of Democrats said illegal migrants should not be counted in the census, while 49% said they should, and 13% weren't sure. By contrast, 65% of Republicans wanted illegal immigrants excluded, while a mystifying 29% wanted them to be counted. Advertisement On the question of Trump ordering up a new census to replace the error-ridden 2020 pandemic version, 57% of voters approved while 34% disapproved. Of those, a whopping 83% of Republicans were in favor compared to 43% of Democrats. The fact is, even before Comer conducts his investigation, before all the evidence is in, Democrat voters instinctively know that the census hoax benefited their side.
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
NY Democrat: DC police takeover ‘points toward Jim Crow 2.0'
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) compared President Trump's police takeover in Washington, D.C. to the post-Reconstruction era in the United States when racial segregation was codified into law and upheld by law enforcement. In an interview on MSNBC's 'PoliticsNation' on Sunday, the Rev. Al Sharpton, a civil rights activist, noted three Republican-led states — Ohio, West Virginia and South Carolina — announced this weekend they would send hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington to bolster Trump's sweeping anti-crime crackdown in the nation's capital. Sharpton asked Meeks for his thoughts 'on three predominantly White, red states — two of which with roots in the Old Confederacy — sending armed troops to one of our nation's Blackest cities at Trump's demands,' adding, 'What is this pointing towards, congressman?' 'This points towards Jim Crow 2.0,' Meeks said, inviting the public to 'look at history … and what took place post-Reconstruction, and see what's taking place right now, and what this man who is sitting in the White House is trying to do.' 'And here he is trying to send the military into cities, predominantly where there are African-American mayors, Democratic cities, whether you're talking about New York, Chicago, Los Angeles [or] Washington, D.C.,' he continued. Meeks accused Trump of violating the Constitution and violating states' sovereignty by sending in the National Guard. He called the move 'absolutely unconscionable' and said Democratic members of Congress, especially members of the Congressional Black Caucus, will address the issue when they return from August recess. 'We must stand, and we must fight, and we must speak out against all of this, reverend. This is not something that we should take — we cannot take it lightly,' Meeks said. 'And I know that when members of Congress [get] back into Washington, D.C., this is a conversation I can guarantee you, we're having among ourselves as the members of the Congressional Black Caucus.' 'We are not going to just sit by idly and then allow what's taking place,' he continued. 'So we look forward to working with you and all of these civil rights organizations. Our voices must be heard and action must take place.'
