logo
How AI Assessment Tools Affect Job Candidates' Behavior

How AI Assessment Tools Affect Job Candidates' Behavior

According to the World Economic Forum, more than 90% of employers use automated systems to filter or rank job applications, and 88% of companies already employ some form of AI for initial candidate screening. Take Unilever, for example. The consumer goods giant uses AI-driven tools from HireVue to assess early-career applicants, saving 50,000 hours and more than $1 million in the process.
Most companies, when considering AI assessment tools, focus on the gains the tools bring in terms of efficiency and quality. But what they don't factor in is how AI assessment may change candidates' behavior during the assessment. Our new research, examining over 13,000 participants across 12 studies, reveals that this is a crucial blind spot. We looked at simulation of a variety of assessment situations in both the laboratory and the field, and we collaborated with a startup platform offering game-based hiring solutions called Equalture.
The results show that job candidates consistently emphasized analytical traits when they believed AI was evaluating them, while downplaying the very human qualities—empathy, creativity, intuition—that often distinguish outstanding employees from merely competent ones. This drove candidates to present a different and potentially more homogeneous version of themselves, in turn affecting who was likely to succeed in an AI-enabled hiring process, with implications for organizations using AI in hiring, promotions, or admission decisions.
Why This Matters for Your Organization
The implications of our findings extend beyond individual hiring decisions. When candidates systematically misrepresent themselves, organizations face several critical challenges:
Talent pool distortion: While AI is sometimes blamed for making biased hiring decisions (for example, discriminating against women in the selection process), our research suggests that knowing that one is assessed by AI also biases candidates, making them believe that they should prioritize their analytical capabilities. As a result, companies may be screening out exactly the candidates they need simply by using AI: that innovative thinker or emotionally intelligent leader you're looking for might present themselves as a rule-following analyst because they believe that is what the AI wants to see.
Validity compromise: Assessment tools are only as good as the data they collect. When candidates strategically alter their responses, the fundamental validity of the assessment process might be undermined. Organizations may no longer measure authentic capabilities—instead, they may measure what candidates think AI will value the most.
Unintended homogenization: If most candidates believe AI favors analytical traits, the talent pipeline may become increasingly uniform, potentially undermining diversity initiatives and limiting the range of perspectives in organizations. Companies like IBM and Hilton, which integrate AI into both hiring and internal promotion systems, must now contend with whether such tools nudge employees toward formulaic self-presentation.
New transparency regulations like the EU's AI Act, which require organizations to disclose AI use in high-stakes decisions, make these outcomes all the more likely. When candidates are aware that an AI is assessing them, they are more likely to change their behavior.
What Leaders Can Do
Based on our findings, organizations can take several concrete steps to address the AI assessment effect:
Radical transparency: Do not just disclose AI assessment—be explicit about what it actually evaluates. Clearly communicate that your AI can and does value diverse traits, including creativity, emotional intelligence, and intuitive problem-solving. This might include providing examples of successful candidates who demonstrated strong intuitive or creative capabilities. Currently, few companies seem to be transparent about what exactly it is that AI assesses—at least this information is not easily accessible when clicking through career page information on the websites of many major companies. That said, applicants discuss and share their intuitions on blogs and videos, which may be counterproductive because it may or may not align with actual practices. We advise companies not to leave their candidates to speculate.
Regular behavioral audits: Implement systematic reviews of your AI assessment outcomes. For instance, New York City has enacted Local Law 144, requiring employers to conduct annual bias audits of AI-based hiring. In response, one of the market leaders in AI-based hiring, HireVue reports their recent audits for race or gender bias across jobs and use cases. In addition to examining biases regarding demographics, we suggest using these audits to look for patterns indicating behavioral adaptation: Are candidates' responses becoming more homogeneous over time? Are you seeing a shift toward analytical presentations at the expense of other valuable traits?
Hybrid assessment: Some organizations combine human and AI assessments. For example, Salesforce notes that besides technology, a human will review applications. Nvidia and Philip Morris International guarantee ultimate assessment and decision-making through a human. One of our studies shows that while this hybrid human assessment does reduce candidates' tendency to highlight analytical capabilities, it does not eliminate it. To close the gap, you need to train your human hirers to compensate for the AI effect.
The Path Forward
As AI becomes increasingly embedded in organizational decision-making, we must recognize that these tools do not just change processes—they change people. The efficiency gains from AI assessment may come at the cost of authentic candidate presentation and, ultimately, the human diversity that makes organizations innovative and resilient. The irony is striking: In our quest to remove human bias from hiring, we may have created a system where AI introduces a new form of bias. The solution is not to abandon AI, but to design assessment systems that account for and counteract these behavioral shifts. Only by keeping humans—not just metrics—at the heart of our assessment strategies can we build hiring systems that truly identify and nurture the diverse talent our organizations need.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palantir vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Stock: Wall Street Says Buy One and Sell the Other
Palantir vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Stock: Wall Street Says Buy One and Sell the Other

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Palantir vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Stock: Wall Street Says Buy One and Sell the Other

Key Points Palantir and TSMC are two of the biggest AI stocks in the market right now. Palantir has been growing rapidly with very strong operating leverage improving its profits. TSMC has seen extremely strong demand, especially for its leading-edge processes for AI chips. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › Businesses are spending more than ever on artificial intelligence (AI). Hyperscalers are building new data centers and outfitting them with the necessary equipment for training and running large language models. On top of that, practically every business in the world is looking at how to integrate AI into its operations to improve workforce productivity and expand its addressable markets. Two companies have recently seen their stock prices head higher on optimism about the future growth in AI spending. Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) shares are up 93% from their April low, as of this writing. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) is up 67% in that same period. But after their stellar runs over the last three months or so, Wall Street has differing opinions on the two stocks. One is still a buy at its current price, but the other is a sell based on median price targets from analysts. Considering analysts are generally a bullish bunch, a median price target below the current price of a stock is typically a bad sign. Palantir has a median price target of $110 per share based on 27 analyst ratings. That implies a downside of 26% from its price as of this writing. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a median price target of $275 per share based on 48 analyst ratings. That implies upside of 17% from its price as of this writing. Here's what investors need to know. Palantir: Growing fast and profitable, but 26% downside Palantir is one of the biggest beneficiaries of advancements in AI capabilities over the last 20 years. Its software helps government agencies and enterprises collect and make sense of massive data sets using machine learning algorithms, improving operational efficiency and decision making. With the advent of generative AI, Palantir developed its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), which enables users to interact with its software using natural language and create agents for interacting with data. AIP has helped expand Palantir's use cases and addressable market, making it easier for new users to come on board. As a result, the company has seen its U.S. commercial revenue skyrocket over the last two years. It climbed another 71% year over year in the first quarter. Overall revenue growth came in at 39%. On top of that, Palantir is exhibiting strong operating leverage. By focusing on product improvements and letting the product sell itself, Palantir has seen its adjusted operating margin expand to 44% in the most recent quarter. The future looks bright for Palantir as well. It closed 139 deals worth more than $1 million in the first quarter, which led management to raise its full-year outlook for revenue and operating profits. But investors were ultimately disappointed with management's revised outlook, indicating there are already extremely high expectations for the company based on the stock price. Indeed, Palantir shares currently trade for approximately 90 times expected revenue over the next 12 months. That's not just expensive, that's astronomically pricey. Its forward P/E above 200 makes it, by far, the most expensive stock in the S&P 500. It's no surprise that many analysts expect the stock price to come back down as even a strong performance above analysts' expectations would still mean the stock is expensive. TSMC: An industry giant with huge AI-driven upside Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), is the biggest chip fabricator in the world. It commands about two-thirds of all spending on chip manufacturing, and that share continues to grow larger as demand for high-end AI chips drives the market. TSMC's ability to maintain and grow its massive market share stems from its leading technology. That attracts the biggest customers designing the most advanced chips in the world, including Nvidia and Apple. And with such a huge revenue base relative to other chip manufacturers, it's able to reinvest more in R&D to ensure its technology remains best in class. TSMC's next-generation technology, its 2-nanometer node, is expected to fetch premium prices relative to its current 3-nanometer node. Management is already seeing strong demand for it, expecting "the number of new tape-outs for 2-nanometer technology in the first two years to be higher than both 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer in their first two years." TSMC should be ready to start volume production for that node in the next few months. Demand for high-end chips has exceeded management's expectations, leading it to raise its full-year revenue growth outlook for the business to 30% instead of mid-20%. Moreover, the order volume of its most advanced nodes has also led to higher gross margins, which came in at 58.6% last quarter. With premium pricing planned for the next-generation process, TSMC should be able to maintain those high margins over time. Even after the strong increase in stock price over the last few months based on its terrific operating results, TSMC stock trades for just 24 times forward earnings expectations. With strong revenue growth and its ability to maintain its extremely high gross margin, that may still be a bargain for the stock. Wall Street analysts seem to think so, with all but two analysts giving it a buy or equivalent rating. Should you buy stock in Palantir Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Adam Levy has positions in Apple and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Palantir vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Stock: Wall Street Says Buy One and Sell the Other was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Alphabet Just Gave Nvidia Investors Some Great News
Alphabet Just Gave Nvidia Investors Some Great News

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Alphabet Just Gave Nvidia Investors Some Great News

Key Points Alphabet now expects to lay out $85 billion in capital expenditures this year -- up from a previously planned $75 billion -- and expects to further accelerate that spending next year. Alphabet's AI capex will be allocated toward servers, accelerated data center buildouts, and cloud computing infrastructure. Rising AI infrastructure spending from hyperscalers such as Alphabet bodes well for Nvidia and its thriving GPU business. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Over the next several weeks, companies will report financial and operating results for the second quarter of 2025. As usual, technology investors will be focused on one thing: artificial intelligence (AI). "Magnificent Seven" member Alphabet kicked things off earlier this week, reporting robust results across its search, advertising, and cloud computing divisions. While Alphabet shareholders should be encouraged by the internet giant's strong performance, I saw Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) as the real winner from the company's second-quarter performance. Let's dig into some of the important moves Alphabet is making and assess how Nvidia is benefiting from them. Alphabet is picking up the pace on AI infrastructure construction During the Q2 earnings call, Alphabet's management updated some details of its financial guidance. Alphabet now plans to spend around $85 billion on capital expenditures (capex) in 2025. Of note, this is a $10 billion increase over the company's prior guidance. And there's more. "Looking out to 2026, we expect a further increase in capex due to the demand we're seeing from customers as well as growth opportunities across the company," said Chief Financial Officer Anat Ashkenazi. Despite its increasingly aggressive spending on AI infrastructure over the last few years, Alphabet has stated that it doesn't plan on slowing down anytime soon. This should be music to Nvidia's ears. Why is this good for Nvidia? Management consulting juggernaut McKinsey & Company is forecasting that AI infrastructure spending could reach $6.7 trillion by 2030. And its research suggests that almost half of that money will be allocated toward AI hardware for further data center construction. In addition, research from Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan indicates that generative AI could add between $7 trillion and $10 trillion to global gross domestic product in the long run. From a macroeconomic perspective, these secular trends bode well for Nvidia's compute and networking empire. Moreover, I think that Alphabet's decision to bump up its AI infrastructure spending again adds some credibility to those industry forecasts. Alphabet's management specified that it is raising its planned capex in order to accelerate the construction of data centers and position itself to fill the rising demand for capacity on the Google Cloud Platform. Increased spending on network equipment, servers, and cloud infrastructure should lead to rising demand for graphics processing units (GPUs). I see this as a major positive development as Nvidia is still scaling up production of chips made using its latest Blackwell architecture. Considering Nvidia holds an estimated 90% share of the data center GPU market, I see Alphabet's investments in AI infrastructure as a major tailwind for the chip king and further propels the company's momentum over competition in the chip space. Is Nvidia stock a buy right now? With a market cap north of $4.2 trillion, Nvidia is currently the most valuable company in the world. While this might lead one to assume that the stock is expensive, its underlying valuation trends tell a different story. Nvidia currently trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 40. While this isn't "cheap" by traditional benchmarks, it is notably lower than the peak levels Nvidia has witnessed during the AI revolution. What makes these dynamics interesting is that Nvidia's growth trajectory is arguably far stronger today than it was 18 months ago when its forward P/E valuation peaked. The company remains at the center of the AI revolution, providing massive amounts of fast parallel-processing power to hyperscalers and accelerating AI workloads. To me, buying Nvidia stock at its current price is a no-brainer, and I see Alphabet's rising AI infrastructure spending as a long-term catalyst that should not be overlooked by growth investors. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Goldman Sachs Group, JPMorgan Chase, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Alphabet Just Gave Nvidia Investors Some Great News was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

How AI is changing the way companies listen and build, with Brad Anderson of Qualtrics
How AI is changing the way companies listen and build, with Brad Anderson of Qualtrics

Geek Wire

timean hour ago

  • Geek Wire

How AI is changing the way companies listen and build, with Brad Anderson of Qualtrics

Brad Anderson at Qualtrics Tower in Seattle, where he sat down to talk about AI, product development, and customer experience for a new episode of the GeekWire Podcast. (GeekWire Photo / Todd Bishop) This week on the GeekWire Podcast, my guest is Brad Anderson — an engineering and product leader who spent more than 17 years at Microsoft. For nearly five years, he's been at Qualtrics, the experience management technology company, where he's president of products, user experience, engineering, and security. I've known Brad for a while. In fact I've been a guest on two of his shows back when he was a leader in enterprise mobility and cloud technology at Microsoft, when it was all the rage for executives to have their own video shows. There was 'Lunch Break with Brad Anderson,' where he drove his guests around the streets of Redmond in his Tesla. And there was 'The Ship Room,' where he talked about the cloud transformation and played games with guests, challenging me to distinguish real startups from fake ones. Qualtrics, acquired in a private equity deal in 2023, has dual headquarters in Seattle and Provo, Utah. For this week's show, I went to the Qualtrics Tower in Seattle to talk with Brad about how he thinks about building tech today, and how AI agents are changing the experiences the company creates and measures. He also discussed the importance of security in the AI era. (Qualtrics announced a key security milestone this week.) In the final segment, I turned the tables on Brad with a game about cloud and AI terms called 'Real or Ridiculous' (see below). Listen to the end to play along. But first, he reminded me about the random case of mistaken identity that brought us together in the first place, back in the day. Listen to the episode to hear the story, and continue reading for highlights from his comments, edited for context and clarity. On the unprecedented pace of AI innovation: 'My team sends out a summary of what changed in the last seven days every single Monday to the engineering team, because it's moving that fast. I've never seen anything like that.' How AI is transforming customer feedback: 'Worldwide right now, when someone starts a survey, the completion rate is 75%. … With our Gen AI enabled surveys, what we call conversational feedback, it increases to 83%. … When we ask the follow-up question, we get 30 times the number of words back in the second response. And so with generative AI, we've been able to increase the amount of data coming back by 10%, and double the quality.' On AI's impact on engineering productivity: 'What we're seeing right now is, Cursor is literally generating millions of lines of new code for us. Of course, it's AI generated, human-reviewed, human approved, human corrected. But 45% of all that code that's being generated, we're checking into the product.' The changing shape of engineering organizations: 'I think, as an industry, there will be fewer entry level [positions]. If a typical pyramid for an engineering organization is that 20%, 15% of their engineers are entry level, that probably goes down by 3% to 5% over the next couple years.' On trust as the key to AI success: 'If you ask yourself the question, who are going to be the organizations that are going to thrive in this world of AI, I would argue it's going to be the organizations that business leaders trust.' On using AI to accelerate decision-making: 'I've spent hours and hours inside of ChatGPT just asking questions such as, 'Hey, if you were the president of a 1,500-person organization with revenue in the multiple billions … what would you do if you wanted to significantly increase the capabilities and the skill set of the engineering team in AI? … It may not have all the answers, but boy, it puts things in your mind, it gives you ideas.' And here's the quiz that I gave Brad in the final segment, which I created with help from ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Listen to the show to hear the answers. Real or Ridiculous? Are these cloud and AI buzzwords real industry terms, or just expertly crafted nonsense? Quantum Cloud Orchestration: A system that manages and schedules workloads for quantum computers hosted in the cloud. Federated Learning: A machine learning approach where a shared model is trained across multiple decentralized devices or servers, keeping data local. Cognitive Load Balancing: An advanced load balancing technique that uses AI to predict and distribute network traffic based on the cognitive state of individual users. Serverless AI Inference: Running AI model predictions without managing the underlying servers, scaling automatically based on demand. Hyper-Personalized Edge AI Microservices: A highly granular AI architecture that delivers customized intelligent services directly on edge devices, tailored to individual user preferences in real time. Sentient Cloud Nexus: A fully autonomous cloud infrastructure capable of self-awareness and independent decision-making, optimizing its own operations without human intervention. Emotion-Centric Journey Taxonomy: A proprietary framework for categorizing user sentiment patterns across multi-channel experience touchpoints, enabling micro-adjustments to brand resonance in real time. Real or ridiculous? Listen to the final segment to play along and hear the answers. Subscribe to GeekWire in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. Audio editing by Curt Milton.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store