The Gen Z New Yorkers Selling Their Parents on Mamdani
Mr. Mamdani clearly energized young voters. But in statistical terms, the young do not dominate. There are roughly a half-million more New Yorkers over 50 than those between the ages of 20 and 39. The city's population, like its infrastructure, is simply getting older and older. During the past quarter-century the number of New Yorkers 65 and over increased by 53 percent, to 1.43 million. Since 2020 — and even with the devastations of a pandemic that left older people especially vulnerable — this age cohort has been the only one to grow.
But the lack of available exit polling makes it impossible to know what percent of older Democratic voters actually ranked Mr. Mamdani in first place (or at all). But polling data released the day before the primary showed Mr. Cuomo's lead on him shrinking among voters over 60.
In the weeks both before the June 24 primary and since, I have talked to many people in middle age and well beyond it about the mayoral race, about the candidate (or candidates) they supported and, in instances in which they changed their minds, what prompted their shifts in allegiance or interest. The discussions inevitably came around to Mr. Mamdani, and boomer and Gen X parents routinely told me that even if they were not drawn to him initially — questioning his lack of experience and policies, some of which struck them as entirely unfeasible or even absurd — they had been moved by their children's enthusiasm for him.
One friend, a longtime Andrew Cuomo supporter, was recently asked by her 17-year-old son whether she would vote for the former governor in the general election, and she said she would not. As much as she believed he would make a very good mayor, the 'kids,' and her own in particular, had spoken. The future, she felt, belonged to them.
Others view the future in a more proprietary fashion. Earlier this week, someone writing under the handle Caitlin on X described an unpleasant encounter she had just had with a Mamdani antagonist. 'A woman spent the entirety of my parents' party last night insulting me to every guest because I support Zohran,' she offered. 'Thanks to her, my parents, who had Cuomo prayer candles, just sent $1,000 to @ZohranKMamdani.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's EPA to repeal finding that climate pollution endangers human health
WASHINGTON - The Environmental Protection Agency will rescind the long-standing finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, as well as tailpipe emission standards for vehicles, setting off what it describes as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history. Republican President Donald Trump's pick to run the EPA Lee Zeldin announced the agency's plan to rescind the "endangerment finding" on the Ruthless podcast on Tuesday, saying it will save Americans money and unravel two decades of regulation aimed at reducing carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases from cars, power plants, oil production and other sources. In 2009, the EPA under former Democratic President Barack Obama issued a finding that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to pollution and endanger public health and welfare. It was upheld in several legal challenges and underpinned subsequent greenhouse gas regulations. "With regard to the endangerment finding, they'll say carbon dioxide is a pollutant and that's the end of it. They'll never acknowledge any type of benefit or need for carbon dioxide," Zeldin told the podcast. "It's important to note, and they don't, how important it is for the planet." Reuters reported last week that the EPA plans to repeal all greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines in the coming days after it removes the scientific finding that justified those rules, according to a summary. It is also expected to justify rescinding the endangerment finding by casting doubt on the scientific record used to make the finding, saying that "developments cast significant doubt on the reliability of the findings," the summary seen by Reuters says. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark Massachusetts v. EPA case in 2007, said the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and required the agency to make a scientific finding on whether they endanger public health. If finalized, this action will devastate the EPA's ability to carry out its primary authority to limit climate pollution under the federal Clean Air Act. Environmental activists immediately condemned the announcement. 'As if any doubt remained, the Trump Administration has formalized climate denial as the official policy of the United States government," said Sierra Club Acting Executive Director Loren Blackford in a statement. "If approved, rescinding the endangerment finding would strike a decisive blow to the EPA's authority to limit deadly greenhouse gas emissions and protect our people and our planet from the very worst of the climate crisis. Nearly every single day we see increased incidents of extreme weather, record heatwaves, deadly floods and droughts all threatening our lives and communities—all of which are the undeniable result of greenhouse gas emissions. 'The Trump administration is again taking a sledgehammer to the very foundation of our government and settled law, and doing so only to the benefit of corporate polluters while we pay the price." Zeldin said he will make the formal announcement on Tuesday afternoon in Indiana. Contributing: Ben Adler
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
Geoffrey Epstein is running for mayor of a major Boston suburb. Not that Jeffrey Epstein.
But the shared name does draw some comments from people online pleading with him to 'show us the list,' Geoffrey Epstein said. Take one Redditor, who recently posted a photo of an Epstein for Mayor mailer under the header, 'Is this guy for real?' Other commenters, familiar with the former Framingham School Committee member, offered support: 'He's got good ideas about the city's finances,' wrote one. The Framingham mayoral hopeful — who goes by Geoff — says it's not much of an issue among locals, who know him from his work with public schools. 'No one locally cares about that at all,' said Epstein, a former theoretical physics professor who moved to the U.S. from Australia decades ago. Among the abundance of differences between the two: 'He's a dead American, and I'm an alive Australian,' Epstein said. Epstein, who served on the school committees in both Newton and Framingham, both major Boston suburbs, got in the race to tackle problems he sees the city facing. His campaign, he said, is focused on education, infrastructure and environmental action, and he has no shortage of solutions he's pitching — from expanding solar installations on school roofs and in school parking lots, to shifting more of the city's budget toward education. He'll face a demanding fight against incumbent Mayor Charlie Sisitsky, who had more than $61,000 in his campaign coffers as of last month, compared to Epstein's roughly $5,000. Luckily for Epstein, a tough name doesn't necessarily tank a campaign. Look at Harvey Epstein, the New York state assemblymember, whose name unfortunately evokes two of New York's 'most notorious sex perverts,' as comedian John Mulaney put it in a spoof campaign ad on 'Saturday Night Live.' That Epstein recently won the Democratic primary for a New York City Council seat, spoiling the attempted political comeback of former Rep. Anthony Weiner— yet another notorious sexual miscreant — in the process. Harvey's tip: 'My advice to Geoffrey would be to lead with your values and who you are as a candidate,' the New York Epstein said over the phone. 'People will support you if you do the work and follow through.' This reporting first appeared in Massachusetts Playbook. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every weekday.
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Hakeem Jeffries to Visit Texas as Trump Pushes Redrawing Congressional Maps
Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic leader in the US House of Representatives, will meet with Texas Democrats in Austin on Wednesday, according to people familiar with the matter, as a national battle intensifies over President Donald Trump's drive to redraw the state's congressional maps. Trump has said that revamping Texas congressional districts would add as many as five seats for the Republicans, giving the party a leg up as it seeks to defend its narrow House majority in midterm elections next year. Texas state lawmakers have been holding hearings on the controversial effort, but new proposed maps have yet to be released.
