logo
Public transit funding and pension reform, budget and Bears stadium are big issues in final week of legislative session

Public transit funding and pension reform, budget and Bears stadium are big issues in final week of legislative session

Chicago Tribune26-05-2025

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois lawmakers head into the final days of their spring session this week looking for ways to close a substantial gap in the budget while at the same time shoring up ailing public transit operations and taking steps to fix inequities in the state's pension system.
The General Assembly also could move on Gov. JB Pritzker's legislative goals, such as further abortion protections and cryptocurrency regulation. Also still unresolved is whether the state will provide any help for the Chicago Bears' potential relocation to Arlington Heights.
As happens every spring, much of the most serious business in the four-month spring legislative session has been left to the final hours.
But legislative leaders have also warned there's also a chance that, to maintain a balanced budget, legislators will have to return to Springfield after their scheduled adjournment on Saturday, May 31, because of uncertainty over federal funding under President Donald Trump's administration.
Democratic Sen. Elgie Sims of Chicago, the lead budget negotiator for the Senate Democrats, likened the situation with federal funding to the factors that led to a two-year plus budget impasse under Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner, which decimated social services and hurt the state's economy.
'There was a great deal of uncertainty, so we couldn't predict what was going to happen from one moment to the next,' Sims said. 'It has a feel like that coming out of Washington. But that's why you have to stay the course, make sure that we have a clear understanding of what the priorities are, of what the needs are.'
While Democrats have solid control of the General Assembly, haggling about the $55.2 billion budget Pritzker proposed in February could divide party progressives and moderates, especially over issues such as health insurance for noncitizen immigrants under 65, which the governor did not fund in his proposal.
Republicans have long complained about being left out of the budget process, but Sen. Seth Lewis of Bartlett, who works on budget matters for the GOP, said he was happy about one thing this year: Pritzker's message that funding requests must be limited in a tight financial year.
'The governor's early warnings to all interested parties has (tamped) down at least the public requests for more money,' Lewis said. 'We don't know what's coming. But from the tone that I have experienced around the Capitol, the requests for funding for everyone and everything do seem to be (tamped) down.'
'That also (tamps) down any requests for additional revenue,' he said. 'I think that also (tamps) down and forces our agencies to look at what and where they're spending. So, if we can continue this and improve upon it, that'll be good for the residents of Illinois.'
Although the GOP has little power to effect change, House Republicans have voiced opposition to any proposal that calls for increased spending or any potential tax hikes. Republicans regularly note state budgets in Illinois have risen from about $40 billion to more than $50 billion in the past decade under Democratic leadership.
'The Democrats' answer for tax reform is revenue. More revenue. We need to be looking at this as a holistic approach,' said House GOP leader Tony McCombie of Savanna. 'We know we need to lower our corporate income tax here in Illinois. We know, every one of us, as we're getting our property tax bills with increases this year, we know we have to have some real reform there and we cannot piecemeal this.'
An April report from the legislature's Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability showed the state's revenue growth has fallen $471 million short of the $55 billion in state revenues Pritzker used in his February budget proposal.
The bleak financial outlook makes the challenge of addressing reforms and funding to Chicago-area and downstate transit systems especially tough. The Chicago area's transit infrastructure faces a projected fiscal cliff of hundreds of millions of dollars as COVID-pandemic-related federal funds are set to run out by the beginning of next year.
Prompted by years of customer dissatisfaction, a proposal to combine the Chicago Transit Authority, Metra, Pace and the Regional Transportation Authority is now on the table but has been met with pushback from labor groups. Legislation tying a bailout of the CTA to limits on the mayor's influence on the transit boards is also being considered. There have also been discussions about a single police force for all Chicago-area transit systems.
The RTA, which oversees the CTA, Metra and Pace, wants Springfield to allocate $1.5 billion in new funding to overhaul the system. The CTA has outlined a doomsday scenario for Chicago-area transit if lawmakers don't act on reforms and funding by May 31.
'The magnitude of these cuts is unprecedented and would require several rounds of schedule adjustments in 2026 and beyond,' CTA spokesperson Catherine Hosinski has said.
Orlando Rojas, a train conductor for Metra, said there's been talk that 300 jobs, possibly including train conductors and engineers, could be in jeopardy at the agency if transit reforms and accompanying funding aren't put into place in the near future.
'The jobs would basically … be a lot less desirable and probably, you know, have to work longer hours, less desirable hours, just to meet the needs of the remaining service,' said Rojas, a union representative for Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Local 653.
Sarah Chiappe, a line cook at a downtown Chicago hotel, takes the Red Line or a bus to work for her 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. shift. She said she worries that cuts in service could require her to take more expensive ride-sharing options home more often.
'I love taking the train. It gives me a chance to clear my mind on my way to work,' Chiappe said. 'I can finish book after book instead of going through the stressfulness of driving a car everyday to work. But God knows that road rage is a real thing in the city.'
One key lawmaker involved in transit talks, Sen. Ram Villivalam, said he's 'cautiously optimistic' there could be some sort of resolution on the transit issue by the end of the month.
'We're continuing our conversations. There's a lot of consensus as it relates to centralizing responsibilities such as fare policies, capital planning, service planning and so much more, to a central authority,' Villivalam said last week. 'And I think we're continuing to stay with our mantra of no funding without reform.'
Lawmakers could also consider changes to the state's pension system that grants greater benefits to recipients who were employed by the state prior to 2011, when changes to the massively underfunded system took effect, compared with workers hired since then.
The goal of the Tier 2 plan created back then was to shrink a pension debt that now runs to about $141 billion. However, at some point, benefits paid out under the system won't be equal to what Social Security would provide to those employees, a violation of a federal 'safe harbor' law. This would require the state to pay large sums in Social Security taxes instead of operating its own pension system which, while still costly, allows the state more flexibility.
The Pritzker administration has proposed allocating $78 million toward addressing the Tier 2 issue, a figure that Sen. Robert Martwick, a key lawmaker involved in the pension negotiations, thinks could rise as negotiations continue.
'There are different benefit structures throughout the state of Illinois and that means a one-size-fits-all is difficult. But I think we're (homing) in. We've had serious discussions between the House and the Senate, and the governor's office, and I feel like we're narrowing in on a potential solution,' said Martwick, a Chicago Democrat.
He acknowledged the goal is to make moderate changes to pension guidelines as they relate to an employee's final average salary, retirement age and other factors.
'I think there are all kind of ingredients. I don't know that we'll do all of them, or to what degree we'll do any of them,' he said. 'But those are all the different (things) that we're working on, trying to come up with a solution that works for the state, works for the taxpayers, works for our employees.'
While the Bears signaled earlier this month they aren't seeking significant state funding for a new stadium, the team does acknowledge a move to Arlington Heights would be contingent on legislative action allowing for the negotiated financing of large-scale developments. This so-called megaproject legislation would allow them to negotiate with local governments over property tax bills.
But passing such a measure quickly might be a tall order, especially for Chicago lawmakers with an interest in keeping the team in the city.
There are at least three megaprojects-related bills sitting in the legislature that could provide the Bears some sort of path to work on with lawmakers in trying to ease their move to Arlington Heights if the northwest suburb officially becomes their new home.
'Apparently the Bears have made a proposal on what version, which is a combination of all three, that they want to negotiate,' Sen. Mark Walker, an Arlington Heights Democrat who is sponsoring one of those bills, said May 16, the day the Bears announced their shift in focus to Arlington Heights. 'So that's going to be under negotiation in the next couple of weeks.'
Also up in the air are elements of Pritzker's legislative agenda, a menu that includes legislation involving consumer protection, education, local governance and abortion rights, one of the governor's signature issues.
One measure passed by the Senate and awaiting approval from the House would provide more protections under Illinois' 2023 shield law, which prevents health care workers from facing disciplinary action by the state if, for instance, they provide abortion care to someone from another state that has more stringent abortion restrictions.
The legislation also would ensure prescribing abortion medications such as mifepristone would remain legal in the state even if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revokes approval, as long as the World Health Organization recommends their use. Democrats have warned that access to these drugs could be jeopardized following declarations toward that end by Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation policy group thought to have influence on the Trump White House.
Passed by the Senate and awaiting a House vote is a Pritzker-backed bill that would require school districts to adopt guidelines to prohibit students from using cellphones during instructional time, while providing secure and accessible storage for the devices, before the 2026-27 school year.
The bill provides exceptions that would allow students to use phones during an emergency, when a teacher authorizes the device for instruction, when a phone can assist students with a disability or when the device is necessary for a student learning English.
Another Pritzker initiative would allow the state to impose regulations on the cryptocurrency industry, which has come under scrutiny for leaving customers vulnerable to fraud.
Digitized cryptocurrency can be used for electronic payments through the internet that are usually not controlled by a government body or authoritative entity, and the Trump administration has been friendly to the industry, stopping investigations into crypto businesses and litigation against at least one company.
Two bills calling for the cryptocurrency regulations are before the General Assembly, and each has passed through one chamber.
The governor is also pushing legislation that would regulate pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, companies that act as intermediaries among drugmakers, insurance corporations and pharmacies.
The legislation, among other things, would prevent PBMs from sending patients to pharmacies where they have a financial interest and it would also include prohibiting PBMs from pocketing certain savings on medications.
A bill that is expected to include language for a Pritzker-led measure that would allow some community colleges to offer four-year degrees advanced through the House Executive Committee Friday. But Democratic Rep. Curtis Tarver of Chicago at that hearing said, 'The Black Caucus has some concerns about the concept and the bill in general.'
Another Pritzker initiative awaiting consideration by lawmakers would grant voters the ability to decide whether to consolidate township governments, including as a potential solution to lower property taxes.
All of those issues could be addressed as lawmakers continue to press to get money for programs and services they want in the coming year, even as Pritzker has indicated the answer will often be 'No.'
'There are still those priorities that individuals want to see addressed in the budget, making sure that we're protecting our most vulnerable, making sure that we're providing for our seniors,' Sims, the chief budget negotiator for the Senate Democrats, said. 'So those kinds of things, those discussions are ongoing. I imagine we'll continue to do that over the next week.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds

NEW YORK (AP) — The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for NASA, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, 'Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass.' Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. 'For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable.' Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. A spokesman for NHTSA said the probe was ongoing and that the agency 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50% in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14% amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4%. 'Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm,' said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. 'Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative.' One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. Meanwhile, one analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas 'in a meaningful way.' But he's now less hopeful. 'There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments,' TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, 'and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts.' Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for NASA and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the U.S. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later — in a reply to another X user — he said he wouldn't do it. A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40% of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an 'illegal boycott' and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. Now advertisers may have to worry about a different danger. If Trump sours on X, 'there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands,' said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an 'exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends.' ___ Associated Press Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.

Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed
Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed

Papers in that file showed that Trump's nominee to run NASA — a close associate of Musk's — had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through the public farewell, with both men praising each other and saying their relationship would continue. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Musk. Trump started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head and pointing out several of the most recent ones in the file. This was not good, the president said — an early signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk, who was sporting a black eye, which he blamed on a tussle with his young son, tried to explain. He said his friend Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next NASA administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Advertisement Maybe it's a good thing, Musk told the president — it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. But Trump was unmoved. He said that people don't change. These are the types of people who will turn, he said, and it won't end up being good for us. Advertisement Musk was anxious about mounting a vigorous defense of Isaacman with other people around, including Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office who has clashed with Musk over nominees. Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president after the gathering, privately. But later that day, Trump decided he would withdraw Isaacman from consideration to run NASA, dealing a blow to Musk, who had worked to place a top associate in charge of the agency most important to SpaceX, his rocket business. Musk spent the next day trying to salvage Isaacman's nomination, to no avail. Musk was stunned by the timing. This account of the crumbling relationship between the president and Trump is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. On Thursday, less than a week after the confrontation in the Oval Office, an extraordinary political alliance exploded, with Trump and Musk hurling insults at one another on social media. The feud culminated in threats from the president to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Musk's companies, and Musk claiming there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender. Musk indicated his support for the president's impeachment. By Thursday evening, Musk signaled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. Late Thursday, Musk backed off a threat to 'immediately' decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which transports NASA astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. A short time later, when Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund billionaire, posted on social media that the two men 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Musk responded, 'You're not wrong.' Advertisement Over the past several months, Musk saw his standing in the administration diminish. He angered the president by planning to attend a sensitive briefing about China at the Pentagon, one the president learned about from a New York Times report. He also sparred with Cabinet officials and top Trump aides, and criticized the president's tariffs. The president had grown more distant from a man with whom he had once seemed inseparable. One point of contention between the men was the president's signature domestic policy bill. Musk spent several days assailing the bill on X, his social media platform, furious because he said it would undo his work to cut government spending. He also suggested that he would support efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections to unseat Republicans who backed the bill. But it was the decision to pull Isaacman's nomination that people close to both men said had accelerated the end of the relationship. For Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more than the head of NASA, because of its crucial importance to SpaceX. So it was of great personal benefit to Musk when Trump chose Isaacman, who has flown to space twice with SpaceX, to oversee the agency. For weeks, Senate Republican leadership had been under pressure from the White House to expedite his nomination, despite concerns from some Republican lawmakers about his past donations. The president, a White House aide told leaders, was fine with those donations, and the leadership should be as well. Advertisement After Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination, Musk, his allies, and even some White House officials pinned the blame on Gor, believing he intentionally sabotaged Isaacman as Musk was on his way out. Gor and Musk had clashed several times early in Trump's second term, including at two Cabinet meetings, where Musk questioned how swiftly Gor was moving to fill the top ranks of agencies. By Friday morning, White House officials said Trump was planning to sell the red Tesla he said he had purchased in March in a show of support for Musk.

Musk empire faces risks with Trump feud
Musk empire faces risks with Trump feud

The Hill

time43 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Musk empire faces risks with Trump feud

The Big Story Elon Musk, the world's richest man, may have made himself an enemy of the world's most powerful leader. © Evan Vucci, Associated Press The public blowout between Musk and President Trump is threatening the tech billionaire's businesses, some of which have billions of dollars' worth of federal contracts. Musk's aerospace company SpaceX alone reportedly has at least $22 billion in federal contracts — which Trump had threatened to revoke at the peak of his feud with his former adviser. 'Trump goes after people, companies and organizations he doesn't like,' said Peter Loge, a political science professor at George Washington University and former senior FDA adviser during the Obama administration. 'As a real estate developer, politician and president, he has used every tool at his disposal to punish people he thinks have wronged him,' Loge added. 'Unless Musk expresses contrition, Trump is likely to hurt him in every way he can think of. If Musk is contrite, he can be welcomed back into the Trump tent.' While the two could reconcile in the future, observers agree the dramatic turn of events leaves Musk's business empire vulnerable to Trump's wrath. Trump, at one point during Thursday's back-and-forth, threatened to cut Musk's government contracts as he called his former adviser 'crazy.' 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Musk, in turn, said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is responsible for ferrying astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station. He later backed off, after an X user urged him to 'cool off and take a step back.' The public exchange underscored how Musk's business ventures could get caught in the crosshairs of any feud with the president, who is known to have a proclivity for retribution. 'If this turns into a hot war, certainly, the consequences for Musk's business relationship with the federal government could be in peril, or at least significantly complicated,' said GOP strategist and Trump campaign alum Brian Seitchik. Read more in a full report Saturday morning at Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: Grassley to Trump, Musk: Listen to my wife and stop fighting Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) delivered a stern message to President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk on Friday amid their dramatic fallout — a message from Grassley's wife, that is. 'I just heard Barbara Grassley say this disagreement and arguments btwn musk and Trump must end I know she loves both musk and Pres Trump,' the 91-year-old senator wrote on social platform X, using his notable shorthand and … World Liberty Financial to invest in Trump meme coin following crypto wallet dispute World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture launched by President Trump and his sons, plans to invest in the president's meme coin, seemingly resolving a dispute between the two crypto firms tied to the Trump family. Eric Trump — who helps run World Liberty Financial alongside Donald Trump Jr. — announced Friday that the $TRUMP token had 'aligned' with the company and would no longer being moving forward with a crypto wallet, … Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's alliance formed with swift and intense speed less than a year ago. It devolved just as quickly this week. Their relationship abruptly imploded in a matter of days, as a simmering feud boiled over and spilled out in public between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader. Just last week, Trump presented a ceremonial key to Musk at the White House. … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner Trump-tied crypto firms resolve wallet dispute © AP Photo/Altaf Qadri Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture launched by President Trump and his sons, plans to invest in the president's meme coin, seemingly resolving a dispute between the two crypto firms tied to the Trump family. Eric Trump — who helps run World Liberty Financial alongside Donald Trump Jr. — announced Friday the $TRUMP token had 'aligned' with the company and would no longer being moving forward with a crypto wallet, which had caused the rift between the two firms. 'Although their meme wallet isn't moving forward, they remain focused on building the most exciting MEME on earth – $Trump,' Eric Trump wrote in a post on X. 'Moreover, we're proud to announce that World Liberty Financial plans to acquire a substantial position in $TRUMP for their Long-Term Treasury,' he continued. 'We share a bigger vision for crypto, patriotism, and long-term success. Stay tuned for more to come!' The team behind the meme coin initially announced Tuesday that they were launching a crypto wallet alongside Magic Eden, a nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace. However, the announcement sparked confusion as the president's sons denied involvement in the project. World Liberty Financial reportedly sent cease-and-desist letters to both Magic Eden and Fight Fight Fight, the company behind $TRUMP, over the wallet, according to Bloomberg. However, the two firms appeared to have resolved their differences Friday. 'The Trump meme and WLFI may be different lanes, but they share the same highway. Same values, same mission—amplifying American strength through innovation,' World Liberty Financial said in a post. What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Abrego Garcia to return to US to face charges The Trump administration has moved to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia from imprisonment in a Salvadoran facility in order to file a criminal case against … Read more Hegseth could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions … Read more What Others are Reading Opinions related to tech submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store