logo
Ohioans get green light to collect signatures to get property tax issue on ballot

Ohioans get green light to collect signatures to get property tax issue on ballot

Yahoo15-05-2025

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — A group of Ohioans got the green light to start collecting signatures to try and abolish property taxes in a meeting that lasted about ten minutes.
'Our legislators have let us down. Okay? We needed property tax reform for decades. They've done nothing,' Mayor of the Village of Timberlake and petitioner John Marra said.
Marra, along with four others from northeast Ohio, put together a proposed constitutional amendment to try and rid of the tax completely. 'We need property tax relief immediately in the state, Marra said. 'There's no question about it.'
On Wednesday afternoon, the Ohio Ballot Board met to decide whether the three-line-long amendment was only one topic. The board certified that it was giving the group, that is nameless, the green light to try and collect more than 413,000 valid signatures in order to make a ballot.
Ex-Congressman Ryan mulls run for Ohio governor
Marra said the grassroots group is aiming for this November's ballot, which means they would need to collect those signatures by July 2. 'It's going to be a very steep climb,' Marra said. 'But it's something that we want to push through immediately.'
If the group is not successful collecting signatures by the July 2 deadline for the November ballot, they will continue gathering signatures to try and make it on the May 2026 ballot instead.
Lawmakers at the Ohio Statehouse have introduced dozens of bills to bring Ohioans property tax relief in the past several years. Few have actually gone through and the ones that have, only help a fraction of Ohio homeowners.
'It has not been prioritized by the Republican majority,' Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo (D-Upper Arlington) said. 'And so, I see that reflected when the legislature doesn't respond, and the people step up.'
Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman said he shares the frustration of Ohioans about the lack of relief and said property tax relief has not been stalled by the majority, but by outside groups that are largely funded through public property taxes, like schools, police and fire departments.
'Each time we try to step up and do something about this, the groups that are receiving this money say, 'this is going to be terrible; we're going to shut down, we're not going to be able to provide services' and all of that,' Huffman said. 'And it's very difficult for the legislature to move something forward in doing any of this.'
While Republican and Democratic leaders are at odds about why nothing has gotten done, they do agree that something does need to happen soon. But they said abolishing the tax all together is not the way to do, claiming it would leave a funding gap of up to $19 billion for local governments across the state.
The Spectrum: School issues fail; changes in state parties
'It doesn't say how we're going to replace those funds that fund police and fire in our communities, public education, many other critical services,' Russo said. 'So, as it's written, I have huge concerns.'
'How are you going to pay for those services? Well, one answer is the cost will have to go down dramatically,' Huffman said. 'There's going to be a dramatic change in how much school districts and other local entities can spend, how we replace that. It's going to be a giant a giant lift. And I guess we start working on that if it indeed happens.'
But Marra said he already has ideas to make up for that lost revenue. He said his government receives 40% to 50% of revenue from property taxes. Instead, he said a system that charges for services based on number of people in a house, similar to insurance.
'There's plenty of ways to fund it,' Marra said. 'The problem is we need a more fair and equitable way. We can't put a tie to our homes where we could possibly lose our homes. That's where the problem lies.'
In the Ohio Senate, leaders on both sides of the aisle also agreed that this proposal is not the proper way to go.
Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) said while the legislature is to blame for the state of the current property tax system, this proposal would go too far. He said he is hopeful something gets done to address it in the state budget. Though he does not agree with the current proposal of a 30% carryover rate.
Ohio House Minority Leader Nickie Antonio (D-Lakewood) said while yes, there are several bipartisan bills to get something done, the majority has stifled any progress. Antonio said if the majority said they are ready to talk about relief, the Democrats would be ready and at the table.
'Abolishing property taxes would be devastating for local communities and public schools,' Rep. Anita Somani (D-Dublin) said in a statement. 'For years, the state legislature has failed to properly fund public schools, which has put undue burden on local taxpayers to make up the difference through skyrocketing property taxes. Without real action from the legislature to address school funding, getting rid of property taxes will only force our schools into even worse financial situations, and in the end, Ohio's children will suffer.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

Hamilton Spectator

time29 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

timean hour ago

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store