‘Disgusting abomination': Donald Trump ‘furious' Elon Musk turned on his Big Beautiful Bill
©UK Independent
Today at 21:30
Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade revealed yesterday that Donald Trump is privately seething over his 'first buddy' Elon Musk publicly blasting the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' as a 'disgusting abomination,' but that the president is 'so smart' to stay silent for now.
Mr Musk, who wrapped up his time as a special government employee last week, tore into the president's signature spending legislation on Tuesday, saying he 'can't stand it any more' and had to speak out against the bill that a non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projects would add trillions of dollars to the national debt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Philip Bump: Elon Musk has already lost the war as Republicans rally behind Donald Trump
No one really knows where the billionaire and the president will go from here ©Washington Post There is only one person who is unquestionably able to both maintain a high level of public visibility and stay on president Donald Trump's good side. That person is Donald Trump. Everyone else who sidles up to him suffers from the deficit that they are not Trump himself. They therefore risk discovering that Trump has suddenly turned against them, bringing his fervent base of support – tens of millions of Americans strong – with him. Options from that point are limited: obsequious efforts at reintegration with the president or lining up for one of the modest but endless slots reserved in the public conversation for Trump's former allies.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Colin Sheridan: Manscaping of society has gone on for far too long
Considering the latest bromantic melodrama emanating from the sadistic reality TV show that is the USA, I'm thinking of writing a non-fiction book called The Penis Apologist in which I make a case that men should not be allowed to run for public office for a century — at least. The ban would be worldwide, and effective immediately. Where snap elections cannot take place, the closest female relative to the outgoing official's nemesis will be jettisoned in until a plebiscite is possible. In the case of Keir Starmer, for example, Jeremy Corbyn's wife would take charge. Their qualifications are irrelevant, just as they've been irrelevant for men. The same standard will apply to the general staff of all militaries. I understand there will be considerable pushback to this idea from all sides. From the feminists, who might argue that I am appropriating the legacy trauma of women everywhere. From the Andrew Tate acolytes, who will argue treachery to a non-existent brotherhood. From the centrists, who will accuse me of flagrant populism and suggesting I have hopped aboard a bandwagon — or a fallopian flotilla — all in the name of ingratiating myself to the sisterhood. To all of them, I simply say: This isn't working The manscaping of society has gone on for far too long and the results of the masculine monopoly have proven to be much too disastrous for humankind, for the planet, for the arts, culture, and academia. The only thing men have not ruined all by themselves is sport — both the watching of it and the playing of it. That, and drinking silently in pubs. Literally every other thing has been tainted to some degree by an inglorious arms race between men intent on one thing: Winning a big micky contest. The cost of that megalomaniac pursuit has been catastrophic. War. Famine. Drought. Climate change. Kanye. And now, in the case of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, a break-up so unedifying they make Kim Kardashian look like Grace Kelly. Women themselves are not entirely blameless. Maggie Thatcher didn't exactly woo the working class with a mother's touch. Kamala Harris may have proven slightly less duplicitous a president than Donald Trump, but she was too incompetent to defeat him. Liz Truss, Suella Braverman, and Priti Patel were nearly as bad as Boris Johnson, which is a quite the reach. Ursula von der Leyen displays all the empathy of a data centre, and I wouldn't trust Giorgia Meloni as far as I could throw her. Closer to home, the nuns — as a collective — did considerable damage, especially to women Despite all of this, I still think men have had the reins for long enough. All its brought us is disaster. As of this year, only 13% of the world's nations are led by women. Historically, only about one third of United Nations member states have ever had a woman serve as head of government. According to UN figures, women hold just 23% of ministerial positions globally in 2025. The same study notes women are more often assigned portfolios related to social affairs, while defence, foreign affairs, and finance remain predominantly the purview of men. In terms of wealth, women constitute approximately 13.3% of the world's billionaires. According to Forbes' rich list published this year, out of 3,028 billionaires globally, only 406 are women. Let's put the diversity, equity and inclusion argument to one side for a moment. Clearly, that was beyond our abilities to properly implement, probably because it was men responsible for it. Perhaps we don't even need to try that hard. Perhaps we should just seek to put the best people in the jobs with the most power. Perhaps, after many millennia of evidence, men are not those people. Perhaps the best people to be in power are those who do not seek it out. 'Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my mouth. I love your majesty according to my bond; no more nor less.' So said Cordelia, the youngest of King Lear's daughters, when the narcissistic monarch sought some sycophancy before dividing up his kingdom. Cordelia the character was, of course, a work of Shakespeare's imagination. However, she endures in my mind as the antithesis of what we have come to expect from Trump, Putin, Biden, Boris Johnson, Churchill, Blair, Kennedy, Clinton, Netanyahu, Musk, Bezos et al. If we flipped it entirely, we should really let the children be in charge. We'd eat nothing but Nutella with every meal, but you'd be guaranteed wars would quickly end, the hungry would be fed, and there'd be no such thing as genocide. What is absolutely certain is that they could not do any worse.
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as he considers ditching his Tesla amid public bust-up
DONALD TRUMP HAS declared that Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' amid a spiralling public bust-up that has seen government contracts threatened, conspiracy theories hurled, and even a potential presidential Tesla sale in the works. In a phone interview with ABC News, the US President brushed off suggestions of a reconciliation call with the Tesla and SpaceX boss. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump quipped. A White House official later confirmed that no such call is planned, and that Trump is not interested in speaking to his former ally. According to numerous reports, the US President is now considering selling his Tesla – a car he once praised as Musk's 'baby' – in a very public break from the tech billionaire. Musk and Trump pictured in a Model S Tesla vehicle on the South Lawn of the White House. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump and Musk had posed inside the car at a bizarre event in March, when the president turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom after viral protests against Musk's role as head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'Big ugly spending bill' The once-close relationship between the pair imploded this week, just days after Musk exited his position as head of the DOGE . What followed was a dramatic volley of posts and counterclaims across social media platforms. Musk slammed Trump's flagship 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (a major tax and spending package) as a 'big ugly spending bill' that gutted electric vehicle subsidies. The bill, passed by House Republicans in May, removed key EV incentives Musk's companies rely on. Trump responded by claiming he personally asked Musk to step down from his government role, saying he had been 'wearing thin.' Advertisement Musk denied that and escalated further, alleging that Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' a claim swiftly dismissed by the White House as 'baseless.' The Tesla CEO is also now backing calls for the US president to be impeached. The White House said Musk's outrage was nothing more than an 'unfortunate episode' sparked by his disappointment over the EV subsidy cuts. Trump, speaking to reporters, claimed Musk had known the bill's contents 'better than anybody,' and only objected when he saw how it would hit his bottom line. Trump addressed the feud with reporters today. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Musk fired back: 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it.' Markets reacted swiftly – Tesla shares plunged 14.3% yesterday, wiping around $150 billion off the company's value. Musk also threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a vital link to the International Space Station, after Trump floated pulling federal contracts. He later reversed course, posting: 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' 'Expiration date' For now, reconciliation looks unlikely. Trump has made clear he's moving on, and Musk, once a key part of his policy team, appears ready to go to war. Trade Advisor Peter Navarro, whom Musk once called 'dumber than a sack of bricks' in an argument over Trump's tariffs, refused to gloat but said the tycoon had an 'expiration date.' 'No, I'm not glad or whatever,' he told reporters. 'People come and go from the White House.' Vice President JD Vance also stuck by Trump amid the blazing row, blasting what he called 'lies' that his boss was 'impulsive or short-tempered', but notably avoided criticising Musk. Additional reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
