Pennsylvania governor details arson attack on his home after Passover Seder
'Windows were smashed in, and there was glass everywhere. Some tables were turned over, and others had just melted away,' Shapiro wrote in an essay in The New York Times on Wednesday. 'The devastation was shocking, and to me, it did not appear to be an accident. The damage was too extreme. It looked like a bomb had gone off in the middle of our home.'
The Democratic governor recounted being awakened at 2am by a state trooper banging on their door, telling the family they needed to evacuate immediately. Shapiro and his wife rushed to gather their children and dogs before fleeing down a back stairwell to safety.
When allowed back inside to view the damage, Shapiro saw an eerily quiet scene with water dripping from the ceiling and his feet 'sloshing on the soaked floor'. He said the state dining room, where the family had hosted their Seder just hours before, was unrecognizable.
'Artwork from the New Deal era that had hung on display for visitors to enjoy had disintegrated into the walls,' he wrote. 'Plates we had eaten our Seder dinner on were broken and covered in soot. The Haggadah — our prayer book for the Seder — was burned so badly, only a few short lines of text were recognizable.'
According to authorities, 38-year-old Cody Balmer allegedly scaled a fence, broke windows with a hammer and used homemade Molotov cocktails fashioned from Heineken bottles filled with gasoline to set multiple fires in the mansion. Police said surveillance footage captured Balmer breaking in and fleeing the scene.
Balmer was arrested the same day after allegedly confessing to an ex-girlfriend. During questioning, he reportedly admitted 'harboring hatred' toward Shapiro and told investigators he would have attacked the governor with a hammer had he encountered him.
The suspect faces multiple charges including attempted murder, terrorism, and aggravated arson. He was denied bail at his initial court appearance and could face additional federal charges.
In his essay, Shapiro explained that hours after the suspect's arrest, his family proceeded with their second planned Passover Seder, saying how the attack would not deter him from his duties or from practicing his faith 'openly and proudly'.
The governor told reporters on Tuesday that Donald Trump had called him a few days after the attack to check on his family, saying the president 'was very gracious'.
His essay concluded with a plea to address political violence in the country, writing: 'this level of violence has to stop. It is our shared responsibility to do better.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
California legislature poised to vote on redistricting plan in response to Texas gerrymandering
The California state legislature was poised on Thursday to vote on a plan to redraw its congressional boundaries and create five potential new Democratic House seats – an answer to the Republican redistricting push in Texas, sought by Donald Trump, aimed at tilting the map in his party's favor ahead of next year's midterm elections. The nation's two most populous – and ideologically opposed – states were racing on parallel tracks toward consequential redistricting votes, potentially within hours of each other. As Democrats in Sacramento worked to advance a legislative package that would put their 'election rigging response act' before voters in a special election this fall, Republicans in Austin were nearing a final vote on their own gerrymandering pursuit. Approval by the Texas senate, which is expected as early as Thursday, would conclude a dramatic showdown with the state's outnumbered Democratic lawmakers whose two-week boycott captured national attention and set in motion a coast-to-coast redistricting battle. The California plan, led by the state's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, is designed to flip as many as five Republican-held seats in California – the exact number of additional GOP seats Trump has said he is 'entitled to' in Texas. 'This is a new Democratic party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said on a call with reporters on Wednesday. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' The redistricting tit-for-tat is an extraordinary deviation from the norm. Traditionally, states redraw congressional maps once a decade based on census data, with both the Texas and California maps originally intended to last through 2030. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, is expected to easily approve new congressional maps despite sharp Republican objections. Newsom's signature would send the measure to the ballot in a special election this November. The California changes would only take effect in response to a gerrymander by a Republican state – a condition that would be met when the Texas legislatures sends the maps to the state's governor, Greg Abbott, for his promised signature. California was acting after a dramatic showdown in Austin, where Democratic lawmakers fled the state earlier this month to delay the GOP redistricting plan. When they returned, some were assigned police minders and forced to sign permission slips before leaving the capitol. Several spent the night in the chamber in protest ahead of Wednesday's session, where Republicans pushed through a map designed explicitly to boost their party's chances in 2026. The legislative action on Thursday followed a weeks-long showdown in Texas, after Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an effort to delay the GOP redistricting plan. They returned only after California moved forward with its counterproposal. California Democrats are moving ahead after days of contentious debate over the cost – and consequences – of a referendum to temporarily toss out the maps drawn by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $230m – money they said would be better spent on other issues like healthcare. On Wednesday night, the state supreme court declined an emergency request by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the Democratic plan from moving forward. The redistricting push has also caused angst among some Democrats and independents who have fought for years to combat gerrymandering. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Testifying in favor of the changes during a hearing earlier this week, Sara Sadhwani, a political science professor who served as a Democratic member of the state's independent redistricting commission in 2020, said the map-drawing tit-for-tat presented California voters with a 'moral conflict'. But she argued that Democrats had to push back on the president's power grab. 'It brings me no joy to see the maps that we passed fairly by the commission to be tossed aside,' she said. 'I do believe this is a necessary step in a much bigger battle to shore up free and fair elections in our nation.' The plan also drew the backing of former president Barack Obama and other champions of fair redistricting, such as his former attorney general, Eric Holder. But Newsom's redistricting plan – a high-stakes gambit for the term-limited governor who has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions – is not assured to succeed. It faces mounting opposition from high-profile Republicans, including the state's former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has vowed to 'terminate gerrymandering'. Early polling has been mixed. But a new survey conducted by Newsom's longtime pollster David Binder found strong support for the measure in the heavily Democratic state, with 57% of voters backing it while 35% opposed it. In a memo, Binder noted that support for the redistricting measure varies depending on how it is presented to voters. When framed as eliminating the state's independent redistricting commission designed to prevent partisan gerrymandering, support drops. However, when voters hear that the initiative would allow temporary map changes only in response to partisan actions in other states, like Texas, while retaining the commission, the measure enjoys a double-digit margin of support.
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Abby Phillip blasts Jillian Michaels' viral slavery claims
"Last week, on this show, a guest shocked the table by arguing - in part - that slavery can't just be blamed on one race and that museums put too much focus on the role of White people who participated in that terrible institution," Phillip, 36, said. USA TODAY reached out to reps for Michaels for comment. Phillip then referenced a Truth Social post Aug. 19 from President Donald Trump that said museums like the Smithsonian "throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of 'WOKE.' " CNN anchor Jake Tapper caught on hot mic during Trump, Putin coverage: 'Give me my show' "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was," Trump continued. After reading Trump's post, Phillip continued to address the Michaels on-air debacle. "What we try to do on this program is create a platform for discussion and debate. Debate that reflects the very real differences that exist in this country," Phillip said. "It's what echochambers in our society fail to do, frankly. But on this topic, it's important to say, objectively, slavery was indeed bad. It was evil, the nation's original sin." Phillip captioned the social media post, "Some people think we talk too much about slavery in America. But you can't understand this country without it." Jillian Michaels breaks silence on 'Biggest Loser' Netflix doc, co-star Bob Harper Phillip's comments came the same day that the trainer took to Instagram in a series of posts to slam claims made about her in the buzzy Netflix docuseries "Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser" (now streaming). She slammed a range of allegations, including that she once told a contestant, "You're going to make me a millionaire," and that she plied contestants with caffeine pills and encouraged calorie restriction. She also addressed a rumored feud with former costar Bob Harper. Michaels, 51, was a breakout star on NBC's now-controversial 18-season weight loss competition series that aired from 2004 to 2016. Jillian Michaels makes controversial statements about slavery The former "Biggest Loser" trainer got in an on-air argument Aug. 13 with most of the "NewsNight" panel, which included Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky, Democratic congressman Rep. Ritchie Torres, CNN media analyst Sara Fischer and conservative Scott Jennings, known for frustrating the panel during his appearances. After Roginsky said that Trump wanted to deem what was "appropriate for what the Smithsonian can teach in terms of American history," including slavery, Michaels asked for examples. The "Keeping It Real" podcast host claimed that Trump is "not whitewashing slavery." Roginsky asked, "So, he's not?" Michaels replied, "He's not. No." She added that "you cannot tie imperialism and racism and slavery to just one race, which is pretty much what every single exhibit does." Torres then opined that "slavery in America was White supremacy," as Michaels replied, "Do you know that only less than 2% of White Americans owned slaves?" and added, "Did you know that slavery is thousands of years old?" Phillip cut in and said that she was "really surprised" by Michaels for "trying to litigate who was the beneficiary of slavery and who was not." "In the context of American history, what are you saying is incorrect by saying it was White people oppressing Black people?" Phillip asked. Michaels responded: "Every single thing is like, oh, no, no, no, this is all because 'White people bad,' and that's just not the truth." How a 'Biggest Loser' contestant collapsed, angry about being in 'great danger' Bob Harper accuses Jillian Michaels of not reaching out after his 2017 heart attack Later in the segment, Phillip told Michaels, "We don't have time to litigate all of this," after she brought up other social issues. The "Just Jillian" alum said, "Of course we don't, because then you're going to lose the argument. And if everything is racialized, just like you're trying to do to me now." "Excuse me?" Phillip said, seemingly taken about by the interaction. Michaels said that "It's like, oh, I can't believe you're trying to suggest ..." before the CNN star interrupted and said, "Just to be clear, you brought up race," adding that "this was a conversation about the arts and you brought up race." Michaels then claimed Phillip brought it up. After more back and forth, Phillip simply said, "All right. We're going to move on."
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Newsom tops Harris in 2028 presidential poll of California Democrats
The two high-profile Californians are followed in the poll by former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (13%), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (10%), Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (4%) and New Jersey U.S. Sen. Cory Booker (4%). U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear each has support from 3% of the state's Democratic voters, the poll found. More: California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says The Democratic breakdown was taken from a subset of 1,445 registered California voters polled between July 28 and Aug. 12. Although early in the 2028 presidential election cycle, the poll offers a glimpse into the thinking of Democrats in a state that is the party's power center and home to the largest number of Democratic voters. For both Newsom and Harris, winning their home state would be critical to secure the Democratic nomination in 2028 if they decide to run. More: Kamala Harris says she won't run for California governor Newsom, who has acknowledged he might run for president in 2028, has become one of the party's most forceful and visible critics of President Donald Trump. He recently launched a redistricting campaign in California with national implications to redraw the state's congressional maps to counter Republican redistricting efforts in Texas. Harris, the former Democratic nominee who lost to Trump in the 2024 election, on July 30 announced she would be passing on a 2026 run for governor to replace Newsom, whose term is set to end. Harris's decision opened the door for a possible presidential bid in 2028, though several other Democratic contenders have started to make moves toward their own runs. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
