Detroit man charged in sexual assault of teen girl who fought off attacker
Repairs to Belle Isle fountain; financial impact of tariffs; and more top stories
Repairs to Belle Isle fountain; financial impact of tariffs; and more top stories
Repairs to Belle Isle fountain; financial impact of tariffs; and more top stories
A Detroit man accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in a Macomb County park has been charged.
According to the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office, Abdulnasar Muthana Abdullah Muthana is charged with fourth-degree criminal sexual assault. The charge carries a two-year sentence and mandatory reporting as a tier II offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act.
Macomb County Prosecutor's Office
Muthana was arraigned and received a $50,000 personal bond. He is ordered to have no contact with the minors, possess no gun or drugs, or enter parks where there are children.
Prosecutors say on May 10, 2025, three teens, ages 14 and 15, were at the Lake St. Clair Metropark when Muthana allegedly made sexual gestures at them. Prosecutors say sometime later, Muthana allegedly approached the 15-year-old and assaulted her. The teen kicked Muthana in the groin to get away.
"I commend the bravery of the young victim and survivor of the confrontation. I praise the quick work of law enforcement for apprehending this offender. My office remains dedicated to protecting our children, seeking justice for victims, and holding offenders accountable in a court of law," said Macomb County Prosecutor Peter Lucido in a statement.
A probable cause hearing is scheduled for May 27, and a preliminary exam will be scheduled for a later date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court tosses Mexico's lawsuit against American gun manufacturers
The Supreme Court has made it harder to sue gun manufacturers when their weapons are frequently used in crimes. The justices ruled unanimously Thursday that claims in a lawsuit the Mexican government brought against seven major American gun makers were too tenuous to try to hold the companies liable for guns eventually being used in murders and robberies. Mexico claimed the gun manufacturers knowingly allowed large volumes of weapons to be sold to 'rogue dealers' who were lax in vetting their customers. Often, those guns were then routed to Mexican drug cartels, Mexico said. But the high court, in an opinion by Justice Elena Kagan, said Mexico could not plausibly show that the gun makers 'aided and abetted' illegal retail sales of guns because the weapons first traveled through a network of wholesalers before reaching dealers who might have knowledge that the weapons were likely to be illegally trafficked to Mexico.
Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Rejects Mexico's Lawsuit Against US Gunmakers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a high-profile, multibillion dollar lawsuit filed by the Mexican government that sought to hold American gun manufacturers legally accountable for the rampant cartel violence south of the border. In a decision authored by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court ruled that Mexico's claims were barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)—a 2005 federal statute that largely shields gunmakers and sellers from liability when crimes are committed with their products. This is a breaking news story—more to follow.
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Suit Against U.S. Gunmakers
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the Mexican government cannot sue U.S. gun manufacturers to hold them responsible for violence committed by drug cartels. In a unanimous decision by Justice Elena Kagan, the court held that a lawsuit by the Mexican government was barred by U.S. legislation that insulates gun makers from liability. Mexico, she wrote, had not plausibly argued that American gun manufacturers had aided and abetted in unlawful gun sales to Mexican drug traffickers. Mexico had argued that the gun industry's production and sale of arms in the United States had helped fuel and supply drug cartels, harming the Mexican government. Mexican government lawyers also claimed the companies were aware that some of their guns were illegally trafficked, and that the country should therefore be allowed to sue. During an oral argument in early March, a majority of the justices appeared skeptical that Mexico could prove a direct link between gunmakers and cartel violence. Several justices appeared persuaded that a 2005 law shielding gun makers and distributors from most domestic lawsuits over injuries caused by firearms could also apply to the case brought by the Mexican government. The case began in 2021, when Mexico filed a lawsuit against a number of American gun makers and one distributor, arguing that they shared blame for drug cartel violence. The country asked them for $10 billion in damages. In the lawsuit filed in federal court in Massachusetts, the Mexican government alleged that the gun industry's actions had burdened the nation's police, military and judicial system. Mexico also argued that the U.S. gun industry had been negligent in marketing, distributing and selling high-capacity guns. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
