logo
Op Blue Star remarks: Cong compares LoP Rahul's politics to that of Mahatma Gandhi's; BJP calls it 'drama'

Op Blue Star remarks: Cong compares LoP Rahul's politics to that of Mahatma Gandhi's; BJP calls it 'drama'

Hans India05-05-2025

Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi's, comments on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, made during an interaction at Brown University in the US, have ignited a political firestorm, with the Congress projecting him as a statesman in the mould of Mahatma Gandhi and the BJP accusing the party of staging a "drama" and perpetuating a decades-long cover-up.
While responding to a question on the Congress' role during the 1984 riots, LoP Gandhi said, "A lot of those things happened when I was not there, but I am more than happy to take responsibility for everything the Congress party has ever done wrong in its history. I have publicly stated that what happened in the 80s was wrong. I have been to the Golden Temple multiple times; I have extremely good relationships with the Sikh community in India."
His remarks came in response to a Sikh attendee questioning the Congress party's treatment of Sikhs in the past and a perceived lack of freedom for the community under its rule.
The Congress, along with the INDIA bloc, swiftly rallied behind the LoP.
Senior leader Husain Dalwai told IANS, "Rahul Gandhi's politics is truly like Mahatma Gandhi's. One needs a big heart to accept mistakes. During the UPA tenure, Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi admitted the wrongs done to Sikhs. That statement changed the atmosphere in Punjab, and the Congress came to power."
"Many mistakes are made while running a government, but one needs to have a big heart to accept and correct them. We are not like the BJP, which says that they do not make any mistakes. Politics doesn't work like this. It is important to be generous in politics," Dalwai said.
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP, Sanjay Raut, also backed LoP Gandhi, stating, "Rahul Gandhi is a politician with a clean heart. He accepts his mistakes. In politics, that is a big thing. PM Modi and Amit Shah should learn from him."
RJD spokesperson Mrityunjay Tiwari called Rahul Gandhi's acceptance a mark of "greatness" and "maturity."
"He did not blame others but took it upon himself. He has set an example," Tiwari told IANS.
However, the BJP launched a scathing counterattack, slamming the Congress' hypocrisy of "giving shelter" to those convicted in the Sikh riots.
BJP National General Secretary Tarun Chugh accused the Congress and the Gandhi family of shielding the perpetrators of the 1984 carnage.
"In 52 cities, Sikhs were selectively burnt alive, Gurudwaras were torched, and the Congress leaders behind it were awarded Padma awards and given political shelter," he told IANS.
"Rahul Gandhi should be ashamed that Sajjan Kumar, convicted for the 1984 massacre, is still associated with the party. His comments are like rubbing salt in the wounds of the widows living just a short distance from his residence," Chugh added.
Madhya Pradesh Minister Sarang termed Gandhi's remarks "a drama," questioning why he chose a foreign stage to make such a statement.
"If he was sincere, he should have admitted this in India, not in America," Sarang told IANS.
"The Congress does nothing but divide society based on religion and caste. Since coming to power after Independence, it has only spread anarchy and created divisions within the community. This party engages in politics solely in the name of religion," he added.
BJP leader Parinay Fuke asserted that the Congress' complicity had long been evident.
"The massacre forced Sikh families to flee their homes. Rahul Gandhi's admission shows Congress lied for 40 years," he said.
Maharashtra Minister Pratap Sarnaik said the LoP's apology for what happened in 1984 shows "his immaturity."
"Rahul Gandhi should learn from Amit Shah and Narendra Modi. If he is apologising for decisions taken in the 1980s, those who made those decisions must apologise too," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'
‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'

Hans India

time33 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has issued a detailed and pointed response to the Congress' allegations regarding a sharp surge in voter turnout during the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. The statement, coming after Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge echoed Rahul Gandhi's concerns in a public post, dismisses the claims as unfounded and politically motivated, while also questioning the procedural conduct of the Congress leadership. Sources within the ECI said that despite making serious public allegations, Rahul Gandhi has not approached the Commission formally. 'Even after two days of making his baseless assertions, Rahul Gandhi has not sent any complaint or letter, nor has he requested an appointment to meet the ECI. Why?' the source asked. Sources described the silence as a lack of intent to engage constructively. The Commission clarified that the Congress party had already received a formal reply to its earlier queries on December 24, 2024. This response, according to the ECI, is publicly available on its official website, contradicting claims of a lack of transparency. Refuting the charges of deliberate opacity in the electoral roll process, the ECI advised District Congress Presidents to appoint Booth Level Agents (BLAs) at every polling booth and actively participate in the annual process of electoral roll updates, sources said. The Commission sources added that it has been conducting training programmes for BLAs of all political parties at its dedicated training institute and encouraged the Congress to make full use of these opportunities to avoid any 'misconceptions". The sources further asserted that if the Congress chooses not to engage in the roll revision process, it should at least trust the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) appointed by the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) under Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. These officials, the ECI sources noted, function as part of a statutory framework to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the electoral rolls. The EC sources also reminded the public that the preparation of electoral rolls, conduct of polls, and counting of votes are overseen by statutory authorities such as the ERO, Presiding Officer (PRO), and Returning Officer (RO), all of whom work under the ECI's constitutional mandate under Article 324. Ultimately, it stressed, it is the voters who decide the outcome of elections, not the administrative process. In a strongly worded final remark, ECI sources took aim at what they described as a pattern of political deflection by the Congress. They said any party preparing for electoral outcomes should do so in the political domain, not by 'fighting the referee". The Commission sources concluded, 'The electors of India are intelligent enough to understand why the INC (Indian National Congress) keeps fighting the referee whenever it loses an election.'

LA protests explode after ICE raids: National guard deployed, marines on standby as tensions surge across California
LA protests explode after ICE raids: National guard deployed, marines on standby as tensions surge across California

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

LA protests explode after ICE raids: National guard deployed, marines on standby as tensions surge across California

The immigration protests in Los Angeles began after ICE arrested 44 undocumented individuals. According to the US Department of Homeland Security, the total number later reached 118. Uniformed ICE agents carried out the operations in unmarked, military-style vehicles. Protesters gathered outside facilities where some of the arrested were believed to be held. This sparked large demonstrations in downtown LA and beyond. What is the government's response? President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard soldiers to Los Angeles County on Saturday. This move was opposed by both California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass. The Trump administration has now indicated that US Marines could also be deployed if needed. The US military's Northern Command confirmed that about 500 marines are on standby. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a social media post that the Marines and National Guard 'stand with ICE.' Speaker of the House Mike Johnson supported the stance, calling it consistent with the principle of maintaining peace through strength. Where are the protests happening? The demonstrations are largely taking place in downtown Los Angeles. One protest group blocked the 101 Freeway, with reports of objects thrown onto the road and police vehicles being damaged. LAPD declared the area an 'unlawful assembly.' Protesters also spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the Edward R Roybal Federal Building. In San Francisco, a solidarity protest near an ICE building also led to arrests. Police declared that gathering unlawful and detained about 60 people. What is an unlawful assembly? An unlawful assembly is legally defined as an intentional meeting of three or more people that disturbs public peace. LAPD enforced this definition during the protests and took action when demonstrations disrupted roads and damaged vehicles. How has law enforcement reacted? LAPD Captain Raul Jovel said 10 people were arrested on Sunday. Police Chief Jim McDonnell noted that 29 were arrested the previous day. Jovel also reported that three officers were injured in the clashes, though the injuries were minor and didn't require hospitalisation. What has been vandalised? Some protesters targeted Waymo self-driving cars, setting several on fire and spray-painting anti-ICE slogans. Media reports said the vandalism occurred between Arcadia and Alameda streets. LAPD issued an advisory asking the public to avoid the affected area. Peaceful protests in LA. LA is on fire What are leaders saying? California leaders strongly opposed Trump's actions. Newsom called the deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty,' and Bass termed it a 'chaotic escalation.' Both urged protesters not to resort to violence. Former Vice President Kamala Harris said the National Guard deployment was meant to provoke chaos and called it part of a broader agenda to 'spread panic and division.' Trump responded via his Truth Social platform, criticising Newsom and Bass and labelling protesters as 'insurrectionists.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said ICE would continue enforcing immigration law despite the protests. Are there historical parallels? The Trump administration's actions have drawn comparisons to the 1992 Rodney King riots, where marines were deployed alongside the National Guard after a jury acquitted four officers who were filmed beating a Black man. Those riots lasted six days and resulted in 63 deaths. While the current protests in LA have seen sporadic vandalism, many demonstrations remain peaceful, according to officials.

Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful
Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful

New Indian Express

time37 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful

CHANDIGARH: Senior Congress leader and opposition leader Partap Singh Bajwa on Monday slammed the AAP government in Punjab, accusing it of a 'deliberate and deceitful attempt' to sideline the Punjabi language and deprive local youth of job opportunities in the recruitment for 166 posts in Sugarfed Punjab. Bajwa claimed that the AAP government initially attempted to dilute the requirement of Punjabi language proficiency by allowing candidates who hadn't passed Punjabi in Matric to appear for the examination, on the condition that they clear a basic Punjabi test during their three-year probation. "It was a clear attempt to recruit non-Punjabis by stealth. Only after a massive public outcry and media backlash did the government take a panicked U-turn and declare Punjabi compulsory again. This is not governance, it's deceit,' Bajwa said. He accused the AAP government of trying to sneak in policies that betray Punjab's linguistic and cultural ethos, only to reverse course when caught red-handed. 'This pattern has become a hallmark of the AAP regime, quietly undermining Punjab's interests, then staging a course correction to save face,' Bajwa stated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store