"Press has to learn to be truthful": US President Trump to sue WSJ for Epstein report
The reaction by Trump was catalysed by a report by the Wall Street Journal that the former sent an alleged letter to Epstein, the contents of which were sexually suggestive.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1946007571984236634
'The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
'President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag' and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant. If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for 'TRUMP' to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!' Trump said.
As per CNN, a collection of letters gifted to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003 included a note bearing Donald Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman, according to a Wall Street Journal report published on Thursday (local time).
Trump in an interview with the Journal on Tuesday denied that he wrote the letter or drew the picture and threatened to sue the newspaper if it published the story, as per CNN.
'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he said, according to the Journal. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.'
Epstein, a financier who socialized with a range of politicians and other powerful figures, was charged in 2019 with sex trafficking minors in Florida and New York. He was later found dead in his jail cell. Medical examiners ruled the death a suicide, but the circumstances have since opened a bag of worms, spinning conspiracy theories, as per CNN. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 minutes ago
- The Star
News Analysis - Philippines gets minor US tariff cut, but defence ties remain intact
MANILA: Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr flew to Washington on Sunday (July 20), hoping to turn warm diplomatic ties with the US into tangible economic gains. But instead of a breakthrough, he is returning to Manila with a modest concession: a 1-percentage point cut in the reciprocal tariff rate on Philippine exports to the US, from 20 per cent to 19 per cent. In exchange, the Philippines agreed to remove tariffs on key American goods, including cars. It was not the outcome Manila had hoped for. The new rate is still higher than the 17 per cent announced in April by US President Donald Trump, and analysts say it spotlights the Philippines' limited bargaining power when dealing with an unpredictable but transactional US partner. Philippine trade negotiators had initially aimed to secure a free trade agreement or a bilateral comprehensive economic partnership deal. 'Well, that's how negotiations go,' Marcos told reporters hours after Trump announced the revised tariff rate on his Truth Social platform. 'When we arrived here in Washington, the tariff rate was 20 per cent... so we tried very hard to see what we can do,' he added, referring to the 1-percentage-point decrease. That cut came at a cost. Marcos confirmed the Philippines would open up previously protected sectors, including car imports from the US. Other American goods set to receive zero tariffs are still being determined. The Philippines also committed to buying more US products such as soya beans, wheat and medication, which Marcos framed as a move to help Filipinos access more affordable essential goods. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on July 23 that the US is set to give the Philippines some US$60 million (S$76 million) in foreign assistance funding to support energy, maritime and economic growth programmes. Rubio said the State Department also plans to work with the US Congress to allocate US$15 million to support investments and job creation along the Luzon Economic Corridor, a trilateral initiative with Japan and the Philippines launched in April 2024 to boost infrastructure and connectivity across Manila and surrounding provinces. Lopsided deal? Still, the asymmetry in the deal is hard to ignore. While Trump praised Marcos as a 'strong negotiator' during their joint press conference ahead of their bilateral meeting, he also quipped that the Philippine President was 'negotiating too tough', hinting that a larger concession had been left on the table. The result, analysts say, was not a clear win for Manila, but a strategic compromise. Dr Aries Arugay, visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore and chairman of the University of the Philippines' Political Science Department, described the outcome as underwhelming. 'We are worse off than the original' position of the Philippines, he told The Straits Times, noting that South-east Asian neighbours like Vietnam and Indonesia had secured steeper tariff reductions from the Trump administration. 'Marcos was really hoping to make economic gains out of this trip. Unfortunately... the general outcome was not really what was expected,' Dr Arugay said. For Washington, success in this negotiation was always going to be measured differently. Trump appeared content with the outcome, and he did not press the Philippines to increase its defence spending, as he has done with other allies. Manila may have accepted the limited economic gain to preserve goodwill with its treaty ally amid rising tensions with Beijing over the South China Sea, said Georgi Engelbrecht, senior analyst for the Philippines at the International Crisis Group. 'I have a feeling (the Marcos government) was also thinking the priority is to keep Trump close to us, and what we can get is what we can get... It's not perfect, but it could have been worse,' Engelbrecht told ST. Strong military ties Still, the Philippines was able to reaffirm its longstanding defence ties with the US, one of the key goals of Marcos' trip. In that sense, both Dr Arugay and Engelbrecht said Marcos achieved what he needed: a reaffirmation of military cooperation with the US, no public scolding from Trump, and enough progress to signal continuity in the alliance – even if it fell short of a clear economic win. Both Trump and Marcos voiced support for a planned US-funded ammunition production and logistics hub in Subic, a former US military base turned freeport zone located north-west of Manila. Touting America's military stockpiles, Trump said the ammunitions hub is 'very important' and part of broader US efforts to bolster its posture in the Indo-Pacific, where Washington is locked in a rivalry for influence with China. Marcos cast the project as part of his administration's 'self-reliant defence programme', aimed at modernising the Armed Forces of the Philippines and reducing dependence on foreign suppliers. 'It will help the Philippine modernisation of the military,' said Dr Arugay, but added that it also 'really reinforces American presence in the country through the EDCA sites'. He was referring to the Filipino military bases that American troops have access to under the Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement. The US initially had access to five bases, but Marcos expanded that to nine in 2023. The proposed ammunition facility, initiated under the Biden administration with bipartisan support in the US Congress, is not without risks. Its location in Subic places it within striking distance of the South China Sea, raising concerns over potential escalation. But Engelbrecht downplayed those fears, saying: 'China's not going to launch a rocket just because of that alone.' What matters more is Philippine control over how such facilities are used, he added. 'These are still Philippine bases. Marcos would still need to green-light any activity that the US wants to do,' Engelbrecht said. Despite failing to get a steeper tariff cut, Marcos was the first South-east Asian leader to meet Trump at the White House since his re-election in 2024. That alone sent a signal that Marcos remains a reliable US partner, said the analysts. Yet the challenge moving forward is clear: The Philippines cannot afford to rely on the US alone. 'The Philippines must hedge and diversify, like Indonesia did with its EU trade deal,' said Engelbrecht. Dr Arugay agreed, saying: 'The Marcos administration should not put all its strategic economic and security eggs in the US basket. We must look for new markets.' - The Straits Times/ANN
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump announces massive Japan trade deal with $550B investment
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump announced a 'massive' trade deal with Japan on Tuesday, marking the fifth agreement secured under his administration's push for '90 deals in 90 days.' The deal includes a $550 billion investment from Japan into the US, with Trump claiming it will create 'hundreds of thousands of jobs.' The agreement comes just days before an August 1 deadline, after which the US threatened to impose higher tariffs on countries failing to negotiate new trade terms. Japan faced potential auto tariff increases from 10% to 25%, but under the new deal, levies on vehicles will drop to 15%. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba confirmed the reduction, which sent shares of major automakers like Toyota and Mitsubishi surging by 14%. The Nikkei index also rose 3.5%. 'We continued negotiations to meet the national interest of both Japan and the United States,' Ishiba said. However, Japan's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa clarified that 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium remain unchanged. Increased defense spending, a key demand from Trump, was also excluded from the agreement. The deal includes expanded US agricultural exports, particularly rice—a sensitive issue in Japan. Ishiba assured that Japan's agricultural sector would not be 'sacrificed,' with additional imports staying within WTO commitments. Business leaders cautiously welcomed the deal, though some demanded more details. Tatsuo Yasunaga of the Japan Foreign Trade Council called it a 'major milestone' but stressed the need for clarity on its full impact. Public reaction in Japan was mixed. 'It's disappointing that Japan cannot act more strongly,' said Naomi Omura, an 80-year-old voter. Meanwhile, Tetsuo Momiyama, 81, criticized Ishiba's leadership, saying, 'It's good timing for him to go.' Reports suggest Ishiba may resign following recent election losses. Trump also announced a smaller tariff reduction for the Philippines, another US ally, but negotiations with China, Canada, Mexico, and the EU remain unresolved. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is set to meet Chinese officials next week in Stockholm. China responded cautiously, with foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun stating, 'China supports equal dialogue to solve trade issues.' - AFP
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
China slams US exit from Unesco, says not a move by a ‘responsible major country'
BEIJING, July 23 — China said it regretted today the United States' decision to withdraw from the UN cultural and education agency Unesco. 'This is not the action that a responsible major country should take,' foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said. 'China has always firmly supported the work of Unesco,' he added. The United States said yesterday it would quit Unesco, best known for establishing world heritage sites, claiming it was biased against Israel and promoted 'divisive' causes. US President Donald Trump also ordered the country's withdrawal from Unesco 2017 during his first term. President Joe Biden later reestablished membership. This latest withdrawal will take effect in December 2026. Since taking office, Trump has indicated he would pull the United States out of several multilateral institutions—including the World Health Organization and the Paris climate agreement—and has launched punishing trade tariffs against allies and foes alike. China, meanwhile, has sought to promote itself as a responsible major power by expressing support for the United Nations and other international bodies. 'This is already the third time that the US has withdrawn from Unesco, and it has long been in arrears with its membership fees,' Guo told reporters Wednesday. 'We call on all countries to reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism and take concrete actions to support the international system with the UN at its core,' he said. — AFP
