The Fed is just as confused as the rest of us
THE most powerful institution in global finance is as completely and utterly confused as the rest of us.
At its policy decision on Wednesday (Jun 18), the US Federal Reserve's rate-setting committee held rates at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent, but Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues essentially acknowledged that they had no idea what would come next.
They couldn't precisely project where US President Donald Trump's tariff rates would end up, much less how they would impact consumer inflation and the labour market. Nor could they confidently handicap jarring changes to immigration and fiscal policies and the evolving war between Israel and Iran. The big risk, of course, is that the uncertainty and indecision will make the Fed late to arrest a potential increase in unemployment.
In the Summary of Economic Projections, the median member of the Federal Open Market Committee pencilled in two rate cuts this year. But that 'base case' constitutes a massive oversimplification of the outlook, and some investors may be underestimating just how fat the tails are in the distribution of potential outcomes, even over just the next three or four months.
Of the 19 respondents, 14 policymakers thought the risks to their inflation forecasts were weighted to the upside — the same number that thought as much about the risks to their unemployment projections. In a nutshell, they don't pretend to know what's coming, but Powell thinks we may find out relatively soon.
At his post-decision press conference, Powell said: 'We feel like we're going to learn a great deal more over the summer on tariffs. We hadn't expected them to show up much by now, and they haven't. And we will see the extent to which they do over coming months. And I think that's going to inform our thinking for one thing. In addition, we'll see how the labour market progresses.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Given all the uncertainty, Powell is right to stay in wait-and-see mode, but he can't linger there too long once the data breaks. Meanwhile, those of us on the sidelines should prepare for the policy outlook to shift quite quickly, potentially as soon as the Fed's Sep 16-17 meeting. Maybe we really will get two rate cuts this year, but it's also perfectly plausible that we'll get 150 basis points worth – or none. It's a great environment for high-stakes gamblers – but not so much for American households.
As Powell alluded to, it's largely trade policy that has put us all in this bind. In recent months, the disinflationary trends in housing and non-housing services have the core personal consumption expenditures deflator – the Fed's preferred inflation gauge – up around 2.6 per cent in May from a year earlier.
That's not at all terrible, and it would probably be poised to converge on the Fed's 2 per cent target if not for Trump's extremely ill-timed and pointless trade wars. Without tariffs, the Fed would probably be cutting right now, providing ballast to a wobbly labour market and a housing market that's already seeing year-over-year price drops in some parts of the country.
Unfortunately, the central bank has to play the hand it's dealt. In the immediate term, we still don't know if companies will pass on higher prices to consumers, accept narrower margins or manage their way to stable prices by laying off parts of their workforce – and maybe it will be a combination of all three. The risks to both the Fed's stable prices and maximum employment mandates are substantial, and that's causing paralysis among policymakers – a weird 'calm before the storm' effect both at the Fed and in financial markets.
But at some point before autumn, we are very likely to see something shatter that calm. An alarming jump in initial jobless claims could lead to rate cuts above and beyond any policymaker's base case. A jarring CPI report or two could keep the Fed on hold for longer and prompt a selloff in bonds. And a jump in realised inflation coupled with signs of unanchored inflation expectations could even put hikes back on the table.
If they're late to mitigate the damage, Fed policymakers can take cover in blaming Trump's self-sabotaging trade policy. But they must prepare to act immediately and convincingly once the signals break in a particular direction. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Singapore stocks sink after Powell signals higher inflation; STI down 0.7%
The downbeat messaging sent the benchmark Straits Times Index (STI) sliding 0.7 per cent or 26.63 points to 3,894.18. PHOTO: ST FILE SINGAPORE – Local shares mirrored falls across global markets on June 19 amid concerns about sticky US inflation and growing unease over the escalating tensions in the Middle East. An air of pessimism set in for the trading day when US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell warned that consumers are expected to face higher prices due to the Trump administration's proposed import tariffs. He also dampened hopes about impending interest rate cuts in coming months. The downbeat messaging sent the benchmark Straits Times Index (STI) sliding 0.7 per cent or 26.63 points to 3,894.18 – its second straight negative session – with losers outpacing gainers 315 to 167 across the broader market on lacklustre trade of 980 million securities worth $933 million. The STI's top performer was conglomerate Jardine Matheson Holdings, up 0.9 per cent to US$46.26, while brewer Thai Beverage led the laggards, falling 3.2 per cent to 45 cents. Red ink also washed over the local banks: DBS fell 0.7 per cent to $43.93; OCBC declined 0.3 per cent to $15.99; and UOB closed 0.3 per cent lower at $34.71. Regional bourses ended mostly lower on the same concerns that were flagged here. Japan's Nikkei 225 fell 1 per cent, Malaysian shares declined 0.7 per cent, the ASX in Australia slipped 0.1 per cent and Hong Kong's Hang Seng tumbled 2 per cent. The Kospi in Seoul managed to buck the trend, adding 0.2 per cent. Wall Street put on modest gains early in the session overnight but those gains were steadily trimmed back, leaving the three key indexes largely unchanged, although there is rising concern surrounding the security of oil supplies if the Middle East conflict affects shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Mr Suan Teck Kin, head of research at UOB Global Economics & Markets Research, said his team is still projecting three 25-basis-point rate cuts in the US – in September, October and December – and two cuts in 2026. THE BUSINESS TIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
International Business Times
9 hours ago
- International Business Times
U.S. Senate Passes Stablecoin Regulation Bill; Major Banks and Companies Explore Launches
The U.S. Senate has passed a bill establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins, transforming what was once a niche area of crypto into a fast-growing sector gaining interest from global corporations. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to hold a stable value—usually pegged 1:1 with the U.S. dollar—and are often used by crypto traders to move funds across tokens. Before becoming law, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives must approve its version of the bill, known as the GENIUS Act, after which it will be sent to President Donald Trump for his signature. Analysts say the bill could be a critical turning point for broader adoption of stablecoins across industries by offering clear legal and regulatory guidance. If enacted, the law would require stablecoins to be backed by liquid assets like U.S. dollars and short-term Treasury bills and mandate monthly public disclosure of reserve compositions by issuers. Here's a summary of leading global firms already active or planning to enter the stablecoin market: MAJOR U.S. BANKS: Top American banks are in early discussions on expanding into crypto, with more support emerging from regulators. However, initial moves will be cautious—limited to pilot projects, partnerships, or selective trading, according to a May Reuters report. Bank of America may launch stablecoins, its CEO Brian Moynihan said this year, while Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick expressed interest in acting as a crypto intermediary. BofA declined to comment, and Morgan Stanley didn't respond to Reuters' inquiries. SOCIETE GENERALE: The French bank revealed in June plans to issue a publicly tradable, dollar-backed stablecoin through its digital asset unit. WALMART AND AMAZON: According to the Wall Street Journal, both U.S. retail giants have looked into issuing their own stablecoins. Walmart told Reuters it isn't piloting any such project and hasn't taken a stance on the GENIUS Act. Amazon has not commented. BANCO SANTANDER SA: The Spanish banking giant is reportedly considering expanding into digital assets, including early-stage plans for a stablecoin, Bloomberg reported in May. Santander did not respond to Reuters for comment. WORLD LIBERTY FINANCIAL: Linked to former President Trump, this crypto initiative launched a dollar-pegged token called USD1 this year, which now has a market cap of about $2.2 billion per CoinGecko data. PAYPAL: In August 2023, PayPal became the first major fintech firm to release a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, integrating crypto into everyday transactions. CIRCLE INTERNET: The newly public firm introduced its USDC stablecoin in 2018. With a market capitalization of approximately $61.5 billion, it's among the top stablecoins globally, per CoinGecko. PAXOS: This crypto-native company issues USDG and USDP, both pegged to the dollar. It also partners with Binance to issue BUSD, widely used in crypto trading. TETHER: The company behind the largest stablecoin globally, Tether issues USDT, which has a market cap exceeding $155 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. It remains pegged to the dollar. MAKERDAO: MakerDAO's DAI stablecoin is the fourth-largest in the world with a value around $5.4 billion, as per CoinMarketCap data.
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
The Fed is just as confused as the rest of us
THE most powerful institution in global finance is as completely and utterly confused as the rest of us. At its policy decision on Wednesday (Jun 18), the US Federal Reserve's rate-setting committee held rates at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent, but Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues essentially acknowledged that they had no idea what would come next. They couldn't precisely project where US President Donald Trump's tariff rates would end up, much less how they would impact consumer inflation and the labour market. Nor could they confidently handicap jarring changes to immigration and fiscal policies and the evolving war between Israel and Iran. The big risk, of course, is that the uncertainty and indecision will make the Fed late to arrest a potential increase in unemployment. In the Summary of Economic Projections, the median member of the Federal Open Market Committee pencilled in two rate cuts this year. But that 'base case' constitutes a massive oversimplification of the outlook, and some investors may be underestimating just how fat the tails are in the distribution of potential outcomes, even over just the next three or four months. Of the 19 respondents, 14 policymakers thought the risks to their inflation forecasts were weighted to the upside — the same number that thought as much about the risks to their unemployment projections. In a nutshell, they don't pretend to know what's coming, but Powell thinks we may find out relatively soon. At his post-decision press conference, Powell said: 'We feel like we're going to learn a great deal more over the summer on tariffs. We hadn't expected them to show up much by now, and they haven't. And we will see the extent to which they do over coming months. And I think that's going to inform our thinking for one thing. In addition, we'll see how the labour market progresses.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Given all the uncertainty, Powell is right to stay in wait-and-see mode, but he can't linger there too long once the data breaks. Meanwhile, those of us on the sidelines should prepare for the policy outlook to shift quite quickly, potentially as soon as the Fed's Sep 16-17 meeting. Maybe we really will get two rate cuts this year, but it's also perfectly plausible that we'll get 150 basis points worth – or none. It's a great environment for high-stakes gamblers – but not so much for American households. As Powell alluded to, it's largely trade policy that has put us all in this bind. In recent months, the disinflationary trends in housing and non-housing services have the core personal consumption expenditures deflator – the Fed's preferred inflation gauge – up around 2.6 per cent in May from a year earlier. That's not at all terrible, and it would probably be poised to converge on the Fed's 2 per cent target if not for Trump's extremely ill-timed and pointless trade wars. Without tariffs, the Fed would probably be cutting right now, providing ballast to a wobbly labour market and a housing market that's already seeing year-over-year price drops in some parts of the country. Unfortunately, the central bank has to play the hand it's dealt. In the immediate term, we still don't know if companies will pass on higher prices to consumers, accept narrower margins or manage their way to stable prices by laying off parts of their workforce – and maybe it will be a combination of all three. The risks to both the Fed's stable prices and maximum employment mandates are substantial, and that's causing paralysis among policymakers – a weird 'calm before the storm' effect both at the Fed and in financial markets. But at some point before autumn, we are very likely to see something shatter that calm. An alarming jump in initial jobless claims could lead to rate cuts above and beyond any policymaker's base case. A jarring CPI report or two could keep the Fed on hold for longer and prompt a selloff in bonds. And a jump in realised inflation coupled with signs of unanchored inflation expectations could even put hikes back on the table. If they're late to mitigate the damage, Fed policymakers can take cover in blaming Trump's self-sabotaging trade policy. But they must prepare to act immediately and convincingly once the signals break in a particular direction. BLOOMBERG
