logo
It's Gary Oldman's 'alcoholic era' but he isn't tempted to even take a sip

It's Gary Oldman's 'alcoholic era' but he isn't tempted to even take a sip

Metro29-04-2025

There were times when Gary Oldman was a heavy drinker. Now he just plays them.
The iconic British actor, 67, jokes that he's in his 'alcoholic period', playing characters like his booze-addled screenwriter in Netflix's Mank and the slovenly, hard-drinking spy Jackson Lamb in Apple TV Plus show Slow Horses.
This week he's back in cinemas in Parthenope as John Cheever, the American author who struggled with the bottle for years until he became sober aged 65.
In the 90s, Oldman was just the same, drinking two bottles of vodka a day at his peak. Did alcohol ever help him? 'No,' he says, firmly, when we meet. 'You think that it gives you an edge.'
He recalls a day on 1995 film The Scarlet Letter when he drank at lunchtime and then performed a scene opposite co-star and now newly-minted Oscar winner, Demi Moore.
'That particular day…the devil got into me,' he sighs, mortified. 'Like the Baptists [say]…the devil came down!'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
No doubt, Oldman – who has played such memorable roles as Lee Harvey Oswald, Dracula and Joe Orton – was on a slide towards oblivion until he gave up alcohol in 1997.
'Without that, I wouldn't be sitting here today, really. I'd be dead. I know that for a fact. Things have come my way since then.'
Since, he's gained three Oscar nominations – and won Best Actor for his role as British PM Winston Churchill (another boozer), as well as being a regular actor for mega-director Christopher Nolan, including smash hit Oppenheimer.
Still, you have to wonder when he plays an alcoholic – like Cheever in Parthenope – is it hard to resist the temptation?
'I don't even see it,' he says. 'It's like another life, really. It's like a whole different person. Like I lived a whole different other life. I can go out and buy it. I can open a bottle of wine and pour you some. I have no desire to even take a sip. I had no interest at all.
'And sometimes people will say, 'Oh, you don't mind if I ever drink?' Have two! Have one for me! I don't care!'
Now on his fifth marriage, to art curator Gisele Schmidt, Oldman is looking fresh and upbeat. And he certainly doesn't seem bothered if his better half takes a drink.
'My wife occasionally likes a glass of wine. And it don't worry me. It's a miracle. It's fantastic. I mean, just because I get sober, they're not going to take booze out of the liquor store. The world is what it is. The problem's with me, not with the vodka company!'
He's delighted to be in Parthenope, the new film from Italian director Paolo Sorrentino – a great hero of Oldman's – who has made films like Youth and the Oscar-winning The Great Beauty.
The feeling is clearly mutual. 'Gary Oldman is an actor I really adore – I love him very much,' the enthusiastic Sorrentino tells me. 'He's a very kind, gentle person and he can play anything. He plays anything to perfection.'
Although his role in Parthenope is small, it's perfectly formed, you might say. His character, Cheever, meets a young Italian woman, Parthenope, played by Celeste Dalla Porta, who has academic intentions.
Oldman says it was fascinating playing opposite the untested Dalla Porta, even if it made him a little sad.
'Fifty years of doing it, I'm a veteran with experience. And Celeste is a young actress whose life will change after this film. And there's an innocence and purity that will be lost forever.'
Unlike his co-star, Oldman has been through the mill. Comb through his CV and you'll find little-seen films like Sin, Dead Fish and The Unborn.
'I've had darker periods where there's the highs and then there's the lows, and you got to put the kids through school, and you got to pay the mortgage and do all of that. And you do sometimes. I've done things that ordinarily wouldn't be on the radar. Under different circumstances, I may have said, 'Pass, no.' That's soul destroying.'
You won't find him critiquing others for milking a cash-cow, though.
'We've all done it. And if I see a really good actor sometimes appear in something that's a little bit dubious, I never judge. People would be quick to say, 'Oh my God, what's he doing in that? What's she doing in that?' Now, I know. And I go, 'Oh, he just had that divorce, didn't he?''
Recently, Oldman has found a steady paycheque on TV show Slow Horses, a gig that he – and fans – absolutely love.
'Now a lot of people know that I'm not available,' he says. 'Basically I'm kind of off the market because of the show. But I like that. I like that. I like the show very much.'
Winning him an Emmy nomination, it shows no signs of slowing down, with season five slated for the summer and Oldman wrapping on season six earlier this year.
'He's still living so he's still writing these books,' he says, talking about author Mick Herron. 'So I think I signed up for eight [seasons].'
The only thing that seems to be frustrating him these days is getting another directorial project off the ground. The only ever movie he's directed was 1997's scorching Nil By Mouth – another story of addiction, inspired by his own upbringing in South London.
Since then, for a decade, he's tried to get a movie made about Edward Muybridge, the pioneering 19th century photographer. But the studios simply don't want to fund a movie Oldman estimates will cost $30million (£22.3m). More Trending
'You go to Focus and they don't want to do it, and they say that it doesn't fit our model. But then, of course, someone else a year later is the head of Focus, and then you try again. And you go to Netflix, and then they're out, and then [there are] the new guys at Netflix.
'The producer of Parthenope, Lorenzo [Mieli], read it and adored it, and he said, 'I long to see this movie.' But people want to either give you a million dollars or $200mi (£149m). There doesn't seem to be any middle.'
Maybe we should all have a whip-round down the pub.
Parthenope is in cinemas on May 2.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: 7 'scarily dystopian' sci-fi TV series to stream now after Black Mirror
MORE: 'Must-see' thriller officially dethrones Severance in Apple TV charts
MORE: Hollywood star 'was really nervous' filming sex scenes due to cancer scars

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flight attendant explains why you should never swap seats on a flight
Flight attendant explains why you should never swap seats on a flight

Daily Mirror

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Flight attendant explains why you should never swap seats on a flight

TikTok video creator and flight attendant Leanna Coy explained why she doesn't like to switch seats whens she is flying as a passenger, arguing that doing so is risky business A flight attendant has warned that seat switchers on planes are risking it all. Leanna Coy recently published a TikTok video titled ' Why you shouldn't switch seats on the plane' that explains exactly that. The commonly touted reason flight attendants typically tell off-seat switchers is that the plane's boarding plan is designed to put an even number of passengers on each side of the plane. ‌ Too many on one side, and the aircraft can be a little trickier for the pilot to fly. ‌ However, Leanna Coy has a whole different reason. The American flight attendant was recently asked to switch seats with a passenger on a United Airlines flight. "Normally, I am absolutely 100 per cent against changing seats. Your lack of planning should not constitute me having to move," Leanna explained. However, on this occasion, the flight attendant couldn't think of a good reason not to swap, so she obliged. She immediately began to have doubts about her decision. "I'm already on edge about it," she said. According to Leanna, if the person you've switched with does anything to "act up" on the plane, the behaviour would be associated with her seat number. That means any breach of the aircraft's rules, such as vaping in the bathroom or throwing snacks at fellow passengers, could wrongly be pinned on her. Leanna argued that such a thought was not as far-fetched as one might think. "I see what goes down on the plane. If this lady decides to go smoke in the bathroom or whatever, that could come back to me," the world-weary flight attendant explained. ‌ "I realised I'm flying United. If you know anything about United's service, if you want to buy drinks or anything, you have to put your card onto the app ahead of time, which I've done before." This means that the passenger who swapped with Leanna may be able to access her card to pay for items. The off-duty cabin crew member asked one of her colleagues if that was indeed the case, and they confirmed that it was. "'Now, do I think this lady was trying to scam me out of money on my card? No. But that's just something to be aware of. I fully support you if you don't want to switch seats. You are entitled to the seat that you chose," Leanna said. It is not a rare occurrence for chaos to break out on a flight or for passengers to indulge in a bit of bad behaviour. At the end of last year, a passenger caused chaos after allegedly attempting to open the emergency door mid-flight. The incident took place on a Copa Airlines flight on Tuesday night. Footage of the incident shows a man being restrained in a headlock while a crew member tried to attach plastic handcuffs to his wrists. Two passengers – Marcelo Ribeiro and Everaldo Torres – reportedly helped to restrain the man, according to local reports. Marcelo attempted to reason with the passenger when he noticed him trying to open the door, which ignited a brawl.

EXCLUSIVE Reality icon Johnny Bananas addresses racism backlash over 'misleading' Netflix edit
EXCLUSIVE Reality icon Johnny Bananas addresses racism backlash over 'misleading' Netflix edit

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Reality icon Johnny Bananas addresses racism backlash over 'misleading' Netflix edit

Johnny Bananas, the MTV reality veteran, has responded to accusations that he made a racist comment during his appearance on the Netflix live dating show Pop the Balloon. The incident, which aired in April, sparked controversy after viewers believed a joke he made was directed at a Black contestant. In an interview with Bananas, 42, stated that a close-up camera angle made it appear he was addressing the wrong contestant. According to Bananas, Netflix has since updated the streaming version of the episode with a wider camera angle that clearly shows which contestant he was addressing. 'They corrected the error and the footage as it lives now accurately shows who I was actually speaking to,' Bananas told 'Now it's clear to anyone who watches the Pop the Balloon episode that the comment I made was directed towards a white contestant.' has reached out to Netflix for comment but has not received a response. Bananas further stated, 'I want to be absolutely clear... anyone who knows me, knows my heart and my character, and they know that I'm not a racist and would never make any sort of racist comment towards anyone.' The moment in question involved Bananas moving down a line of contestants, jokingly commenting on their toes as a quirky dating preference. He stopped at one contestant and said, 'You look like you sleep from a tree hanging upside down.' In response to the backlash on Twitter— where one user posted, 'That's so racist @netflix' —Bananas shared a photo from the scene along with a message clarifying his remarks. He wrote that he was referring to the 'WHITE girl whose toes were hanging over her shoes who is literally dressed like a tree,' and criticized what he described as a 'false narrative' around the incident. Bananas told that the exchange was meant to be playful banter, noting the live format encouraged a back-and-forth dynamic among contestants. 'There was a fun, kind of back-and-forth with multiple contestants on the stage. Insults were flying around,' he said. 'I was getting made fun of for my age, the way I dressed. And I was just firing quips because the show was live.' In response to the backlash on Twitter— where one user posted, 'That's so racist @netflix' —Bananas shared a photo from the scene along with a message clarifying his remarks Despite this, Bananas acknowledged that the backlash affected him and apologized for any hurt caused by the incident. 'The damage has already been done,' he said. 'While the correction has been made, the record has to be set straight.' Bananas, who has appeared on more than two dozen seasons of MTV's The Challenge as well as shows like House of Villains, Love Island, and the latest U.S. version of The Traitors, expressed surprise at the accusations given his long career in reality television. 'It's kind of crazy that after 19 years of being on TV and all the media training I've had, and the diverse groups of individuals I've filmed with, that I would do something as dumb and as insensitive as making a blatantly racist comment on live national television,' he said. Bananas also shared that the controversy has led to significant online criticism, including death threats. He attributed the incident primarily to the camera angle and editing rather than intent. 'I think none of this would have happened if it wasn't for this camera angle and the way it was edited,' he said. 'I don't think this was an edit done to intentionally try to harm me.' 'If this could change one person's mind who was truly hurt by what happened, if one person can be convinced that I'm not what they might have thought based on that edit, then that means the world to me,' he concluded He added that he supports accountability when it is warranted but felt this situation was a misrepresentation. 'Accountability has to be based on truth,' Bananas said. 'What happened here wasn't accountability. It was a rush to outrage fueled by a misrepresentation of something that should not have aired the way it did.' Bananas concluded by expressing hope that the clarification will help address any misunderstandings. 'If this could change one person's mind who was truly hurt by what happened, if one person can be convinced that I'm not what they might have thought based on that edit, then that means the world to me.'

Love Island fans 'rumble' first Casa Amor bombshell - and it's a past Islander
Love Island fans 'rumble' first Casa Amor bombshell - and it's a past Islander

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Love Island fans 'rumble' first Casa Amor bombshell - and it's a past Islander

Love Island 2025 viewers are convinced they know the first name to be confirmed for this year's Casa Amor before the twist has even been confirmed on the ITV2 series Viewers think they already know which former Love Island star is set to enter the famous second villa, Casa Amor. During the series and just as the couples have usually formed strong bonds, the series airs a second villa twist with new arrivals. For a few days the original boys and girls are split up in separate villas, with a group of new boys and girls arriving to cause drama. ‌ The twist has often led to unexpected betrayals, shock exits and new couples. Ahead of the show confirming if it will air this year or not, fans think they already know someone who will enter as part of the shake-up. ‌ Sophie Lee was axed from the show on Tuesday night in a brutal dumping, after her partner Harry was stolen by Shakira. Sophie's exit left fans stunned with many gutted to see her go so early on. But some viewers are now convinced her time on the show isn't over. With a recent series seeing a dumped girl return to the villa for Casa Amor, viewers are now speculating Sophie will be back on the show in a matter of weeks, as a bombshell in the second villa. Taking to X, fans guessed the twist would happen with one fan writing: "I reckon Sophie will re-enter the villa as a bombshell by the end of next week at the latest or she will re-enter in Casa Amor." Another said: "Dw Sophie you'll be back in 4 weeks for Casa Amor." A third viewer begged: "Nah bring Sophie back for Casa Amor she deserves a chance." A fourth fan agreed: "Bring her back for casa amor!!" as a fifth viewer posted: "Gutted for her and bring back Sophie as a bombshell or Casa Amor." The comments kept on coming with one reading: "They better bring Sophie back as a Casa bombshell. Justice for Sophie." Another said: "BRING SOPHIE BACK FOR CASA AMOR!" ‌ It comes after Sophie was axed from the show in the latest episode. Despite not initially being at risk of an early exit, the motivational speaker and author was abruptly booted out of the villa after her man Harry was chosen by newly single Shakira. It was Shakira who had been told by host Maya Jama in the previous episode that she could be leaving within hours. Shakira had just 24 hours to woo another man, after her partner Ben was stolen by American bombshell Toni. ‌ Blu, Conor and Harry all chose to opt for Shakira, knowing full well she'd only be able to pick one of them. It wasn't an easy choice, more so because she knew, as clarified by Maya, that the girl left single would be going home instead of her. With the three boys standing, Shakira's fate was sealed. It was then Helena, Alima and Sophie who were at risk. It came down to Shakira choosing out of the three boys, with some encouragement from Maya. Maya urged the Islander to remember why she was here, no doubt trying to lessen her panic over sending a girl home but also so she would make the right choice. With that, Shakira named Harry as the man she wanted to steal. Sophie was immediately dumped from the villa as a result, as Maya confirmed she was now single and would be leaving the show.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store