Some Nebraska Republicans join national quest to infuse more religion into schools
LINCOLN – Across the street from the Nebraska State Capitol, a monument to the Ten Commandments stands on the sidewalk outside of St. Mary Catholic Church. Although it's not on Capitol grounds, as in some states, religion still similarly influences the statehouse.
This year, three Nebraska lawmakers have bills that could infuse more religion into public schools and test the legal limits of the separation of church and state. While the bills might not pass during this legislative session, they reflect a push by Republican state lawmakers nationwide, emboldened by President Donald Trump's second term and recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that appear to have altered the legal landscape for religion in education.
The Nebraska proposals include requiring the Ten Commandments and 'In God We Trust' to be displayed in public schools, allowing students to leave during the school day to receive religious instruction and letting schools hire unlicensed religious chaplains to counsel students.
The lawmakers who filed the bills say they aim to restore morality and character among Nebraska students, saying that they believe the nation needs help.
'We have somewhat lost our way on values,' State Sen. Glen Meyer of Pender said during a hearing on his bill requiring schools to display the Eisenhower-era national motto about God and trust, Legislative Bill 122.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Religious Studies Professor Max Mueller said the bills seem to be steps towards re-establishing a Christian dominance in public schools.
'States are the laboratories of democracy,' he said.
State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, during the hearing on his Ten Commandments bill, said LB 691 isn't designed to 'force any religion on our students, but instead to expose our students to the very historical wisdom that inspired our founders.'
He alluded to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2019 that allows the Ten Commandments to be displayed publicly because of historical significance.
'Under that context, perhaps it would be good for our courts to reexamine the topic,' Murman said during the bill's hearing in the Education Committee last month.
The Cornhusker State is one of 15 states nationally where lawmakers introduced legislation this year requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. The Nebraska bill is modeled after a recent Louisiana law, which went into effect this year. It's currently blocked in five K-12 school districts because of litigation challenging its constitutionality.
Louisiana became the first state to add such a requirement in four decades since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that Kentucky's law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools was unconstitutional. Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers joined a handful of other state AGs in a brief defending the Louisiana Ten Commandments law in federal court.
Proposed religious-related school laws LB 691, by State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, requires displaying the Ten Commandments in every Nebraska elementary school classroom and in every middle or high school building.
LB 122, by State Sen. Glen Meyer of Pender, requires display of the state and national motto, 'In God We Trust,' in prominent areas in schools.
LB 549, by State Sen. Loren Lippincott of Central City, allows school districts to employ unlicensed religious chaplains to counsel students.
LB 550, by Lippincott, requires school districts to adopt a policy that excuses students from school to attend religious instruction during the school day.
David Barton, a Texas-based evangelical activist who has spent four decades advocating that church-state separation is a 'myth, ' testified in favor of the Ten Commandments bill in Nebraska late last month. Barton also pointed to the shift in the nation's highest court, saying the 'hostility is gone.'
In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Washington state public school football coach who prayed with his team on the 50-yard line. Many on the religious right see that case as an opening that signals the legal landscape is more favorable to religious-themed laws.
The opinion signals that the court is moving away from the 'Lemon Test' to determine whether the government allows religion in public spaces. The test consists of three parts: The government's primary purpose must be secular. The government's actions must not promote or inhibit religion. And the government's actions must not create excessive entanglement with religion.
ACLU Nebraska testified against the Nebraska proposal, arguing that Nebraska's Ten Commandments bill is 'blatantly unconstitutional' and that the Louisiana law it's modeled after 'violates the establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment.'
'If LB 691 is enacted, it will announce that the state has a favored brand of Christianity and marginalize those who do not subscribe to it,' said Dylan Severino, ACLU Nebraska's Policy Counsel.
Severino added that Nebraska schools serve students of all faiths and those with none, and their families should feel welcome in their schools.
Tim Royers, The President of the Nebraska State Education Association, the state teachers' union, told the Examiner that public schools can 'promote religious liberty and religious literacy as two fundamental competencies for citizenship' but must work within the framework provided by the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
'Finding common ground regarding religion is a centuries-old issue in America,' Royer said. 'And the battleground shouldn't be in our public schools.'
Mueller, the UNL religious studies professor, said the culture war fight over the Ten Commandments in classrooms is a 'very American fight' and isn't new, but that the 'super Catholic majority' on the U.S. Supreme Court makes some on the religious right eager to face lawsuits because they feel the court is now on their side. The Supreme Court now has a 6-3 conservative majority, with three members appointed during the first Trump administration.
At the end of the hearing on his Ten Commandments bill, Murman echoed Barton's view on the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prevents the government from creating a state religion. Murman argued that too many people have misunderstood the Founding Fathers' 'wall of separation.'
'That document was Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist … was to keep government out of religion, instead of religion out of government,' he said. 'In other words, there shouldn't be an established religion by the government, but the Founding Fathers definitely supported it, and the historical record shows that religion and the Ten Commandments are a big part of the history of the United States.'
Many historians and scholars have sneered at or debunked Barton's interpretation. But it still has significant influence in conservative circles. Mueller said that while it's true that 'the wall' isn't directly in the Constitution, some lawmakers' arguments lack context.
Thomas Jefferson's interpretation was before the Supreme Court became the arbiter of the Constitution, Mueller said. While 'originalists' like former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and current Justice Clarence Thomas claim they're returning to the Constitution's original language, it's still an interpretation.
'Like all documents, whether it's the Bible, the Declaration of Independence [or] the Constitution, we have the text itself,' Mueller said. 'And then we have histories of interpretation.'
State Sen. Loren Lippincott of Central City is behind the proposed law allowing students to be excused for religious instruction and coursework, LB 550. He says the bill would 'empower parents by giving them a stronger voice in their children's education.'
'We aim to support families who seek religious education with their children while strengthening character education in our public schools, fostering a well-rounded and inclusive learning environment for every student,' Lippincott said.
He proposed a similar bill during the last legislative session, but it was indefinitely postponed, essentially stalled for the year. Lippincott said the difference with his bill this year is that it would cost school districts nothing and that all religious studies would be conducted off school grounds.
Meyer, during his hearing for LB 122, the 'In God We Trust' bill, said, 'What I'm trying to accomplish is to have a real first step to realizing what we stand for in this country.'
Mueller said simply displaying the Ten Commandments or the trust motto in classrooms and schools wouldn't lead to more productive classrooms and students.
'If they feel so inclined to place something, a statement of values in the classroom, I would encourage, why not the Bill of Rights?' Mueller asked.
Lippincott said he filed his other bill, allowing schools to employ chaplains in a role similar to counselors, to support children in schools. The proposed law's language states hiring a chaplain is not an endorsement of a specific religion by the school.
During previous attempts to pass similar legislation, he said it would help Nebraska schools facing staff shortages, while some opponents said it was another way to insert religion into public schools.
One state that has already taken some of the steps Nebraska's GOP-dominated, officially nonpartisan Legislature has been considering is Texas. The Lone Star State recently passed legislation that allows chaplains and requires 'In God We Trust' signs in schools. Some Texas Republicans have called their 2025 legislative session a 'spiritual war.'
The Nebraska Republican Party platform and constitution don't specifically mention the Ten Commandments. The state GOP's legislative plan for this session mentions God, but only referring to 'God-given talent,' 'God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,' and calling for an end to 'the legal ability for [Nebraska Natural Resource Districts] to try and play 'God' and attempt to modify the weather.'
Nebraska GOP Chairman Eric Underwood said that while the religion in schools bills are not explicitly referenced in the state party's 2025 plan, he pointed to Article I of the party constitution, which mentions 'the furtherance of our Principles.'
'Which could be defined as our faith-based principles and included through our education systems,' Underwood said.
The education section of the GOP platform also says, 'We believe moral training based on principles established by God, under whom we profess to be a nation, should be returned to its proper and traditional place in the public schools.'
It also says, 'Mindful of our religious diversity, we reaffirm our commitment to the freedoms of religion and speech guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. We firmly support the rights of all citizens to openly practice the same, including the rights of individuals to engage in voluntary prayer in schools or in any other public institution.'
Underwood added that the party supports the Meyer bill requiring 'In God We Trust' in schools. Gov. Jim Pillen has said in the past that Catholics and Christians should 'have more courage' to stand up for Christian values in the state.
Nebraska Democratic Party Chair Jane Kleeb said, 'Our country was founded on a separation of church and state, [and] the Democratic Party believes in that fundamental principle.'
The Education Committee could decide the fate of each bill this week. Mueller said that when it comes to religion in government, America is a paradox.
'America was founded as a Christian nation, as a Protestant Christian nation that favors Protestant Christians,' Mueller said. 'At the same time, America is an experiment … can we all participate equally in democratic institutions and society at large?'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
CONTACT US
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls
Out of all 50 states, President Donald Trump is the least popular in Vermont, a new poll reveals. According to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters, Trump has the lowest approval rating in the country in Vermont. There, he has a net approval rating of -32, with 64% disapproving of his job performance. This aligns with polls taken earlier this year, too: a University of New Hampshire Survey Center poll conducted in June found Trump's net approval in Vermont at -41. Trump isn't popular in any of the New England states: the poll found Massachusetts was tied with Maryland for the second lowest net approval nationally with -26. Trump saw his highest approval in New England in Maine: -14. What is Trump's approval rating in New England? According to Morning Consult, this is Trump's net approval rating in each New England state: Connecticut: -19 Maine: -14 Massachusetts: -26 New Hampshire: -16 Rhode Island: -21 Vermont: -32 Where is Trump the most popular? Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states, according to Morning Consult. The poll found him to be most popular in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance. What is Trump's approval rating overall? An average of recent polls from the New York Times shows that Trump's approval rating as of Aug. 14 is 44%, with 53% disapproving of his performance. This average has remained largely steady over the past month, but some individual polls have shown his support dropping to near-record lows as voters seem frustrated with Trump's August tariffs and his sweeping budget bill passed in early July. What is Trump's current presidential approval rating?Disapprove +22 (38% approve, 60% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 4-10 3,505 registered votersDisapprove +12 (42% approve, 54% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 9-11 1,635 adults Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies Disapprove +5 (46% approve, 51% disapprove) Poll taken July 29 – Aug. 3 1,000 adultsDisapprove +16 (40% approve, 56% disapprove) Poll taken July 25-27 1,023 adults1,400 registered voters Disapprove +1 (46% approve, 47% disapprove) Poll taken July 21-22 Contributing: Kinsey Crowley This article originally appeared on Burlington Free Press: Trump's approval rating is lowest in Vermont, poll says


New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
DC sues to block Trump's ‘unlawful' takeover of police department as crackdown intensifies
The nation's capital sued to block President Donald Trump's takeover of its police department in court on Friday, hours after his administration escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department. District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb sought an emergency restraining order in the federal court lawsuit, which argues the Trump administration is going far beyond the president's legal powers. 'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call D.C. home. This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it,' Schwalb said. 5 The nation's capital sued to block President Trump's takeover of its police department in court on Friday. AP The lawsuit comes after Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi said Thursday night that Drug Enforcement Administration boss Terry Cole will assume 'powers and duties vested in the District of Columbia Chief of Police.' The Metropolitan Police Department 'must receive approval from Commissioner Cole' before issuing any orders, Bondi said. It was unclear where the move left the city's current police chief, Pamela Smith, who works for the mayor. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser pushed back, writing on social media that 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.' The Justice Department declined to comment on the district's lawsuit, and a White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. Chief had agreed to share immigration information Schwalb had said late Thursday that Bondi's directive was 'unlawful,' arguing it could not be followed by the city's police force. 5 The lawsuit comes after AG Pam Bondi said Thursday night that DEA boss Terry Cole will assume 'powers and duties vested in the District of Columbia Chief of Police.' He wrote in a memo to Smith that 'members of MPD must continue to follow your orders and not the orders of any official not appointed by the Mayor,' setting up the legal clash between the heavily Democratic district and the Republican administration. The D.C. attorney general is an elected position that is the city's top legal officer and is separate from Washington's federal U.S. attorney, which is appointed by the president. The U.S. attorney general is also appointed by the president and not elected. 5 Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith speaks on Trump's plan to place Washington police under federal control and deploy National Guard troops, on Aug. 11, 2025. AP Bondi's directive came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's directive because it allowed for continued enforcement of 'sanctuary policies,' which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Bondi said she was rescinding that order as well as other MPD policies limiting inquiries into immigration status and preventing arrests based solely on federal immigration warrants. All new directives must now receive approval from Cole, the attorney general said. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the U.S. illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the administration has portrayed. Residents are seeing a significant show of force A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks, and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments, to which was often unclear. Department of Homeland Security police stood outside Nationals Park during a game on Thursday between the Washington Nationals and the Philadelphia Phillies. DEA agents patrolled The Wharf, a popular nightlife area, while Secret Service officers were seen in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood. Bowser, walking a tightrope between the Republican White House and the constituency of her largely Democratic city, was out of town Thursday for a family commitment in Martha's Vineyard but would be back Friday, her office said. 5 Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser (right) wrote on social media that 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.' AP The uptick in visibility of federal forces around the city, including in many high-traffic areas, has been striking to residents going about their lives. Trump has the power to take over federal law enforcement for 30 days before his actions must be reviewed by Congress, though he has said he'll re-evaluate as that deadline approaches. Officers set up a checkpoint in one of D.C.'s popular nightlife areas, drawing protests. Troops were stationed outside the Union Station transportation hub as the 800 Guard members who have been activated by Trump started on missions that include monument security, community safety patrols, and beautification efforts, the Pentagon said. 5 Members of the DEA and police patrol near Nationals Park after a baseball match at the Navy Yard after Trump's announcement of the federal takeover. REUTERS Troops will assist law enforcement in a variety of roles, including traffic control posts and crowd control, National Guard Major Micah Maxwell said. The Guard members have been trained in de-escalation tactics and crowd control equipment, Maxwell said. National Guard troops are a semi-regular presence in D.C., typically being used during mass public events like the annual July 4 celebration. They have regularly been used in the past for crowd control in and around Metro stations.


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Outrage Grows After Meta Admits AI Guidelines Let Chatbots Flirt With Kids
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, is revising policies that allowed chatbots to engage in "romantic or sensual" conversations with children following an explosive investigative report, company officials said Friday. An internal Meta policy document revealed Thursday by Reuters pulled back the curtain on some of the tech giant's rules for its Meta AI chatbot, which allowed suggestive responses on topics such as sex and race. The document, which detailed policies on chatbot behavior, permitted AI to engage a "child in conversations that are romantic or sensual," as well as to generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people," Reuters reported. Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children. Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children. Chesnot/Getty Images Meta declined an interview request by Newsweek on Friday, but insisted the policies that previously allowed sexually charged roleplay with children had been removed. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. "Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed." Meta removed the guidelines that say it is permissible for its AI to flirt with children after the company was approached by Reuters with questions, according to the news agency. Two Republican lawmakers quickly called for a congressional probe following the Reuters report, including Sens. Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn, both Republicans. "So, only after Meta got CAUGHT did it retract portions of its company doc that deemed it 'permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children,'" Hawley wrote Thursday on X. "This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation." Read more Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids Blackburn said the internal documents indicate the need for movement on the Kids Online Safety Act, which would impose more rigid obligations on tech companies to protect minors. The bill has passed the Senate, but remains stalled in the House. "Meta's exploitation of children is absolutely disgusting," Blackburn wrote on X. "This report is only the latest example of why Big Tech cannot be trusted to protect underage users when they have refused to do so time and time again." Senator Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, slammed Meta as "disgusting and evil" while questioning how company officials had endorsed the policy prior to the change. "Meta chat bots that basically hits on kids — f--k that," Schatz wrote on X. "This is disgusting and evil. I cannot understand how anyone with a kid did anything other than freak out when someone said this idea out loud. My head is exploding knowing that multiple people approved this." The internal Meta document obtained by Reuters, titled "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," detailed rules for chatbots that had been approved by the company's legal, public policy and engineering staff, according to the news agency. The document, in excess of 200 pages, defined acceptable chatbot behavior, but acknowledged they didn't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable" outputs, according to the report. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp."It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards stated. The document also suggested guidelines that allowed a chatbot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old boy that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply," but limited more sexually explicit banter. "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')," the guidelines read, according to Reuters. Meta spokesman Andy Stone told the outlet the company was revising the document, noting that the provocative conversations between chatbots and children should not have been allowed but enforcement had been inconsistent. Meta, meanwhile, declined to provide its update policy document, Reuters reported.