logo
Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto may soon be richer than Warren Buffett, and Zuckerberg could be next

Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto may soon be richer than Warren Buffett, and Zuckerberg could be next

Time of India2 days ago

Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin's creator, may soon become wealthier than Warren Buffett. A price surge could elevate Nakamoto's fortune. Nakamoto holds a substantial amount of Bitcoin. This holding is currently valued at over $120 billion.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Bitcoin's Price Surge Boosts Satoshi Nakamoto's Fortunes
A Billionaire Who Never Cashed Out
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
The mysterious creator of Bitcoin, known as Satoshi Nakamoto , whose real identity is still unknown, will soon overtake the billionaire investor Warren Buffett in wealth and potentially Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg next, as per a report.According to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, if Bitcoin continues its historical pace and rises 50% this year, in line with its long-term average, Satoshi's fortune could surpass Buffett's, according to The Street. The pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin is believed to hold approximately 1.096 million BTC, none of which have ever been moved or sold, as per the report.At Bitcoin's current price of approximately $109,874, Nakamoto's holding is worth over $120 billion, ranking him the 11th wealthiest person in the world, and he is now still behind Buffett's net worth of approximately $157.5 billion as of June 2, according to The Street. Nakamoto would need about $37 billion more to exceed Buffett's wealth, given Bitcoin's price and Buffett's assets remain unchanged, reported The Street.ALSO READ: Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki predicts greatest market crash in history – are you prepared? Balchunas wrote in a social media post that, "It's fascinating to ponder that the founder of something so successful never cashed in," quoted The Street. The analyst also compared the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin's move to the Vanguard founder, Jack Bogle, who revolutionised investing but didn't pursue maximal personal wealth, as per the report.While, Bogle has previously said, "There is nothing for Bitcoin, except the hope that you would sell out to somebody for more than you were paid for," quoted The Street. The Vanguard founder wanted people to avoid Bitcoin "like the plague," reported The Street.Satoshi is the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, as per The Street. No one knows their real identity, it could be one person or a group.He is believed to hold around 1.096 million BTC, mined during Bitcoin's earliest days and never moved, as per The Street.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eminem's publisher drags Meta to court over copyright violation
Eminem's publisher drags Meta to court over copyright violation

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Eminem's publisher drags Meta to court over copyright violation

Eminem's publisher has filed a copyright lawsuit against Facebook and Instagram owner Meta over unauthorised use of over 200 songs, according to a report by Rolling Stones. The lawsuit was filed by Eight Mile Style, which administers Eminem's early catalogue release, on May 30. The Lose Yourself fame rapper is not personally involved in the suit, he clarified in a separate statement. The lawsuit alleges that Meta violated the copyright of 243 songs from Eminem's catalogue through the 'unauthorised storage, reproduction and exploitation' of the tracks on its platforms. 'This case involves Meta's knowing infringement of the Eight Mile Compositions by first reproducing and storing them in Meta's online Music Libraries, and then distributing them for users to select and incorporate into their own photos and videos made available for public streaming on the users' WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram accounts,' the report cited the complaint as saying. The publishing house added that the social media apps' features, including Original Audio and Reels on Instagram, were tools that 'allow and encourage its users to steal' Eminem's music to use in video content 'without proper attribution or license', the report said. The company has demanded monetary damages for 'the diminished value of the copyrights by defendants' theft of them, lost profits, and defendants' profits attributable to the infringement,' the report said. It is seeking maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for wilful copyright infringement for each of the 243 titles, amounting to $109.35 million. In response to the lawsuit, a Meta spokesperson told the publication that it has licenses with thousands of partners and an extensive global licensing program for music on its platforms. Meta had been negotiating in good faith with Eight Mile Style, but rather than continue those discussions, Eight Mile Style chose to sue, the spokesperson fresh lawsuit comes after Eight Mile Style lost its five-year-long copyright legal battle against Spotify last September due to a legal loophole.

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon
Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

"I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies… Unregulated crypto assets can facilitate unlawful behaviour." That was Donald Trump in 2019, when he still voiced concerns shared by central bankers, International Monetary Fund (IMF) economists and financial crime experts across the world. The consensus was clear: crypto, while technologically innovative, lacked both intrinsic value and sovereign backing, and undermined anti-money laundering regimes as well as monetary integrity. Fast forward to 2025. Better educated perhaps by the America crypto lobby's campaign cheques and the sweat equity gifted to his family, Trump, now US president again, recently signed Executive Order 14178. A stroke of the pen dismantled many of the regulatory guard-rails once deemed essential. Not long after, the Trump family entered the crypto business. One of their earliest strategic partners was Pakistan, a state associated with cross-border terrorism, shady finances and furtive fund diversion. Also Read: The triumph of crypto bros: Don't just shrug and move on What should India make of a superpower whose political leaders launch private currencies? Or of a country where former convicts are rehabilitated as strategic advisors to sovereign crypto councils? Are we witnessing a global power in search of infinite minting rights without democratic oversight but with the full cover of plausible deniability? Changpeng Zhao, former CEO of Binance, pleaded guilty to serious anti-money laundering failures, spent time in US custody and paid $4.3 billion for a settlement. His crypto exchange facilitated transactions for sanctioned groups like Hamas—flows that would never get past a regulated banking system. The Binance blow-up should have ended his financial career. Instead, he now advises Pakistan's official crypto task force. Justin Sun, whose firm invested $30 million in Trump-linked World Liberty Financial, was under investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for civil fraud. Today, he is a front-row guest at US political fund-raisers. Are crypto dealings the new way to buy influence in the US? This seems like a gateway through which otherwise ineligible actors—be it individuals, regimes or rogue states—are quietly admitted into the global financial order, now that the need for institutional legitimacy appears to be receding behind the opacity that once resulted in exclusion. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | De-dollarization: Trump should target crypto, not Brics It's a return to Cold War-style shadow financing, but with the support of blockchains instead of banks. So much for the superpower that lectures the world on clean governance. When financial opacity is rebranded as innovation, geopolitics takes on a new form we should all be wary of. The IMF and World Bank have been vocal in their concerns. The IMF has warned that widespread adoption of private cryptocurrencies threatens monetary sovereignty, enables illicit flows and undermines capital controls, especially in emerging markets. We saw disruptions in El Salvador, Nigeria, and Lebanon, where crypto experiments coincided with capital volatility and institutional erosion. Terror finance remains an enduring threat to global security. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has repeatedly highlighted how terrorist groups exploit crypto to bypass formal banking oversight. Yet, Pakistan has FATF clearance. For a country like India—on the front-line of cross-border terrorism—this is a real risk. Crypto has operationalized what could be described as 'eHawala': borderless transfers in real time that can stay hidden. A sovereign nation should not let private entities mint currency, however trendy or popular it proves. To its credit, the Reserve Bank of India saw this coming. Its resistance to private cryptocurrency is neither timidity nor technophobia—it is an assertion of monetary sovereignty. In today's world, capital flows can be weaponized. It is therefore a matter of national security to ensure such weapons are not aimed at us. Also Read: Trump's crypto reserve: An odd idea with a silver lining for the world Yet, the pressure to capitulate is mounting. Global crypto platforms, freshly repackaged as fintech innovations, have been pushing for softer regulation. In India, domestic actors have lobbied against India's high tax on crypto gains by arguing that crypto capital must be stopped from fleeing offshore. In matters of financial security, arguing that crypto should remain unchecked because conventional checks aren't flawless is not just illogical, but dangerously juvenile. Even if the US exerts diplomatic pressure, India mustn't oblige. Instead, India should put systems in place for crypto deterrence. Cutting-edge surveillance tools, forensic finance capabilities and offensive digital arsenals could be deployed against adversarial scenarios of crypto being used as a Trojan horse to destabilize our financial system. Just as strategic weapons are kept discreet, so must this. The future of finance may well be digital. But that future must be guided by sovereign plans, not determined by offshore hype or patronage games. In the crypto age, our sovereignty must be defended with the same strategic intent that we apply to borders, seas, airspace and cyberspace. Crypto is now a geopolitical instrument and potentially a vector of strategic harm. It needs to be viewed as a weaponizable tool, even as we secure our financial architecture from any threat it may pose. This is no longer a matter for committees to discuss. It is a political decision—one that cannot be deferred without consequences. The author is a corporate advisor and author of 'Family and Dhanda'

Popular rapper Eminem sues Facebook-parent Meta for $109 million, here's why
Popular rapper Eminem sues Facebook-parent Meta for $109 million, here's why

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Popular rapper Eminem sues Facebook-parent Meta for $109 million, here's why

Eminem takes Mark Zuckerberg's Meta to court. Grammy-winning rapper Eminem has filed a lawsuit of $109 million against Facebook-parent Meta accusing it of copyright infringement. The lawsuit, filed by Eminem's music publishing company, Eight Mile Style, accuses Meta of the "unauthorised storage, reproduction, and exploitation" of 243 of Eminem's songs across its per the court documents seen by People, Eight Mile Style alleges that Meta's in-app features, such as "Original Audio" and "Reels Remix," have actively encouraged and allowed users to incorporate Eminem's music into their video content without proper licensing or attribution. The lawsuit further claims that this has led to rapper's songs being used in millions of videos and streamed billions of times, resulting in diminished value of the copyrights and lost profits for the publisher. Eminem vs Meta: Unauthorised use of music As reported by People, the lawsuit alleges that Meta has allowed its users to store, reproduce and exploit Eminem's songs through features like Original Audio and Reels Remix, which enable users to incorporate music into their content without proper attribution or licensing. Eight Mile Style is seeking statutory damages of $150,000 per song, per platform (Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp), which could accumulate to the total sum exceeding $109 million. The publisher has also requested a jury trial and a permanent injunction to prevent Meta from future unauthorised use of Eminem's music. What Meta said on the lawsuit Meta has not yet issued a public comment directly on the lawsuit. However, a company by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo spokesperson told People that the company has licenses with thousands of partners around the world and the company has also been negotiating with Eight Mile Style. 'Meta has licenses with thousands of partners around the world and an extensive global licensing program for music on its platforms. Meta had been negotiating in good faith with Eight Mile Style, but rather than continue those discussions, Eight Mile Style chose to sue,' said Meta spokesperson. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store