logo
Pakistan sees minimal fiscal impact from India standoff as economists estimate billions in losses

Pakistan sees minimal fiscal impact from India standoff as economists estimate billions in losses

Arab News13-05-2025
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's finance ministry said on Tuesday the recent four-day standoff with India will not have a significant fiscal impact, as analysts estimated that the conflict cost both countries losses of around $1 billion per hour.
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after a deadly April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the assault, an allegation denied by officials in Islamabad, though it still led to one the worst military confronts between the two nuclear-armed neighbors in decades.
A ceasefire was announced on Saturday by US President Donald Trump, following four days of fighting and intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington. However, the military confrontation, by then, had disrupted stock markets, led to airspace closures, escalated defense spending and caused economic losses amounting to billions of dollars.
'The current standoff with India won't have a large fiscal impact on Pakistan,' Khurram Schehzad, adviser to the finance minister, told Arab News.
'It can be managed within the current fiscal space, with no need for a new economic assessment,' he added.
Schehzad said Pakistan's economic resilience was evident from a new record at the Pakistan Stock Exchange, which on Monday posted the highest single-day gain in over 26 years, surging by 10,123 points or 9.45 percent, significantly surpassing the losses recorded last week following the Indian strike.
'Pakistan's measured and responsible response, in both its narrative and actions on the ground, has caught investors' eye, alongside the potential positive spillover effect of a possible settlement in the US-China tariff issue,' he added.
Arab News reached out to the defense ministry and Pakistan's military media wing for official estimates of the conflict's cost, but did not receive a response by the time of filing this story.
Meanwhile, economists said the recent military standoff inflicted heavy financial losses on both countries, with combined costs approaching $1 billion per hour.
'The recent conflict, over an 87-hour period, I think cost about a billion dollars an hour for both countries,' economist Farrukh Saleem told Arab News.
He estimated total combined losses of between $80 and $90 billion over the four-day period.
'About 20 percent of that was incurred by Pakistan and a good 80 to 85 percent by India,' he added.
Saleem said daily economic losses from the conflict, including stock market declines and other impacts, amounted to around $20 billion per day, with Pakistan losing up to $4 billion and India as much as $16 billion per day.
'I have tried to put things together. If this conflict had continued for 30 days, my estimate is that both countries would have lost a good $500 billion, with over a $400 billion loss for the Indian economy,' he added.
Explaining India's higher losses, he noted that each Rafale fighter jet costs around $240 million, while Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder or J-10C jets are priced between $20 and $25 million per unit.
'BrahMos, for instance, the Indian ballistic missile, costs $3 million apiece. If, for example, 10 units are used in a day, that amounts to $30 million in a single day,' he said.
Dr. Ali Salman, Executive Director of the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), an Islamabad-based independent economic policy think tank, said the conflict had disrupted economic sentiment and affected investor confidence.
'Certainly, investors would not like to come into countries, whether India or Pakistan, if they are in a constant war-like situation,' he told Arab News.
He emphasized that prolonged conflict would push people in both countries deeper into poverty, noting that one in four poor people in the world lives in India or Pakistan.
'We have 27 percent of the world's poor in just these two countries, and I believe that we need to come out of the military context and go into an economic context,' he added.
Another economist, Shakeel Ramay, said every war has an economic dimension and that the conflict had imposed a heavy financial burden on both economies.
'Pakistan's military expenditure over the four-day conflict, including jets, artillery and missiles, amounted to around $1.5 billion from the national budget, by my estimate,' he said, adding that this was significant, especially as the country continues to face economic challenges.
'The good thing is our economic activities continued without interruption, retail markets operated smoothly with no shortages and trade routes remained open, all indicating that the direct economic cost was minimal,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India says international court lacks authority to rule on Pakistan water treaty
India says international court lacks authority to rule on Pakistan water treaty

Arab News

time9 minutes ago

  • Arab News

India says international court lacks authority to rule on Pakistan water treaty

NEW DELHI: The international Court of Arbitration lacks any legal authority to make pronouncements on the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan as New Delhi has never recognized the legitimacy of the court, India's foreign ministry said on Thursday. A ruling from the Court of Arbitration last week backed Pakistan by saying that India must adhere to the Indus Waters Treaty in the design of new hydro-electric power stations on rivers that flow west into Pakistan. Under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, three rivers that flow westwards were awarded to Pakistan, with India getting three eastern flowing rivers. Pakistan fears its neighbor India could choke its main water supply, with 80 percent of the country's agriculture and hydro-power dependent on those three river flows. In 2023, Pakistan brought a case to the Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration over the design of Indian hydro-power projects on rivers that were awarded to Pakistan under the treaty. The court, in a ruling on Friday that was posted on its website on Monday, said it had jurisdiction over the dispute and ruled the treaty 'does not permit India to generate hydro-electric power on the Western Rivers based on what might be the ideal or best practices approach for engineering' of these projects. Instead, the design of these projects must adhere 'strictly' to the specifications laid down in the treaty, the court said. Pakistan's Attorney General, Mansoor Usman, said in an interview on Tuesday that, by and large, the court had accepted Pakistan's position, especially on the design issue of the new hydropower projects. 'I am sure it is clear now that India cannot construct any of these projects in violation of the court's decision,' he told Reuters. Pakistan's foreign ministry said late Monday that the court ruling said that India had to 'let flow' the waters of the three rivers for Pakistan's unrestricted use. The court said its findings are final and binding on both countries, according to the foreign office statement. An Indian official pointed to a June statement by India's foreign ministry, which said that India has never recognized the existence in law of the Court of Arbitration. Tensions between the two countries over the Indus Waters Treaty soared when India unilaterally said in April that it would hold the treaty in abeyance in response to the killing of 26 civilians in Indian-controlled Kashmir, an attack it blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied involvement. Conflict then erupted in May, the most serious fighting between the two countries in decades, before it ended with a ceasefire announcement by US President Donald Trump.

Pakistan, US step up investment talks, move toward joint counterterrorism plan
Pakistan, US step up investment talks, move toward joint counterterrorism plan

Arab News

time9 minutes ago

  • Arab News

Pakistan, US step up investment talks, move toward joint counterterrorism plan

KARACHI: Senior Pakistani and US officials on Friday discussed next steps in economic investment and the development of a joint counterterrorism strategy in meetings aimed at deepening economic and defense ties between the two countries. Pakistan's commerce ministry said earlier this week it had finalized a strategy to implement a recently negotiated tariff deal with the United States that Islamabad hopes will unlock US investment. Announced last month, the agreement set a reduced tariff rate of 19 percent on Pakistani imports — the lowest in the region — and is expected to revive bilateral trade while opening the way for US firms to participate in various Pakistani economic sectors. In talks with US Chargé d'Affaires Natalie Baker in Islamabad, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said Pakistan's economy had 'turned a corner' after a prolonged downturn, a shift recognized by three major international rating agencies. 'The Minister emphasized that the [trade] agreement would usher in a new era of economic collaboration — particularly in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency and other sectors — while expanding market access, attracting investment and fostering cooperation in areas of mutual interest,' the finance ministry said in a statement released after the meeting. 'He expressed hope that the deal would lead to increased US investment in Pakistan's infrastructure, development projects and digital and mining sectors, which were ready for tangible action and progress,' it added. Aurangzeb thanked Washington for its continued economic and development support and recalled recent meetings in the US with senior officials to finalize the trade deal. In a video message after last month's announcement, he had noted Pakistan's goal was always to move 'beyond the immediate trade imperative,' calling the US-Pakistan pact 'a real win-win situation' for both nations. Pakistan, he added, had 'come a long way' in its overall strategic partnership with the US. COUNTERTERRORISM PLAN Separately, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi met US Coordinator for Counterterrorism Gregory LoGerfo in Islamabad to discuss closer cooperation to fight militant violence, and to work jointly on border security and anti-narcotics efforts. Pakistan and the US have shared a defense relationship dating back to the Cold War era, collaborating over decades on regional stability and counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. The latest talks between Naqvi and LoGerfo came days after Washington designated the separatist Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and its Majeed Brigade faction as 'terrorist' organizations. Both have carried out coordinated attacks in Balochistan targeting security personnel, civilians and foreign nationals working on major development projects. 'Naqvi added that counterterrorism dialogue will help in creating a joint strategy,' the interior ministry said in a statement. 'He termed the US decision to designate the banned BLA and banned Majeed Brigade as Foreign terrorist organizations a commendable step, expressing hope that Pakistan-US cooperation will yield positive results in eliminating terrorism.' Naqvi also noted that bilateral ties had improved since President Donald Trump took office, citing transparency, mutual trust and cooperation as the hallmarks of the relationship and called it an opportune time to strengthen engagement in all areas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store