CM outlines fiscal, development agenda
Addressing a post-budget press conference on Saturday, the CM criticised the federal government for failing to meet its financial commitments, revealing that Sindh was informed just one day before the budget presentation that Rs105 billion in expected funds would be withheld. Sindh has received Rs1,478.5 billion from the divisible pool since last year, but Rs422.3 billion remains outstanding. He expressed hope that the withheld amount would be disbursed by the end of June.
Despite being under an IMF programme that demands strict fiscal discipline, the Sindh government will allocate Rs590 billion for development projects this year, with a total budget of Rs3.45 trillion, Rs1 trillion for development and Rs2.15 trillion for current expenditures. Notably, Rs1.1 trillion is earmarked for salaries and pensions, leading to salary increases of 12 per cent for lower-grade employees and 10 per cent for higher grades.
Sectoral budget increases include an 18 per cent rise in education funding and an 11 per cent increase in health. Funding for agriculture, irrigation, and local government projects has also seen significant boosts. Furthermore, Rs236 billion has been allocated for infrastructure projects in Karachi, including public-private partnership initiatives.
CM Shah highlighted Sindh's social welfare achievements, particularly in housing for flood victims, with 500,000 homes built and another 850,000 under construction, totalling 1.3 million. To enhance rural living standards, the CM announced a Rs600-billion-project for rural water and sanitation, benefiting 4.5 million villagers.
Regarding taxation, Murad noted that no new taxes were introduced in the budget, with some taxes eliminated or reduced, including the abolition of the entertainment tax and cuts to restaurant taxes. The stamp duty on third-party vehicle insurance has been reduced to Rs50, with a drop in the insurance tax from 15 per cent to five per cent.
To modernise governance, the Sindh government is digitising land records through block chain for easier access. The CM claimed that free laser levellers will be provided to small farmers, with subsidies for larger ones, alongside the implementation of cluster farming technology. The CM said that improvements in education and health include the establishment of 34,000 new caste centres and expanded support for persons with disabilities.
Cognitive Remediation
The CM outlined the K-4 water project structure, where the federal government is responsible for sourcing water from Keenjhar Lake, while the Sindh government manages distribution and has allocated necessary funds. A total of Rs20 billion is earmarked for the K-4 feeder, alongside plans for a costly five-million-gallon desalination plant.
The CM also noted 20,000 to 25,000 job vacancies in grades I to IV, with plans for recruitment via IBA-administered tests for BPS-V to VII and filling higher Grade 16 positions. The CM mentioned Sindh's conditions for supporting the federal budget, emphasising equitable distribution of development schemes and the detrimental cut of university funding from Rs4 billion to Rs2 billion, which has sparked protests.
On the critical Sukkur-Hyderabad Motorway, the CM expressed concern over the halving of federal funding from Rs30 billion to Rs15 billion.
The CM emphasised that major projects are not included in the Federal Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) and criticised the 18 per cent tax on solar panels as unjust. He warned that the Pakistan Peoples Party would not support the federal budget if unresolved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Resetting economic governance
We have lost count of experiments conducted to resolve challenges confronted by our economy. However, except interludes of relative stability, the economy has kept faltering with breathing space provided by IMF bailouts, rollovers by friendly countries and expatriate Pakistanis' remittances. While political disruptions and policy shocks contributed to the snowballing of the economic disorder, civil bureaucracy remained ill-equipped to deal with the decline. On their part, technocrats overtime fell in line with their employers in civil bureaucracy. Surprisingly, despite being the most relevant stakeholder the businessmen were not enabled to take centre stage to play substantive role in economic governance or to sway the policies to economy's favour. The corporate executives have been part of the Cabinet, but they lose their independent voice once they join the ruling club. Their recommendations are not incorporated in a way they would desire in the final decisions, legislations, and policies. Likewise, they are hardly taken on board on economic matters linked to strategic and foreign policy issues. Resultantly, the decisions pertaining to geopolitical dynamics are aligned more with political objectives than long-term economic benefits. An example of this approach is Pakistan's insignificant trade with its neighbouring countries. Issues and controversies that crop up every now and then between businessmen and the government indicate ineffectiveness of former's consultative role as well as their inability to wield real influence in matters having substantial impact on the economy. No wonder policymakers' chronic neglect of corporate sector's policy inputs has exacerbated economic deterioration. The economic governance status quo chose to disregard the counsels of the entrepreneurs, despite the fact that alongside the establishment and civil society businessmen have kept the country afloat in times of peace and national emergencies. As heads of organizations which create wealth, generate employment, deposit mammoth taxes, partner with government in social development and step forward in national upheavals, business leaders have a strong and legitimate right to be embedded into national economic decision-making as strategic partners. The concept of privatisation is premised on private sector's proven ability to better able to govern. This should also hold true in the case of national economic governance as the economy is led by entrepreneurs who should not merely be considered as business managers but as economic sages capable of coming up with viable strategies for economic recovery and tweaking these modalities all the way in their successful implementation. The economies flourish when they function as enterprise and who could be more suitable to run them in this manner than the businessmen. At the national level a civil-military hybrid format is in full throttle to plug in gaps in governance, official procedures, coordination, policy implementation and, above all, actualize difficult reforms. The unprecedentedly close civil-military liaison has come forward to deal with these complex tasks as existential challenge after the country was pulled back from the brink. This template is explicitly manifest in the form of enthusiastic and happy coordination between political and military leaderships, fruitful military diplomacy and institutional collaboration in the shape of Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). While doubts surround the usefulness of the hybrid system in dealing with economic challenges, the businessmen continue to be on the blind spot of the government and the establishment. One only learns about business groups' separate interactions with the Prime Minister and the Chief of Army Staff (now Field Marshal). Why not institutionalize these meetings into an apex level consultative and decision-making platform. A tripartite civil-military-business model of economic governance could be created in which the corporate executives have a robust role in making recommendations with the understanding that these will be endorsed and implemented by the government. Corporate representatives may veto proposals which can adversely impact on the businesses and economic health. The implementation of policy recommendations may be monitored by the establishment after finding viable ways out of political expediencies. In the absence of such a body it took the government a long time before realizing to insulate the business community from National Accountability Bureau. The latest such organization is Federal Board of Revenue, which has run into controversies with the business community. The civil-military collaborative model, in the context of whole-of-government approach, provides a good ground to engage corporate leaders as the major players in economic revival. The suggested high level body could function as an expanded version of SIFC in a manner that political and military leaderships interact with eminent entrepreneurs to seek workable solutions of issues relating to regulations, taxes, energy pricing, monetary and fiscal policies, trade and investment, privatization, economic legislation, corporate laws, budgetary proposals, strategic issues linked to economy and above all the painful reforms. This triangular body, shielded from political disruptions and bureaucratic resistance, could operate independently for consistent and private-sector driven policies on the principle of economic pragmatism. The proposal might sound radical, but in extraordinary situations nations resort to non-traditional remedies. Since we have exhausted conventional governance mechanisms without achieving the desired outcome, the proposal to accord lead role to entrepreneurs as members of national economic team should be seen as a plausible measure with a sure promise of success. Pakistan has yet to fully come out of a precarious economic situation. The fragile economic scenario has been rendered more vulnerable by the Indian aggression and other multiple security threats. In these unusual circumstances, one key step must be to enlist business leaders, whom Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif hailed as national heroes, in economic governance to salvage the economy. Empowering local businessmen in national decision-making will also lead to a huge increase in the ease of doing business, presenting a strong stimulus for attracting foreign investment. In a write-up for a newspaper Ahsan Iqbal, Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiatives, stated that 'expansion of the private sector and devolution of multiple responsibilities to provinces have made policymaking a multi-actor exercise with rising complexity.' Implicit in this statement is the important role of business sector in proposing strategies and modalities to the government. The economic transformation plan of the government could take off provided, among other things, the business leaders are irreversibly co-opted by the government in economic governance and decision-making. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Consolidated fiscal operations
EDITORIAL: The summary of consolidated federal and provincial fiscal operations 2024-25 was uploaded on the Finance Division website on 5 August and presented a picture that challenges the government's claim that reforms are underway in all sectors to ensure that the ongoing thirty-nine-month International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme is the last one Pakistan would need to secure. The outlay of most concern to the general public is the sustained rise in current expenditure as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product on three counts: (i) it comprised 95 percent of total outlay in 2024-25 compared to 84 percent in 2022-23 as per the summary of the consolidated fiscal operations of that year; (ii) current expenditure was budgeted at around 17 trillion rupees in 2024-25 while the government spent 15.69 trillion rupees with 1.6 trillion rupees savings attributed to the decline in the discount rate — from 22 percent in June last year to 11 percent in the current year; however (iii) mark-up payments as a major component of current expenditure were 8,159,826 million rupees in 2023-24 against 8,887,417 million rupees in 2024-25 indicative of an increased reliance on borrowing by the government — up to 7,089 billion rupees last fiscal year as reported in the summary. Federal tax revenue rose to 11,744 billion rupees in 2024-25 against 9,311 billion rupees in 2023-24 — with the major increase attributed to increase in direct taxes (disturbingly consisting of withholding taxes levied in the sales tax mode) — an indirect tax — though wrongly credited under direct taxes in spite of the Auditor General's exhortation to the FBR to abandon this practice. The incidence of indirect taxes on the poor is greater than on the rich. Non-tax revenue increased from 3,050.4 billion rupees in 2023-24 to 4,905.9 billion rupees in 2024-25 due to higher petroleum levy collections (again an indirect tax) and more than doubling of State Bank of Pakistan profits which mopped up USD 8 billion from the open market last fiscal year to shore up dollar reserves that at USD 14.3 billion (25 July) are still lower than the USD 16 billion rollovers from friendly countries, leading to an erosion in the external value of the rupee. SBP has since agreed to ease purchases in the open market. Development expenditure rose from 635,148 million rupees in 2023-24 to 785,836 million rupees in 2024-25 — a rise that indicates authorisations as noted by the Planning Ministry however not disbursed due to fiscal constraints. The Finance Committee of parliament was informed that 596 billion rupees had been disbursed by end-May 2025, and it is rather difficult to accept that the government disbursed a whopping 189.8 billion rupees in June this year, the last month of the fiscal year. GDP (nominal) was estimated at 106,045 billion rupees in 2023-24 and 114,692 billion rupees in 2024-25, which implies an 8 percent rise, though actual GDP growth for last fiscal year was 2.6 percent. This may have led to an erosion in the rupee value which remained remarkably constant with the IMF documents exhorting the government to 'monitor the recent Real Effective Exchange Rate appreciation to avoid eroding competitiveness,' and/or a reduction in Consumer Price Index though that declined to 11.09 percent in 2024-25 against 28.31 percent in 2023-24. Bank borrowing by the provinces rose to negative 920,434 billion rupees against negative 212,157 billion rupees that no doubt contributed to claims of a surplus while non-bank also rose from negative 1022 billion rupees to 29,430 billion rupees. Sales tax on services (constitutionally a provincial tax) rose from 504,617 million rupees in 2023-24 to 612,418 million rupees in 2024-25 with Sindh continuing to take the lead at 284,427 million rupees (raising collections by 24.8 percent in comparison to 2023-24), Punjab collecting 264,026 million rupees (raising collections under this head by 17.6 percent compared to 2023-24), KPK at 40,772 million rupees (13.5 percent rise from the previous year) and Balochistan at 23,193 million rupees (7.7 percent increase). To conclude, the economic team managed to contain the primary balance to 6,168 billion rupees in 2024-25 against 9,529 billion rupees the year before while the budget deficit declined from 7,207 billion rupees in 2023-24 to 6,168 billion rupees in 2024-25; however, this was largely due to heavier borrowing in 2024-25. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PAC orders probe against town chairman
The Sindh Assembly's Public Accounts Committee has referred a corruption reference against Mustafa Bilal, Chairman Town Municipal Corporation (TMC) Mian Sarfaraz in Hyderabad, to Sindh Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE). PAC Chairman Nisar Ahmed Khuhro, who conducted a hearing of the TMC in Karachi on Tuesday, also directed Sindh Secretary Local Government to initiate an inquiry over allegations that Bilal violated the law by single-handedly passing the budget for fiscal 2024-25. Embezzlement of the public funds, illegal expenditures and other irregularities are among the allegations which have been levelled against the TCM's chairman who has been accused for singularly approving the TMC's budget of over Rs1 billion. He is also being blamed for continuously withdrawing funds from the Octroi Zilla Tax head without obtaining signatures of the town municipal commissioner. TMC Miaz Sarfaraz is one of the nine TMC which work under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (HMC). The vice chairman accused the corporation's chairman for corruption, misappropriation of funds and for passing the budget without calling the due meeting of the corporation's council. The vice chairman of Union Committee (UC) 24 blamed Bilal for holding meetings of the council occasionally to fulfill the formalities without engaging the council in constructive works. "He sends extortion receipts of Rs400 to all shopkeepers," he alleged. The vice chairmen of UC 20 and UC 21 charged the chairman for completely failing to undertake development works. Many of the vice chairman during the hearing demanded a forensic audit of the TMC's revenues and expenditures. Khuhro inquired Bilal to share details about monthly income and expenditures of the corporation. The PAC's chairman was briefed that the TMC received Rs18 million monthly from the OZT share and that Rs13 million of that fund is spent on the salaries.
