logo
Divination isn't scientific, but can it ever be therapeutic?

Divination isn't scientific, but can it ever be therapeutic?

Sana Qadar: Whenever I read a description of my star sign, which let me preface this by saying is not often, I do think that kind of fits. I don't really believe in astrology and horoscopes, actually I don't believe them at all, but I am totally a Sagittarius. According to astrologers, if you're a Sagittarius, you like new experiences and travel, you're curious and a storyteller, hello, you can also be blunt. I've lived in Washington DC, Beijing, London, Qatar, New Delhi and now Sydney. I tell stories for a living and as my husband can attest, I can be blunt. It all feels like too much of a coincidence not to be true. But the idea that celestial objects and events can determine your personality or how your life is going to go, it's not exactly backed up by science.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: The position of the planets has a lot to do with your inner dynamics. I'm not so sure, but you know, some people really take it seriously.
Sana Qadar: Why do we take it seriously? And is it harmful to do so? Or can seeking guidance from the universe ever be therapeutic?
Ryan Findlay: If I'm just feeling really confused or stuck or I'm sort of swirling, I just really want to see what the universe wants to tell me essentially.
Sana Qadar: I'm Sana Qadar, this is All in the Mind, and this week's episode is from reporter Shelby Traynor, looking into how occult practices like astrology set up cognitive traps that many of us fall into. But also, how practices like reading tea leaves or reading tarot might overlap with traditional therapy. Shelby, hi.
Shelby Traynor: Hello.
Sana Qadar: I'm very intrigued by all of this subject matter, but let me start by asking you, what's your star sign?
Shelby Traynor: I am a Gemini, and I don't always relate to being a Gemini. I feel like Geminis get a bad rap to be honest.
Sana Qadar: I don't actually know what a Gemini is supposed to be, so fill me in.
Shelby Traynor: They are the twins of the zodiac, and so it's often said that Geminis can be two-faced, which sounds like an insult to me.
Sana Qadar: but I don't recognize you as quite as very two-faced. You're pretty straight.
Shelby Traynor: No, but maybe I have two sides to me, because I'm one of those people who does not believe in these things, like horoscopes, and also does kind of believe in it at the same time. Like, I own crystals. Do I think that the clear quartz that's beside my bed is bringing me clarity? No. But when I bought it, I was seeking clarity.
Sana Qadar: Okay.
Shelby Traynor: So there's a little something going on there, clearly. And so I wanted to explore this contradiction of believing and not believing and dig down into why a lot of us feel this way. But I figured, as this is an evidence-based show, we're going to start with the science and the skepticism. But for all the horoscope girlies out there, stick with me. I am a Gemini, as you pointed out, and so this story is going to be quite two-faced.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: People are willing to believe almost anything about themselves if it looks official and seems to fit.
Shelby Traynor: This is Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne, a clinical psychologist known for her work on personality and identity. Also, she's a Sagittarius, like Sana, but she doesn't take much stock in it.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: It's like a sock that's not quite too big, not quite too small. You can get it on, it doesn't matter if it doesn't fit perfectly. You're happy with it.
Shelby Traynor: She made the connection between a well-known effect in psychology and horoscopes. It's called the Barnum effect. We've mentioned it on All in the Mind before in relation to psychics. It's playfully named after 19th century showman P.T. Barnum.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: We like the name, it's easy, people really can understand it. And it's named after Barnum because of that sucker born every minute. People are willing to believe almost anything about themselves. The more general it is, almost the better, because you will make it fit you. You want to suspend disbelief, you want to believe in it.
Shelby Traynor: The Barnum effect was originally called the fallacy of personal validation. And it wasn't coined in response to astrologers reading people's horoscopes, but in response to shoddy personality tests. In 1948, psychologist Bertram Forer gave his students a test which promised to produce a vignette of their personality. But this was all a farce.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: I did the exact same thing that the original researcher had done. I gave a questionnaire, paper and pencil questionnaire. I would give it to my students, they would take it, and then we would magically produce the feedback. What I really did was throw them all out. There was never any scoring. I mean, there's like 300 kids in my class, so I'm not going to score those. Toss them out, print something back.
Shelby Traynor: When the students received their test results, what they got was an identical response with statements like, you need people to like and admire you, or you have a tendency to be critical of yourself.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: And so they read this generic description of themselves, and then they had to rate how much they felt it applied to them. And they'd say like, yeah, that's totally me.
Shelby Traynor: How'd you know that? Susan would score these results, eventually revealing to the students it was all a fallacy. And look how many of you fell for it.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: So we would give them back the feedback and say, look how easily you were suckered. I didn't say suckered, probably, but drawn into this explanation that had nothing to do with you because it seemed real. I mean, I felt a little bit bad, like we fooled you, but again, it's for science.
Shelby Traynor: In order to sucker the students, there did need to be some sense of legitimacy to the test. It was done in a classroom, they filled out intimate information about themselves, which is kind of how it feels to fill in a form before it spits out your astrological birth chart. You've got to dig out your birth certificate or ring your mum to ask what time of day exactly you were born.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: The premise is you take a test, it seems legitimate. The test spits back feedback that seems to fit. And you say, oh yeah, that's me. And the way it works is the feedback in and of itself has some internal contradictions. You're a little of this, you're a lot of that. Sometimes you feel this way, but sometimes you feel the other way. Sometimes you feel like you fit in. Sometimes you feel like nobody likes you. I mean, who wouldn't agree to that?
Shelby Traynor: So, Sana, now we know what's happening psychologically. I want to test this out with your horoscope today and see how you feel about it.
Sana Qadar: Okay, so my horoscope that's going to tell me how today is going to go for me?
Shelby Traynor: Yeah, exactly.
Sana Qadar: All right, let me open it up. Okay, July 7th, 2025. You may feel like someone caught in a tornado, Sagittarius. Things are whirling around you and everything seems out of control. Don't get stressed out. There's nothing you can do about it. Allow the storm to do what it will. You will only get hurt if you try to stop it. Accept things you have no control over. The storm will settle down soon. Well, that is perfectly vague and nice enough, I guess. It gives me a hopeful message. Things will settle down. I don't know.
Shelby Traynor: Yeah, but it's all about stress, which I feel like anybody could relate to, really.
Sana Qadar: Yeah, who's not stressed?
Shelby Traynor: Yeah. I guess one of the issues, though, with horoscopes is they do look forward. They tell you, here's how your day is going to go. Or if you get a broader reading, here's how your month is going to go, your year, your life. And so this is where something else sets in. Confirmation bias. It's the tendency to seek out and fixate on things that fit our existing beliefs. If you believe there's a storm coming, then you're going to be on high alert. The overwhelming, stressful parts of your day are the things that might end up standing out.
Sana Qadar: And I will say this horoscope says the storm will settle down soon, which is, there's no timeline there. I just have to trust it will. And of course, at some point it will. No one's stressed forever, right?
Shelby Traynor: Yeah, I guess. And you're going to hold on to that little glimpse of hope, aren't you?
Sana Qadar: Exactly.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: There's no way this is valid.
Shelby Traynor: Because of confirmation bias, you might then look back at your day and think, whoa, that horoscope was really accurate. And so tomorrow you read your horoscope again, this time armed with the supposed evidence from yesterday, you might take it more seriously. You might even change your behavior based on its advice. And this doesn't just apply to your daily horoscope either. It applies to people too. For example, you've probably had this interaction before.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: After the fact, you say, oh, I knew that all along. Of course you were a Leo. I mean, this totally fits with being a Leo.
Shelby Traynor: Of course it is a spectrum. Some people are aware of their star sign and don't pay much attention beyond that. But for others, star signs might determine who they choose to be friends with or who they date. It's pretty common these days to have your star sign on your dating profile alongside your age and your height. There is a study from 2020 that looked into this so-called astrological compatibility between couples. Researchers looked at data on married couples in Sweden between 1968 and 2001, and they failed to find any evidence that people with compatible star signs were less likely to get divorced.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: You know, people believing lies is really what it turns out for. I mean, nobody wants to be a sucker on purpose, but people are inadvertent suckers when they believe in something that has no truth on the face of it or even in any way, shape or form.
Shelby Traynor: It is worth acknowledging, though, that while this might seem either like a bit of fun or ridiculous, depending on your views on astrology, it does have deep roots in history and culture, stretching all the way back to Mesopotamia. It arose side by side with sciences we don't dispute, like astronomy, similar to alchemy's journey alongside chemistry. It was a way of making sense of the world and remains so for many people. But Professor Krauss-Whitbourne takes issue when money gets involved.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: That's one problem is just the whole industry that's based on this and has for hundreds of years. It's just irritating that people make money off of this fake information they provide to people. So we need to train people, don't fall for this stuff. You can if you want, if you feel like it. But I felt I really wanted to get that point out there that there's no way these generic statements about you could have anything to do with who you are as a person.
Shelby Traynor: When it comes to personality, it's much more complicated than your birth chart. Ironically, though, researchers from Lund University, again in Sweden, did try to find out whether certain personality traits predicted a belief in astrology. Belief was associated with a higher narcissism score as well as a higher agreeableness score, while people with a higher level of intelligence had a lower belief in astrology.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: I mean, the number of people who say not just I read my horoscope, it's you're this way because you are, in my case, Sagittarius or a Leo. And just that's it. OK, we've now said this is you because you were born under the cusp, whatever that means, you know, in between two astrological signs.
Shelby Traynor: While it can be a form of introspection, Professor Krauss-Whitbourne says it isn't the safest or the most rewarding path you can take.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: If you want to learn about yourself, which I think is an admirable goal, the way to do it is to find a reputable way to get that information.
Sana Qadar: You're listening to All in the Mind. I'm Sana Qadar and I'm joined by reporter Shelby Traynor. Shelby, you kind of believe in astrology. How do you feel about being called a narcissist with low intelligence?
Shelby Traynor: Not great. I did read the paper. I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt and I sort of understand the reasoning. So this is narcissistic traits. This isn't full blown narcissism, which is a slight comfort. And the researchers did say it might have something to do with a self-centered worldview. So like my personality and the way my life goes is determined by the stars. It kind of implies the universe cares about me personally, which is very flattering. I don't actually think it does. When I say I believe, I don't believe astrology is like a testable, verifiable science. I believe just enough in like the vibe of it to have a little fun without taking anything too seriously. And that applies to divination and the occult in general. So when I was reading that study, I was sort of like cracking my knuckles, stretching out, getting ready to make a bit of a counter argument.
Sana Qadar: OK.
Shelby Traynor: What I want to put on the table is something called an N of one experiment. That's a study with just one participant.
Sana Qadar: Who's the one participant?
Shelby Traynor: It's me.
Sana Qadar: OK. Yeah (both laugh). What are you going to do?
Shelby Traynor: Well, I've already done it. So Susan mentioned, if you want to learn about yourself, don't go to an astrologer or a psychic reader. Don't turn to tea leaves or cards. Go find a reputable person. See a psychologist or a psychotherapist, which is generally great advice. So I've had the same psychologist for years. She's amazing. Accredited. Love her. Wouldn't trade her for a pack of tarot cards at all. But I love tarot cards.
Sana Qadar: Do you?
Shelby Traynor: Yeah, I do. I have four decks and I've been reading tarot for the entirety of my 20s. I found it's a great way to reflect on things and set goals. But that's my experience.
Sana Qadar: And why do tarot for those things as opposed to, I don't know, journaling?
Shelby Traynor: Well, I do both (both laugh). I'm a glutton for self-reflection.I love it. But that is just my experience. I know that N of one experiments are far from ideal. So I wanted to get someone else's perspective.
Ryan Findlay: Yeah. So my name's Ryan Finlay and I'm a practicing psychotherapist. I also practice tarot as well.
Shelby Traynor: Ryan's day job is traditional psychotherapy. He doesn't typically bring tarot into that space. You might think tarot readers are fortune tellers. They consult cards and tell you you're going to meet a dark, handsome stranger or come into some money. But most tarot readers won't tell you what is going to happen. For the most part, they'll get you to reflect on your past, what it means for the present, and how that might apply in the future.
Ryan Findlay: Historically, tarot was a card game. And then over the years, over the centuries, actually, since the 1500s, it's just gained more and more traction in terms of being used to help people find clarity. I think there's a misconception out there that it's purely based on fortune telling. And that's really not how I use it. I'm very much about bringing it into the present moment, what's here right now. So I'm really much more about using it rather than sort of a psychic prediction, more as an intuitive, let's find out what's happening right now and unpack that.
Shelby Traynor: In that way, Ryan says tarot can overlap with his therapeutic work.
Ryan Findlay: If you haven't really had experience with that version of tarot, then, yeah, of course, you can think of it as just how cartoons and movies and everything portray it as just a more fortune teller kind of thing, which, yeah, that archetype's been sort of bashed around a lot for a long time. But I think it's evolving. I think in this generation of people who have more access to the Internet and different ways of using these tools, I think there's a nice movement of, yeah, looking at it as another form of self-inquiry.
Shelby Traynor: We have entered a new era of tarot. There are card readers all over TikTok, Instagram and YouTube. They usually tell you if you've stumbled across their video, it means it was meant for you. It's a powerful draw.
Youtube clips: Hi there, welcome to your tarot readings for July and Cancer season... OK, we've got lovers on each side...We've got the tower on each side. I feel like you're more connecting with this person coming up...So for today's reading, we have your one last message that you're meant to receive before you start your new life.
Shelby Traynor: If you're not seeking some kind of message from the great beyond, if you're not feeling particularly introspective, you just scroll past. But if you are, then in many ways you're deciding to suspend disbelief and you're primed to make meaning from whatever you hear. That's one of the criticisms, that if you want it to mean something, it will.
Ryan Findlay: And it's like, well, yeah, but we're meaning making machines. That's what we do. So why not draw upon this vast collection of beautiful symbols and instilled wisdom to make meaning out of what's going on for yourself?
Shelby Traynor: OK, so Sana, I've brought one of my tarot decks into the studio and I want you to have a little look.
Sana Qadar: OK, I'm intrigued. I've never actually looked at a tarot deck before, I don't think.
Shelby Traynor: Nice. So there are 78 cards. There's the major arcana and the minor arcana.
Sana Qadar: What is that?
Shelby Traynor: So the major arcana, it kind of tells this overarching story from the first card, the Fool, all the way to the last card, the World. And it's kind of this journey the Fool goes on to like learning.
Sana Qadar: The Full and the World?
Shelby Traynor: The Fool.
Sana Qadar: Oh, the Fool rather. And the World. Got you.
Shelby Traynor: Yes. Then you've got the minor arcana. That's more like your traditional deck of playing cards that you'd be familiar with. It's split into four suits. You've got swords, cups, pentacles and wands. And like an ordinary deck of cards, these go from ace to ten, then the page, knight, queen and king. And all of these cards, all 78, have descriptions attached to them. They have different meanings. So I might get you to pull a card and we'll do a little reading.
Sana Qadar: Okay, from anywhere on the deck?
Shelby Traynor: Anywhere on the deck. Anywhere you're feeling drawn to.
Sana Qadar: I'm slightly terrified of this. Okay. I'm drawn to this card. The Wheel of Fortune.
Shelby Traynor: Ooh, that's a nice card.
Sana Qadar: What does that mean?
Shelby Traynor: So that's part of the major arcana. Let me look through my book. I don't know them off by heart. Wheel of Fortune. Destiny. Fortune. Success. Luck. Felicity.
Sana Qadar: Oh hey, I like this. Yeah, this is a great card. Am I about to get rich?
Shelby Traynor: Mmm, I think this is general enough that if you don't get rich, you won't blame the card. The Barnum effect might apply here. As I said, super, super general. There might also be some confirmation bias. If you win the lotto, you're going to say the card had predicted it.
Sana Qadar: You know, I'm sad to admit, I do on occasion, more frequently than I should, buy a lotto ticket. So now I will after pulling this card (both laugh).
Shelby Traynor: Exactly. So is that experience altogether harmful? In the right circumstances, Ryan says pulling a card like this can be just another tool for self-reflection.
Ryan Findlay: From memory, there's 22 major arcana. So they're really big containers. If we look at an archetype, it's just a big container full of symbolism and meaning. Carl Jung was an eminent therapist back in the day, and yeah, his work looking into symbolism and the collective unconscious, that really maps beautifully with how I like to do tarot and how I like to do therapy as well, which is just looking more at, I don't know, the greater energies in life, not so much just getting caught up in the personal struggle. Getting out of that more personal problem-solving space into a more trans-personal space.
Shelby Traynor: In psychology, trans-personal means beyond the self or beyond the bounds of the ego.
Ryan Findlay: Yeah, just tune in. Just like, oh, what do I want to know? And I think, I guess the important kind of energetic part of that for me is opening up to vulnerability of like, oh, I don't really know what's going on. That actual step of going, oh, I actually want to seek some support here from outside of my own mind. I think that's, yeah, sort of the ritual for me is just really opening up to the cards themselves.
Sana Qadar: So it sounds like they're almost kind of conversation starters.
Shelby Traynor: Yeah, 78 of them.
Ryan Findlay: So an example for that is like the five of cups. It's like asking me to just really tune in to grief or disappointment. And then also to let gratitude come in. So I sort of just pull them ad hoc. Now and again, I'll do a bigger reading to get a bit of a map or an overview, which is really quite special.
Shelby Traynor: There's often ritual involved in tarot readings, maybe some meditation beforehand or a breathing exercise. Before pulling a card, people are usually encouraged to ask a question like, what do I need to know right now? There's plenty of evidence that ritualistic behavior can help us ease anxiety and regulate our emotions. But of course, it's not always appropriate to turn to tarot cards. Ryan had to figure out that balance when he first started practicing in his early 20s.
Ryan Findlay: I just had a lot of, I guess, decision anxiety at that age. So tarot really helped me tune into my own intuition. Probably used a little bit too much. I used it every day at that point. So I was a little bit of a crutch. But yeah, it just helped me navigate my way through my early 20s, which were, you know, full of anxiety and doubt and all those sort of things.
Shelby Traynor: It was later that Ryan became a psychotherapist. And even later that he decided to combine the two in private sessions. While he says therapy and tarot overlap in a lot of ways, there are many situations where tarot isn't the way to go.
Ryan Findlay: Definitely someone with a lot of mental health diagnoses. So where they're feeling really, really chaotic in their life and they actually just need some grounding and some human connection.
Shelby Traynor: The cards aren't where you turn mid-breakdown or when your emotions are heightened.
Ryan Findlay: So I'm really big on making sure that if we are making meaning and we are connecting to new ideas and new associations, that it's actually feeling nurturing to us and grounding for us and making us feel more solid in ourselves.
Shelby Traynor: And so Ryan recommends some questions to ask yourself before doing a reading.
Ryan Findlay: How solid do you feel right now? And are you in your head already too much? Or just searching too much for some kind of clarity when really you actually just need some human connection to rest and reset. There's a thing called metacognition, which is like that ability to sort of zoom out and really watch yourself. And if you've lost that, like your frontal lobes go on and you're too dysregulated, then I don't think tarot is indicated.
Shelby Traynor: But when he does use it, Ryan says tarot can bring something to sessions that he doesn't experience through traditional methods. The deck is almost like a third person in the room.
Ryan Findlay: It brings a different energy. So I've been working as a counselor psychotherapist for about eight years now. And so I've got that established in me and I'm really quite familiar with that terrain or that landscape of therapeutic work. But when I do tarot with people, it sort of brings in this other energy, this almost third witness.
Shelby Traynor: He finds it can even help drive home a message that maybe a client has been resistant to or defensive of.
Ryan Findlay: Where they maybe have some self-sabotage or some built up defenses, the cards are really good at just gently spotting that and helping people see their blind spots. And it sort of takes me out of the equation a bit more because I'm like, well, it's what's coming up.
Shelby Traynor: Suffice to say, there's no randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of tarot alongside traditional therapy. And because it's a combination of cards giving you a reading and you interpreting that reading however you like, there is a risk involved. Ryan experienced this when he first got into tarot.
Ryan Findlay: I think in those early days I was probably drawing upon the meanings and the cards too much. And I was just looking for answers, looking for answers, looking for confirmation, validation. Whereas now they just help me access parts within myself that I've already cultivated and developed. But I try to just use them intuitively rather than reactively.
Shelby Traynor: But at the risk of over intellectualizing tarot readings, I should say that tarot can be as woo-woo as some people criticize it to be. Readings can feel meaningful beyond probability. Certain cards can keep coming up. A message can feel particularly hard hitting, sometimes brutally honest. And it feels inexplicable, like the universe really is trying to send you a message.
Ryan Findlay: I'm more and more convinced every time I just get these amazing things happen and cards coming out that I'm just like, wow, you really are trying to say something to me. Because I've got a skeptic too, you know, I've got a science background as well. So I've always got that part of me, that skeptic part. And throughout the years, tarot has just proven to me over and over again how valuable and useful and intriguing and entertaining it is as well.
Shelby Traynor: You can believe the universe is sending you a message, or you can believe that humans are really good at recognizing patterns and making connections. In fact, it's a basic survival skill. Last time I ate this plant, I got sick. Last time I heard this noise, it was a snake. There's a word for our tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things, apophenia. This skill humans have is why we're able to see constellations or detect images in the loose leaves at the bottom of a teacup. Apophenia can be an asset or it can be misleading, depending on the person and the circumstance. Here's Professor Krauss Whitbourne again.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: They just need to preserve their worldview or astronomical view, astrological view, I should say. I don't know. I mean, I suppose it is a way of imposing order onto chaos. People are always looking for that. It's just the wrong form of order because chaos is sometimes chaos. And sometimes chaos has a lot to do with your actual personality, your actual life, your actual upbringing, all of the factors that make us who we are and what make us tick.
Shelby Traynor: I did ask her if she thought there could be any case in which horoscopes or other forms of divination might be harmless, maybe even a little beneficial.
Professor Susan Krauss Whitbourne: I guess. If you're being totally tongue in cheek about it, but then why not actually spend your time reflecting on something real?
Shelby Traynor: Ouch. But I guess for me, tarot cards at least are real. As in, I can shuffle them, I can pull them, I can see them laid out in front of me. And making meaning through them has been formative. Readings have helped me to accept things I've been resisting. They've given me confidence in decisions I have already made. And at the very least, they've been a comforting ritual, a method of inquiry and a form of self-care.
Ryan Findlay: I do see it as like a candle in the dark. Like often if I'm just feeling really confused or stuck or I'm sort of swelling, I just really want to just see what the universe wants to tell me essentially. And that really brings a lot of solace because it paints a picture. And I'm quite a visual person, so it just immediately I get to see what's going on in my internal psyche out in the world, externalized. And that's something in therapy that we're really trying to help people do is externalize what's going on inside. And that does calm the nervous system. So for me over the years, it's just brought a lot of solace and a lot of comfort. And really made me who I am actually because each tarot card has so much wisdom in it. And so rather than just moving through the motions of life and waiting for the challenging emotions to disappear or whatever, I'm actually making myself stronger through those experiences using tarot. So just supportive, like just to get this big vision of what's possible for myself.
Sana Qadar: That was Ryan Findlay. And earlier you heard from Susan Krauss Whitburn, Professor Emerita of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. This episode was reported and produced by Shelby Traynor. You can stick around after the credits to hear Shelby do my tarot reading if you really want to. A warning, it does get a little woo-woo. Thanks to producer Rose Kerr and senior producer James Bullen and sound engineer Simon Branthwaite. I'm Sana Qadar. Thank you for listening. I'll catch you next time.
Sana Qadar: Okay, read my tarot.
Shelby Traynor: Oh my goodness.
Sana Qadar: Okay, do I shuffle?
Shelby Traynor: Okay, do you want to hear my ritual?
Sana Qadar: Yeah.
Shelby Traynor: I knock it.
Sana Qadar: Oh yeah? Two times?
Shelby Traynor: (Both laughing) Oh my god. I'm sorry I sound insane.
Sana Qadar: (still laughing) You're like the weirdest science reporter ever, but keep going.
Shelby Traynor: I knock the deck. It's to get the energy from the last person who read it out. No, no, no, you got to knock it yourself.
Sana Qadar: Oh, I have to knock it. Okay.
Sana Qadar: All right. Energy out.
Shelby Traynor: And so I hold it to my chest. I do some breathing and I ask a question. Usually the question I ask is what do I need to know right now? And then I start shuffling and I just shuffle until I feel done. Okay, I feel done.And then I turn three cards. Just one, two, three.
Sana Qadar: From anywhere in the pile?
Shelby Traynor: No, from the top.
Sana Qadar: Top, okay. Okay.
Shelby Traynor: Okay. You've got your past, present and future. So past will be your left. Can you tell me what your past says?
Sana Qadar: Yeah, it's a man in a red robe and green kind of scarf thing with his back towards me. He's holding a long stick thing and there's three long stick things coming out of the ground in total.
Shelby Traynor: Three of ones. There we go. A calm, stately figure with his back turned looking from a cliff's edge at ships passing over the sea. Three staves are planted in the ground and he leans slightly on one of them. He symbolizes established strength, enterprise, effort, trade, discovery, commerce. Those are his ships bearing his merchandise which are sailing over the sea.
Sana Qadar: What's that supposed to tell me about my past?
Shelby Traynor: To me it says something about your ships coming in. As in you've put in the work and you're watching at the horizon as those ships come in.
Sana Qadar: So like the fruits of my labor.
Shelby Traynor: Yeah.
Sana Qadar: Coming home to roost. These are mixed metaphors happening (laughing).
Shelby Traynor: There are many mixed metaphors. Yeah. All right, what's the next one?
Sana Qadar: Okay, the next one is a guy with like a nail and anvil like chiseling pentagrams into some discs.
Shelby Traynor: Eight of pentacles. Let's go. An artist in stone at work. Work, employment, commission, skill in craft and business. That's your present.
Sana Qadar: Okay, that's what I'm doing on the show.
Shelby Traynor: There's a lot of work going on. Do you work a lot?
Sana Qadar: I feel pretty burnt out at this point in my life (laughs).
Shelby Traynor: Okay, you work a lot. That's the vibe I'm getting. What about your future?
Sana Qadar: I wake up in the middle of the night thinking of scripts. I do work a lot (both laugh).
Shelby Traynor: Your future, is the holiday in your future? Well, I've got the knight of wands. So he looks pretty free.
Sana Qadar: He's coming to save me.
Shelby Traynor: He is shown as if upon a journey armed with a short wand and although mailed. I don't know what that means. Oh, he's got chain mail on. Yeah. He's not on a warlike errand though. He's passing mounds or pyramids. Yes. Oh, oh my goodness.
Sana Qadar: What?
Shelby Traynor: Departure, absence, flight, immigration.
Sana Qadar: Oh my God, that's actually kind of uncanny.
Shelby Traynor: You're about to go and leave, aren't you?
Sana Qadar: I'm about to go and leave. That's why you're doing the episode.
Shelby Traynor: Change of residence, it says.
Sana Qadar: Well, I've been thinking more and more about whether I want to go back to Canada for a couple of years in a few years time. Like it's really heavily on my mind, Canada.
Shelby Traynor: See, a lot of people could relate to that reading.
Sana Qadar: Yeah. I mean, who isn't burnt out also?
Shelby Traynor: But none of this is new to you as well.
Sana Qadar: What do you mean?
Shelby Traynor: Well, you've been thinking about this stuff. But sometimes the tarot reading is just a chance to actually make the space to think about it. Like you actually sit down.
Sana Qadar: And to bring like these disparate ideas in my head together in one single narrative. And a narrative is very seductive, obviously.
Shelby Traynor: But also it's really nice having something outside of yourself to tell you something you kind of have an inkling about.
Sana Qadar: Yeah. I have worked really hard. I am tired. I do want a break.
Shelby Traynor: (both laughing) And all you needed was a pack of tarot cards.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussie tradie and Love Island star revealed as mystery man in sexy ad with Martha Stewart
Aussie tradie and Love Island star revealed as mystery man in sexy ad with Martha Stewart

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Aussie tradie and Love Island star revealed as mystery man in sexy ad with Martha Stewart

An Aussie tradie was left 'buzzing' after his recent sexy encounter with domestic goddess Martha Stewart. The US powerhouse starred in a sultry ad campaign for Rexona's new Whole Body Deodorant last week, turning up the heat in a cheeky TV commercial with a mystery man. The tall, dark and handsome suitor's face was not shown in the ad, just his chiselled torso displayed from under a satin robe that matched Stewart's silky negligee. But today, can exclusively reveal the man's identity as Gold Coast-based electrician Tommy Armour, who also appeared on Season 6 of Love Island Australia last year. 'Honestly, still pinching myself,' he exclusively tells 'I was on a job site just over a year ago, and now I'm filming next to Martha Stewart talking about my feet for Rexona's new Whole Body Deodorant – life's wild.' Indeed, Armour's feet were also front and centre in the ad, as Rexona's new Whole Body Deodorant promises to tackle odour from head to toes. But it didn't bother him being the face behind the foot. 'I've always been up for a laugh and keen to put myself out there, so when Rexona came knocking, I was all in,' he says. 'Turns out, my toes have been waiting for their big break.' Armour secretly filmed the ad in May when Stewart was in Sydney to headline an event at the Vivid Festival. The duo filmed the footage inside the landmark Crypto Castle in South Coogee – and both had to keep the project under wraps until last week. Now that the cat's out of the bag, Armour's phone has been ringing off the hook. His mates became 'suss when I kept dodging questions' about flying to Sydney for a shoot. He simply told them he was 'working on something fresh', which turned out to be true. 'The reactions have been hilarious, my phone hasn't stopped,' he tells us. 'I've had mates sending screenshots, my mum asking if I'm famous now, and way too many jokes about my feet.' 'Never thought I'd be known for my feet, but hey, if the foot fits … I'll take it! Honestly, it's been such a fun ride. Working with Martha and Rexona, and being part of something this unexpected has been a real pinch-me moment.' The ultimate highlight of the experience was filming alongside Stewart – a model, mogul, influencer whose TV shows, lifestyle books, magazines and product lines have helped make her the first self-made female billionaire in US history. 'She's a total icon. I always thought she was classy and kind of the queen of all things home and lifestyle, but I didn't realise how funny she was until I met her,' Armour says. 'Honestly, I was starstruck. Everyone was. She's such a professional, and smelt amazing, by the way. We had a good laugh on set, and surprisingly great chemistry as you can see from the teaser clip! I wasn't expecting to vibe with her as much as I did, but she's a legend.' Armour also made sure he was primed and ready for his encounter with the iconic star, even putting his 'schnittys on pause for a few weeks' in preparation for the role. But for him, it was more about 'smelling good than looking shredded' for the ad. 'Rexona Whole Body Deodorant gives you odour protection from top to toe, and when your foot's going to be inches from Martha Stewart's face, you want to smell on point. Pedicures, the lot!' he says. Armour is no stranger to the spotlight. In 2024, he appeared on Season 6 of Love Island Australia, only to shock his fellow Islanders when he chose to leave three days later after failing to finding a connection. He still made an impact on the dating program, gained attention for his unique party trick of eating whole raw eggs – shell included. His party trick has now gone viral on TikTok, and the loveable larrikin has earned the nickname 'Egg Man'. So did he show this trick to culinary expert Stewart while they were filming in Sydney? 'I wanted to, trust me. But no, I reckon she would've critiqued my yolk control. Maybe next time.' And he's hoping there is a next time … 'Maybe it's time to go from foot model to hand model, hey Rexona?' he jokes when asked what's next for him. 'But mostly, I'm out here feeling fresh, having fun, trying new things, and bringing good energy wherever I go.'

Geraldine Doogue delivers the 2025 Andrew Olle Media Lecture
Geraldine Doogue delivers the 2025 Andrew Olle Media Lecture

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

Geraldine Doogue delivers the 2025 Andrew Olle Media Lecture

'NOT DROWNING, WAVING---A MODERN MEDIA TALE' This invitation is particularly gratifying because it carries quite a lot of personal weight. Andrew's sudden collapse and then death was the most terrible shock for thousands of us, but especially in my very ABC household. My late husband Ian Carroll was technically one of his bosses (now called Leads) as Exec Producer of the 7.30 Report: and together with Television Division leaders, the decision was made back then in 1995 to refresh the whole early evening television current affairs line-up; that it would benefit from being beefed-up to a national approach (as it is now) and the decision was made to appoint the experienced Kerry O'Brien in the chair. It was all rather secretive, as these things tend to be, up till the point that it wasn't! And the news doesn't emerge… neatly , as you know. No alternative role had yet been fully devised for Andrew on television though his 702 morning radio role would remain the same. Word got out about the changes. Then, Andrew collapsed from this tumour….and died. Obviously we all wondered whether pressure over his future had played any role and we'll never know…but I don't really think Ian ever forgot that sense of responsibility for his part in the decision-making, and whether it could have been improved. There was such a lot of grief, shock…and dismay, visibly conveyed. It was not an easy time cos it was all so sudden, there was such sheer sadness, at losing the fabulous, reliable generalist Andrew Olle. So as I say, I'm especially delighted to be here tonight to honour his memory….and in the presence of Annette and the family. And what a year to be delivering the lecture, on media of the future! On any subject that requires good prophecy. Because NOTHING seems certain in our lives. For quite a while after the invitation arrived, I'd settled on those immortal WB Yeats lines as my title tonight: 'Can The Centre Hold?'…followed by those unforgettable lines… The best lack all conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity.' Those words certainly describe our times. But it just felt too defensive and grim… and I didn't want to leave you all like that. 'Not drowning, waving', the distinctly Australian rock group formed in the year my lovely daughter Eliza was born, 1983….somehow seemed to convey my sentiments with a bit more irony, as we grapple with what many of us see as our epic challenge: helping our profession survive. Because It IS all bit grim to be frank, for those of us who love the media, love working inside it, consuming it, believing it's vital to our way of life, our identities. Roy Greenslade, the UK media analyst was pretty blunt back in 2016: 'It's time to recognise that the whole UK newspaper/media industry is heading for a cliff-fall, that tipping point when there's no hope of a reversal of fortune….Space in newsprint papers can be filled. The end result is something that looks like a paper but the content lacks any real value. And of course readers gradually catch on and stop buying.' And advertisers can stop advertising, knowing that many subscribers have switched to inidividualised screens. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford has been forensically examining things. (headline below) ' Journalism is in freefall---and the public doesn't care . What should the media do next?' was how Prospect magazine headlined their coverage of Reuters' latest overview, with a good piece by a senior research associate, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. ….and the public doesn't care! That rider has stayed with me. 'The public doesn't miss yesterday's news, but journalists miss the public.' Nielsen says current trends suggest at best a continued retreat , as the press serves fewer and fewer people, ultimately ending up with a role akin to contemporary art or classical music: highly valued by a privileged few, regarded with indifference by the many. (one could argue this….but I think you get the analogy) Consumers' lack of grief about these changes was because THEY felt they WERE keeping sufficiently up-to-date without their (so-called) legacy media…. And maybe they are! Are we still needed? That's our existential crisis….though the fine print of the Reuters research does indicate that the public in theory is still with us …it's just that other information-distraction options loom up as better, perfect vehicles, as I read recently, for skimming rather than close reading . …all part of what Andrew Denton described to me as 'information-sickness'. That newish outfit of Andrew Jaspan, 360 Info, a sort of research Reuters, describes us all being involved in a ' war-of-attention' …to work out how we counter (or at least compete) with the outlets whose stock-in-trade is harnessing community rage and anger, often legitimate. Mind you, the Reuters people have also found the hated algorithm that directs people to other-than-conventional-news-sites slightly broadens people's news outlets too. And of course it is true that our consumers have, in some key ways, have become our competitors , via their own bespoke news outlets, that they set up themselves---one of the great ironies! 'While many people retain a sound scepticism of aspects of the digital media environment, they also appreciate much of what it has to offer and choose it every day at the expense of declining legacy media. Scare stories about the problems associated with digital media will not bring people back to news,' says Reuters. 'A wiser course of action might be to impress people…rather than try to depress them. 'The people best positioned to forge a different path are those journalists and publishers who accept that the next step is to meet people where they are. The aim should not be to take journalism backwards….but to create something new.' But what? What would that look and sound like? --- Well for further context, I was very diverted by the thoughts of one of Australia's great intellectual exports Christopher Clark, who's professor of modern history at Cambridge University (and a guest on Global Roaming next week btw): he wrote that book 'Sleepwalkers' about the terrible drift into WW1, it was considered possibly the best book to emerge from that deluge of scholarship around the Great War centenary in 2018. He recently wrote an essay called 'The End Of Modernity—A Crisis Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes…And Also In Our Heads.' (not quite Yeats' elan!) We can't---or shouldn't---avert our gaze, he says. He sees the global blocs of the 20th century dissolving, therefore a return to the more 'mobile and unpredictable world of the 19th century'…that Vladimir Putin et al aim to exploit all this, to 'crush the moral spine of Europe'….to undo entirely the international order established in the aftermath of WW2. Then he went further. The anchors for the collective identities of the era that he'd roughly called The Modern---with its hugely accelerated industrialisation, big growth in population, welfare states, political parties…coincided with 'the age of the great supra-regional newspapers plus the emergence of national radio and television networks'…all had created their own mythology…a story we could tell ourselves in time, of understanding where we came from and where we were heading'. 'It meant mediatization,' he writes. 'In old Europe…people obtained their information from friends and acquaintances, or even from strangers, but always from individuals , by word of mouth. In modern times, by contrast, information was increasingly disseminated through influential media channels---rumour-mongers gave way to trained journalists. ' Well, this modernity, Clark says, is disintegrating before our eyes. 'The multi-faceted nature of contemporary politics, the present of turmoil and change without a clear sense of direction, is causing enormous uncertainty. It helps explain why we are so easily unsettled by the agitations of the present and why we find it so difficult to plot our course.' Maybe, he wondered, there's a general reversal of the process of mediatization….in the sense that the gossip-mongers of the Internet have once again seized the initiative, leaving fragmentation of knowledge and opinions. Here's his great summary-line. 'It has never been so difficult to think calmly.' Yet so necessary! Now here I am, 15 minutes or so in, leaving you maybe even more ready to escape to a cave than you were on arrival! Not my intention. I have come to wonder whether what's needed is a more communitarian sensibility to our work in the media, and our approach to news, information and the characters of our communities: more than we've necessarily prioritised in our anxiety to survive and cut through all the noise. …..in other words, fleshing out that vital interaction between individualism and the communal, an individual's relationship with their community: the precious good soil that underpins a thriving culture, putting the community at the centre of social and political thought. I do wonder whether our individual journalistic egos have become very wrapped up with hitting the headlines ourselves while also pursuing time-honoured goals: holding the powerful to account, lifting the lid on established unfairness within our systems. We will always have a duty to warn citizens of danger and incompetence, alerting them to what's NOT solved, why today might be different from yesterday, the classic role of the 4th Estate: advising of the cyclone's or bushfire's incipient arrival is obviously the day-to-day duty of the good journalist, she who'll never reveal her sources . ….and hey, who among us can honestly say we were impervious to the Woodward-Bernstein achievements around Watergate, sensationally recreated in 'All The Presidents Men': two young bloods, nobly jousting with the deeply flawed leader Richard Nixon and his establishment…and yay, bringing him down (with some help from others}. Journalistic nobility---then Super-stardom! Why wouldn't the world of journalism shift, I ask you! However I do wonder whether the breadth of the community and its range of tastes and interests, is sufficiently canvassed? Whether we're far more energised by displaying the incompetence on display rather than searching for the competence? Of course it may not yield that fabulous rush of revelation, of schadenfreude…as Mike Carlton once put it in his SMH column..'the definition of schadenfreude? the awful joy of watching a human catastrophe unfold'. For instance, will all the current emphasis on investigative journalism save us? All that brilliance and tenacity of investigative journalists who labour away so impressively: will that amount to the 'glittering prize' that ensures the public remains sufficiently grateful to keep subscribing? I'm not at all sure it will. Naming the guilty man or woman---or institution---should not be the ONLY part of the story yet it often is, especially e.g. around Royal Commissions who've long frustrated me with their total focus on the knaves among us…rather than what I imagined was their broader remit, which was to examine the full scope of actors in a relevant industry, so that we, the people, could pass better judgement. (One of the people I spoke to preparing for tonight wondered a 'sacriligeous thought' our loud----should the fact that a report was seen to 'prompt a Royal Commission' necessarily be the clincher in determining worth, going to that question of Impact, one of the categories required for Walkley Award success….quite thought-provoking.) I have long believed---and my colleagues here tonight will know this---that new patterns of achievement make very good first pars…plus act as a drawcard for imitators…plus might in fact persuade doubting citizens that we really ARE interested in the wider community not merely claiming a political scalp….and it just might in fact encourage them to persist with their subscriptions. I heard a nice story recently about Matthias Doepfner, who leads the giant German media group Alex Springer, reacting to American research showing very bright young emerging Americans wanting to devote all their energies to 'investigative reporting'….was he thrilled at all this intellectual grunt arriving in his industry, he was asked? 'No, I'm not,' he apparently said…. 'I think that's a dangerous misunderstanding of journalism.' He believes one of the reasons people are losing trust in the media is because many reporters confuse journalism for activism - telling us what the world should look like and ignoring inconvenient news. And that the public can see it and doesn't necessarily like it. Does that matter? Well yes I think it does. In this communitarian model I'm reflecting on, I see a renewal of the covenant between the public and the journalist: that we will clearly make the effort to be fair and accurate. (We could spend the night exchanging clever memes about News definitions. So I won't do that) I've always liked that definition: we're reporting on that which differs from the norm , we're not there to tell people about the comfortable status quo. To that extent, we are there to bother people, to introduce some alert-and-alarm. And no we can't GUARANTEE we'll be fully objective….but we can observably try , and be seen to be doing so or judged for not. The public can draw its own conclusions. I remember the respected social researcher Neer Korn a few years back telling the ABC Board that 'trust' was possibly the ABC's vital power, its secret sauce…that of course the audience made their minds up in their own households about those of us on telly or the radio or online and our 'take on the world'. Intellectual openness is, for me, the essential aim, it really is: impartiality is articulated a lot as a goal but I actually find the word openness to be more inviting, maybe more active, as a concept? That's certainly what I look for in colleagues. And I suspect the public does too. --- Allow me to ponder some more about this more communal, service model of journalism. (As an aside, I remember being incredibly moved during those 50th anniversary docos of Cyclone Tracey to hear Alan Kohler describe emerging as a 21 yr old from the rubble, with his two mates Dave Johnson and Lorna King, using every means possible to put out a little information broadsheet, handed out to whoever they could find, with as much detail as they could grab, just to spread the word that Darwin was alive…just!) Now Alan HAS become justly famous well beyond that episode….but it does say quite a bit about his essential-journalist within! I do propose that refreshing this communal model (many of you here tonight probably feel you already access it) would mean the public would FEEL an overt embrace of wider community characteristics: and that might indeed restore more trust in us over time. This won't be an instant salvo against TikTok et al of course: Andrew Jaspan's 360 Degree outfit did a big Digital News report in June, noting that Facebook was still the most visited social media site for news (38%), alongside YouTube, Instagram and TikTok…now at 14% up from 12% in 2020. Worryingly, of the 48 countries surveyed, Australians had the highest levelof concern about what is real or fake online…amidst a loss of interest in news and growing news avoidance (going back to that Reuters survey). News literacy training, a subset of media literacy, Jaspan thinks is crucial here: he believes people would benefit from knowing how the sausage is made, might in fact value that outcome more. (I do admire Andrew Jaspan for stepping outside established moulds, when he championed that other major break-out of information, The Conversation, where he worked out that universities contained masses of new, relevant material that could be transformed into news features…and the rest is history, as they say….now an absolute fixture in our lives, with an obvious public purpose…so clever in my view and really out on his own ) I do keep an eye out now for where a clear association between the public and the media occurs: *Podcasts…the phenomenon of our recent times: lots of ego, I can assure you, but less rules (maybe) around the conversational tone, meaning a wider exposure of the relevant people and topics, less curated than straight Radio? (which is still my first love, I want to reassure you) *Special events, like ABC Classic 100 in that first week of June----with some composer or instrument chosen as a focus, Beethoven, piano music, with the community voting on the best, always with huge take-up, of all ages and skills. …you can hear it, instant market research on offer. (Tell story of Russell Torrance, on the Monday after the weekend, playing Mozart Piano Concerto No 27, which did NOT make the top 100! A Qld woman texted in…'I had a baby 7 hours ago, she's sleeping beside me now, with Mozart by her side.' I think that might be the pinnacle of engagement between mainstream media and its audience, frankly it doesn't get much better than that.) Triple J's Hottest 100 is obviously another candidate. *Explainers… I sat on the Walkley judging panel for this category's second year in 2024 (called Explanatory Journalism); SO incredibly impressive to see this instinct among journalists. It was invariably team work , I noticed, generally involving some institutional backing, incredibly imaginative, bold, demanding, huge amounts of work often in people's own time, driven by curiosity and, I would say, a desire to tell stories by CLARIFYING complexity----a time-honoured drive to serve! Follow-ups to natural disasters: I've come to believe this matters a great deal. It proves that the media is genuinely curious about deeper stories, slower stories, as much as crisis-management, in the full knowledge that the way people, animals and the natural world adapt is a vital, if diffuse story. ABC News did some wonderful, repeated reporting after the last bushfires in ways that were both incredibly moving, deeply informative and genuinely fresh. There are some interesting developments overseas, by say Swedish Radio, developing a system of classifying content, to more clearly determine public service journalism drivers, and help younger arrivals to the industry Apparently the Finns are looking at this along with other European countries: the idea being that increasingly diverse news items are evaluated via four tests: how high is the general news value? How long is the life span of the story? Are unique voices from affected people included in the coverage? Does it align with significant Swedish Radio values? Media literacy is apparently becoming a massive thing in the Asian region…with some quite fascinating projects, like one in Nepal, called Hello CIN (Community Information Network ), combining radio, talkback and citizen-driven solutions journalism: people voice-record questions often about local governance or education issues….then it's played to the relevant govt official, who responds directly, all on air: an average of 15,000 questions, complaints and issues are resolved, publicly, via this platform each year. And it's widely appreciated. Now, I can hear some of you thinking….does she really think these compete with some fabulous scoop? No, I love those big-beast stories of course I do: who doesn't, and we've certainly experienced a few in these past two years. But my tastes won't deliver an industry of scale in the future, sadly. --- This all dovetails with other bigger needs within the culture of course. I would argue that we might well have reached peak-individualism, which manifests in all those solitary searches on the Net for some bliss, sometimes found. And yet so many of them are seeking ways to avoid loneliness or separateness or alienation…. I don't think we thrive on individualism! Many of you will know of my interest in Catholic and religious matters ---in fact it's been quite surprising to see the overlap between the challenges facing the media and the Churches in terms of reading the signs-of-the-times: how to revive We and Us versus I? Religion thrives on community…so might we in the media! And doing it better just might recruit more of those consumers to leave aside their complacency and push back against the autocrats on-the-march. It just might. We're all looking for green-shoots: that's the truth of it and maybe some new 21st century media grammar. After all, in the 1930s the BBC had to 'invent' all those looks and props and sounds that we simply take for granted now that mark studio news presentation. Moving past individual gossip to something more formal involved massive creativity. We clearly need it again. We surely need to lionise creativity and service beyond individual achievement and fame in order to routinely engage lots more people, more regularly: because otherwise we simply won't have an industry-at-scale, it won't be prosperous enough to offer careers, or cadetships to young people----all sorts of people will end up as artists-working-in-garrets, rationing their time and money, occasionally striking it rich, mostly doing something else. That's no answer. And there'll certainly be a much less certain audience for investigative journalism, which can change big things. ----- I haven't talked about AI, or the innards of socials, or dis- or mis-information, weaponised or 'disordered' information. I know I won't satisfy all those people who are just SEETHING at the structures of money and power and clowns on display these days…..I spoke to several of them preparing for tonight! I can't even give you specific new models of this communitarian emphasis I'm emphasising: I wish I could. If we're passive, we might lose this gem of ours, this marker-buoy of modernity? This industry that I adored from Day One, back in 1972, when I wandered up the corridor of Newspaper House at 125 St Georges Tce, Perth on a hot December day and said…is there a way in here? Thank goodness they said yes, there is!

MasterChef fan favourite sent packing in shock elimination, as top five revealed
MasterChef fan favourite sent packing in shock elimination, as top five revealed

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

MasterChef fan favourite sent packing in shock elimination, as top five revealed

One of the fan favourites on this season of MasterChef Australia has been eliminated just shy of the grand final. Sunday's high-stakes episode saw the remaining contestants battle it out to make the top five, with debut MasterChef winner Julie Goodwin and most recent victor Nat Thaipun forming part of the special-look judging panel. The current season of the long-running Ten cooking series has seen past stars return to the kitchen for another shot at the title. In Sunday's elimination, Goodwin and Thaipun set the contestants a challenge of creating a meal with ingredients they each used in their respective winning dishes. With just 60 minutes on the clock, Depinder and Ben ultimately came out on top, joining last week's immunity winners Callum and Laura to make up the top four. Sarah and Jamie were then sent to a second round for the final spot, tasked with whipping up yet another dish from Goodwin and Thaipun's pantries. Sarah, who recently went public with her relationship with fellow MasterChef star Declan, set herself the almighty feat of making Pork Assiette – which required her to cook pork three different ways in just 60 minutes. Jamie, meanwhile, leant into classic flavours with roast chicken and vegetables. After a last-minute hurdle, in which Jamie was forced to abandon his failed gnocchi, the first-time returnee was ultimately victorious over Sarah, with the judges unable to look past her undercooked pork belly. The third-time MasterChef competitor, and runner-up in season 14, broke down in tears upon realising she just missed out on the top five, as the judges rallied around her. 'Sarah. You are so unique,' Jean-Christophe Novelli said. 'It is a pleasure watching you cooking. Every single dish you came out with were very different, and please, do not change. 'It's just a bad day in the office. You are so credible. Trust me. I really admire you.' While Sarah didn't make it to the final, the TV cook did leave the show with a new love in her life, Declan, who was eliminated several weeks ago. The pair revealed their secret relationship to Stellar in June, saying they began dating during filming of the latest season in Melbourne. 'We instantly got along and started spending a lot of time together,' Declan, 27, said. 'Nothing was ever rushed or forced – we just enjoyed spending time together. And Sarah, being from Melbourne, knew all the places to go. So we'd go to the beach, or go-karting, and we went out for lots of dinners.' It was Declan who made the first move on Sarah, who has a 14-year-old son, as she faced elimination for the first time. 'I was [panicking]. 'Oh sh*t. I've been spending all this time with this bloody amazing chick and now she might be leaving,'' he told the magazine. 'And so, as she's walking into the elimination [challenge], I said, 'Sarah, can I ask you something? Would you like to go on a date with me?' And she just looked at me and said, 'You're a bloody idiot!'' MASTERCHEF AUSTRALIA'S TOP FIVE REVEAL THEIR HIGHLIGHTS: Ben Macdonald, New Zealand 'Travelling to Doha and winning immunity cooking in an Alain Ducasse restaurant. Unforgettable,' Macdonald said. Callum Hann, South Australia 'All the way back on day one, I was lucky enough to be the leader of the Green Team in the Gordon Ramsay service challenge, and we won! Afterwards, Gordon said to me 'if this is how you run your restaurants, I can't wait to make a reservation'. To get that positive reinforcement from one of the best chefs in the world was a pretty incredible feeling. 'Another great memory was our trip to Doha and cooking with so many ingredients in the desert that I've never heard of or seen before. Winning the first immunity challenge of International Week was incredible. 'Cooking with Hugh Allen and Vue de Monde, with another ingredient I wasn't familiar with, was also a very special experience.' Depinder Chhibber, NSW 'My proudest achievement would be winning immunity in the final challenge in Doha. I had a rough week so winning that immunity just made it all worth it. 'My fondest memory is the Dough-Fest team challenge where Callum and I were safe [with immunity] and we got to roam the MasterChef Garden and taste everyone's the dishes.' 'My fondest memory of the season far is definitely winning a business class flight to Doha in the travel challenge. Getting to travel in style with some of my good friends was pretty wild.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store