Family-run Edinburgh dog salon and spa opening new venue bringing 'luxury and love'
Groomingdales will be opening up in Sighthill, with owner Rachel WIlliamson promising 'a space filled with luxury'. Rachel says she's 'loved and adored dogs for as long as she can remember'.
The spa, on Bankhead Avenue, will be 'coming soon' after the space is transformed. Your four-legged friends can get a range of treatments, including a bubble bath and body butter massage, at the new spot.
READ MORE: Edinburgh 'disturbance' sees police swoop on busy street as locals concerned
READ MORE: Elite Edinburgh armed police officer was withdrawn for 'indefensible' conduct
Posting online, Rachel said: "We're thrilled to announce that we've just signed the lease and picked up the keys for our brand new salon in Edinburgh!
"This next chapter means even more pampering, love, and care for your dogs—right here in the heart of the city. Our family-run salon is getting ready to welcome you and your furry friends to a space filled with warmth, luxury, and all the little touches you know and love.
Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
"Stay tuned for updates as we transform our new home into a haven for happy, healthy pups. We can't wait to share every step of this journey with you!
"Thank you for being part of the Groomingdales family. Let the adventure begin!"
After sharing the news online, locals commented with messages of support.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages.
One said: "Here's to the start of something great! Wishing you all the very best Rachel."
Another added: "Amazing news well done Rachel you deserve it your fantastic."
Rachel previously said: "I have loved and adored dogs for as long as I can remember. I grew up around animals but always felt a deep connection and love for dogs. This connection has only deepened since the arrival of my little Shichon, Willo, who I truly adore."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Cruze Says This Is the Only Thing People Don't Like To Buy on Sale — but They Should Anyway
It's very common for people to feel anxious or worried when there is significant economic uncertainty. In 2025, there has been economic turbulence, constant news about tariffs and concerns about inflation. As a result, the stock market has experienced several days with significant dips, most notably in April when ABC News reported the Dow dropped 2,230 points. Rachel Cruze, a bestselling author and a Ramsey personality, recently posted a video on her YouTube channel reassuring those who feel worried during market volatility. She explained that these downturns are actually an opportunity. In fact, she encouraged her listeners to think of a stock market dip as stocks 'going on sale,' noting that savvy investors should take advantage of it. Read Next: Explore More: Cruze reminded her listeners that investing in the stock market is about long-term gains and that it's normal for there to be fluctuations. Here are some more highlights and tips from Cruze's video that can help people feel more confident about investing during challenging times. Being Nervous About Investing Is Normal A recent Gallup poll revealed that 60% of investors are concerned about market volatility. Not only that, but 73% of them believe that the turbulence will continue this year. This shows that many people don't feel confident about the state of the market and that worries about investing are normal. Cruze acknowledged that it's normal to be worried about stock market dips or volatility. 'But remember, investing in the stock market is a long-term strategy … Over time, the American economy still trends upward, okay? Now, again, it's going to take some dips and turns every now and then, but you want to stay put,' she said. Find Out: Think of Historical Returns In her video, Cruze explained that historically, the stock market has returned 11.8% annually. J.P. Morgan Wealth Management reported a similar statistic, noting that over the last eight years, the market has returned over 11%. So for people who are worried about losing money, it helps to know that data shows investing for the long term yields positive results. Although some years will be more volatile, there will also be years when the market does extremely well. Averaged together, over time, research shows investors will see a return on investment provided they are properly diversified. Get Support Cruze encouraged her listeners to consult a financial professional if they have questions. Remember that sensational headlines sell. However, negative news can also cause panic and worry among investors. The reality is that the market will fluctuate over time, and when it drops, it could be a good time to buy. More From GOBankingRates These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs This article originally appeared on Rachel Cruze Says This Is the Only Thing People Don't Like To Buy on Sale — but They Should Anyway
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why Reeves would do best to bank on Bailey
Rachel Reeves is fighting on too many fronts. She remains wedded to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules when even the traditionally hawkish German government is relaxing its budgetary rules to make provision for extra defence spending. Moreover, the chancellor has moved into potentially dangerous territory by antagonising the Bank of England. She is in open conflict with governor Andrew Bailey over her extraordinary scheme to relax the financial regulation that was brought in after the 2007-2009 banking crisis to ringfence retail banking – a service for business and the general public – from the excesses of investment banking. This is all supposed to be in the interests of the faster economic growth on which she has rashly staked her reputation. But the UK's financial sector is quite big enough already. It is there to serve the interests of the wider manufacturing, innovative and service economy, as well as us 'consumers'; it is not supposed to be an object of growth in itself. Bailey is rightly worried about the threat to the financial system of governments playing fast and loose with the rules. The chancellor used to go on about the brief period she spent as a junior Bank of England official, but that hardly bears comparison with Bailey's experience there. After a 40-year career on Threadneedle Street, Bailey knows the City in general – and the banking system in particular – inside out. One of the great governors of the past 40 years was 'Steady' Eddie George (1993 to 2003). Bailey ran George's private office for a time and learned at the feet of the master. Alas, George's successor, Mervyn King, was not as interested in the City as most Bank governors are, and, sadly, the Bank took its eye off the ball in the run-up to the 2007-09 banking crisis. Bailey must be well aware of this. It shows not only in his opposition to Reeves's advocacy of deregulation, but also in a more parochial dispute he is having with the chancellor over the granting of banking licences to Revolut, the challenger fintech firm. Actually the relationship between governments and central banks is a hot topic at present, not least on account of the abuse being levelled at Jay Powell, chair of the United States central bank, the Federal Reserve, by Donald Trump – still president of the US at the time of writing. While Trump does his best to disrupt the trading relationships of the world economy, the Federal Reserve is concerned about the domestic inflationary threat from his tariff policies. Powell has, understandably, been refusing to bow to Trump's repeated requests for the Fed to lower interest rates. The president has called this distinguished central banker a 'numbskull' for doing his job and refusing to kowtow. When the Bank of England was granted operational independence to decide on interest rates policy – by chancellor Gordon Brown and his economic adviser Ed Balls in 1997 – I was concerned about the consequences of transferring such policy decisions from a democratically elected government to non-elected officials. However, I prefer the judgment of Powell to that of Trump; and I prefer the judgment of Bailey to that of Reeves. Both Bailey and his immediate predecessor, Mark Carney, saw through the tissue of lies produced by the Brexiters in the runup to 2016. We are continuing to live with the consequences of Brexit. It is about time that prime minister Keir Starmer and his chancellor woke up to the need to adopt the most obvious growth policy: a return to the customs union and single market. Photograph by Getty
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Millions of drivers denied compensation by Supreme Court car finance ruling
Millions of drivers will miss out on tens of billions in compensation after Britain's highest court rejected claims drivers were mis-sold car loans. The Supreme Court on Friday rejected arguments that customers should have been informed about 'secret' commissions paid to car salesmen when they arranged loans to fund vehicle purchases. Judges overturned earlier rulings that had claimed payments from banks amounted to 'bribes' and salesmen had a 'fiduciary duty' to look out for customers. The Supreme Court decision is a major boost for Rachel Reeves, who had feared that a mass compensation scheme would undermine UK growth. Analysts had estimated the cost of redress schemes for banks could have reached £44bn, putting it on a par with the PPI scandal that cost £50bn. The Chancellor was preparing to push through new laws to protect banks in the event that the Supreme Court ruled against them. A Treasury source said this intervention was now no longer necessary. A Treasury spokesman said: 'We respect this judgment from the Supreme Court and we will now work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers.' The Supreme Court did not hand banks and salesmen a total victory. It upheld one case that argued a car loan had been 'unfair'. However, experts said this judgment was based on the unique circumstances of one particular case. Nicola Pangbourne, a partner at Kennedys law firm, said drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation. 'The court ruled there was an unfair relationship in one case but that was very fact-specific. It's not going to be the same for everybody,' she said. Drivers may still be in line for some compensation from a separate investigation into the car finance market by the City watchdog the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). However, Friday's ruling effectively shields lenders including Lloyds, Barclays and Santander from a wave of claims that they would have struggled to defend. Gary Greenwood, an analyst at Shore Capital, said: 'The worst case scenario is off the table for the banks.' Bank share prices are expected to rise in London when markets open Monday morning. Two million people use car finance loans each year and around eight in ten vehicles sold in Britain are purchased using borrowed money. It is common practice for car salesmen to be paid a commission or a flat fee when arranging a loan for a vehicle purchase. Customers are not always informed how much salesmen are paid under these arrangements. A lower court decision last year ruled that dealers should inform customers about the rate of commissions. This judgment triggered chaos in the car market, amid fears that the way it worked had become illegal overnight. On Friday, Lord Reed, president of the Supreme Court, said that because car dealers were motivated by commercial factors they could not be held liable for failing to disclose commission payments. Reversing the lower court decision, he said the payments could not be classed as 'bribes'. The Finance and Leasing Association, the UK's main trade group which represents dozens of lenders, called it an 'excellent outcome'. Stephen Haddrill, director general, said the decision 'restored certainty and clarity' to the market. 'Cars are an essential part of UK life – and for many people, relying on a car means relying on motor finance,' he said. The FCA, which regulates the sector, is investigating another type of bonus commission, known as a discretionary commission arrangement, which was paid to dealers if they convinced customers to take on more expensive car loans. The regulator said it planned to lay out details of a compensation scheme for drivers who were sold this type of loan on Monday. The Supreme Court disclosed its verdict at 4:35pm on Friday, shortly after the London stock market closed, avoiding significant swings in share prices as investors digested the ruling. 07:18 PM BST Signing off... Thanks for joining us here. That's all for this blog but you can read our article on whether you could you still get compensation here. 07:01 PM BST Motorists warned to 'sit tight' and avoid claims firms Motorists are being urged to 'sit tight' and avoid signing up to potentially costly claims management firms. Paul Barker, editor of Auto Express, said: 'Today's Supreme Court ruling - which found that car finance firms did not unlawfully mis-sell products simply by failing to disclose commissions - narrows the scope for car finance compensation claims, but it doesn't eliminate them entirely. 'Anyone who signed up for a discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) between 2007 and 2021 should still be eligible for compensation; the FCA [Financial Conduct Authority] is expected to set out next steps regarding this ruling in the coming weeks. 'In the meantime, we strongly advise against using claims management firms, which often take a hefty cut of any compensation. 'Instead, there are free tools and official routes available to help you make a claim directly. 'And if the FCA introduces the mooted 'opt-out' scheme, you may not need to do anything at all - your lender will be required to contact you. 'Until then, sit tight, avoid unnecessary fees and keep an eye on updates from the regulator.' 06:34 PM BST Motorist involved in Supreme Court case 'dumbfounded' by ruling One of three drivers involved in a legal row over motor finance compensation has said he is 'dumbfounded' after the Supreme Court ruled that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments. Marcus Johnson, then a factory supervisor, was buying his first car in 2017 and paid £1,650.95 in commission as part of a finance agreement. In October last year, the Court of Appeal ruled that the 35-year-old and two other drivers who had also paid commission as part of car finance agreements before 2021 were entitled to compensation. The court ruled that the motorists were not told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them. The Supreme Court overturned the decision on Friday, but said Mr Johnson should retain his compensation and interest as he was in an 'unfair' relationship with the lender. When asked by he felt about the outcome of the case, Mr Johnson, from Cwmbran in Wales, said: 'It was surprise and sadness, because I was quite confident, just based on how I felt about it, the unfairness of what happened to me. 'I thought people looking at all the information would come to the same conclusion, and I'm just dumbfounded. 'I feel terrible that people won't be able to claim anything like I have.' Mr Johnson said he did not 'disagree with commission' as he understood 'that that is how the market works'. But he said that the ruling 'sounds like it's fine to secretly overcharge customers for commission'. 06:11 PM BST FCA to consider redress scheme for some car finance payments Britain's financial watchdog will this weekend reach a decision on whether to offer a redress scheme for some car finance customers. The Financial Conduct Authority said it would decide before financial markets open on Monday whether to provide some form of remedy to people who took out car finance and paid commission they did not know about. A spokesman for the regulator said: 'We welcome that the Supreme Court has clarified the law and are grateful to the Court for delivering the judgment after the market closed. 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible. 'We will be working through the weekend to analyse the judgment and determine our next steps. 'We said we would set out within six weeks whether we would consult on a redress scheme. But we want to provide clarity as quickly as possible. 'So, we will confirm whether we will consult on a redress scheme before markets open on Monday 4 August. 'Our aims remain to ensure that consumers are fairly compensated and that the motor finance market works well, given around 2 million people rely on it every year to buy a car. 'If we do decide to propose a redress scheme, we'll consult widely. In designing a redress scheme, as we have previously said, we will balance principles including fairness, timeliness, and certainty.' 06:01 PM BST Lawyers ready fresh claims over motor finance debacle Lawyers are readying themselves to file lawsuits against banks after the Supreme Court left the door open for some compensation claims, Louis Goss reports. Lizzy Comley, from law firm Slater and Gordon, said people who took out car loans could still make claims on the basis their agreements were 'unfair' even after the Supreme Court largely ruled in favour of the banks. Ms Comley said: 'Where it was unfair, you can still seek redress for fixed commission.' 'You're going to have to establish that actually there were a number of different factors that made a particular arrangement unfair, and you'll have to do that on a bespoke basis.'Factors that could demonstrate unfairness include the characteristics of the customer and the size of the commissions paid, Ms Comley said. 05:52 PM BST Car finance industry welcomes ruling The UK's main motor finance body has welcomed the Supreme Court ruling, calling it an 'excellent outcome'. The Finance and Leasing Association represents dozens of lenders. Stephen Haddrill, director general, said: 'This judgment is an excellent outcome. It properly reflects the role and responsibilities of dealers, lenders and customers, and it has restored certainty and clarity to the largest point-of-sale consumer credit market in the UK. 'In addition, it has also restored confidence to the sector, confirming that it remains a solid investable option – which in turn means the supply of affordable motor finance will continue for customers. 'Cars are an essential part of UK life – and for many people, relying on a car means relying on motor finance. It's a product that's trusted and valued by our customers – just over 80pc of new cars are bought on finance, as is a large percentage of used cars. 'The FCA now has the legal clarity to continue its work to establish if a redress scheme is needed, and of course the thousands of unfounded complaints submitted to lenders by claimant law firms and CMCs can now be removed from the system.' 05:38 PM BST Car finance claims will not be 'easy win' Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation if they took out a car loan. She said proving customers had an 'unfair' relationship with a bank would prove challenging, not least because they would have to have all the documentation about the loan. 'The court ruled there was an unfair relationship in one case but that was very fact-specific. It's not going to be the same for everybody,' she said. 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through. It will be difficult to find out the details about what commission rates were paid. 'It will not be an easy win.' She said the Supreme Court's decision was 'very good for the banks'. 'It rightly clarifies that there is no fiduciary duty when you are a car dealership. The banks are going to be breathing a sigh of relief,' she said. 05:26 PM BST Could you still get compensation? The court's decision means lenders including Lloyds, Barclays and Santander are likely to be shielded from the majority of claims that would have cost billions of pounds. As things stand following today's decision, far fewer consumers look poised to be eligible for reimbursement. Telegraph Money explains what you should and shouldn't do next... 05:17 PM BST Motorists could get 'automatic' compensation in some cases, Martin Lewis says Some customers who bought cars on finance could be offered 'automatic' compensation by Britain's financial regulators in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling, Martin Lewis has suggested. The personal finance expert said: 'My suspicion is the FCA will within weeks announce consultation on a redress scheme for discretionary commission cases. You may not even have to claim it, could be automatic. 'And with excessive commissions I suspect more guidance will come on that at a similar time. 'If you sign up to a claims firm now, you may have to give it a cut even if it does nothing. So just sit on your hands for now.' The regulator had been looking at bonuses paid to dealerships - known as Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCA) - which were higher if dealers get customers to take out loans at higher interest rates. DCAs were banned by the FCA several years ago but the watchdog is pursuing an investigation into historical deals dating back to 2007. 05:14 PM BST 'Worst case scenario' averted for banks, analysts say Banks appear to have swerved the worst of the financial impact of the car finance scandal after the Supreme Court rejected the majority of claims in a landmark case today. Gary Greenwood, an analyst at Shore Capital, said: 'The broad read across is that the extreme scenario of fiduciary duty and bribery have been rejected - therefore the worst case scenario is off the table for the banks. 'It allows the FCA to come up a redress plan that only punishes those that need to be punished. It's a positive impact for Close Brothers in particular.' Susannah Marsh, a lawyer at Moore Barlow, said: 'This decision prevents what could have been the biggest consumer compensation crisis in UK history after PPI and the Chancellor can now park any plans for retrospective legislative intervention. 'As the threat of billions in industry-wide payouts has been lifted, the financial services sector may breathe a sigh of relief, however this doesn't put a pin in the issue entirely. 'While the Supreme Court ruling might prevent mass litigation, there may still be litigation to come. Ultimately, we're not out of the woods yet. Each case will turn on its facts and there will still be circumstances where a motor broker could be found to owe fiduciary duties.' 05:08 PM BST 'Excessive' claims could still come to court, says Martin Lewis Customers who were mis-sold car loans and charged 'excessive' commission could still bring claims in the motor finance scandal, Martin Lewis has suggested. The MoneySuperMarket founder said that the fact there was 'no disclosure [of] commission will not make arrangement unfair', but deals with excessive commission could still have a claim. In the case that was upheld, a finance firm charged a car customer 55pc commission as part of their loan. Mr Lewis said: 'The fact it was so high is powerful indication that relationship between the customer and finance company was unfair. 'Other cases can be brought on case by case basis if excessive commission and/or misleading documents.' 05:04 PM BST Chancellor 'respects' Supreme Court judgment The Government has said it will now work with regulators to unpack the Supreme Court's ruling and its impacts on consumers, banks and the car industry. A Treasury spokesman said: 'We respect this judgment from the Supreme Court and we will now work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers. 'We recognise the issues this court case has highlighted. That is why we are already taking forward significant changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Consumer Credit Act. These reforms will deliver a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment for businesses and consumers, while ensuring that products are sold to customers fairly and clearly.' 04:55 PM BST Supreme Court rejects majority of claims in car finance scandal The Supreme Court has rejected two of the claims before it in the car finance scandal. Lord Reed told the court that the commission paid to car dealers was 'not a bribe'. However, he said the court had upheld a claim from a third claimant over an 'unfair' relationship between a customer and a finance company. He said that in this case the 'financial commission was so high' that it was unfair. Lord Reed said: 'The finance company should pay the amount of the commission plus interest.' In a written summary of the judgment rejecting the majority of the claims, the Supreme Court said: 'A finance package on acceptable terms was always going to be an integral part of what had to be negotiated to bring the transaction to fruition. 'No reasonable onlooker would think that, by offering to find a suitable finance package, the dealer was thereby giving up, rather than continuing to pursue, its own commercial objective of securing a profitable sale.' However, in one of the claims, the court decided that the 'fact that the undisclosed commission was so high is a powerful indication that the relationship' was unfair. 04:50 PM BST Court of Appeal decision was a 'shock' to industry The Supreme Court has considered three cases seeking to claw back commissions paid to dealers. Lord Reed says the cases are based on three arguments: the commissions amounted to a 'bribe'; the dealers had a 'fiduciary' duty to look out for the best interests of customers and the commission violated this; and in one case it was argued that the relationship with the finance company was 'unfair' based on the consumer credit act. He adds the decision of the Court of Appeal was a 'shock' to the industry and the FCA. 04:44 PM BST Court lays out how car loan scheme works The case revolves around two relationships, says Lord Reed, the Supreme Court president: the agreement between banks and dealerships and the agreements between the customer and banks. Lord Reed says it considered the two relationships as a whole as both agreements are contingent on each other. He said they feature a 'three-cornered' arrangement between customers, financiers and dealers. He adds: 'The important point to understand is the car dealer has an interest in the negotiation over the customer's finance package.' The customer does not deal with the finance company directly, he says. The dealer acts as an intermediary. 'The dealer does not act as the agent of the customer,' he says. 'It does not give the customer any reassurance that it is setting its commercial interest aside.' 04:39 PM BST Supreme Court delays judgment to avoid financial volatility The court is now in session. The Supreme Court has confirmed it delayed delivering a judgment on the car finance scandal to avoid volatility on the London stock market given the huge implication for Britain's financial services industry. The President of the Supreme Court, Lord Reed of Allermuir, confirmed the FCA and other parties had requested the decision was handed down after markets closed to avoid 'market disorder', and that nobody had objected. 04:20 PM BST Bank shares fall ahead of Supreme Court ruling UK bank shares are trading down this afternoon ahead of the Supreme Court's ruling. Lloyds Bank, which is the most exposed to the motor finance matter, is down 2.7pc and Barclays is 3.65pc lower. They are among the heaviest losers on the FTSE 100, which is down 0.65pc. Close Brothers, a smaller FTSE 250 lender also heavily involved, has fallen 2.6pc. The Supreme Court will issue its judgement starting at 4:35pm - shortly after the London stock market closes. 04:12 PM BST Timeline: How the car finance scandal unfolded 04:05 PM BST Banks set aside billions to pay potential claims Some of Britain's biggest banks have already set aside billions of pounds to cover potential claims if today's Supreme Court verdict does not go their way. Lloyd's, through its Black Horse division, was the UK's top motor finance lender and the bank has already put aside £1.2bn for possible compensation. Santander has earmarked £295m and Barclays has set aside £90m. Close Brothers, a smaller specialist lender deeply embedded in the market, has provisioned £165m and Investec has set aside £30m. The scandal also threatens to blow a hole in the Government's finances. Treasury officials believe that a string of major firms could use compensation payments to people who were mis-sold loans to legally cut their corporate tax bills. This would reduce revenue for the Treasury at a time when the Chancellor is battling to meet her fiscal targets. Analysis suggests the Treasury could lose up to £5.5bn in corporation tax receipts as a result. 03:52 PM BST Car finance ruling risks 'calamity for Reeves' The Supreme Court's decision later today could have major knock-on effects for the Labour Chancellor, the UK economy and the pockets of millions of consumers. As Louis Goss reported this morning, a ruling that upholds the decision by the Court of Appeal in October could hamper growth in the financial services sector and force banks to pay out billions of pounds in compensation. It could also open the door to a flood of other claims: The judgment could not only unleash a PPI-style compensation scheme worth billions, but also create a fresh headache for Reeves, who fears a ruling against the banks would reflect badly on Britain as a place to do business. Read the full story here: The £44bn car finance ruling that threatens calamity for Reeves 03:42 PM BST Supreme Court to deliver £44bn verdict Good afternoon. The Supreme Court is preparing to deliver a critical verdict over the car-finance mis-selling scandal that threatens to spark a wave of compensation claims and shake the City of London. The UK's highest court is set to rule on an earlier decision that said car dealers should have informed customers about the commissions they were paid by banks when they arranged car loans. The decision could have major implications for Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, who is concerned having another major redress scheme for the banking sector will hit UK economic growth. The court is expected to hand down its judgment at 4.35pm today. The Telegraph will be covering events live here. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
