
Could Pop-Up Headlights Make a Comeback?
8-bit
' styling on its modern EVs, while Honda is on a mission to revive the
long-lost wedge
.
One thing we haven't seen return, though, are pop-up headlights. The once-ubiquitous design element quickly faded into the background as automakers moved to sleeker, simpler light fixtures focused more on aerodynamic efficiency. What a shame.
With so many other retro elements returning to modern cars, though, why can't pop-up headlights also make a comeback?
First, some history.
The first pop-up headlights date back to 1935. Cord debuted the 810 prototype at the New York Auto Show, touting a technology never before seen. Hidden on either of the exterior fenders were headlight fixtures that "popped up" with a few vigorous twists of a dashboard-mounted crank.
Alfa Romeo would introduce pop-up headlights on the production 8C 2900A Berlinetta just a year later in 1936, and the Buick Y-Job concept would follow in 1938. But it wasn't until 1962 that pop-up headlights made their way into the mainstream on the Lotus Elan, which ditched the manually operated crank for the first vacuum-operated pop-ups.
The 1938 Buick Y-Job Concept
Photo by: Buick
Automakers would adopt the technology quickly thereafter, and pop-up headlights boomed in popularity in the US throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Sadly, the last production cars to have pop-up headlights in the US were the Lotus Esprit, ironically enough, and the Chevrolet C5 Corvette. Both of which ended production in 2005, taking pop-ups with them.
As with anything good and fun, government regulations all but put a stop to pop-ups. But they weren't necessarily banned.
Instead, regulators approved more aerodynamic headlight designs as opposed to the classic round, sealed beams, which meant automakers could save time and money by affixing sleeker, smaller fixtures to the front ends of their vehicles as opposed to fussy, often-complex pop-up units. Pedestrian protection laws globally also meant that anything protruding from the top of a vehicle's hood was a big no-no.
Chevrolet Corvette C5 Z06
Photo by: Chevrolet
But in the US, at least, pop-up headlights aren't explicitly banned. So why don't we see more of them? Especially if there's a burgeoning demand for the good ol' days of car design.
Audi
has been at the forefront of lighting technology for more than a decade. They pioneered the adaptive Matrix LED headlight for Europe in 2013 and continue to evolve the technology.
Just recently, Audi debuted the new Q3 SUV with updated Digital Matrix LED headlights featuring micro-LEDs with semiconductors that are thinner than a hair. The man behind the implementation of that technology is Dr. Michael Kruppa, who's been the head of headlight development at Audi for a number of years.
Even though Audi has never made a single production car with pop-up headlights (almost unbelievably), Kruppa knows as much as anyone about modern lighting technology.
2026 Audi Q3
Photo by: Audi
"The most important point to understand is that everything we do is function-driven," Kruppa tells me. "[The headlights] always come from a very emotional perspective. They want to give the whole car a unique appearance, even if the light isn't illuminated."
At Audi, engineers work hand-in-hand with designers to create light fixtures that are as functional as they are beautiful, he says. But with innovation comes roadblocks; getting some specific lighting elements to market is no easy task.
It took years for regulators to approve Audi's use of adaptive matrix lighting technology in Europe and other markets. In the US, meanwhile, similar technology is only now hitting the road. Rivian is among the first automakers to get its adaptive lighting technology approved.
"[We] had to prove that [matrix LEDs] were robust enough," Kruppa says of regulators. "It was very important to convince the regulators that there is no glare for upcoming traffic… We went for test drives with them to show how the systems worked on the road. Based on this feedback, we were also able to understand their fears, because regulation is quite old-fashioned."
Photo by: Audi
That's all to say: lighting technology is extremely complicated. Pop-up headlights would undoubtedly further complicate the matter.
"If you really want to make [the headlights] disappear completely, it's quite difficult," Kruppa says. "Because in the end, you need them to have a free, open perspective for use at night. At the moment, the big problem is the mechanics and all the additional parts you would have to integrate. So you make the headlamps even bigger, you make them heavier, and our focus, really… is not really having additional mechanical movements."
It makes sense. Adding a mechanical function to a feature that doesn't already require one would be a step backward. Not to mention the added costs associated with slapping a piece of sheet metal or carbon fiber to the front of a bumper, and the potential interference with the many safety systems required on modern cars. Plus, there isn't even much room for a pop-up function at all.
"The space in front of the car is really limited," he says, "so you don't have a lot of empty space where you can move a lid or where you can put a mechanical part that completely disappears. So that's the reason why we are not focusing on that at the moment."
'If you really want to make [the headlights] disappear completely, it's quite difficult.'
But that's not to say companies haven't tried hiding their headlights. We just haven't noticed.
A big, modern trend is the split headlight—that is, a two-piece light fixture with an LED running light near the hood line and a larger headlight lower down on the bumper. The new Q3 has it, as do so many modern SUVs. As Kruppa notes, the split headlight was developed, in large part, as a way of 'hiding' the main headlight housing so that the focus is drawn to the upper LED. And you can see that on the latest Q3.
"The main focus [with split headlights] really is aesthetics," he says. "Designers focus on the daytime conditions; You're only using the daytime running light… You still have to fulfill legal requirements, though, which means you need a low-beam and a high-beam."
"The bezels and polymer pieces surrounding the lower headlights were created so that if they're not on, you don't see them, because you're attracted to the daytime running light."
Mazda Iconic SP Concept
Love them or hate them, split headlights are, largely, an evolution of the pop-up.
But for the most part, the dream of a new car with pop-up headlights is largely dashed. There are some outliers, like the coachbuilt
Ares Panther
and the
Mazda Iconic SP concept
. Unfortunately, it's unlikely that we'll ever see another mass-produced modern vehicle with old-school light fixtures.
For Audi specifically, the distinct lighting signature of its Matrix LEDs does offer shades of nostalgia. The shape and function harken back, in some ways, to the original R8 and TT. But for Kruppa, he's more focused on the future of lighting design, not necessarily the past.
"I think the biggest contribution we will see in the future from lighting is taking over more responsibilities in terms of communication," he says, pointing specifically to things like autonomous driving and pedestrian safety.
"Light will create some kind of touch point from the exterior… creating a sense of safety. This is what we strongly believe will happen in the future, whether we need 10 years, I don't know. But this is definitely the outlook."
More Design Trends
Chrysler Has Its Own Design Studio. That Could Be a Game-Changer
America's Beautiful, Forgotten Hypercars
Share this Story
X
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
WASHINGTON (AP) — A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and "a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, "gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest" and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Maxwell Woody, lead author of the University of Michigan study, made the opposite case. Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.' ____ Associated Press writer Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report. Susan Haigh, The Associated Press Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio

Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
WASHINGTON (AP) — A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted,' he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force.' She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and 'a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract,' Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, 'gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project 'has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest' and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were 'carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Maxwell Woody, lead author of the University of Michigan study, made the opposite case. Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle,' he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.' ____ Associated Press writer Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Ford Be in 3 Years?
Key Points Ford is launching a new EV platform for upcoming electrified models. A new $30,000 EV pickup truck is slated for 2027. The company will still have to manage tariffs and a shift in the U.S. federal government's approach to EVs over the next few years. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You There's a lot of transition in the auto industry right now, but no other legacy car manufacturer may be undergoing bigger shifts than Ford (NYSE: F). The company recently announced that it will use a new production process to build and launch an entirely new electric vehicle (EV) lineup, beginning with a pickup truck that costs around $30,000. It's an ambitious plan, and Ford hasn't laid out all the details yet, but it's clear that this is the company's roadmap over the next few years. For that reason, it's worth diving into what Ford has said about its plans, as well as some of the biggest challenges it'll face. 1. It'll have an entirely new EV platform by 2027 Ford said it assembled a stealth skunkworks team to completely rethink the assembly line for a new era. The result will be the Ford Universal EV Platform that future vehicles will be built on. Specifically, the assembly line will reduce parts by 20% compared to a typical vehicle and have 40% fewer workstations, and vehicles will be 15% faster to assemble. The goal is to get a new EV pickup truck to customers by 2027, with a price tag of around $30,000. That's an enormously ambitious plan. To get there, Ford will spend $2 billion converting a Kentucky factory for the new vehicle lineup, which will eventually make more than just the pickup truck. It'll also spend an additional $3 billion previously announced for a battery factory in Michigan. 2. Ford will shift toward improved profitability Of course, any new venture a company makes has the goal of making money. But it's worth mentioning that Ford appears laser-focused on making this successful and realizes that the next few years are a do-or-die EV scenario for the company. Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a press release: "We have all lived through far too many 'good college tries' by Detroit automakers to make affordable vehicles that ends up with idled plants, layoffs and uncertainty. So, this had to be a strong, sustainable and profitable business. From Day 1, we knew there was no incremental path to success." There's a sense of urgency from Ford here. Frankly, that's good to see. Ford understands that competition from China is fierce and that if those rivals were ever to sell their products in the U.S., legacy automakers would not be able to compete. And with the average transaction cost of an electric vehicle in the U.S. being about $57,000, Ford is positioning itself both to be profitable with its new EV line, and to appeal to the budgets of the masses. While there's no guarantee of success, Ford's aim over the next several years to have a new, profitable EV lineup that's efficiently produced and affordable is a step in the right direction. 3. There will still be some headwinds from tariffs While Ford is clearly working to reduce its exposure to automotive tariffs, it's important to note that it's not out of the woods. Ford said tariffs have cost the company about $800 million already. Management recently increased the projected hit to its pre-tax adjusted profit to $3 billion -- $500 million higher than previously estimated. In addition to tariffs, the company will have to contend with a less hospitable EV environment as the federal EV credits disappear at the end of September. Ford's new lower-cost EV model is accounting for this and could spur its own demand simply by being an affordable EV. But it's noteworthy that the federal government is backing away from trying to spur the electric vehicle market. It means that Ford and other automakers will be left to convince buyers that electric vehicles are worth buying on their own merits. Where does all this leave Ford in three years? Even with Ford's ambitious EV plans, there are still a lot of unknowns with the company over the next few years. For one, will customers want its new EVs? I wouldn't mind a $30,000 pickup truck option, and others probably wouldn't either. But that leads to another question: Can it actually deliver on that price tag? Plenty of automakers have promised an affordable EV in the U.S., and it usually ends up being more of a unicorn than reality. Ford has a lot to prove over the next three years. The company's stock will likely rise or fall based on how well it delivers on its latest EV plan. Do the experts think Ford Motor Company is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Ford Motor Company make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Ford Be in 3 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data