Some Nebraska Republicans join national quest to infuse more religion into schools
The top of the Nebraska statehouse and a church cross in the Lincoln skyline on Mar. 5, 2025. (Juan Salinas II/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN – Across the street from the Nebraska State Capitol, a monument to the Ten Commandments stands on the sidewalk outside of St. Mary Catholic Church. Although it's not on Capitol grounds, as in some states, religion still similarly influences the statehouse.
This year, three Nebraska lawmakers have bills that could infuse more religion into public schools and test the legal limits of the separation of church and state. While the bills might not pass during this legislative session, they reflect a push by Republican state lawmakers nationwide, emboldened by President Donald Trump's second term and recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that appear to have altered the legal landscape for religion in education.
The Nebraska proposals include requiring the Ten Commandments and 'In God We Trust' to be displayed in public schools, allowing students to leave during the school day to receive religious instruction and letting schools hire unlicensed religious chaplains to counsel students.
The lawmakers who filed the bills say they aim to restore morality and character among Nebraska students, saying that they believe the nation needs help.
'We have somewhat lost our way on values,' State Sen. Glen Meyer of Pender said during a hearing on his bill requiring schools to display the Eisenhower-era national motto about God and trust, Legislative Bill 122.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Religious Studies Professor Max Mueller said the bills seem to be steps towards re-establishing a Christian dominance in public schools.
'States are the laboratories of democracy,' he said.
State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, during the hearing on his Ten Commandments bill, said LB 691 isn't designed to 'force any religion on our students, but instead to expose our students to the very historical wisdom that inspired our founders.'
He alluded to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2019 that allows the Ten Commandments to be displayed publicly because of historical significance.
'Under that context, perhaps it would be good for our courts to reexamine the topic,' Murman said during the bill's hearing in the Education Committee last month.
The Cornhusker State is one of 15 states nationally where lawmakers introduced legislation this year requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. The Nebraska bill is modeled after a recent Louisiana law, which went into effect this year. It's currently blocked in five K-12 school districts because of litigation challenging its constitutionality.
Louisiana became the first state to add such a requirement in four decades since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that Kentucky's law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools was unconstitutional. Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers joined a handful of other state AGs in a brief defending the Louisiana Ten Commandments law in federal court.
Proposed religious-related school laws LB 691, by State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, requires displaying the Ten Commandments in every Nebraska elementary school classroom and in every middle or high school building.
LB 122, by State Sen. Glen Meyer of Pender, requires display of the state and national motto, 'In God We Trust,' in prominent areas in schools.
LB 549, by State Sen. Loren Lippincott of Central City, allows school districts to employ unlicensed religious chaplains to counsel students.
LB 550, by Lippincott, requires school districts to adopt a policy that excuses students from school to attend religious instruction during the school day.
David Barton, a Texas-based evangelical activist who has spent four decades advocating that church-state separation is a 'myth, ' testified in favor of the Ten Commandments bill in Nebraska late last month. Barton also pointed to the shift in the nation's highest court, saying the 'hostility is gone.'
In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Washington state public school football coach who prayed with his team on the 50-yard line. Many on the religious right see that case as an opening that signals the legal landscape is more favorable to religious-themed laws.
The opinion signals that the court is moving away from the 'Lemon Test' to determine whether the government allows religion in public spaces. The test consists of three parts: The government's primary purpose must be secular. The government's actions must not promote or inhibit religion. And the government's actions must not create excessive entanglement with religion.
ACLU Nebraska testified against the Nebraska proposal, arguing that Nebraska's Ten Commandments bill is 'blatantly unconstitutional' and that the Louisiana law it's modeled after 'violates the establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment.'
'If LB 691 is enacted, it will announce that the state has a favored brand of Christianity and marginalize those who do not subscribe to it,' said Dylan Severino, ACLU Nebraska's Policy Counsel.
Severino added that Nebraska schools serve students of all faiths and those with none, and their families should feel welcome in their schools.
Tim Royers, The President of the Nebraska State Education Association, the state teachers' union, told the Examiner that public schools can 'promote religious liberty and religious literacy as two fundamental competencies for citizenship' but must work within the framework provided by the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
'Finding common ground regarding religion is a centuries-old issue in America,' Royer said. 'And the battleground shouldn't be in our public schools.'
Mueller, the UNL religious studies professor, said the culture war fight over the Ten Commandments in classrooms is a 'very American fight' and isn't new, but that the 'super Catholic majority' on the U.S. Supreme Court makes some on the religious right eager to face lawsuits because they feel the court is now on their side. The Supreme Court now has a 6-3 conservative majority, with three members appointed during the first Trump administration.
At the end of the hearing on his Ten Commandments bill, Murman echoed Barton's view on the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prevents the government from creating a state religion. Murman argued that too many people have misunderstood the Founding Fathers' 'wall of separation.'
'That document was Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist … was to keep government out of religion, instead of religion out of government,' he said. 'In other words, there shouldn't be an established religion by the government, but the Founding Fathers definitely supported it, and the historical record shows that religion and the Ten Commandments are a big part of the history of the United States.'
Many historians and scholars have sneered at or debunked Barton's interpretation. But it still has significant influence in conservative circles. Mueller said that while it's true that 'the wall' isn't directly in the Constitution, some lawmakers' arguments lack context.
Thomas Jefferson's interpretation was before the Supreme Court became the arbiter of the Constitution, Mueller said. While 'originalists' like former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and current Justice Clarence Thomas claim they're returning to the Constitution's original language, it's still an interpretation.
'Like all documents, whether it's the Bible, the Declaration of Independence [or] the Constitution, we have the text itself,' Mueller said. 'And then we have histories of interpretation.'
State Sen. Loren Lippincott of Central City is behind the proposed law allowing students to be excused for religious instruction and coursework, LB 550. He says the bill would 'empower parents by giving them a stronger voice in their children's education.'
'We aim to support families who seek religious education with their children while strengthening character education in our public schools, fostering a well-rounded and inclusive learning environment for every student,' Lippincott said.
He proposed a similar bill during the last legislative session, but it was indefinitely postponed, essentially stalled for the year. Lippincott said the difference with his bill this year is that it would cost school districts nothing and that all religious studies would be conducted off school grounds.
Meyer, during his hearing for LB 122, the 'In God We Trust' bill, said, 'What I'm trying to accomplish is to have a real first step to realizing what we stand for in this country.'
Mueller said simply displaying the Ten Commandments or the trust motto in classrooms and schools wouldn't lead to more productive classrooms and students.
'If they feel so inclined to place something, a statement of values in the classroom, I would encourage, why not the Bill of Rights?' Mueller asked.
Lippincott said he filed his other bill, allowing schools to employ chaplains in a role similar to counselors, to support children in schools. The proposed law's language states hiring a chaplain is not an endorsement of a specific religion by the school.
During previous attempts to pass similar legislation, he said it would help Nebraska schools facing staff shortages, while some opponents said it was another way to insert religion into public schools.
One state that has already taken some of the steps Nebraska's GOP-dominated, officially nonpartisan Legislature has been considering is Texas. The Lone Star State recently passed legislation that allows chaplains and requires 'In God We Trust' signs in schools. Some Texas Republicans have called their 2025 legislative session a 'spiritual war.'
The Nebraska Republican Party platform and constitution don't specifically mention the Ten Commandments. The state GOP's legislative plan for this session mentions God, but only referring to 'God-given talent,' 'God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,' and calling for an end to 'the legal ability for [Nebraska Natural Resource Districts] to try and play 'God' and attempt to modify the weather.'
Nebraska GOP Chairman Eric Underwood said that while the religion in schools bills are not explicitly referenced in the state party's 2025 plan, he pointed to Article I of the party constitution, which mentions 'the furtherance of our Principles.'
'Which could be defined as our faith-based principles and included through our education systems,' Underwood said.
The education section of the GOP platform also says, 'We believe moral training based on principles established by God, under whom we profess to be a nation, should be returned to its proper and traditional place in the public schools.'
It also says, 'Mindful of our religious diversity, we reaffirm our commitment to the freedoms of religion and speech guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. We firmly support the rights of all citizens to openly practice the same, including the rights of individuals to engage in voluntary prayer in schools or in any other public institution.'
Underwood added that the party supports the Meyer bill requiring 'In God We Trust' in schools. Gov. Jim Pillen has said in the past that Catholics and Christians should 'have more courage' to stand up for Christian values in the state.
Nebraska Democratic Party Chair Jane Kleeb said, 'Our country was founded on a separation of church and state, [and] the Democratic Party believes in that fundamental principle.'
The Education Committee could decide the fate of each bill this week. Mueller said that when it comes to religion in government, America is a paradox.
'America was founded as a Christian nation, as a Protestant Christian nation that favors Protestant Christians,' Mueller said. 'At the same time, America is an experiment … can we all participate equally in democratic institutions and society at large?'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
CONTACT US
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bold move to keep Americans safe from ‘terrorists' is basis for US travel ban for some African nations
President Donald Trump's restrictions on travel from 10 African countries are being praised by analysts for improving U.S. security internationally and domestically. The president said on X the travel ban was being introduced after a terror attack against a pro-Israel group advocating for Hamas to release Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colorado, last weekend, allegedly by an Egyptian man who had overstayed his visa. In a White House fact sheet, Trump said, "We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country." Suspect In Boulder Terror Attack Determined To Be Egyptian Man In Us Illegally: Fbi This point was backed by the State Department's principal deputy spokesperson, Tommy Pigott. In a briefing Thursday, Pigott said, "This is a national security imperative". But observers believe there is an external, international reason. Read On The Fox News App "Most, if not all, of the African countries were added to this list either because of extreme instability and thus terrorist havens or because relations between them and the U.S. is either extremely poor or non-existent," Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and editor of FDD's Long War Journal, told Fox News Digital. "For instance, the U.S. has been historically hard on Eritrea for its human rights abuses and also alleged support for terrorism. While in Chad, its military regime kicked the U.S. military out of its territory last year, further hurting the U.S. military posture in Africa." Trump Bans Travel To Us From Several Countries To Block 'Dangerous Foreign Actors' Some of the restricted African countries listed below pose significant potential security concerns for the U.S. The world's two principal Islamist terror groups, ISIS and al Qaeda, represented here by Al-Shabaab, both operate openly in Somalia. The White House described it this week as "a terrorist safe haven." A briefing note accompanying the travel ban declared, "A persistent terrorist threat emanates from Somalia's territory. Somalia also remains a destination for individuals attempting to join terrorist groups that threaten the national security of the United States." The U.S. Africa Command mounted five air attacks against operators from both groups in just the 12 days up to June 2. Fighting and subsequent piles of bodies in the streets have been reported in the past month in Tripoli, the Libyan capital. The U.N.'s Support Mission in Libya recently posted on X that the situation could "spiral out of control." "The historical terrorist presence within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals," the White House note states, adding U.S. border officials can't properly vet Libyans because "there is no competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents in Libya." The U.S. has already imposed sanctions against the leaders of both parties involved in a two-year civil war that has reportedly killed 150,000 and displaced 12 million. The U.S. claims up to 28% of Sudanese overstay their visas. The criminal records of Eritreans are not available for inspection by U.S. officials. With an overstay rate of up to 55%, the White House also reported that "Eritrea has historically refused to accept back its removable nationals." Critics Have Meltdown And Accuse Trump Of Imposing Renewed 'Muslim Ban' Through 'Disgusting' Travel Order The West African country is causing concern in Washington as it deepens relations with Russia. Chad President Idriss Deby went to Moscow last year for talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Kremlin Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov was then warmly welcomed in Chad's capital, N'Djamena, for a reciprocal visit. Russia's shadowy Wagner private mercenary group's importance in the country is being questioned after three of its members were arrested in September and sent back to Moscow. Banning nationals this week, the U.S. said Chad has had a visa overstay rate of up to 55%. In Chad, President Deby responded by saying, "I have instructed the government to act in accordance with the principles of reciprocity and suspend the issuance of visas to U.S. citizens." People from this West African country have reportedly overstayed their F, M and J visas by up to 70%. Depending on the visa category, up to 35% of citizens in the U.S. are reported to have overstayed their visas. Overstaying is the main issue for the other African countries whose nationals are partially restricted and now have only limited entry into the U.S. Has an overstay rate of up to 35%, and, the White House says, "has historically failed to accept back its removable nationals." Togo suffers from poor governance, nepotism and widespread corruption, which reportedly goes all the way to the president's office. Over 50% of the population lives below what's regarded as the international poverty line. Togo's nationals have an overstay rate of up to 35% in the U.S. Burundi vies with South Sudan for the dubious title of poorest country in the world. Yet soaring inflation has caused a devastating rise in food prices. A former rebel group has led the country for two decades in a climate of political unrest and alleged repression. Burundi's citizens have an overstay rate of up to 17% in the article source: Bold move to keep Americans safe from 'terrorists' is basis for US travel ban for some African nations
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.
Donald Trump has repeatedly slammed Joe Biden's use of an autopen during his presidency, going so far as to center its usage in a broad investigation Trump announced Wednesday into his predecessor. But politicians on both sides of the aisle are deeply familiar with the tool. The autopen — also referred to as the robot pen — replicates an individual's signature using a writing utensil, rather than a scanned and printed version of it. The tool, which resembles a small printer with a long arm that allows users to attach a pen to the center, has a long history of use in American politics. The device was first patented in 1803, according to the Shapell Manuscript Foundation, an independent research organization that collects original manuscripts and historical documents. Iterations of the autopen have been used by presidents as far back as Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that 'I could not, now therefore, live without' the device he used to duplicate letters. 'The Autopen has long been a tool for the world's most influential leaders, allowing them to more effectively apply their time and attention to important issues without compromising the impact of personalized correspondence," according to The Autopen Co., which sells the machines. U.S. leaders on both sides of the aisle have used the autopen for decades — and have faced criticism for their use of the tool. During Lyndon Johnson's administration, the autopen was featured in The National Enquirer for an article headlined 'One of the Best Kept Secrets in Washington: The Robot That Sits In For The President.' Even Trump himself has said he used autopens, but 'only for very unimportant papers.' 'We may use it, as an example, to send some young person a letter because it's nice,' Trump said in March, according to The Associated Press. 'You know, we get thousands and thousands of letters, letters of support for young people, from people that aren't feeling well, etcetera. But to sign pardons and all of the things that he signed with an autopen is disgraceful.' In 2004, George W. Bush's secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, faced criticism from some veterans for using an autopen to sign condolence letters to families of troops killed in the Iraq War. In 2011, Barack Obama used an autopen to sign a Patriot Act extension — becoming the first known, apparent use of the tool by a president for legislation — and used it subsequently in his administration. The move resulted in Republicans questioning the constitutionality of Obama's decision, though Bush's Office of Legal Counsel, which is part of the Department of Justice, had already concluded the use of autopens was constitutional. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law,' the office's 2005 ruling stated. "Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' There is no specific law governing a president's use of an autopen. But the ruling from the Department of Justice hasn't stopped Trump from accusing Biden and his team of illegally using the tool, alleging that Biden's team used an autopen to sign documents without Biden's permission or knowledge. Trump has also claimed that Biden's round of pardons — including 'preemptive pardons' of Jan. 6 investigators, his son Hunter Biden and Anthony Fauci — were illegal and are 'void' and 'vacant.' However, most legal scholars are in agreement that pardons cannot be overturned once granted. In 1869, a federal court ruled, 'The law undoubtedly is, that when a pardon is complete, there is no power to revoke it, any more than there is power to revoke any other completed act.' Biden has denied the claims that any decision was ever made or issued in his name without his approval or knowledge. Trump and other Republican accusers have provided no evidence that aides used an autopen without the former president's approval. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency,' Biden told POLITICO in a statement. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false. This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.'


Chicago Tribune
29 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump deploys California National Guard to LA to quell protests despite the governor's objections
PARAMOUNT, Calif. — President Donald Trump is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom after a second day of clashes between hundreds of protesters and federal immigration authorities in riot gear. Confrontations broke out on Saturday near a Home Depot in the heavily Latino city of Paramount, south of Los Angeles, where federal agents were staging at a Department of Homeland Security office nearby. Agents unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls, and protesters hurled rocks and cement at Border Patrol vehicles. Smoke wafted from small piles of burning refuse in the streets. Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, including in LA's fashion district and at a Home Depot, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement. The White House announced that Trump would deploy the Guard to 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.' It wasn't clear when the troops would arrive. Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post on the social platform X that it was 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' He later said the federal government wants a spectacle and urged people not to give them one by becoming violent. In a signal of the administration's aggressive approach, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to deploy the U.S. military. 'If violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,' Hegseth said on X. Trump's order came after clashes in Paramount and neighboring Compton, where a car was set on fire. Protests continued into the evening in Paramount, with several hundred demonstrators gathered near a doughnut shop, and authorities holding up barbed wire to keep the crowd back. Crowds also gathered again outside federal buildings in downtown Los Angeles, including a detention center, where local police declared an unlawful assembly and began to arrest people. Earlier in Paramount, immigration officers faced off with demonstrators at the entrance to a business park, across from the back of a Home Depot. They set off fireworks and pulled shopping carts into the street, broke up cinder blocks and pelted a procession of Border Patrol vans as they departed and careened down a boulevard. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said federal agents made more arrests of people with deportation orders on Saturday, but none at the Home Depot. The Department of Homeland Security has a building next door and agents were staging there as they prepared to carry out operations, he said on Fox11 Los Angeles. He didn't say how many people were arrested Saturday or where. Paramount Mayor Peggy Lemons told multiple news outlets that community members showed up in response because people are fearful about activity by immigration agents. 'When you handle things the way that this appears to be handled, it's not a surprise that chaos would follow,' Lemons said. Some demonstrators jeered at officers while recording the events on smartphones. 'ICE out of Paramount. We see you for what you are,' a woman said through a megaphone. 'You are not welcome here.' More than a dozen people were arrested and accused of impeding immigration agents, Essayli posted on X, including the names and mug shots of some of those arrested. He didn't say where they were protesting. Trump federalized part of California's National Guard under what is known as Title 10 authority, which places him, not the governor, atop the chain of command, according to Newsom's office. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that the work the immigration authorities were doing when met with protests is 'essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens.' The president's move came shortly after he issued a threat on his social media network saying that if Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass did not 'do their jobs,' then 'the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump signed the order shortly before he went to attend a UFC fight in New Jersey, where he sat ringside with boxer Mike Tyson. Newsom said in his statement that local authorities 'are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice,' and 'there is currently no unmet need.' The California Highway Patrol said Newsom directed it to deploy additional officers to 'maintain public safety.' 'Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable,' Bass said in a statement early Sunday. She said she had spoken with members of the Trump administration and insisted that she and Newsom were in control and there was no need for the National Guard to be deployed. In 2020, Trump asked governors of several states to deploy their National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to quell protests after George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police. Many agreed and sent troops. Trump also threatened at the time to invoke the Insurrection Act for those protests — an intervention rarely seen in modern American history. But then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper pushed back, saying the law should be invoked 'only in the most urgent and dire of situations.' George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. Trump did not invoke the act during his first term, and he did not do so Saturday, according to Leavitt and Newsom. Protests kicked off a day earlier in Los Angeles after federal authorities arrested 44 people for violating immigration law Friday. DHS later said recent ICE operations in Los Angeles resulted in the arrest of 118 immigrants, including five people linked to criminal organizations and people with prior criminal histories. David Huerta, regional president of the Service Employees International Union, was also arrested Friday while protesting. The Justice Department confirmed that he was being held Saturday at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles ahead of a scheduled Monday court appearance. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called for his immediate release, warning of a 'disturbing pattern of arresting and detaining American citizens for exercising their right to free speech.'