Island residents in Ernakulam left waiting for CRZ nod
As per the CRZ Notification, 2019, implementation of an IIMP is mandatory for construction to proceed on island regions.
Singh clarified that IIMPs are prepared according to the CRZ notification, 2019 and the Centre approves them only after detailed proposals are submitted by the state. However, no IIMP project proposals have been submitted by the Kerala govt, he stated.
The minister was answering questions from the MP regarding the the inclusion of 13 previously excluded panchayats in Ernakulam under the CRZ-II category.
These include Alangad, Chendamangalam, Chittattukara, Ezhikkara, Kadungallur, Karumaloor, Kottuvally, Kunnukara, Puthanvelikara, Udayamperoor, Vadakkekkara, Kuzhippilly, Pallippuram and Edavanakadu.
Hibi Eden noted that the wait has been long for residents, particularly the island fisherfolk and coastal communities, to benefit from the construction relaxations under the 2019 CRZ Notification. The Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP), which reflects the new CRZ norms, was approved in Oct 2024, after much delay.
"Even with the approval of this Coastal Zone Management Plan in Oct 2024, the key benefit of CRZ 2019 for coastal communities, including island fishermen, remains unrealized," stated the MP.
"The concession, allowing construction beyond 20 meters from the water body boundary, hasn't been granted to eligible applicants because the IIMP, which was supposed to be released alongside the coastal zone management plan, is still not ready."
He urged the state government to act swiftly to prepare and submit the IIMPs so that eligible coastal communities can finally access their long-promised development rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Six years after Article 370: What would statehood change for J&K?
Six years after the abrogation of Article 370 and the reorganisation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two separate Union Territories—Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh—there is now a strong political push to restore July 20, J&K's Chief Minister Omar Abdullah called for restoring statehood. 'We're not asking for something that is not our due. Statehood is a right; it was promised to the people,' he Central government had also assured the Supreme Court during the hearing on petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that restoration of statehood will be done expeditiously. Under the Constitution, India is a 'Union of States', and the powers of a State and a Union territory under the federal system are clearly DID THE SUPREME COURT SAY?In 2023, while passing its verdict, the Supreme Court noted that the Parliament under the Constitution has admitted and established new States in article 3 of the Constitution would legally allow the Parliament to 'extinguish' the status of a State in the manner that was done by reorganising J&K into two Union territories was left open by the five-judge bench, however, noted that 'states under the Indian Constitution have their own independent constitutional existence.'The Supreme Court had agreed not to go into the issue of legal validity of the J&K Reorganisation Act 2019, after the Solicitor General for the Union of India told the court that 'statehood will be restored to Jammu and Kashmir and that its status as a Union territory is temporary.'The Court in its verdict noted that the Solicitor General had clarified that 'the status of the Union Territory of Ladakh will not be affected by the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir.'The Court in its verdict had directed that 'Restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible.' It has, however, been nearly 2 years since the Sc is also a petition pending before the Supreme Court of India, likely to be heard on August 8, seeking restoration of statehood to J&K. The petition has argued that delay in restoration of statehood is 'gravely affecting the rights of the inhabitants of Jammu andKashmir and also violating the basic structure of federalism.'WHAT DOES STATEHOOD MEAN UNDER THE CONSTITUTION?States are the foundational units of India's federal structure. According to a paper by former Law Commission member P.M. Bakshi, 'The essence of federalism lies in the sharing of legal sovereignty by the Union and the federating units.'advertisementDemarcation of legislative power between the Center and the states also helps in defining the boundaries of the executive power shared by the two, as usually the legislative power controls the powers of the Executive legislatures have exclusive powers over subjects enumerated in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and concurrent powers over those enumerated in List powers of the legislature include authorisation of all expenditure, taxation and borrowing by the state legislatures, apart from exercising the usual power of financial control, use all normal parliamentary devices like questions, discussions, debates, adjournments and no-confidence motions and resolutions to keep a watch over day-to-day work of the executive. They also have their committees on estimates and public accounts to ensure that grants sanctioned by legislature are properly a state, the Governor also has limited powers to interfere with governance and ordinarily acts only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. In a UT, the situation is different, as the LG has expanded powers of discretion and there are restrictions on the subjects which are under control of the legislature and executive IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR?Under Article 239 of the Constitution, Union Territories are administrated by the President acting to such extent, as he thinks fit, through an Administrator appointed by him. Currently, the role of the Administrator of J&K and Ladakh is held by the Lieutenant Governor (LG).At present, following the J&K Reorganisation, the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have limited powers to legislate and the Reorganisation Act, the UT of J&K has been included under Article 239A of the Constitution, which means that the UT has a legislative Assembly with 107 seats that are filled by direct UT of Ladakh is directly administered by the President, which means that it does not have an elected Assembly, and the Parliament of India passes any laws and monitors the administration of the the parliament under these provisions can introduce changes to the powers of the UT legislature, the J&K Reorganisation Act has granted extensive powers to the LG. Which means that, effectively, the Home Minister of India has control over the Police and bureaucratic apparatus in both union to Section 36 relating to Financial Bills in the Reorganisation Act 2019, no Bill or amendment shall be introduced in the Legislative Assembly without the recommendation of the Lieutenant Governor, if such a Bill deals with amendment of the law of any financial obligation taken or to be incurred by the legislature of the Union Territory, among other provision has had wide significance as virtually every policy decision may give rise to a financial obligation for the Union Territory. This has also raised points of conflict between the elected government and the amending the rules framed under the Reorganisation Act, the Center in 2024 had also vested more powers to the for taking decisions on police, officers of all-India services such as the IAS and the IPS, and giving sanction for prosecution in various MHA further said that all decisions regarding the appointment of advocate general and other law officers, besides matters related to the anti-corruption bureau, will also be taken by the Act also provides that the decision taken by the Lieutenant Governor in his discretion will be final and the validity of any action taken by the Lieutenant Governor will not be questioned on the grounds of whether he should have acted in his discretion or WILL CHANGE ONCE STATEHOOD IS RESTORED?All limitations on the power and authority of the elected government and legislature will be removed once statehood is the Reorganisation Act, the J&K Legislature has the power to pass laws on the subjects mentioned in the Concurrent list of the Constitution as well as on any subject in the State List 'except the subjects mentioned at entries 1 and 2, namely 'Public Order' and 'Police' respectively'Once statehood is restored to J&K, the power to control the police forces in the state and regulate 'public order'- would go back to the elected Assembly and the elected Government of the extensive discretion and powers granted to the LG, as the administrator representing the President, will also be removed, with the powers to control the police, law and order, transfer postings of bureaucrats and anti-corruption branches going back to the elected both the Solicitor General (in the Supreme Court) and the Union Home Minister (in Parliament) have clarified that Ladakh will remain a separate Union Territory even after J&K regains statehood.- Ends
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
US tariff hike threatens Kerala's export economy, says state finance minister
Thiruvananthapuram: Finance minister K N Balagopal warned that the 25% tariff imposed by the United States on Indian products could seriously hurt Kerala's economy. The higher tariff would badly impact exports of key products like marine foods, spices, and tea, he said. Balagopal said the US-led trade war with countries worldwide would cause a major crisis in global trade and economy, hitting India hard. He made these remarks while inaugurating a seminar on 'Post-Covid Development Challenges and Response: Through the lens of Kerala budgets,' organized by Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation. He added that developed countries like the US and Australia are pressuring the Union govt to open up the markets for agricultural products, milk and milk-based products. Reports suggest that Australia can sell milk in India at a much cheaper rate (Rs 30/litre). If cheaper milk floods Kerala's market, local milk producers could face serious difficulties. He criticized the campaign that Kerala is in a debt trap and its total debt has mounted to Rs 6 trillion. "This is absolutely baseless and a section of experts had been spreading false information about the debt status of Kerala through social media platforms," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo He clarified that Kerala's total debt at the end of FY 2025-26 would be around Rs 4,70,000 crore. According to the trend prevailing over the last three decades, Kerala's total debt has doubled in every five years. Kerala's debt could have crossed Rs 6 trillion as per this cyclical trend, he added. Economist M A Oommen added that Kerala's fiscal condition has worsened due to repeated natural disasters and the Covid pandemic, which have severely impacted the state's finances.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rahul-Tejashwi ‘yatra' against SIR postponed
Patna: The much-publicised "Vote Adhikar Yatra," which was to be jointly launched by leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and Bihar assembly opposition leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav , has been postponed due to "unavoidable reasons". The yatra, originally scheduled for Aug, was intended to raise awareness about voting rights and "expose" the functioning of the Election Commission. "Information was issued to the media on Monday regarding the 'Vote Adhikar Yatra' programme, but now the yatra has been postponed due to unavoidable reasons," read a letter issued by RJD state principal general secretary Ranvijay Sahu. "This notice should be considered void until the announcement of a new date," the letter added. However, Tejashwi clarified that the decision to defer the yatra followed the death of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha founder and former Jharkhand CM Shibu Soren. "We had to reschedule the yatra programme due to the death of the former Jharkhand CM," Tejashwi told reporters on Tuesday, adding that a revised schedule would be announced soon. According to sources, the yatra, planned as a joint initiative by two major INDIA bloc allies, the RJD and Congress, was being positioned as a grassroots movement in defence of voting rights. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo It also aimed to strongly oppose the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being undertaken in Bihar ahead of the upcoming assembly elections. The campaign was being widely seen as a launchpad for the opposition's election drive and a means to energise party workers across the state. The sudden postponement, however, has sparked questions about the rationale behind the decision. "We don't understand the reason behind its postponement. The JMM leader died on Monday and the Jharkhand govt declared three days of state mourning, ending on Aug 6. But the yatra was to begin on Aug 10. So, the postponement move looks strange," said an analyst.
