BBC security manager fired after claims he spent 12 hours trawling CCTV for kitchen mess culprit
Mr Rakib was a duty security manager for Mitie from April 2022 until his dismissal in September 2023. He managed a team of around five security officers at the BBC's Central Square building in Cardiff city centre. The employment tribunal centred on the events of May 8, 2023, when he was alleged to have breached data protection rules by looking through CCTV footage in the control room without a suitable SIA (Security Industry Authority) licence.
According to Mitie's investigator Martyn Barrass, Mr Rakib gave multiple explanations — at one point saying he reviewed the CCTV because another member of staff had misplaced a bag, and at another point saying he could not remember the reason. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter.
Mr Rakib said during an investigation meeting: "I don't know why. I don't really do CCTV reviews that often, but there was a reason why I was doing it."
Another security officer claimed to have had a conversation in which Mr Rakib admitted going through the footage for 12 hours "to catch who had made a mess in the kitchen".
Questioned on this allegation, Mr Rakib said he thought the "kitchen incident" happened on a different day. He denied spending 12 hours trying to find the culprit.
When Mr Barrass informed the BBC of the matter, the broadcaster's corporate security manager Joel Adlington described the alleged data protection breach as "unacceptable", adding: "I must put on record that it is a significant breach of trust between the staff member and the organisation, and you have my full support in your assessment of gross misconduct."
Mitie held a disciplinary hearing over the alleged CCTV misuse as well as a claim that Mr Rakib had bullied a security officer. The bullying allegation was found "not proven on the evidence" but the firm did conclude Mr Rakib had reviewed footage without the correct licence — and that his explanations for doing so would not have been appropriate even if he did have a licence.
Mitie's regional operations manager Marc Pearson took into account Mr Rakib's decade of service and that he had relocated from London to Cardiff for the job. But he said the damage to trust with the BBC was "so serious" he had to be sacked.
He appealed but the decision was upheld by the deputy account director for the BBC contract, Lee Hill, who acknowledged Mr Rakib had a door supervisor licence entitling him to view live feeds but not to "review footage for any form of investigation without prior approval from the data controller".
At the Cardiff employment tribunal, Judge Rachel Harfield found Mr Hill failed to check whether there was a pattern of other duty security managers reviewing CCTV. "Instead, all Lee Hill did in his appeal outcome letter was fudge the issue by saying if there was evidence of other duty security managers undertaking such activity then appropriate action would be taken to address it," she said.
The judge noted Mr Pearson had failed to properly investigate Mr Rakib's claim that a former colleague had told him a licence was not needed for internal reviewing. Mr Pearson did not attempt to contact that ex-colleague and instead "presupposed" what he would say, the judge said.
The judge also found Mitie had not given Mr Rakib any standard operating procedures on CCTV use. She concluded he had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed.
Judge Harfield said Mr Rakib was now only earning the minimum wage as a security officer at SGD Guarding. She added: "It took the claimant eight years and a move to Cardiff to get promoted. The claimant says he is now at back of the queue at SGD Guarding in terms of promotion opportunities. He says he thinks it will take another five years."
Following Judge Harfield's ruling against Mitie, the parties agreed to a payout for Mr Rakib totalling £31,637.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
11 hours ago
- Wales Online
Wetherspoon manager sacked for giving discount on halloumi fries
Wetherspoon manager sacked for giving discount on halloumi fries The fired employee took Wetherspoon to court - and the judge has ruled against the pub chain The Pontlottyn, a Wetherspoon pub in Abertillery (Image: WalesOnline) A former manager at a JD Wetherspoon pub has won an employment tribunal after the chain sacked him for allowing a colleague a 50% food discount. Peter Castagna-Davies was dismissed from his role as a shift leader at the Pontlottyn pub in Abertillery despite 22 years of unblemished service. Mr Castagna-Davies had put the items – two portions of halloumi fries, two portions of chicken breast bites, and two cans of Monster energy drink – through the till for kitchen worker Noah Gardiner and applied a half-off discount for shift staff. An internal investigation found he had breached policy by allowing Mr Gardiner to buy "excessive products" at the 50% rate and to take the food home. The Cardiff employment tribunal heard Mr Castagna-Davies had not been aware that two minutes before he approved the items, Mr Gardiner had used a different manager's till key to process another free meal for himself – chicken breast bites and a can of Monster Punch. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter . Wetherspoon's disciplinary chairman Chris Jenkins decided to fire Mr Castagna-Davies, telling him: "Shortly before you processed Noah's 50% on-shift discount he had processed through the till his own staff feeding meal, some two hours after his break when he had consumed it, which you had no knowledge of him doing so or even going on his break. "I find this both worrying and surprising that, as the duty manager with so few staff to manage on the shift in question, you had no knowledge or control over what was going on." Article continues below Two months before the ill-fated discount – which happened at 8.04pm on January 31, 2024 – the chain had internally circulated rules stating only one item from the food menu and one soft drink were available for free to employees on a shift. Employees wishing to add extra items could purchase them at half price and if they wanted to take food home the discount would only be 20%. Pontlottyn manager Sarah Newton had messaged the pub's employee group chat saying the company was "cracking down" because staff at other pubs had taken multiple 50% orders home. She warned there had been cases when use of the discount had led to disciplinary investigations. In the tribunal, Wetherspoon's witnesses said there had been "a crackdown on the 50% discount because staff had been caught taking food home to feed their whole family". They claimed the business had suffered "significant" costs, which led it to adopt a "corporate zero-tolerance attitude towards abuse of the staff discount". Wetherspoon uses a system called IntelliQ to flag potential staff fraud. A week after the discount was approved by Mr Castagna-Davies, the system flagged concern over the transaction. Ms Newton told him "mistakes happen" but that he should be careful because the company "really were cracking down on it". Mr Castagna-Davies responded that he was disappointed in himself for the mistake. An investigating manager, Keri Blanchard, interviewed Mr Gardiner, who said he had cooked the food himself. Asked if he had eaten his initial free meal on-site, he replied: "I should've yeah, I don't take food home any more.' But he then admitted he had taken home the items put through by Mr Castagna-Davies. Asked if he had requested a 50% discount, Mr Gardiner said: 'I just asked for someone to put it through.' When Mr Castagna-Davies was interviewed he said he could not remember the transaction but that he may have mistakenly "pressed the wrong button" in applying a discount of 50% rather than 20%. He denied being aware Mr Gardiner planned to take the food home. Mr Jenkins dismissed him without notice. Although he acknowledged Mr Castagna-Davies' clean disciplinary record over 22 years, he pointed out Wetherspoon had been "vigorous" in communicating its zero-tolerance approach. He also believed Mr Castagna-Davies had known the food would be taken home as it was not "normal for staff at the pub to eat that much food during their breaks". In an appeal, Mr Castagna-Davies drew on evidence from four witnesses to argue Mr Gardiner "had ordered the food in a deceptive way". But Wetherspoon area manager Dannie Stephens upheld the dismissal, telling him he had "failed to lead, manage and organise your shift sufficiently to prevent the breach". At the tribunal, Judge Rachel Harfield noted "the staff discount system is one built on trust" and that regular abuse would be costly to Wetherspoon. But she concluded it was not reasonable for Ms Stephens to conclude this was a case of "gross incompetence or gross negligence, as opposed to being simple negligence that falls within the misconduct category of the respondent's policy". The judge added: "There is no evidence that Dannie Stephens gave any thought to that at all. She seems simply to have operated on the basis that the claimant should have managed the shift better, that if he had done so the breach would not have happened, therefore the claimant should be held responsible for the breach, and it was possible under the policy to dismiss for a single act. "There was no weighing of the actual seriousness of the claimant's actions in their actual context. Dannie Stephens seemed to have viewed the claimant as diligent in other areas. It was one incident on one shift that he could have managed better. He was an employee with long service and a clear disciplinary record. The decision to uphold the dismissal at appeal stage was not within the reasonable range. In my judgement that rendered the whole dismissal unfair." A payout is yet to be decided. Judge Harfield encouraged the parties to attempt a settlement before a remedy hearing takes place. WalesOnline has asked Wetherspoon if it will be reviewing its approach to disciplinary matters in light of the judge's findings. Article continues below
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
KATIE HIND on Naga Munchetty: 'Naga's being treated like Gregg Wallace, Jermaine Jenas and Wynne Evans all rolled into one... it is punishment for standing up to her boss'
When BBC Breakfast won the first Bafta in its 25-year history this year, the champagne flowed and its editor, Richard Frediani, couldn't stop smiling. Stepping on to the stage to collect the prestigious award – granted for the programme's coverage of the Post Office scandal – was the culmination of years of hard work. Yet it came at a price. Months later Frediani – known as Fredi – stepped down following complaints about his alleged mistreatment of staff. He was on extended leave when the investigation began but is understood to have returned to work. Now it seems another senior employee is under the BBC microscope: its popular but controversial female anchor, Naga Munchetty. For weeks now, I'm told, those close to Frediani have been throwing mud at the Breakfast host as a form of retaliation for her role in defying him. 'This is all Richard's doing,' an insider tells me. 'It's disgusting. She is being dragged into all of the grotty male behaviour at the BBC because she dared stand up to Richard. She's being treated like Jermaine Jenas, Wynne Evans and Gregg Wallace all rolled into one.' Jenas is the football pundit sacked by the BBC last year over a sexting scandal. Evans stepped down for making lewd comments on Strictly Come Dancing. Wallace, meanwhile, was sacked this year from his role as MasterChef host after 45 allegations of misconduct were upheld against him. Naga first found herself under scrutiny in June over two alleged incidents, said to have taken place over three years, including one accusation that she bullied a junior member of staff – a complaint, I'm told, that was not upheld. It was also reported that she was hauled in to bosses after making a sex jibe while she was working in her other BBC role at Radio 5 Live. Having been made privy to this comment, I understand it was not directed at anyone but instead was a question to another woman about a rude picture. This week it was reported that Naga has been accused of high-handed behaviour, belittling junior staff over how she likes her toast. 'It needed to be a little bit burnt but not too much. And if you didn't get it right she would never shout at you but she would act as if it was a really stupid mistake to make,' one former staff member told the Telegraph. 'Instead she would be like, 'Oh, they can't get the toast right, they can't do anything'.' There was a separate story this week alleging that Naga had 'kicked off' at an intern over how they spread Marmite on her toast, had complained that her porridge was too hot and said she didn't like the blueberries on top. She is now, apparently, under review – something Frediani's circle are said to find 'absolutely hilarious'. But as one insider and Naga supporter told me: 'Richard's allies have been going hammer and tongs against Naga and all they have managed to come up with is a piece of toast.' Under-fire editor Richard Frediani (pictured) reportedly took an extended period of leave after an internal review of bullying and misconduct allegations was opened into the show I first revealed allegations about Frediani's 'bullish' managerial manner in April 2020, just months after he started working at the corporation. A series of complaints had already been made to the BBC's management and HR department about an 'intimidating and bullying' culture on Breakfast, which had led to long-term members of staff leaving their jobs. One employee, who wished to remain anonymous, told me 'the whole atmosphere had become poisonous'. They added: 'There is a normalisation of people crying at work and on their journeys home. There are favourites and it is made explicitly clear to everyone in the newsroom who they are.' Until recently, staff would be ignored by Frediani and names would be 'forgotten'. A select 'banter' circle of white, straight men meant there was a culture of 'boys club favouritism'. Following the article, I was inundated with messages from people who worked for Frediani when he was at ITV News saying much the same. In June, I told how he was the subject of at least two misconduct complaints, including one from a woman who had her grievance upheld after claiming that he physically shook her during a heated BBC newsroom exchange last year. One source said: 'It's the women who got it worse from Frediani and his clan. It's more often than not the women who get humiliated and shouted at.' I have also been contacted by staff who worked with Frediani at ITV, where he was Head of News, who say that he was also bullish to the lower rank and file, though was very good at 'managing upwards' – in other words, keeping in with his superiors. Sources previously compared the workplace to 'The Hunger Games' saying the morning programme had been 'ripped apart' amid allegations Last year Frediani had his role expanded to become editor of News At One by chief executive of news Deborah Turness – who was also his boss at ITV News. 'The fury is real about that decision,' one staff member tells me. The catalyst for Naga coming under scrutiny, and seemingly falling out of favour, began in 2023 when BBC management set their sights on that coveted Bafta. Their dogged desire for the award prompted a war between Frediani and Naga as they 'skirmished' over who told writers and production staff what to do. Sources tell me there was no one incident that prompted the fall-out but described it as 'like watching a slow train coming, as their respective egos bumped along for a while – but the situation simply couldn't last'. The staff member added: 'Frediani was given carte blanche to follow certain stories to the exclusion of others and his chosen stories were pumped up above the normal bland output. It was 'cheerio' to anyone who was not on board his train but Naga, as a more rounded journalist, did not like that. 'She can be very personally irritating but she has a sound journalism grounding. So Fredi and what was left standing of the BBC Breakfast team won that Bafta for the Post Office story. Some BBC management yes men said 'well done' but you cannot believe the long-standing pain and ructions this has caused in pursuit of an award.' Meanwhile, Naga's co-anchor Charlie Stayt has been left in an invidious position, according to my sources, with both sides chasing his backing and approval. 'He is beloved by the rank and file but doesn't have many allies in the creepy mid-management class,' said the insider. As for the future of the show, Naga would be forgiven for casting around for a new role, either at Sky or LBC, but it doesn't look like she's found anything yet. One of her colleagues told me they are 'saddened' that she feels the need to leave the corporation after 15 years climbing through the ranks to become one of the most recognisable faces (and voices) on the network.
North Wales Live
a day ago
- North Wales Live
BBC security manager fired after claims he spent 12 hours trawling CCTV for kitchen mess culprit
A security manager at BBC Wales' headquarters was sacked following an allegation he spent 12 hours poring through CCTV to find out who made a mess in the kitchen. Mohammad Rakib was fired by the broadcaster's security contractor Mitie after an investigation found he did not have a licence to review CCTV — but he has now won a £31,637 payout after a judge ruled he was unfairly dismissed. Mr Rakib was a duty security manager for Mitie from April 2022 until his dismissal in September 2023. He managed a team of around five security officers at the BBC's Central Square building in Cardiff city centre. The employment tribunal centred on the events of May 8, 2023, when he was alleged to have breached data protection rules by looking through CCTV footage in the control room without a suitable SIA (Security Industry Authority) licence. According to Mitie's investigator Martyn Barrass, Mr Rakib gave multiple explanations — at one point saying he reviewed the CCTV because another member of staff had misplaced a bag, and at another point saying he could not remember the reason. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter. Mr Rakib said during an investigation meeting: "I don't know why. I don't really do CCTV reviews that often, but there was a reason why I was doing it." Another security officer claimed to have had a conversation in which Mr Rakib admitted going through the footage for 12 hours "to catch who had made a mess in the kitchen". Questioned on this allegation, Mr Rakib said he thought the "kitchen incident" happened on a different day. He denied spending 12 hours trying to find the culprit. When Mr Barrass informed the BBC of the matter, the broadcaster's corporate security manager Joel Adlington described the alleged data protection breach as "unacceptable", adding: "I must put on record that it is a significant breach of trust between the staff member and the organisation, and you have my full support in your assessment of gross misconduct." Mitie held a disciplinary hearing over the alleged CCTV misuse as well as a claim that Mr Rakib had bullied a security officer. The bullying allegation was found "not proven on the evidence" but the firm did conclude Mr Rakib had reviewed footage without the correct licence — and that his explanations for doing so would not have been appropriate even if he did have a licence. Mitie's regional operations manager Marc Pearson took into account Mr Rakib's decade of service and that he had relocated from London to Cardiff for the job. But he said the damage to trust with the BBC was "so serious" he had to be sacked. He appealed but the decision was upheld by the deputy account director for the BBC contract, Lee Hill, who acknowledged Mr Rakib had a door supervisor licence entitling him to view live feeds but not to "review footage for any form of investigation without prior approval from the data controller". At the Cardiff employment tribunal, Judge Rachel Harfield found Mr Hill failed to check whether there was a pattern of other duty security managers reviewing CCTV. "Instead, all Lee Hill did in his appeal outcome letter was fudge the issue by saying if there was evidence of other duty security managers undertaking such activity then appropriate action would be taken to address it," she said. The judge noted Mr Pearson had failed to properly investigate Mr Rakib's claim that a former colleague had told him a licence was not needed for internal reviewing. Mr Pearson did not attempt to contact that ex-colleague and instead "presupposed" what he would say, the judge said. The judge also found Mitie had not given Mr Rakib any standard operating procedures on CCTV use. She concluded he had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed. Judge Harfield said Mr Rakib was now only earning the minimum wage as a security officer at SGD Guarding. She added: "It took the claimant eight years and a move to Cardiff to get promoted. The claimant says he is now at back of the queue at SGD Guarding in terms of promotion opportunities. He says he thinks it will take another five years." Following Judge Harfield's ruling against Mitie, the parties agreed to a payout for Mr Rakib totalling £31,637.
